Brian Kushner's "GA NUDE" Spams
Tout Fini
bku...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>>I never said I know anyone at 1013 productions and THEY ARE THE ONES
>>who sold me the merchandise and the more I sell the more they make so
>>they don't care! And as you said, they are just that, fake nudes and
>>I specifically state that on the page. What's your problem?
>I'm glad you asked. The point is that posting GILLIAN ANDERSON NUDE and
GILLIAN ANDERSON IMAGES messages to XF >newsgroups (and probably to
alt.binaries.sex.nude.whatever) surely brings a LOT of hits to your page,
where you're waiting with >a sales pitch for XF merchandise. You're
bringing customers to your page by spamming newsgroups to see these
pictures.
>That's using GA's manipulated, unauthorized image to sell XF merchandise.
You and 1013 (and Fox?) collect that money. You >are exploiting her
image for financial gain, and exploiting it in a way that she would be
offended by. It's her image and her >property. When you use it to make
money, you are doing a bad thing. I understand that this is a difficult
concept for you to >grasp.
>I'd like to hear more about your statement that 1013 Productions does not
object to your sales pitch. Are you saying that you >cleared this with
the company, or that they don't know about it and you are assuming that
they don't care? I'd hate to think >that GA's employer would knowingly
accept profits made by pasting her face on scans from Hustler.
Then Brian scurried off and moved the "NUDES" page from AOL to Prodigy and
set up a fake e-mail address, xfi...@xfiles.com. Then he re-spammed these
groups using the new address. And just for good measure, he's also
spamming as Powerstar, the name of his company. Sure, that'll work. Next
it will be his Netcom, Compuserve or MCI accounts.
He still doesn't "get it." I hope that his big "10% OFF" sale means that
sales are slow. I'd hate to think that people in these newsgroups are
contributing to his slimy scheme.\
Portia
In <54gdc9$e...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> mcdu...@aol.com (Mcduff300)
writes:
>
>There was a story on this in my local news. Several people that have
>posted fake nudes have been shut down! Believe it or not, there is a
>regulation on this!
From a legal point of view, getting shut down would be the least of his
worries. GA's lawyers could easily show specific intent and very
substantial monetary damages.