Too bad this NG is full of L00ny Repug whackos
atlas...@yahoo.com
Go tap someone's phone already! Or maybe arrest someone for wearing a
tee-shirt! Or commit treason and reveal the identity of an intelligence
officer! Or lobby for more tax cuts for the rich! Or lie to some
citizens of New Orleans and say you'll help rebuild their city! Or
deplete our military and National Guard! Or ignore Al-Qaeda!
Now make a lame L00ny comeback full of meaningless myths!
Aaron
LOL
Thanks for that! The liberals here and in the Democrats newsgroup are
being total pussies about that crossposting thread. I wonder if its
because the Republican newsgroup has the entire Democratic newsgroup
killfiled, and vice versa.
Isn't it funny how usenet mimics life?
*smirk*
-Aaron
George Kerby
On 2/2/06 11:05 AM, in article
1138899943....@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com, "atlas...@yahoo.com"
<atlas...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I think you pretty well got the corner on that market, judging by your first
paragraph. 'Nuff said...
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Rick
Joe Attardi
> There, fixed the title for you, dickhead.
What exactly was he lying about, Rick? Or are you just saying that
because Rush and Ann Coulter told you to?
Rick
"Joe Attardi" <jatt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1138916849.8...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Rick wrote:
>> There, fixed the title for you, dickhead.
>
> What exactly was he lying about, Rick?
He's a liberal...pick a subject, he's probably lying about it.
Joe Attardi
"Probably" lying about it.
So in other words, you were just saying it because all the other
conservatives say it too.
When you're ready to give me something concrete, let's talk.
atlas...@yahoo.com
The dumb little rightard did exactly as I said:
"make a lame L00ny comeback full of meaningless myths."
You've got no game to fight the truth I posted, L00nboy.
Joe Attardi
Hehehe. Yup.
Although it's kinda funny. I've been reading some of Rick's other
posts, and he has some unnatural obsession with the word "lie". Every
one of his responses pretty much are, "You are lying." "That's a lie."
"Lie lie lie." "I love lie."
Also, instead of making any coherent points he just calls people
idiots, etc. You won't be taken seriously in a debate if all you can do
is attack the other side.
But, we're used to that. After all, if we disagree with the President
we're "traitors" apparently.
The thing that cracks me up the most is that, whenever somebody tries
to make a point, or at least asks someone to respond to a point, they
instead just say something like "Shut up stupid liberal", instead of
actually engaging in a discussion.
atlas...@yahoo.com
Maybe his parents beat him a lot, like his hero O'Reilly.
Joe Attardi
> Maybe his parents beat him a lot, like his hero O'Reilly.
O RLY?!
hehe.
In seriousness though, I think there is too much of the insult-hurling
from both sides. Once, just once, I'd like to have a respectful debate
with someone on the other side. *sigh* Ah well.
WM
It is not incumbent on anyone to prove a negative. It is the task of the
Bush detractors to prove he lied about the WMDs, not the other way around.
All arguments therefore generated downstream from that base accusation are
on shaky ground at best. If you have proof of Presidential malfeasance and
think the US Congress or the FBI would be interesting in knowing about it -
write them a letter and spare the folks here that are interested in chatting
up 24.
Sign it Jack Bauer, I'm sure they'll get a kick out of it.
WM
Joe Attardi
> It is not incumbent on anyone to prove a negative. It is the task of the
> Bush detractors to prove he lied about the WMDs, not the other way around.
Do you hear that?
WOO WOO! Here comes the clue train! Last stop: you.
I don't recall seeing anything about lying about WMDs in the original
message. To recall:
> Go tap someone's phone already! Or maybe arrest someone for wearing a
> tee-shirt! Or commit treason and reveal the identity of an intelligence
> officer! Or lobby for more tax cuts for the rich! Or lie to some
> citizens of New Orleans and say you'll help rebuild their city! Or
> deplete our military and National Guard! Or ignore Al-Qaeda!
I could be wrong, but there was no mention of Bush lying to go to war
with Iraq in there. Can you find any?
Joe
Brett A. Pasternack
In other words, you were lying.
WM
Admittedly, I should have led off the second sentence in my remarks with
"For example, it is the task...". My omission. Now that you are armed with
that extra bit of information, I'll leave it to you to apply my remarks
towards any future big picture discussions about Bush, his politics and what
it is about them you don't like. Consider it a one size fits all response to
a one sized fits all diatribe of mindless atacks upon Bush & conservatives -
shall I leave it to chance, no I shall not - whether that concerns WMDs,
wiretaps, Jack Abramoff, election results in FL, etc. etc. etc.
Got it now bub? Great.
WM
Joe Attardi
> Consider it a one size fits all response to
> a one sized fits all diatribe of mindless atacks upon Bush & conservatives -
> shall I leave it to chance, no I shall not - whether that concerns WMDs,
> wiretaps, Jack Abramoff, election results in FL, etc. etc. etc.
>
> Got it now bub? Great.
Got it.
Allow me to, at least, respond to the wiretaps. From the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act
Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney
General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order
under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for
periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing
under oath that-
...snip...
(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will
acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States
person is a party; and
For clarification, the definition of a "United States person":
(i) "United States person" means a citizen of the United States, an
alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence (as defined in section
1101 (a)(20) of title 8), an unincorporated association a substantial
number of members of which are citizens of the United States or aliens
lawfully admitted for permanent residence, or a corporation which is
incorporated in the United States, but does not include a corporation
or an association which is a foreign power, as defined in subsection
(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this section.
To make sure I'm not quoting it out of context, here is the source:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode50/usc_sup_01_50_10_36_20_I.html
Now please read, for example, this article:
http://www.newsobserver.com/114/story/387483.html
Note this sentence: "Even as he delivered a lengthy defense of the
program, Bush stepped back from the seemingly strong opposition he
expressed last month to a public investigation of his decision to allow
the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on communications between
people in the United States, including U.S. citizens, and those in
other countries in suspected terrorism cases."
So, to sum up. He authorized the NSA to eavesdrop on communications
that involve U.S. citizens, who fall under the definition of a "United
States person". So, for this to have gone forward, the Attorney General
would have to certify under oath that there is no substantial
likelihood that these wiretaps would apply to these citizens.
So, either (1) he did swear this under oath, and therefore could be
guilty of perjury, or (2) he did not swear this under oath and thus
this monitoring violates 50 USC Sec. 1802.
Rick
>> He's a liberal...pick a subject, he's probably lying about it.
>
> "Probably" lying about it.
> So in other words, you were just saying it because all the other
> conservatives say it too.
>
Nope, I am saying it from experience with liberals.
Rick
<atlas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1138918368.3...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> The dumb little rightard did exactly as I said:
>
> "make a lame L00ny comeback full of meaningless myths."
>
>
>
Actually no, I simply dismissed you as the retarded, self-deluded liberal
you are.
Rick
> atlasre...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> The dumb little rightard did exactly as I said:
>>
>> "make a lame L00ny comeback full of meaningless myths."
>>
>> You've got no game to fight the truth I posted, L00nboy.
>
> Hehehe. Yup.
>
> Although it's kinda funny. I've been reading some of Rick's other
> posts, and he has some unnatural obsession with the word "lie".
Only because you liberals can't stop yourselves from lying.
Rick
"Brett A. Pasternack" <bret...@erols.com> wrote in message
news:oI6dnd3rgIXtEX_e...@rcn.net...
No, in other words he was lying. Now you are.
Daniel Joseph Min
In fact, anyone who is colluding with, conspiring with, aiding
and abeting, or otherwise supporting terrorists are themselves
subject to the Patriot Act on -equal- par with the terrorists.
Don't believe it? Try contacting some al-Qaeda liaison at the
Al Jazeera network and see how fast your ass gets red flagged
and ALL of your communications--electronic and otherwise--
tapped, surveilled and cross-referenced faster than you can
say "Guantanamo Bay, Baby!"
But of course, the milquetoasts protesting NSA wiretaps-without-
warrants are mainly Liberals, or Republican politicians fearing
narrowing margins in their districts for the mid-term elections.
Liberals fear the wiretaps because of their consistent support
of terrorists and consistent treason against our US Government,
our US Military, and against mainstream Republicans in general.
In fact, let's see if the FBI, CIA, NSA, HLS, et al are getting
"hits" on YOUR conversations, you anti-American Liberal scumbag!
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=100&q=author%3Ajat...@gmail.com&safe=off
Liberal "Joe Attardi" <jatt...@gmail.com> wrote:
><snipped for clarity>
"Atheism -
the *belief* that there is no God, or denial that
God or gods exist." [end quote, emphasis added]
--Webster's New World Dictionary & Thesaurus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQ+KnR5ljD7YrHM/nEQI7GwCbBDNrBlSYveBXfR0sfOBFwI/vFhsAoLTI
5YpZ+KiOeR3Yg1CirFyXUfhm
=fEVr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Rick
<atlas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1138918761....@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Maybe his parents beat him a lot, like his hero O'Reilly.
>
Hero? Sorry no. My heroes put their lives on the line, not just their
mouth.
Joe Attardi
> warrants are mainly Liberals, or Republican politicians fearing
> narrowing margins in their districts for the mid-term elections.
> Liberals fear the wiretaps because of their consistent support
> of terrorists and consistent treason against our US Government,
> our US Military, and against mainstream Republicans in general.
Here we go again. How is disagreeing with the President's policies, or
being opposed to a war, classified as "treason" exactly? Let me
rephrase the question so it's more relevant to our discussion. How is
demanding that the laws of this country be obeyed (i.e. FISA)
treasonous??!!
I don't _fear_ the wiretaps. I have nothing to hide. I am, however,
_opposed_ to them. There is a big difference there. And unlike you, who
apparently has to attack anyone who disagrees with you, I respect your
support of the wiretaps because every man's entitled to his own
opinion.
> In fact, let's see if the FBI, CIA, NSA, HLS, et al are getting
> "hits" on YOUR conversations, you anti-American Liberal scumbag!
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=100&q=author%3Ajat...@gmail.com&safe=off
Yay! You know how to use Google Groups to search for conversations by
me! I hope it made for some interesting reading. What, in my
conversations that you so expertly located, is anti-American? Am I
anti-American because I want the laws to be obeyed, or because I an
opposed to a particular war that we are involved in?
Also, I'm not really a liberal, I'm fairly moderate. I agree with the
Democrats on some things (Iraq war, civil liberties) and with the
Republicans on others (abortion, faith).
Furthermore, who the hell do you think you are to call me un-American?
How do you arrive at the conclusion, after reading a couple of
conversations, that you could possibly know one way or the other about
my political leanings? I question our leaders, whether Democratic OR
Republican, because I love my country, and am proud of it, and don't
want to see powers abused.
Let's sum up what I've done:
(1) Called out "Rick" for accusing the original poster of lying when he
wasn't lying about anything.
(2) Explained my position on the wiretaps, and fully backed up my
assertions from sections of the U.S. Code.
In return, instead of debating the merits of my response, you've
decided instead to:
(1) assume I'm a liberal because I disapprove of some things the
President is doing
(2) call me anti-American when you don't even know me, let alone how I
feel about this country (I love it, by the way)
(3) imply that I'm guilty of treason, simply for disagreeing (?)
(4) imply that somehow I have something to worry about if the FBI, CIA,
NSA, DHS read my conversations. Fine, then they'll know that I am
opposed to this president and that I am interested in computers.
Why can't ANYBODY actually disagree with some facts, or opinions, and
have a real debate, instead of throwing insults and repeating the
mantras of the Republican talking-heads?
Like, seriously. Can you even have a real discussion, or can all you do
is throw the usual insults around?
I'm ready to talk if you want to have a respectful dialogue. If all
you'd do is fire off another salvo of (completely baseless) accusations
and labels, then good day sir.
Also, I don't understand the atheism quote.
Joe Attardi
> >> He's a liberal...pick a subject, he's probably lying about it.
> >
> > In other words, you were lying.
> No, in other words he was lying. Now you are.
Really, Rick. Don't you have any other words in your vocabulary?
Rick
Yep. I use the words that are applicable to the situation.
Joe Attardi
> Yep. I use the words that are applicable to the situation.
Not really. You haven't given anything to back up your assertion that
anyone in this thread is lying...
Daniel Joseph Min
"No Atheists in the foxholes"! You Liberals have dug yourselves
into a very DEEP sinkhole, and those heavy artillery shells are
about to be cascading--raining cats and dogs--upon your heads...
Now that We've permanently seized control of ALL THREE main
branches of our beloved *United States Federal Government*,
all that matters now and from here on out is what We ruling
Republicans think, say and do about who's who & what's what.
Hallelujah! The United States Supreme Court is OURS!
The Communistic Atheistic Liberal Agenda is *TOAST*!
Enjoy Life! (fillet a liberal for lunch)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF13826...@anonymous.poster
Liberal "Joe Attardi" waxed indignant:
><snipped for clarity>
"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem"
--William of Ockham (~1300-1349)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQ+LGO5ljD7YrHM/nEQLqxwCg9YfwZTCS5AOAFY4sJgXO2WmkmgsAnA40
4pRytoxSiZiVlaeuWAuCd8LZ
=Xg4S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Joe Attardi
Good work, your credibility has been shot to shit.
And stop trying to pigeonhole everyone who is not a Republican as
atheist. I love God and am a Christian.
Rick
> So in other words, you have nothing to respond to my previous post.
Perhaps your post wasn't worth much of a response. Ever consider that?
Joe Attardi
> Perhaps your post wasn't worth much of a response. Ever consider that?
you, right Rick?
All sarcasm aside though, why is it not worth responding to?
All I did was cite U.S. LAW to back up my opinion. I can't see how that
isn't 'worth responding to', unless you don't have anything to come
back with?
Daniel Joseph Min
Good. Please killfile me and every other Republican who
sees right through you & yours' abjectly-failed Liberal
obfuscation tactics! Liberals simply don't matter--that
is, unless you're an extraordinarily gifted artist who
works in syndicated television, major motion pictures,
music, fine arts, martial arts, sports, athletics, or
any other respected and popular *artistic* industry of
your choice; in which case, please feel free to share
your efforts so that the rest of us may enjoy it, too. :-D
Enjoy Life! (fillet a liberal for lunch)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF13826...@anonymous.poster
PS Sorry, but I had to killfile you because you used
a nasty word. Besides, I don't HAVE to care what
you or any non-artistic Liberals think, say or do. :-D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQ+Lae5ljD7YrHM/nEQLHAQCgh2kevQdMsPDYpHkpUidyLojvjFAAoN4z
ahU3IfPh1PIOVbkw1PvKLfGm
=QtKe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Joe Attardi
> Good. Please killfile me and every other Republican who
> sees right through you & yours' abjectly-failed Liberal
> obfuscation tactics! Liberals simply don't matter--that
with the president, that has demonstrated me to be a liberal? Please
answer me that.
Also, obfuscation tactics? What the hell are you even talking about?
I'm asking what is wrong about my interpretation of the law. How is
that obfuscation?! I just want an answer to my question!!
So:
(1) What makes you say I am a liberal? Liberal doesn't mean "a person
that disagrees with Republicans", so unless you know more about my
political views, you are making an idiotic generalization.
(2) What am I allegedly obfuscating?
atlas...@yahoo.com
You don't get to throw the word around.
Your hero is a liar and a traitor.
What does that make you?
Rick
> Rick wrote:
>> Perhaps your post wasn't worth much of a response. Ever consider that?
> Well, of course! Nobody is worth responding to unless they agree with
> you, right Rick?
>
Not me, it's reality they should agree with. I happen to agree with
reality.
Rick
<atlas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1138963729.3...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Sorry, you're a supporter of the greatest liar in American history.
>
No, I don't support Michael Moore.
Aaron
Every time you do this, you're just flinging our claims about Bush's
administration being a pack of liars right back in our faces. This is a
very weak argument. We claim you are lying, so you say we are lying
about you lying. Lame.
If you're going to act like a preschooler, then I guess I'll have to
stoop to your level:
Try this on for size:
We said it first!
Or how about:
No we're not. You're liars infinity!
Try to keep the discussion on facts...if you can.
-Aaron
Aaron
Daniel Joseph Min wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Good. Please killfile me and every other Republican who
> sees right through you & yours' abjectly-failed Liberal
> obfuscation tactics!
Why not? You do the same thing.g
> PS Sorry, but I had to killfile you because you used
> a nasty word. Besides, I don't HAVE to care what
> you or any non-artistic Liberals think, say or do. :-D
I'm an artistic liberal. I have great talent in music. Now, you must
listen to what I think, say, and do.
-Aaron
atlas...@yahoo.com
tee-shirt! Or commit treason and reveal the identity of an intelligence
officer! Or lobby for more tax cuts for the rich! Or lie to some
citizens of New Orleans and say you'll help rebuild their city! Or
deplete our military and National Guard! Or ignore Al-Qaeda!
Now make a lame L00ny comeback full of meaningless myths!
Rick
"Aaron" <aaro...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1138973457....@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Rick wrote:
>> "Joe Attardi" <jatt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1138918529....@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>> > atlasre...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> >> The dumb little rightard did exactly as I said:
>> >>
>> >> "make a lame L00ny comeback full of meaningless myths."
>> >>
>> >> You've got no game to fight the truth I posted, L00nboy.
>> >
>> > Hehehe. Yup.
>> >
>> > Although it's kinda funny. I've been reading some of Rick's other
>> > posts, and he has some unnatural obsession with the word "lie".
>>
>> Only because you liberals can't stop yourselves from lying.
>
> Every time you do this, you're just flinging our claims about Bush's
> administration being a pack of liars right back in our faces.
Which is right where such unsupported claims belong.
Rick
<atlas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1138973782.9...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Go tap someone's phone already! Or maybe arrest someone for wearing a
> tee-shirt! Or commit treason and reveal the identity of an intelligence
> officer!
You mean like Democratic Senator Pat Leahy did, resulting in their deaths?
>Or ignore Al-Qaeda!
>
Naw, I'll leave that to Bill Clinton. He did it so well for 7 years.
Aaron
Rick wrote:
The point, Rick, is that you are just playing "I know you are, but what
am I?"
Except, you don't even ask "what am I?"
Get a life. It's pretty nice...I can attest to that.
I apologize for top posting. Rick's snipping tricks necessitate it.
> > Every time you do this, you're just flinging our claims about Bush's
> > administration being a pack of liars right back in our faces.
>
> Which is right where such unsupported claims belong.
Congratulations, you passed the first grade exam in snipping posts to
show only what you want them to show.
-Aaron
Aaron
Lies. You're a liar.
-Aaron
robin hood zoro
Daniel Joseph Min wrote:
>Liberals fear the wiretaps because of their consistent support
>of terrorists and consistent treason against our US Government,
>our US Military, and against mainstream Republicans in general.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=rove+treasongate&btnG=Google+Search
I did the google for you since you seem to be menatlly handicapped.
Rick
Rick
>
> Rick wrote:
>
> The point, Rick, is that you are just playing "I know you are, but what
> am I?"
>
Nope. I am stating the facts in the face of your lies and propaganda. Don't
like it? Stop repeating the lies and propaganda.
Buck Fush
"robin hood zoro" <robinh...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1138990275.9...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
> Daniel Joseph Min wrote:
>>Liberals fear the wiretaps because of their consistent support
>>of terrorists and consistent treason against our US Government,
>>our US Military, and against mainstream Republicans in general.
Actually, it's the disregard of the Constitution and warrantless seizure of
freedom and privacy that most oppose.
Aaron
Rick wrote:
> "Aaron" <aaro...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1138985958.2...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Rick wrote:
> >
> > The point, Rick, is that you are just playing "I know you are, but what
> > am I?"
> >
>
>
> Nope. I am stating the facts in the face of your lies and propaganda.
You are lying.
Aaron
Daniel Joseph Min wrote:
> Now that We've permanently seized control of ALL THREE main
> branches of our beloved *United States Federal Government*,
*stores message until 2007, when "permanently" will take on a new
meaning*
Idiot.
-Aaron
Joe Attardi
> There you go.
Rick is cracking me up. Instead of coming back with any reasonable
arguments, he just changes the subject line and thinks he's so clever.
Ouch, Rick, you really showed us.
Aaron
Careful. Now he's going to call you a liar! It's too bad we don't have
thick skulls and skin like our elephant counterparts. I don't know what
I'm going to do when he calls me a liar again!
-Aaron
Rick
> Rick wrote:
>> There you go.
>
> Rick is cracking me up.
Oh I don't know...you sound as if you may have been cracked already.
Rick
Rick
"Buck Fush" <amish...@verSPAMBLOCKizon.net> wrote in message
news:VCOEf.2066$%i3.1278@trnddc02...
without their head up Michael Moore's ass knows.
Rick
Nope. Too much work to lie. Easier to remember the truth.
Brett A. Pasternack
> "Brett A. Pasternack" <bret...@erols.com> wrote in message
> news:oI6dnd3rgIXtEX_e...@rcn.net...>>>news:1138916849.8...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Rick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>There, fixed the title for you, dickhead.
>>>>
>>>>What exactly was he lying about, Rick?
>>>
>>>
>>>He's a liberal...pick a subject, he's probably lying about it.
>>
>>In other words, you were lying.
>
>
> No, in other words he was lying. Now you are.
No, you were lying. You were asked to support your claim, and you not
only failed to support it, but you essentially admitted that it was just
a default assumption on your part.
If you weren't lying, you'd be able to support your claims. Until you
can, you're just a liar.
Buck Fush
"Rick" <rikw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:RaSEf.7826$g47...@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
None of that applies? Who exactly has their head up someone's ass here?
Dano
hold? I know I didn't vote for him. Or did you mean support him, like claim
him as a dependent?
Rick
"Buck Fush" <amish...@verSPAMBLOCKizon.net> wrote in message
That would be you, still. Not likely to change anytime soon either.
Rick
> Rick wrote:
>> "Brett A. Pasternack" <bret...@erols.com> wrote in message
>> news:oI6dnd3rgIXtEX_e...@rcn.net...
>>
>>>Rick wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Joe Attardi" <jatt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:1138916849.8...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Rick wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>There, fixed the title for you, dickhead.
>>>>>
>>>>>What exactly was he lying about, Rick?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>He's a liberal...pick a subject, he's probably lying about it.
>>>
>>>In other words, you were lying.
>>
>>
>> No, in other words he was lying. Now you are.
>
> No, you were lying.
No, I haven't lied once. But you just lied again.
Rick
"Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:r--dnYQxR4J...@comcast.com...
I mean support him as in invite him to the Democratic convention...
Brett A. Pasternack
> "Brett A. Pasternack" <bret...@erols.com> wrote in message
> news:prudndd2LbcNYX7e...@rcn.net...
>
>>Rick wrote:
>>
>>>"Brett A. Pasternack" <bret...@erols.com> wrote in message
>>>news:oI6dnd3rgIXtEX_e...@rcn.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Rick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Joe Attardi" <jatt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:1138916849.8...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Rick wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There, fixed the title for you, dickhead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What exactly was he lying about, Rick?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>He's a liberal...pick a subject, he's probably lying about it.
>>>>
>>>>In other words, you were lying.
>>>
>>>
>>>No, in other words he was lying. Now you are.
>>
>>No, you were lying.
>
>
> No, I haven't lied once. But you just lied again.
Then why did you snip the rest of the post. Oh, sure, you'll go, "oh, I
snip idiocy." But that's nonsense; you snipped it because it proves you
wrong.
You lied, I proved it, and you had no response. Deal with it.
atlas...@yahoo.com
Just like his Un-American hero Bush, they're both fringe. That's why
their ratings are in the toilet.
The majority of Americans hate Bush, and would no doubt hate Rick too.
How does that make you feel, shrimp-boy?
George Kerby
On 2/5/06 12:12 AM, in article
1139119978.0...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
"atlas...@yahoo.com" <atlas...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Rick is a liar and a traitor. And everyone knows it.
>
> Just like his Un-American hero Bush, they're both fringe. That's why
> their ratings are in the toilet.
>
Hmmm.... I did not know that Rick HAD ratings. What show would that be?
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Rick
<atlas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1139119978.0...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Rick is a liar and a traitor. And everyone knows it.
>
> Just like his Un-American hero Bush, they're both fringe. That's why
> their ratings are in the toilet.
>
> The majority of Americans hate Bush, and would no doubt hate Rick too.
>
> How does that make you feel, shrimp-boy?
>
Greatly amused. Please, do go on...I haven't laughed this hard since Nov
3rd, 2004.
Rick
<atlas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1138963515.6...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> Sorry, you're a supporter of the greatest liar in American history.
>
>
> Your hero is a liar and a traitor.
>
> What does that make you?
>
Right. And you wrong.
atlas...@yahoo.com
That's right folks, Rick thinks it's funny to be un-American and a
traitor.
Aaron
When did you laugh harder? When Kerry admitted defeat, or when Bush
gave the finger in response to the off-the-record question, "What do
you have to say to all those who didn't want you to get re-elected?"
That FY gesture really summed up his presidency, I think.
And no, I'm not lying. I saw it. Several times.
-Aaron
Aaron
Rick wrote:
> "Brett A. Pasternack" <bret...@erols.com> wrote in message
> news:prudndd2LbcNYX7e...@rcn.net...
> > Rick wrote:
> >> "Brett A. Pasternack" <bret...@erols.com> wrote in message
> >> news:oI6dnd3rgIXtEX_e...@rcn.net...
> >>
> >>>Rick wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>"Joe Attardi" <jatt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:1138916849.8...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Rick wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>There, fixed the title for you, dickhead.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>What exactly was he lying about, Rick?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>He's a liberal...pick a subject, he's probably lying about it.
> >>>
> >>>In other words, you were lying.
> >>
> >>
> >> No, in other words he was lying. Now you are.
> >
> > No, you were lying.
>
> No, I haven't lied once. But you just lied again.
You lied when you said the Bush Administration hasn't lied.
That is a lie. That was enough to i.d. you as a Republican.
-Aaron
Aaron
Liar.
-Aaron
Rick
No you misunderstand...I wasn't the one about to cry. In fact, you really
do make me laugh.
Rick
<atlas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1139199693....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> That's right folks, Rick thinks it's funny to be un-American and a
> traitor.
>
>
That's why I find you so amusing.
Rick
Nope. You're lying when you say that, liar.
Rick
>
> Rick wrote:
>> <atlas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1139119978.0...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > Rick is a liar and a traitor. And everyone knows it.
>> >
>> > Just like his Un-American hero Bush, they're both fringe. That's why
>> > their ratings are in the toilet.
>> >
>> > The majority of Americans hate Bush, and would no doubt hate Rick too.
>> >
>> > How does that make you feel, shrimp-boy?
>> >
>>
>>
>> Greatly amused. Please, do go on...I haven't laughed this hard since Nov
>> 3rd, 2004.
>
> When did you laugh harder? When Kerry admitted defeat, or when Bush
> gave the finger in response to the off-the-record question, "What do
> you have to say to all those who didn't want you to get re-elected?"
>
Oh, either one was good. Frankly, I loved metaphorically giving the finger
to all the effette Euroweenies who were desperate for a more socialist
president in the US.
Obwon
<amish...@verSPAMBLOCKizon.net> wrote:
>
>"robin hood zoro" <robinh...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1138990275.9...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Daniel Joseph Min wrote:
>>>Liberals fear the wiretaps because of their consistent support
>>>of terrorists and consistent treason against our US Government,
>>>our US Military, and against mainstream Republicans in general.
>
>Actually, it's the disregard of the Constitution and warrantless seizure of
>freedom and privacy that most oppose.
>
Bush seems to think we can still have a democracy
with a lawless, unaccountable executive running the
show. How foolish can one get?
Obwon
0[ZZ-reading in nyc.politics-ZZZZZZZZ]0
Liars share with those they deceive
the desire not to be deceived.
--Sissela Bok
0[ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ]0
Obwon
They both apply!
Obwon
Don't mind the child, he clearly isn't a responsible
person, otherwise how could he post something so
clearly untrue?
Rick
"Obwon" <obl...@att.net> wrote in message
news:e71fu1hlcdd6vl2ti...@4ax.com...
> Bush seems to think we can still have a democracy
> with a lawless, unaccountable executive running the
> show. How foolish can one get?
>
Well, it worked for Clinton...
Rick
> On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 00:02:57 GMT, "Rick"
> <rikw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Buck Fush" <amish...@verSPAMBLOCKizon.net> wrote in message
>>news:VCOEf.2066$%i3.1278@trnddc02...
>>>
>>> "robin hood zoro" <robinh...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1138990275.9...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>> Daniel Joseph Min wrote:
>>>>>Liberals fear the wiretaps because of their consistent support
>>>>>of terrorists and consistent treason against our US Government,
>>>>>our US Military, and against mainstream Republicans in general.
>>>
>>> Actually, it's the disregard of the Constitution and warrantless seizure
>>> of freedom and privacy that most oppose.
>>>
>>Damned good thing neither of those applies to this situation, as anyone
>>without their head up Michael Moore's ass knows.
>>
> They both apply!
>
Nope, neither one applies.
Rick
> Don't mind the child, he clearly isn't a responsible
> person, otherwise how could he post something so
> clearly untrue?
>
I dunno...you're a liberal whackjob, tell me your secret for repeating
obvious lies with a straight face.
Aaron
When you tell one lie, it leads to another. Then, you've told two lies,
to cover each other...
That should be the motto for you Republicans.
-Aaron
Rick
>
> > When you tell one lie, it leads to another.
You'd know more about that than I. You make lying a policy, while I
actively avoid it.
Aaron
All of your policies are lies, Republican. And you never avoid it, even
when you post on this newsgroup.
-Aaron
Rick
Nope, that would be yet another lie from you.
Sid9
You lose.
Rick
"Sid9" <si...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:OxMFf.21085$vp6....@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
No, I already won. In fact, I won before I even began toying with you poor,
pitiful liberals.
Aaron
The sad thing is that you will one day realize that, in fact, we have
all lost, thanks to you and others like you.
-Aaron
Aaron
Rick wrote:
> "Aaron" <aaro...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1139250214.9...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Rick wrote:
> >> "Aaron" <aaro...@msn.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1139249864....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > > When you tell one lie, it leads to another.
> >>
> >> You'd know more about that than I. You make lying a policy, while I
> >> actively avoid it.
> >
> > All of your policies are lies, Republican. And you never avoid it, even
> > when you post on this newsgroup.
> >
>
>
> Nope, that would be yet another lie from you.
"I never tell a lie." And that is the truth.
-Aaron
Rick
> "I never tell a lie." And that is the truth.
No, you just repeat the lies of those more devious than you.
Rick
>
>> The sad thing is that you will one day realize that, in fact, we have
> all lost, thanks to you and others like you.
>
No, one day I hope to discover that idiots like you have been bred out of
the gene pool.
Brett A. Pasternack
Nonsense. Clinton only lied about his personal life. As chief executive,
he followed the law and was accountable for his actions.
Brett A. Pasternack
You've ignoring all the substantive points, and just saying "liar, liar"
over and over.
It's quite obvious that you've been proven to be the liar, and you know it.
Rick
"Brett A. Pasternack" <bret...@erols.com> wrote in message
> You've ignoring all the substantive points
Haven't had to, because no one has made any except for me.
Aaron
Liar.
Brett A. Pasternack
You're full of shit.
You accused Joe of lying, then failed to provide any support for your
claim. That's the major substantive point here. You're not addressing it.
Obwon
Poor thing... You've got no one decent to talk
with, eh? Will you ever figure out why? I don't think
so. Pity.
Rick
> Poor thing... You've got no one decent to talk
> with, eh?
Not on this group...just lying liberal losers like you.
Aaron
Ignore him. He hasn't the capacity for listening to others and
reasoning out conflicts of information.
Rick thinks that everything he knows right now is true, now and
forever, and anyone who knows otherwise is lying.
-Aaron
Rick
>
> Rick wrote:
>> "Obwon" <obl...@att.net> wrote in message
>> news:9l6ku1lo11mkgm9a1...@4ax.com...
>> > Poor thing... You've got no one decent to talk
>> > with, eh?
>>
>> Not on this group...just lying liberal losers like you.
>
> Ignore him.
Okay, I will. I guess I should ignore you too, Captain Crunch. Or were you
Admiral Benbow?