Henry Adams' histories of the Jefferson and Madison administrations
contain many, many sentences like the following:
"In July he [James Monroe] crossed the Channel to London and Aug.
17, 1803, was duly presented to George III. as the successor of Rufus
King...." (p. 496 of the Library of America _Jefferson_)
Dates are pitchforked into the narrative as a sort of parenthesis,
with no proposition at all, but usually with a comma or two.
Two questions:
(1) Does any other author make a habit of this?
(2) Considering how peculiar the usage is, how does Adams get away
with it? Why does it seem only slightly odd and not flagrantly wrong?
> Two questions:
>
> (1) Does any other author make a habit of this?
>
The historian Will Durant surrounds his dates with parenthesis:
Cicero returned in triumph to Italy (57).
This is not nearly as offensive as the inline style.
> (2) Considering how peculiar the usage is, how does Adams get away
> with it? Why does it seem only slightly odd and not flagrantly wrong?
The date, which ought to be a noun, has effectively become an adverb. It has
a cheap, journalistic sound to me. It's like if I had omitted the "the" from
the last paragraph, and just written "Historian Will Durant".