>I'm beginning to believe the "Rickson Gracie" legend is pure hype.
Only "beginning"?
Well whaddya know? ANOTHER post about Rickson being hype.
Bill Holland, seriously, is there ANYTHING on earth that does not remind you
that you think Rickson is overrated?
Not necessarily. Most succesfull BJJ fighters recognize him to be the best
or one of the best. That must mean something. Maybe he is to old now, or
maybe he does not want to risk loosing, or maybe its just for business
reasons, but that doesn’t mean he is not among the best. He was champion in
Brazil for years. I believe a lot of the current fighters are not so great
anyway. Coleman is an example. And another thing, maybe some of his
opponents in Japan aren’t so bad. Does anybody know any history about
fighters, which were in the Japan tournament. (I.e. Nishi). Has anybody
offered the amount of money he makes in Japan to fight any well known fighter?
>
> Apparently so!
>
> > I'm beginning to believe the "Rickson Gracie" legend is pure hype.
> >
> > Who has Rickson fought that hasn't been crushed by one of today's NHB
> > fighters?
> >
> > Since Rickson wont defend his reputation in the Octagon, his reputation
> has
> > rested on the shoulders of those he defeated (by default). Hugo Duarte
> was
> > supposed to be the giant pillar Rickson's reputation rested on, right?.
> So
> > much for that idea.
> >
> > I always hear people saying "Rickson is 400-0". If Hugo Duarte was the
> > toughest of those 400, and Hugo Duarte lost to Tank Abbot in 44 seconds,
> > that says alot about the other 399 opponents.
> >
> > Of Rickson's "400 wins" I can think of maybe 3-4. Hugo Duarte, Zulu,
> Dave
> > Levicki, and a Japanese WWF type guy - with only one being fought in the
> > last 3 years. Now it's known that each of these fighters was 2nd tier at
> > best. If Tank is 2nd tier, then they would be 3rd tier at best.
> >
> > I think I understand now why Royce and Rickson don't fight in the UFC,
> they
> > would probably lose.
> >
> > With no time-limits, maybe they would win. But then their opponent might
> > want true no-rules at all, and the Gracies might not have an advantage
> when
> > you include joint manipulation, gouges, biting, kicking while down, and
> > elbows to the head.
> >
> > Playing the "less rules" game would eventually work against a little guy
> > like Rickson.
> >
> > "No timelimits" with all the other rules would be handi-capping.
> >
> > It's rapidly approaching the time for Rickson to step up to plate and
> show
> > the world he is not a fraud, with Hugo down there is no one else to carry
> > his reputation for him.
> >
> > - Bill Holland
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
> I believe a lot of the current fighters are not so great
> anyway. Coleman is an example.
Hugo also seems to be an example. Tank nearly killed him, and Tank is a
second-tier fighter. Is this really the best that Rickson has fought? (I would
love to see Tank v. Rickson).
> Has anybody offered the amount of money he makes in Japan to fight any well
> known fighter?
"Independence Day" grossed more than "Schindler's List," but what does this
mean?
If Rickson were to beat a top wrestler( Coleman is no longer in this group), I
would have no reservations about calling him one of the best. If he beats two,
then I'd say he's the best.
If Rickson could survive Tank, I'd say he's near the top.
--
"Most people see no reason to stop arguing just because an issue has been
decided."
He fought NHB for 15 years undefeated in Brazil. I think its probable he is
among the best. Not aven Carlson or Carley gracie have anything to say
against his reputation. Even Royce who didnt have as much experience and is
skinier than Rickson, beat Ken Shamrock and then went to a Draw, thats all
a muscular Shamrock could do after practicing for his revenge for years. And
he is the teacher from the Lions Den. On the other hand, some people say
Rickson is in his 40's.
> Hugo also seems to be an example. Tank nearly killed him, and Tank is a
> second-tier fighter. Is this really the best that Rickson has fought? (I
would
> love to see Tank v. Rickson).
>
>
> "Independence Day" grossed more than "Schindler's List," but what does
this
> mean?
>
That makes no sense, Im not saying he is better because they pay him more. Im
saying he may have not fought because they have not offered him the same money
he makes in Japan to fight a well known fighter. By the way I hate that
stupid movie.
> If Rickson were to beat a top wrestler( Coleman is no longer in this
group), I
> would have no reservations about calling him one of the best. If he beats
two,
> then I'd say he's the best.
> If Rickson could survive Tank, I'd say he's near the top.
Of course he would survive Tank! Taktarov beat tank. Any good BJJ'r can beat
Tank. Even Renzo KO Taktarov. In IMO I would like him to fight someone from
the RAW team like Randy Couture. Even Bustamante went to a draw with Erickson
who is a monster. Or he could fight Frank Shamrock too. But not tank!
herman...@hotmail.com wrote:
> That makes no sense, Im not saying he is better because they pay him more. Im
> saying he may have not fought because they have not offered him the same money
> he makes in Japan to fight a well known fighter. By the way I hate that
> stupid movie.
My mistake, I misunderstood your point.
> Of course he would survive Tank! Taktarov beat tank. Any good BJJ'r can beat
> Tank. Even Renzo KO Taktarov. In IMO I would like him to fight someone from
> the RAW team like Randy Couture. Even Bustamante went to a draw with Erickson
> who is a monster. Or he could fight Frank Shamrock too. But not tank!
Oleg beat Tank because he was tough enough to stand up to Tank's punches.
Oleg v. Tank was a real war.
Renzo is probably a better grappler than Oleg, and Oleg played the grappling
game with him.
Rickson v. Couture would be a great fight. Couture showed some boxing skill
against Vitor, so it would be interesting to see what Rickson would do against
him.
>In article <01bd81b3$41a4f260$ee8cdccf@wjhpc>,
> "Bill Holland" <hollandx @hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Not necessarily. Most succesfull BJJ fighters recognize him to be the best
>or one of the best. That must mean something. Maybe he is to old now, or
>maybe he does not want to risk loosing, or maybe its just for business
>reasons, but that doesn’t mean he is not among the best. He was champion in
>Brazil for years.
Hey, being "Champion in Brazil" and 50 cents will probably buy you a
good cup of coffee.
I bet Hugo Duarte, Amauri Bittetti, Vitor Belfort, the guy who
Zinoviev took out, etc., were "Champions in Brazil" too. Being
"Champion in Brazil" does not seem to carry a whole lot of weight
around the UFC, where the quality level appears to be a notch higher
than what it is in Brazil.
So, unless Rickson beats somebody worth fighting, he is and will be a
tomato can crusher--albeit it the most hyped tomato can crusher ever.
I believe a lot of the current fighters are not so great
> Rickson is one of, if not the, best BJJ practitioners. This does mean
>something- it means he's a master of BJJ. This doesn't necessarily make him a
>great fighter capable of beating the best-of-the-best in competition.
>
Gee, don't tell that to the idiots who think Rickson nearly walks on
water; you'll break their heart.
Really? I bet Steve Jennum, Pat Smith, Oleg Taktarov, Jerry Bohlander, etc.
were "Champions in the US" too. In fact, with the exception of Pat Smith, they
all ARE past UFC champions (very different from Duarte or Belfort) and they all
got spanked in Brazil. Your Brazilian counterpart probably says the quality of
competition in the UFC is about ten notches below that in Brazilian Vale Tudo.
Personally, I don't feel that way. I just think you're both stupid.
GAHTU wrote:
> Really? I bet Steve Jennum, Pat Smith, Oleg Taktarov, Jerry Bohlander, etc.
> were "Champions in the US" too. In fact, with the exception of Pat Smith, they
> all ARE past UFC champions (very different from Duarte or Belfort) and they all
> got spanked in Brazil.
Jennum was a fluke. Taktarov got beat by another UFC Champ.
Yeah, and I bet there are a bunch of Brazilians who are saying the same thing
about Americans that go over there and get waxed. Ruas beats Jennum and the
Brazilians say "What the hell? That guy won a UFC". Ruas pummels Oleg from
ringpost to rinpost "That guy is one of the UFC's best?". Brian Keck (Premiere
American Wrestler) goes over and gets choked out by a Luta Livre guy he
outweighs by 20 lbs. The UFC Middleweight Champion (Bohlander) goes over and
gets KNOCKED STIFF by Murilo Bustamante. Renzo sends Oleg into Matua land, and
the Brazilians are asking "That guy WON a UFC?". That is a double edged sword
that you are wielding.
Samoa.
>
> Hey, being "Champion in Brazil" and 50 cents will probably buy you a
> good cup of coffee.
>
> I bet Hugo Duarte, Amauri Bittetti, Vitor Belfort, the guy who
> Zinoviev took out, etc., were "Champions in Brazil" too. Being
> "Champion in Brazil" does not seem to carry a whole lot of weight
> around the UFC, where the quality level appears to be a notch higher
> than what it is in Brazil.
>
> So, unless Rickson beats somebody worth fighting, he is and will be a
> tomato can crusher--albeit it the most hyped tomato can crusher ever.
>
First of all, he must have fought at least a few good oponents in 15 years of
NHB experience defending the name of the Gracies, non of the fighters you
mentioned have had that type of experience. Just because he is not in his
prime and fighting in the UFC for what they pay does not mean he was not a
good fighter. In general the gracies have a good fighting level so why
wouldnt rickson if they all recognize he is among the best. And BTW that
tomato can crusher phrase is really stupid. Like Ruas challenges Rickson
while he can barely handle Taktarov, yea right.
>
> Gee, don't tell that to the idiots who think Rickson nearly walks on
> water; you'll break their heart.
>
>
UUhhh. Rickson is a tomato can crusher, is that all you have to say you
moron?
>
>
>>
>> Gee, don't tell that to the idiots who think Rickson nearly walks on
>> water; you'll break their heart.
>>
>>
>
>UUhhh. Rickson is a tomato can crusher, is that all you have to say you
>moron?
>
Yes, and let me repeat the theme slowly. Betcha you can't name 2 top
competitors Rickson has defeated in a real professional match.
> That is a double edged sword
>that you are wielding.
>
Point well taken. Let me clarify my point. There is no doubt that
Brazil has some terrific fighters. The problem is that in NHB, like
in professional boxing, every Harry, Dick, and Tom is a champion of
something. Being the "Champion" of anything in either Boxing or NHB
does not carry any weight. In fact, because of the politics of
Boxing, for example, sometimes the legitimate champions get stripped
of their titles and two palukas then duke it out for the title.
So, the point I was making is that being a "Brazilian Champion", like
being the "UFC Champion" does not necessarily amount to much, there
are as many B.S. champions in Brazil, it seems to me, as there are
B.S. champions in boxing.
Consider this. Marco Ruas is a terrific fighter from Riod de Janeiro.
Super-hyped Rickson Gracie is also from Rio de Janeiro. I bet that
both Ruas and Rickson claim that they are the champions of Brazil's
something or other. Now, they have never faced each other, as far as
I can tell, so how do you know who the worhty "Champion" is?
> And BTW that
>tomato can crusher phrase is really stupid.
OK, what about "Tomato can smasher" or "Tomato can blaster" or "Tomato
can bomber"?
>
>First of all, he must have fought at least a few good oponents in 15 years of
>NHB experience defending the name of the Gracies, non of the fighters you
>mentioned have had that type of experience.
OK, then go ahead and list those worthy opponents. By the way, did
any of them go into the ring wearing just one boxing glove, like Art
Jimmerson, or were in their '50s, like Ron Van Cliff?
>Just because he is not in his
>prime and fighting in the UFC for what they pay does not mean he was not a
>good fighter.
Nobody questions that Rickson was or is a good fighter. It's just
that when he is sold as having a 400+ and 0 record and being the
greatest NHB fighter that ever walked the earth, one has to wonder
first, who the heck did he fight and second, under what rules and
circumstances.
>In general the gracies have a good fighting level so why
>wouldnt rickson if they all recognize he is among the best.
There is a big difference between fighting your family and friends in
the gym and fighting a stranger in a real match.
Samoa.
What do you mean by "top competitors"? Name the two "top competitors" Don
Frye, Mike Van Arsdale, Dan Henderson, Mark Kerr, Tom Erickson, Kevin Jackson,
Kenny Monday, or Ken Shamrock have beaten and then maybe we can talk.
I'm not saying these guys haven't beaten more than two "top competitors". Just
wondering what you think a top competitor is. Is Bobish a "top competitor"? Or
Big Daddy? Or Bitteti? Or Randleman? Or Branco Cikatik? Or Ed De Kuijf? Or
John Lober?
Most of the competitor he beat are too old now. And so much for calling the
valetudo japan tomato cans, can someone give detailed information about all
the fighters in these tournaments, what they did before and after the
tournaments, etc. Also, anybody know anything about Yoji Anjo?
howz about the whole Gracie family is a bunch of greedy media whores who made
their money and ran home before they got beat too badly..
GAHTU!!! Guzuntite!
>> Betcha you can't name 2 top
>>competitors Rickson has defeated in a real professional match.
>
>What do you mean by "top competitors"? Name the two "top competitors" Don
>Frye, Mike Van Arsdale, Dan Henderson, Mark Kerr, Tom Erickson, Kevin Jackson,
>Kenny Monday, or Ken Shamrock have beaten and then maybe we can talk.
The difference is that these guys and their followers don't go around
claiming they nearly walk on water and these guys fight and try to get
fights with whomever is at the top of the game. Can you say the same
thing about The Great Tomato Can Crusher?
>
>howz about the whole Gracie family is a bunch of greedy media whores who made
>their money and ran home before they got beat too badly..
>
Very succinct description of the situation.
>I understand your point now Leobueno, and I agree that the Brazilians hype
>their guys up a little too much. I guess hype is a constant in our sport.
Exactly. Rembember all the bullshit about Vitor Belfort? He
supposedly was even a great boxer. Well, Randy Couture, the
*wrestler*, outboxed the hell out of him.
As far as being the standard bearer for the *other* Gracie clan
(Carlson), maybe they should get somebody else. And, by the way, at
least the Carlson clan seems to get out there and fight, unlike the
side of the family which has Rickson.
Then there is Bittetti. Turned into Don Frye's punching bag.
Hugo Duarte was hyped up too. Bomb, bomb, bomb, Tank away.
Allan Goes comes in surrounded in the Brazilian aura and, although he
did a good job and I though he should have won, he only did an
adequate job against a guy with little NHB experience.
I think also from Brazil was Mario Sperry, who got hammered by
Zinoviev.
So, your comment on Brazilian fighters seems to me to be right on the
money.
Well, I know he got spanked by Tank.
Well, I know he got spanked by Tank.>>
He also got spanked by Rickson and Rickson made him submit, unlike Tank. That
means nothing I know, but I can see the comparisons already. The "this fighter
beat this guy; but this fighter beat that guy quicker" thing doesn't always
work. Jon Lober beat Frank Shamrock, Kevin Jackson beats Jon Lober, so K.J.
should be able to squash Frank; right? Wrong. Oleg beat Tank and Renzo beat
Oleg.....any commments on that one? Barretto beat Bobish, Bobish beat
Beneteau; Barretto should be able to crush Beneteau right? wrong. Tank beat
Duarte up quicker than Rickson did; so what? Renzo knocked Oleg out in under a
minute, are you going to assume that Renzo could knock Tank out? I don't think
so.
Samoa.
isn't this the asshole who shot bobby kennedy?
Leo Bueno wrote:
Ya' gotta admit that GTCC has got everyone beat in one regard----money. He
snagged 1m$ for one fight.
--
peace
-s-
Dog-Boy
Nuthin' there Nuthin' there, he's goin' out the back door.
There's no power in those legs. J.B.
the truth is what the truth is, and i pity anyone who shits out a lifes saving
on one of their worthless seminars to learns a single technique from one of
their green belts....
GAHTU! Gazuntite!
Leo, you better be careful. You're awful obsessed with Rickson, and may end
up riding his jock if you say his name too many times.
Bob
"These guys fight"? Who has Kenny Monday fought in the last couple years? How
about Ken Shamrock? Who has Erickson fought in the last year? And do you
really think Kerr considers Branco Cikatik one of the fighters "at the top of
the game"?
LandS...@webtv.net wrote:
> Point is Rainbow boy Rickson could not submit him with punches either.
> You should really come to the Mainland and learn. But then again you
> would get your ass beat down because we don't like Islanders.
>
>
Do you like people from Long Island? What about Hawaii? When you say
"we don't like Islanders," what fringe racist group are you talking
about?
IronmanIII wrote:
> Yeah Jumpie, that's the guy. They are one and the same. He also shot Abe
> Lincoln. And JFK.
> On Mon, 18 May 1998 04:39:20 GMT, Johnny Kincaide
> <john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Rickson is one of, if not the, best BJJ practitioners. This does mean
> >something- it means he's a master of BJJ. This doesn't necessarily make him a
> >great fighter capable of beating the best-of-the-best in competition.
> >
>
> Gee, don't tell that to the idiots who think Rickson nearly walks on
> water; you'll break their heart.
Dude, don't even bother. They're of the same mentality of the folk who think Bruce
Lee would destroy anyone and everyone if he were to fight in NHB.
- -Keegan
"NHB has passed Rickson by and left him clinging to his ego and his past
accomplishments."
- -Jeff Shanks
<<Point is Rainbow boy Rickson could not submit him with punches either. You
should really come to the Mainland and learn. But then again you would get your
ass beat down because we don't like Islanders.>>
First of all igorant one; wrong island. Come to the table with some knowledge
or you'll end up on the endangered species list like your weak ass namesake.
Second; I live on the "mainland", and I RESPECT NO ONLINE CHALLENGES!! Anyone
can woof for their monitor.
Wanna try a debate again? Tank made Anjoh quit? No. Rickson made Anjoh quit?
Yes. Tank was stupid enough to break his hand against Anjoh? Yes. Rickson
injured himself while spanking Anjoh? No, and the spanking took less time.
Samoa.
Mike
Rickson's Vale Tudo opponents were not that good - nobody seriously
disputes this. The two guys that Rickson faced in the two tournament
finals were David Levicki (or maybe one of the kickboxers made it to the
finals?) and Yuki Naki. Naki weighed in at an imposing 140 lbs while
Levicki was a UFC castoff who had lost to Johnny Rhodes in the first
round of UFC II.
-Ivan
LandS...@webtv.net wrote:
> First off bright one their was on on line challange.
The irony is just too much.......
lol
[ snip - Rickson trounced Yoji Anjo...]
> Yoji has since fought Tank
> to a draw in the UFC.
Tank beat Yoji Anjo by judges' decision.
This is basically identical to the account that I heard from another one of
Rickson's instructors, quite some time ago.
Bob
> Dude, don't even bother. They're of the same mentality of the folk who
think Bruce
> Lee would destroy anyone and everyone if he were to fight in NHB.
Who has said Rickson can destroy anyone, I have not so who are you reffering
to?
These american fighters sure do have alot of excuses.
:)
Yes, that was my point. Tank injured himself tryin to get Anjoh to submit, but
still couldn't do it. Rickson got the job done without hurting himself. Does
this mean that Rickson could beat Tank, no, and I'm not saying that, I was
simply pointing out the fact that Tank couldn't submit the tomato can Anjoh,
yet Rickson did. Fact. The rest is speculation.
Finboy wrote that he could shoot Anjoh in the head quicker....so what? We are
talkin NHB here, right? Tank needed the judges, Rickson didn't.
As far as his stupid little typo, he doesn't need my help lookin stupid, he
does an excellent job himself. A little Freudian slip by the Internet tough
guy I guess.
Samoa.
>Point is Rainbow boy Rickson could not submit him with punches either.
>You should really come to the Mainland and learn. But then again you
>would get your ass beat down because we don't like Islanders.
>
Here is a clip from my web page on the match:
Rickson beat 220 lb Yoji Anjo in the summer of 1994 in a challenge match after
Yoji invaded his LA studio with some
Japanese press . Rickson was [sick?] at home but came over after his
brown belt instructor Mauricio called him.
Aiming to beat him badly, Rickson traded a few low line kicks and then
clinched and immediately mounted in one fluid
motion. Anjo tried to fish hook Rickson's cheek, who responded with a furry
of punches which released the fish hook
and broke Anjo's nose. Rolling over to avoid the furry of blows, Anjo was
choked unconscious before the reporters
were let in. This was caputered on film by Mauricio and seen live by 10-15
other students. Yoji has since fought Tank
to a draw in the UFC.
Some things to note:
1) Rickson did use strikes and broke Anjoh's nose badly.
2) Anjoh used the dreaded "fish hook" with little success.
3) Anjoh didn't tap, he was choked unconscious. With Rickson you don't have
much time to tap :)
Just some info.
Thomas
Thomas
Aw, c'mon Bill, I couldn't pass up the opportunity.
>Leo Bueno wrote:
>
>> Gee, don't tell that to the idiots who think Rickson nearly walks on
>> water; you'll break their heart.
>
>Dude, don't even bother. They're of the same mentality of the folk who think Bruce
>Lee would destroy anyone and everyone if he were to fight in NHB.
>
Good analogy.
Nobody has said Rickson can beat everybody you IDIOTS. Where is the good
analogy?.
You dont even know the fighters. And look what hapened to Yoji Anjo, he got
bloodied and chocked out easily while Tank who is much bigger and stronger
could not submit him. There you see the difference in quality Rickson is not
even 190 pounds.
>
>You dont even know the fighters. And look what hapened to Yoji Anjo, he got
>bloodied and chocked out easily while Tank who is much bigger and stronger
>could not submit him. There you see the difference in quality Rickson is not
>even 190 pounds.
Then he will be right at home fighting in the UFC lightweight (199
limit) division. Do you think we'll see him there anytime soon?
Bob, don't tell me it took you that long to figure it out. "there"
replaced with "their" Chickson, webtv... I think he faked his death only
to resurface under a new name ^_^
BTH
I would love to see Rickson vs. Couture. I think Rickson would win, but
I'd love to see a fight like that anyways.
Well, I was thinking it from the first post, but he did change his style
just a little bit... I guess I'll have to take back what I usually say about
myself; which is: "I've been known to have a keen eye for the obvious!"
;-)
Bob
>>>>>>>>
> Then he will be right at home fighting in the UFC lightweight (199
> limit) division. Do you think we'll see him there anytime soon?
>
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
Rickson's reply was "I accept". He said it was just up to the anouncers.
Thomas Mitchell
thanks for sharing your speculation. it will be taken into consideration next
time somebody gives a shit what you think.
Style: Gracie Jiu Jitsu
Age: 37
Ht: 5'9
Wt: 190
Record 9-0
What I meant was his weight in 1994 when he fought Yoji Anjo not 1997, anyway
I may not remember well so ill leave it there. My point was comparing his
performance with Tanks.
Andrew Jacobs wrote in message <6kngj4$2hq$1...@newsd-121.bryant.webtv.net>...
You mean better like... uhh... get a hit in? :)
Thomas Mitchell
Maybe, I dont know. I do hope Rickson fights a well known current fighter,
although being 37 I think is a disandvantage and he may not want to risk
loosing before retirement.
Maybe its not, but it can be a factor, im just speculating.
Severn also has a few other things Rickson doesn't have:
1) Size
2) Several losses and several lame draws
Thomas Mitchell
So you are choosing not to include Rickson's fights against Lutra Livre guys on
fight night back in Brazil during the 80's? Those were professional matches,
and they were NHB, and Rickson was undefeated. They were not telivised, but
neither were all of Severn's. It all comes down to the fact that, yea, Severn has
fought more recently. Thats certainly undeniable. He has also lost & drawn
several times more recently, and often uses his size to substitute for some skill
on many oponents. It is lame IMO to try to deny Rickson has experience and
skill beyond the 9-0 record you say. Is it official b/c you read it on Fight World or
where ever? Let me just ask you this: Who has more NHB experience as a
whole, Rickson or Dan Severn? Pound for pound, who has more skill, Rickson
or Dan Severn? Who has accomplished more in their art (BJJ/Wrestling)?
Thomas Mitchell
http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~thomas4/Rickson/rickson.htm
Rickson completely blows people away in BJJ, and has been training since
before he could walk with a mindset of fighting. I don't think being good at BJJ
alone makes you a good fighter, but training for so long and being so good at it
while at the same time haveing a mindset to prepare yourself to fight just makes
for an amazing fighter.
Severn has had a
>total of 23 NHB matches in addition to doing a bunch of other stuff.
>Severn has won 18 of those matches, lost 3 (to Royce Gracie, K.
>Shamrock, and, Coleman), and had 2 draws (with Horn and Kimo/Severn
>was clearly dominating Kimo towards the end of that match and would have
>definetely won had there been a longer time limit or judges).
He also got a lame decision over Shamrock. While Severn's record is good, he
likewise has not really faced any serious oposition (maybe Oleg) and pulled
through with a win.
As far as
>Rickson's unofficial matches go, sure he has an impressive reputation
>but who all did he beat to get that reputation?
They are not unofficial. They just don't happen to be known by the guy who put
up the 9-0 record. I can't find the fighters names either, but they certainly
happened, thats for sure.
Rickson beat Hugo
>Daurte in 2 different street fights but look at how Hugo got destroyed
>by Tank Abott in UFC XVII and while Tank is a tough guy he is not
>exactly in the first tier of fighters himself.
Tank has a bit of size over Rickson don't ya think? Did we really get to see
Hugo's skills?
Tank also beat Yoji
>Anjoh, another one of Rickson's victims. Sure, Anjoh lost to Tank in
>a 15 min. decsion and Rickson finished Anjoh off in like 2 1/2 min. in
>his dojo but Anjoh was a more expierenced NHB fighter when he fought
>Tank as compared to when he fought Rickson too.
Anjoh didn't even get a hit off on Rickson, and went so far as to try to fish hook
as a last resort. Rickson broke him and then put him to sleep. Tank on the other
hand had quite a bit of size on him as well as several months to prepare.
Then you've got
>Rickson's victory over Zulu. Now I know that this match was quite a few
>years ago but what evidence is there to suggest that Zulu was as good as
>any top notch NHB figher on the seen today. NONE. I have the Shooto
>tape where Zulu faces Enson Inoue and Inoue KO'd Zulu with ease in just
>a matter of seconds. Besides, the match against Zulu is listed as a
>part of Rickson's official record. My point is that Rickson has done a
>whole hell of a lot compared to Severn.
Who all is that good that Severn has beaten? I could watch a fight or two of
Oleg's and say "gee, this guy is a tomato can." Or I could watch some of his
other fights and go "wow, this guy is great." Same with Tank. I could watch him
vs. Belfort and Severn and say "damn, he sucks." Or I could watch him K0 a few
people and think he is unbeatable. Here are the reasons I think Severn has
accomplished less than Rickson:
1) He is bigger.
2) He has lost several times.
3) He has fought less in his career.
4) He didn't train wrestling when he was younger with a fighters mindset. (and
consequently still feels the urge to roll to his stomach, forgets to hit when he
can, etc)
5) He has no guard :-)
Thomas Mitchell
It is much tougher to suceed in wrestling than BJJ. I'm not saying wrestling
is better, but there are wrestlers competing all around the world. BJJ is only
in Brazil. What I'm trying to say is far more people have studied wrestling
than BJJ, therefor it is tougher to suceed.
Look at it like this. If me and 10 of my buddies were to start our own sport
and I was known as the best, does that make my accomplishments greater than
Severn's? Well, I am the best. Severn is not the best wrestler. But that
does not mean I've accomplished more.
Well, if Hugo had any skills worth noting, he wouldn't have been beat by Abbott
like that.
>Here are the reasons I think Severn has
>accomplished less than Rickson:
>
>1) He is bigger.
>2) He has lost several times.
>3) He has fought less in his career.
1) What does Severn's size have to do with anything? Has Sugar Ray Robinson
accomplished more than Mohhamed Ali? Using your logic, he has because he's
smaller.
2) That's because Severn has faced much tougher opponents than Rickson has.
3) You don't know this for sure.
>>Here are the reasons I think Severn has
>>accomplished less than Rickson:
>>
>>1) He is bigger.
>>2) He has lost several times.
>>3) He has fought less in his career.
>
>1) What does Severn's size have to do with anything? Has Sugar Ray
Robinson
>accomplished more than Mohhamed Ali? Using your logic, he has because
he's
>smaller.
>
No, you weren't using my logic. Severn and Rickson has both fought in the
same weight class (aka: none). Sugar Ray Robinson and Mohhamed Ali
did not. Severn weights ~60 lbs more than Rickson. Since they both fight in an
open weight class that is an advantage and can make up for Severn's lesser
skills.
>2) That's because Severn has faced much tougher opponents than Rickson
has.
Lets see... Severn lost to Royce, Shammy, and Coleman. Rickson can clearly
beat Royce, and I personally believe he would have little problem with a guy like
Shammy playing his mat game. Coleman would be interesting, but I have a
feeling Rickson would take it a little longer than Severn did IF he were to loose.
Kimo took Severn to a draw. Oleg almost got him in a leg lock at the very
beginning of the match. Shamrock mounted him in his lame decision victory.
See one thing Rickson usually does is fight people around 30 lbs heavier than
him. I imagine Severn does the opposite.
>
>3) You don't know this for sure.
>
So you think Severn, who has been fighting since 1994-1995 has been fighting
more than Rickson, who has had *documented* challenge matches back to age
13 (against an adult Brazilian soldier)? Ok...
Thomas Mitchell
>Look at it like this. If me and 10 of my buddies were to start our own sport
>and I was known as the best, does that make my accomplishments greater
than
>Severn's? Well, I am the best. Severn is not the best wrestler. But that
>does not mean I've accomplished more.
Totally invalid. BJJ is not as distinct as you appear to want to make it. It
wasn't a new sport introduced by Rickson and 10 of his weak friends. You act
like they would be ripe for the pickings if some sambo or judo guy went in to
show them "whats up." That hasn't happened. Further, Rickson not only
dominated his weight class, but likewise reigned as absolute weight class
champion for over 10 years and stayed *undefeated.* He further went and won
gold in the Pan Am games in free style wrestling and has won his share of
sambo tournaments (under THEIR rules). Poor analogy.
Thomas
The fact is that Severn has faced tougher opponents than Rickson. It really
doesn't matter what you personally believe, the fact is Rickson hasn't fought
these people, so we'll never know how well he'd do.
>No, you weren't using my logic. Severn and Rickson has both fought in the
>same weight class (aka: none). Sugar Ray Robinson and Mohhamed Ali
>did not. Severn weights ~60 lbs more than Rickson. Since they both fight in
>an
>open weight class that is an advantage and can make up for Severn's lesser
>skills.
Well, I can just as easily say Severn has accomplished more because he hasn't
trained for NHB fighting as long as Rickson. But both arguments are flawed.
It's not Severn fault he's bigger than Rickson, as it is not Rickson's fault he
has more training experiance than Severn.
>So you think Severn, who has been fighting since 1994-1995 has been fighting
>more than Rickson, who has had *documented* challenge matches back to age
>13 (against an adult Brazilian soldier)? Ok...
Documented? Tell me how you know these fights actually happened? Have you
seen the tapes of these matches, or did you just hear about them?
Ok, when has Duarte had an ON day against a good opponent?
I know BJJ is bigger than the example I made, but it still gets the point
across.