On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:06:23 PM UTC-6,
benl...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
> On 19/05/2022 9:39 a.m., Jerry Friedman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 12:45:56 PM UTC-6,
dklei...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> In a local context I wrote "We must monitor them condors carefully", looked at what I had written and wondered at the "them".
> >>
> >> The "them" variant of "those" has an implication of close down home intimacy. Permissible to an Old Californiano like me.
> >
> > Depending on the social context?
> >
> >> Do other people have this idiom with the same meaning?
> >
> > About 90% of the people in my town. I think it's very widespread among non-
> > standard speakers.
> >
> > I wouldn't call it an idiom. It's a variant that goes back to the Wycliffite Bible (1382),
> > though when modifying the subject of a verb, not till 1607 (OED).
> Hi Jerry, good to have you back.
Good to see you here.
> While we're considering the history, it's worth pointing out that the
> whole _they/them/their_ pronoun set were originally demonstratives in
> their Scandinavian source language ("those (guys)").
> Apparently there's some use of "they" as demonstrative too:
>
> ▸ a1470 T. Malory Morte Darthur (Winch. Coll. 13) (1990) I. 31 They
> two knyghtes mette with kynge Idres that was nere discomfited.
>
> a1500 (▸1422) J. Yonge tr. Secreta Secret. (Rawl.) (1898) 160 (MED)
> Fore thay thre causis, I leue of that matiere.
Interesting, and still in existence in some dialects. The famous example
in certain circles is something the poet Philip Levine, who was working at
a zoo, heard from a black co-worker: "They feed they lion with they sack."
Only I may be misquoting it--I can't find it on line, and I can't find the book
where I read it.
> And doesn't it seem possible that the demonstrative "them" that we see
> in Wycliffe 1382 and after might owe something to the oblique plural
> _þæm_ of the OE demonstrative paradigm for "that" (M se, F þæt, N seo,
> Pl þa)?
More interesting stuff.
> > Compare "we New Mexicans", "us New Mexicans" (non-standard as a subject),
> > "you Californians".
...
And what did you think of that?
--
Jerry Friedman