While I was away, Adam Funk wrote:
>> Aren't Tarot cards *newer* than non-Tarot ones?
And Steve Hayes answered:
> No.
>
> But the non-tarot ones are derived from the minor arcana, not the major;
> the only one of the major arcana that survives in the non-tarot pack is
> the Joker (the Fool).
Meanwhile, I was reading a 6-page article published a few months ago
in last month's issue of "Games", by Thomas McDonald, on exactly the
subject of the origin of the tarot deck.
In brief, according to McDonald, Steve is right. Playing cards were
developed in China originally, and came to Europe "probably sometime
after 1366". They were "perhaps" most commonly used for trick-taking
games, a group that today includes the games of bridge, whist, hearts,
spades, oh hell (aka blackout), and skat.
But whereas most of those modern games include the concept of a trump
suit, the early trick-taking games did not have that concept -- until
"perhaps around the year 1425", when someone in Italy added to their
existing deck (14 cards each in 4 suits) a set of 21 *permanent trump
cards*, plus the Fool, making 78 cards altogether. And, contrary to
occultist claims of a much earlier origin, this is where the tarot deck
comes from.
Games played with the tarot deck would have the rule that you had to
follow to the suit led, but if you couldn't, then you had to play a
trump card if you had one -- even if someone else had already played
a higher trump card that you couldn't beat. However, if you had the
Fool, you could ignore the rule and play that instead -- which is
sort of reminiscent of the joker's function as a wild card in poker.
--
Mark Brader "Things are getting too standard around here.
Toronto Time to innovate!"
m...@vex.net -- Ian Darwin and David Keldsen