GILLIAN ANDERSON NUDE????
Brian E. Kushner
As you may know, I have a page of Gillian Anderson Images. I don't
have any nudes because I didn't think any exists. Yesterday I
received a file which I and many other folks aren't so sure is a fake.
If it is a fake it is an amazing job. THIS LOOKS AS IF IT IS REAL!!!!
I have looked at every picture of Gillian I think exists and I haven't
scene any picture that has her head postitioned the way this image
does. Usually with a fake you usually know which picture the person
used to create the fake. Again, if this is a fake where did the
headshot come from that is being used? I'm putting this on my page
for a limited time to let the fans decide for themselves. Let me know
what you think. The page address is:
Raul A. Velez
It's an obvious fake.
smeagol
It's a very obvious fake. It's one of the recent magizine pictures she
did, airbrushed to apear as if she is toppless. You have several others
in the same series on your page. It's probebly the most wide spread fake
of her around. It's very well done and convincing without the source
material. But the real picture is just as widespread, showing that it is
indead a fake.
Armand de Sevigny
In article <31fa6d58...@nntp.ix.netcom.com>,
>If it is a fake it is an amazing job. THIS LOOKS AS IF IT IS
REAL!!!!
This is most definatly a fake. First off her breats in the
picuture are far to large, secondndly, its quite clear that the
body in the picutre has silicon breasts. As can be told easily
from observing the shape and way the breast 'falls' on the body,
or in this mater, how they do not fall, and are almost perfectly
cicular, these are silicon implantes.
Gilly does not have implants, nor are her breasts that size.The
breasts in the photo you have are clearly C if not larger, Gilly
has a B size.
Ken Birkin
smeagol <sme...@value.net> wrote:
>Brian E. Kushner wrote:
>>
>> As you may know, I have a page of Gillian Anderson Images. I >> don't
>> have any nudes because I didn't think any exists. Yesterday I
>> received a file which I and many other folks aren't so sure is >>a fake.
But do we really want to see full nude Pic's ?
As the series does well, I like the sexuall Tension created by
the two. Were would be the fun of the two of them Whacking good
old Cancer Man with a 12 gage and making love on what is left of
his desk.
No. No.
Brian's Page is very good ( if you have a hankerin for Gillian )
That's good enough for me.
I like the little wrapping that goes along with the pose.
It helps along the imagination/fantasy.
>> what you think. The page address is:
>>
>> http://members.aol.com/gilandersn
Yes Excelent... a good read.
Yo Brian: You out there, I'd love a *real* copy of the photo
she signed ( Grey lacy Top ). Any Ideas on how to
obtain one.
Regards
Ken.
Worked right Beside the two whene they filmed their classic
at the abandoned Brittania Mine, Squamish, shown again last Fri
the 26 Th.
Jessina Luiz
I'm not saying that it wasn't a fake, but she was pregnant which would
make her breasts larger, and her position could account for the circular
shape.
Robert Souza
It's a fake.. it looks to me like someone carved her face right off the FHM
cover shot, and did a little rotate on it.. Someone should rotate 'em both
side by side to be sure, but I'm pretty confident that's the source image..
In article <31FC0C...@worldnet.att.net> Jessina Luiz
<JJJJ...@worldnet.att.net> writes:>From: Jessina Luiz
<JJJJ...@worldnet.att.net>>Subject: Re: GILLIAN ANDERSON NUDE????
>Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 17:55:45 -0700
>I'm not saying that it wasn't a fake, but she was pregnant which would
>make her breasts larger, and her position could account for the circular
>shape.
===================Tupac==Alice-in-Chains==AC/DC==Korn==Dr.Dre==Jewel==
--->Robert Souza<---\==STEELERS==]=====================================
ice...@primenet.com \==PENGUINS=]---/ You never know just how you \---
Phoenix, Arizona USA \==RATTLERS]--/ look thru other people's eyes \--
The TRUTH is out there.\==SOONERS]=====================================
========================The-X-Files==Pearl-Jam==Van-Halen==Trust-No-1==
Raul A. Velez
Armand de Sevigny wrote:
>
> This is most definatly a fake. First off her breats in the
> picuture are far to large, secondndly, its quite clear that the
> body in the picutre has silicon breasts. As can be told easily
> from observing the shape and way the breast 'falls' on the body,
> or in this mater, how they do not fall, and are almost perfectly
> cicular, these are silicon implantes.
>
> Gilly does not have implants, nor are her breasts that size.The
> breasts in the photo you have are clearly C if not larger, Gilly
> has a B size.
WAYYYYY to much "knowledge"...
Armand de Sevigny
"Raul A. Velez" <kik...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> WAYYYYY to much "knowledge"...
In what way? Anyone with a basic knowlage of the female body, as
well as having seen Gilly quite a bit could tell what I did. Do
you just stare at tits and say "Nope, those are real"? Look at
Demi Moore or Pam Anderson, silicon goddesses both of them. Then
compare that to Demi back in the film 7th Sign, and you will be
able to tell the difference.
parismom
i agree-
also, look around the neck area-there is absolutely no skin texture or
tone. it's definitly a cut and paste. kick it off the page!!!
pm
Armand de Sevigny
>I'm not saying that it wasn't a fake, but she was pregnant which
would >make her breasts larger, and her position could account
for the circular >shape.
No, those are silicon. Just compare a silicon breast implant
brest to a real one. Real ones do not lay like that.
Travis Hardwick
Ken Birkin <azi...@sunshine.net> wrote:
> But do we really want to see full nude Pic's ?
>As the series does well, I like the sexuall Tension created by
>the two. Were would be the fun of the two of them Whacking good
>old Cancer Man with a 12 gage and making love on what is left of
>his desk.
>No. No.
>Brian's Page is very good ( if you have a hankerin for Gillian )
>That's good enough for me.
>I like the little wrapping that goes along with the pose.
>It helps along the imagination/fantasy.
Not to mention that the authenticity of such nude photos is highly
questionable. Computer technology can produce some very impressive
fakes and I have seen quite a few nudes pertaining to the cast of Star
Trek, TNG. Brian's page has at least two very questionable images.
The 'crotch shot' is one, and the other will be quite obvious should
you visit the site.
Brian's web site is:
http://members.aol.com/gilandersn
If you're really into images of GA, I highly recommend another site
devoted to the X-Files (GA in particular). ZiggyB is a regular on IRC
(EffNet's #xf channel) and has an extensive display of GA images taken
from a variety of publications from all over the world.
ZiggyB's web site is:
Travis Hardwick
(aka Syvart on IRC)
Brian Mercer
That photo is so fake it's not funny. Her face is too big, it's much
lighter than the rest. Probably done in Photo Shop or Photo Paint. Over all
a bad job.