On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:50:43 +1100, Peter Moylan
<pe...@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote:
>On 2015-Dec-15 05:55, Mark Bannon wrote:
>> Does it matter?
>> a science in and onto itself.
>> a science in and unto itself.
>
>It depends. Are you talking about a science that's on top of itself, or
>a science that's up itself?
And then you could have a science that is in and into itself.
They all sound pretty self-referential to me.
--
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:
http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
Blog:
http://khanya.wordpress.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk