On Sat, 25 Mar 2023 21:18:30 -0000, NY <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote:
> "Cindy Hamilton" <
hami...@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:FLyTL.2112271$GNG9.1...@fx18.iad...
>> Ah, well. We're ahead of you there. We don't use stones as a unit
>> of weight in the U.S. We just use pounds.
>>
>> Hundredweight might be used in some specialized context, but never
>> in daily life.
>>
>> Incidentally, I buy topsoil in 40-pound bags, but mulch by the
>> cubic foot. I often wish I knew the weight of the latter before
>> I attempt to lift it.
>>
>> I'd like the U.S. to go fully metric, but I'm confident I won't see it
>> in my lifetime.
>
> I think the whole world would like the US to go metric, then the imperial
> system (or the US version of it) would finally die the death it should have
> had many decades ago.
>
> I realised that the US didn't use stones for measuring weights.
Why are people obsessed with littering their sentences with "that"? Show me the difference in meaning between:
I realised that the US didn't use stones for measuring weights.
I realised the US didn't use stones for measuring weights.
> In the UK, it's common
More like always.
> for people to give their weight as "14 stone 5 [pounds]" rather
> than "201 pounds". But that's probably the only context in which stones are
> still used as "folk units".
>
> The thing that made me double-take when I was on holiday in Massachusetts
> (*), was road signs, especially local signs and road-works signs, which used
> feet even for fairly long distances: "Road works in 3000 feet".
It's because they only have math and not maths, it doesn't allow for more denominations.
> Hmm, I need to do a quick calculation: that's 1000 yards or about about 0.6 miles. In
> the UK, distances on road signs tend to be expressed in yards (for small
> distances) or fractions of a mile (1/4, occasionally 1/3, 1/2, 3/4 mile).
> And trip milometers in cars express distances in tenths of a mile. I'm not
> saying that UK's convention is better or worse than US's - just different.
It's a lot better. Smaller numbers.
> On the other hand, dates expressed as MM/DD/YY defy logic
They need more brain cells to use logic.
> because the units
> are not in ascending or descending order of significance: DD/MM/YY (UK) or
> YY-MM-DD (ISO something-or-other standard).
Chinese/Japanese I think, and used in computers so a single number will always be in date order.
> I tend to express months in
> letters because "11 Mar(ch) 2023" means the same throughout the
> English-speaking world,
I don't, I use it properly and to hell with th emorons in the far west.
> even if an American might express it as Mar 11 2023;
There's another complication. If someone writes June 24, is that June the 24th (as in about two months from now) or June 2024 (just over a year from now)? You should always write 24 June.
> on the other hand, "11/03/2023" might be Nov 3 2013. There are exceptions:
> even in the UK, we refer to "9/11" because it happened in the US so their
> rules apply.
I call it 11/9 to piss off the thicko merkins. And to laugh at the mozzies getting one over on them. The US couldn't win a war if the opposition had one hand tied behind their backs. They knocked down two of your big buildings. Refuckingtaliate.
> (*) I can never remember the single and double letters: I need to remember,
> it's 2s, 1s, 2t!
How is that easier to remember? Doesn't work for misssisssisssippisspissi either.