Annexation of ATT,ATSL
dawnems
alt.tv.strange-luck
As of January 2, 2001, 11:55 PM
proclaim this group to now be a hacking discussion board .
FAQ to follow within 24 hours of annexation.
ramalane
God!" :o)
/ramalane
--
Powered by AMD Athlon 1GHz processor
Protected by ConSeal PC Firewall 2.09
Pleased with OstroSoft Network Tools 5.2
Pissed off at the rest of the World I don't own
"dawnems" <daw...@att.net> wrote in message
news:3A5288C9...@att.net...
ramalane
/ramalane, Emperor of alt.tv.jerry-springer
--
Powered by AMD Athlon 1GHz processor
Protected by ConSeal PC Firewall 2.09
Pleased with OstroSoft Network Tools 5.2
Pimping a.t.j-s just because I can...
"dawnems" <daw...@att.net> wrote in message
news:3A52C15A...@att.net...
>
>
> ramalane wrote:
>
> > "It's alive! I tellyou, it's alive! Now I know what it feels like to be
> > God!" :o)
>
> MWAHAHAHA You asshole..
> I'll trade ya..alt.tv.tekwar and alt.tv.strange-luck
> For alt.tv.jerry-springer
hadron
>ramalane wrote:
>> If you throw in Australia and a blow job then you've got a deal!
>To high of a price..;)
Not for me, Australia is worthless[1], and Bitey owes me a BJ, but i
don't want to find out how sharp those teeth really are...
1. Disarming the public, then passing the Defense Legislation Amendment
Bill 2000, which basically authorizes the army to use lethal force
against civilians. i once thought it might be a nice place to move,
but now i doubt i will ever set foot there.
danny bean
dawnems wrote in message <3A52C216...@att.net>...
>I also have alt.captain.sarcastic...;)
>
>dawnems wrote:
>
>> ramalane wrote:
>>
>> > "It's alive! I tellyou, it's alive! Now I know what it feels like to be
>> > God!" :o)
>>
>> MWAHAHAHA You asshole..
>> I'll trade ya..alt.tv.tekwar and alt.tv.strange-luck
>> For alt.tv.jerry-springer
>>
>> >
>> >
Bitey
"hadron" <had...@antisocial.com> wrote:
> dawnems <daw...@att.net> wrote:
>>ramalane wrote:
>
>>> If you throw in Australia and a blow job then you've got a deal!
>
>>To high of a price..;)
>
> Not for me, Australia is worthless[1], and Bitey owes me a BJ, but
> i don't want to find out how sharp those teeth really are...
All declines of service from a Bitey thingy have to be made good by
the referrer. Enjoy!
>
> 1. Disarming the public, then passing the Defense Legislation
> Amendment
> Bill 2000, which basically authorizes the army to use lethal
> force against civilians. i once thought it might be a nice place
> to move, but now i doubt i will ever set foot there.
--
-=Bitey=-
Http://Biteybits.port5.com
Meddle ye not in the affairs of Bitey, mortal, for
thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
hadron
>In article <9gi55t0u8ukl8gi7u...@news.alt.net>,
>"hadron" <had...@antisocial.com> wrote:
>>Bitey owes me a BJ
>All declines of service from a Bitey thingy have to be made good by
>the referrer. Enjoy!
To hell with you and your contractual lawyer speak.
overfl0w
> Not for me, Australia is worthless[1], and Bitey owes me a BJ, but i
> don't want to find out how sharp those teeth really are...
Hey! I live there.
> 1. Disarming the public, then passing the Defense Legislation Amendment
> Bill 2000, which basically authorizes the army to use lethal force
> against civilians. i once thought it might be a nice place to move,
> but now i doubt i will ever set foot there.
Anyone is legally able to use lethal force in self defence. The armed
forces can also use lethal force as a last resort, just as the police do.
(I'm in the Army Reserve, by the way.)
--
Emperor overfl0w of xcc.misc
(aka c0redump)
E-mail: overfl0w@(damnihatespam)subdimension.com
Usenet: alt.hackers.malicious
*beep* *beep *beeeeeeeeepppp...*
_/\ ____/\ _________________________
\/ \/
hadron
>Anyone is legally able to use lethal force in self defence. The armed
>forces can also use lethal force as a last resort, just as the police do.
As i understand the Australian law, it allows warrantless searches of
both homes and vehicles. And aren't guns, for the most part, illegal to
the general populous? You will need to be well trained, in both arms and
the law, to be able to use lethal force against an army that legally has
the right to use any "necessary force" to suppress civil unrest. and i
find their definitions of such things to be so vague that they can apply
to far too many situations.
BeH
in 45 carefully crafted lines by -AD- :
>So, 'danny bean' (if that really is your name), let the record show that
>on Wed, 03 Jan 2001 07:22:55 GMT while under oath you submitted the
>following in evidence to this court:
>I'll play you rock-paper-scissors for it..
That's not the Jerry Springer spirit!!1!
BeH