Bill
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Posting to alt.tv.the-practice on Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:36:45 GMT. And then gil...@my-dejanews.com saith:
: Could somebody perhaps explain how a judge has the power to order someone to
: drop his pants in court and define it as contempt if he refuses? I loved the
: scenario with this creep ... but wonder how true-to-life it is.
Probably as true to life as holding a defense lawyer in contempt just for
doing his job. He didn't get the words "Objection" out before she ordered
the baliff to haul him into jail.
And when will we see a balliff *not* respond to a judge's order. I know
probably never, but at what point does it become "I was just following
orders"?
: Bill
: -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
: http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
To...@Fred.Net http://www.fred.net/tomr
The ship sank, the South lost, and the sled got tossed in the fire.
Get over it.
RIP Mr. Coffee - 1914-1999
>He didn't get the words "Objection" out before she ordered
>the baliff to haul him into jail.
>
>And when will we see a balliff *not* respond to a judge's order. I know
>probably never, but at what point does it become "I was just following
>orders"?
If the bailiff saw the web site, maybe he felt the judge would reward him
with a little "Jimmy action" as a boner bonus (assuming, of course, that he is
heterosexual).
By the way, I won't think of her as a psycho judge anymore. On the 4/18
episode, she showed a heroic side of herself that we did not know existed
(whether what she did was legal I don't know). As I was watching, I got the
distinct impression that millions of women were on their feet cheering and
wanting to write in Judge Roberta Kittleson's name for President!
[Then they woke up and realized it was just a TV show -- aw, shucks!].
Overall, the judge is a complicated person.
-->Phil Goldmarx
**** Posted from RemarQ - http://www.remarq.com - Discussions Start Here (tm) ****
If you think that's worthy of disbarrment (for me, it's when Eugene beats up
his own client in the courtroom), then everybody should be off the show.
Lewis.
That was already established. Remember the scene where she doodled on Lindsay
in a picture with Bobby? She's, as Mel Brooks would say, N-V-T-S.
> On the other hand, indecent exposure (what the super was ordered
> to do) is not a lawful act.
> --
> David Chesler
Had he been wearing drawers, as one would normally expect, it wouldn't have
been an order to commit indecent exposure. Of course, after seeing he wasn't
wearing any, she made him keep the pants down and shuffle out of the room in
full view (of at least his backside), so your point is taken. I agree with
another poster. Kittleson is a complicated character. Or at least a
character with complications. From most of the comments I've seen, this ep
has now shifted opinion of her from "all bad and dangerous" to either
"heroic", or "nuts but with redeeming instincts". I find that interesting.
- -
Elizabeth H.
Ra
<gil...@my-dejanews.com> wrote in message
news:7fff1s$bc4$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com...
> Could somebody perhaps explain how a judge has the power to order someone
to
> drop his pants in court and define it as contempt if he refuses? I loved
the
> scenario with this creep ... but wonder how true-to-life it is.
>
> Bill