JRS
James Shelledy, III wrote in message
Who wins and why? And who else here thinks that Vitor has seen too many
Superfly movies?
This would be a great match - I think the world of Frank Shamrock, but I
would have to go with Belfort because of the weight advantage. It would be a
hard choice because of Shamrocks submission skill level and the rather
untested ability of Belfort on the ground. Who's your pick?
I don't get it, what's the Belfort-Superfly connection?
Confused in Pittsburgh
His clothes, maybe.
: His clothes, maybe.
What? You mean the silly looking pimp daddy suit he was wearing? Oh that
is all the rage in crack houses in the ghettos.
head rush wrote:
Thanks, LMAO!!!
Heh, heh, heh ....We shall see.
AirCh621 wrote in message <19980315214...@ladder03.news.aol.com>...
well you're a fucking HOMO, so get over it.
>> I don't have a "pro wrestling rules campaign." I simply point out the
sucess of guys like Ken Shamrock, Dan Severn, Don Frye, Kazushi Sakaruba,
Mo Smith >>
this takes the cake. now in your fucking little "pro wrestling agenda" MO
SMITH has miraculously turned into a "pro wrestler." you are an IDIOT.
you're not one of them. you are BLIND MARK. you try to make pro wrestling
relevent to everything that happens, when it's clearly NOT. this UFC had
NOTHING to do with pro wrestling, but there you go, trying to drag it in the
back door, when nobody cares and nobody wants to hear any of that stupid shit.
PRO WRESTLING IS FOR BABIES.
I think Frank would have a tougher time with Couture but it all depends on
Couture's knowledge in submissions. I don't think Frank can outmuscle
Couture so he would have to catch him where he is ignorant. But I don't
know if Couture can finish off Frank unless he goes the route of knocking
him senseless (i.e. Belfort's bats-in-the-belfry fight).
AirCh621 (airc...@aol.com) wrote:
: Frank Shamrock's problems are: 1) He is cocky and over-confident and 2) He is
then that only solidifies my opinion that he is an ass.
actually shooter, it makes a difference to some people if a fighter is a whiny,
poor-loser, excuse making ass. but you wouldn't understand that, coming from
pro wrestling where all the "fighters" are asses.
If I was as bad as he is, I'd be cocky too!!
I never said he was going to be unbeatable. I even said in another post
that his day will come. I am saying "We are going to have some fun until
it does!!!"
"Frank Shamrock's problems are: 1) He is cocky and over-confident"
Heh heh, We shall see
" He is
> preoccupied with boxing and is moving farther and farther away from his
> strength, which is submission fighting. "
How can we say this? An "armbar" is from boxing? A "double-leg takedown"
a boxing move? He only credited Javier Mendez for teaching him how to
box and made a statement that he didn't get the chance to use it. Coming
from the stance he uses ?? We shall see just how far he has strayed from
his "strength", when the fight calls for it. I for one believe he will
strike (duke) just fine though. Heh, heh....We shall see.
Remember the unbeatable Coleman or Vitor?
I think the "loss of focus" from these guys is totaly diffenent set of
bags. A set that each man carries and carries for different reasons.
Remember for better or worse Frank has been around all these scenes
before. His agenda is one that is "unique" I believe. Heh heh, ....We
shall see.
Andrew Jacobs wrote in message <6ek294$me6$1...@newsd-123.bryant.webtv.net>...
You're wrong. Rickson is unbeatable ... because he never fights worthy
opponents. I am unbeatable for the same reason.
JRS
Andrew Jacobs wrote in message <6eks5r$nrc$1...@newsd-124.bryant.webtv.net>...
So are Mark Kerr and Tom Erickson, lately.
no dan severn is the one exception. the rest of them are all asses.
Marco Ruas, Pat Militech and a handful of others...
BTH
I think the key here is that every good fighter will lose a few times
over time. Fighting is like any other sport in that a fighter can have a
good or bad day, be unprepared for a certain move(s) etc... When a guy
loses a fight, even if it is quite badly (Vitor, Coleman) it doesn't
mean that guy is any less of a fighter. Look at Rumina Sato for
instance... undefeated in LW until he was beaten by a virtual nobody.
He's still one of (if not the) best lightweights out there.
BTH
As long as we have guys like Peretti setting up matches, we should be
able to avoid this in the future. I'd be interested to see who (if they
let him back in) Kerr might face next.
Kerr/Belfort
Ruas/Smith
Machado/Couture
Erickson/F Shamrock (giant vs david)
some interesting ideas...
BTH
In article <350E3C...@deathsdoor.com>,
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
Rodney A. Williams <rkn...@erols.com> wrote in article
<350C4D...@erols.com>...
> AirCh621 wrote:
> >
> > Frank Shamrock's problems are: 1) He is cocky and over-confident and 2)
He is
> > preoccupied with boxing and is moving farther and farther away from his
> > strength, which is submission fighting. The man can fight, but his day
will
> > come. Remember the unbeatable Coleman or Vitor?
>
>
> Heh, heh, heh ....We shall see.
>
JRS
maybe erikson can get some tatoos or grow a goatee and shave his head or dye it
blue or red or purple and get some earrings and a toungue ring and maybe say he
is gay..then they will sign him for sure
You can't win all the time, but you can't lose forever.
they already have one. frank shamrock. just like when they hyped up ken
shamrock and made him their golden boy, despite the fact that he sucked in the
ufc.
what was that whole segment with frank shamrock showing jeff blatnick
submission holds if it wasn't a definate declaration that the ufc has picked
it's new favorite son?
LOL! I never thought of it that way, but it apparently seems so.
BTH
the similarity between your methods and those of hitler becomes more apparent
every day. you repeat the lie over and over like a propagandist until it
becomes more well known and popular than the truth, thus ensuring that people
will be led astray.
what's worst of all is that you know you're lying, that ken never got the best
of royce gracie, but you repeat the lie anyway.
"if you repeat a lie loud enough and long enough, it becomes the truth."
- adolf hitler
IMHO, every one of Tank's losses has been an embarrasment, except for his early
loss to Oleg Taktarov, back when Tank and Oleg were both decent.
Andrew Jacobs wrote in message <6faauu$qgk$1...@newsd-124.bryant.webtv.net
>...that matter) and I also enjoy Tank's commentary and interviews. The man
Did you hear his comments in UFC 15? In the pre-fight interview, Tank says
he's always ready to fight because if some guy comes up to you in a bar, you
can't say "I can fight now, I haven't been training. That's why you always
gotta be ready." After he quits beacuse of some stiff leg kicks (hardest I've
ever seen, IMO much harder than Ruas'), he goes on to say "They pulled me off a
bar stool one week ago, if I'd have been training this wouldn't have even been
a fight." Tank is so full of shit he disgusts me.