Ken Blake:
> For some reason I don't really understand, I've always found
> "negress" offensive. Regarding "actress" and "lady doctor," I
> don't find either offensive, but I dislike both terms, along with
> "waitress" and probably a few other similar terms I can't think
> of at the moment. As far as I'm concerned, there's no need to add
> a suffix describing a person's sex to any of those terms.
The real problem is that there is no suffix specifying the
masculine gender. Cf. the Ukrainian language/dialect, in which
the restrooms for men are labeled Чоловiки (humans) and for women
жiнки (women) -- an even louder screaming instance of the same
phenomenon. I have nothing against it in English, but rather
dislike the extreme form in Ukrainian. When I encountered it for
the first time, I thought to myself "What! They deny women
humanity?"
> Speaking of "waitress," a term I dislike even more is
> "waitperson." The term is most often used to differentiate female
> waiters (waitpersons) from male waiters.
I think `waitperson' is an emphatically (and thereofre unpleasantly)
gender-neutral term, whereas `waiter', as `actor', may be
masculine if used in contrast with `waitress', but otherwise is
gender-neutral. Do you remember the play on this distinction in
"Falling down"?
> In fact, these days I've come to dislike the word "person" used
> in almost any way. It almost invariably means "female." If
> someone were to complain about "person drivers," everyone would
> know exactly what he he was talking about.
Now that usage is nasty indeed. If you want to say it, pluck your
courage and do not euphemise.
> Speaking of "actress" I especially dislike it when used by the
> Academy Awards to separate male and female actors and give an
> award to the best of each category. As far as I'm concerned,
> there should be a single award given to the person of either sex
> who does the best job of acting.
Why? It doubles the number of bestowed awards. What do you think of
`leading lady'? I am much more disappointed with the new PC
requirements for Oscar nominations regarding the presence of women,
non-white people, disabled people, and people with
counter-biological sexual orientations. It disqualifies "Twelve
Angree Men", "Sahara" (1943), and (if memory serves) Tarantino's
"Reservoir dogs" -- good movies with casts of exclusively white men.
I am even more disappointed that people who changed their gender
from male to female can now participate in sports competitions with
genuine female sportsmen. Their physical advantage is almost the
same as of men over women, so change of gender is a way to a
successful career in physial sports. I think it is blatant cheating
at the expense of one's identity. Any such temptations to change
gender are dangerous because people will want to do it for the
wrong resons. "When competeing with men I always come second or
third. If only I could compete with women... Wait! There is way..."