Whiskers <
catwh...@operamail.com> wrote in
news:slrnmolvl4.5...@ID-107770.user.individual.net:
[snip]
> OED also has "Oxfordian, n. and adj" with similar meanings, from the
> 17th century onwards - and with a special meaning
>
> 3. Of or relating to Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford (1550鈥"1604);
> spec. designating, relating to, or advocating the theory that he
> was the author of works attributed to Shakespeare.
Back when humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare was thriving, I
occasionally took issue with the fact that the advocates of Edward de
Vere who hung out there referred to themselves as 'Oxfordians,' but they
referred to advocates of William Shakespeare as 'Stratfordians' rather
than 'Shakespearians.'
There were also some advocates of Christopher Marlowe (faked his own
death, don't you know), but they could never agree on whether they
should be called 'Marlovians' or something else. Since Marlowe attended
Cambridge, I suppose they could call themselves Cantabrigians.
The general term that people who reject Shakespeare's authorship use for
themselves is 'anti-Stratfordians.' A few of them took umbrage when
I referred to them as anti-Shakespearians - they felt that was
inaccurate, for some reason. No one complained when I switched to
calling them Shakespeare deniers, but that's probably due to the fact
that there was hardly anyone left in the group by that time.
--
S.O.P.