what did JT whisper to Stephen at end of reunion?
rick++
but was cut off by Jeff. Isnt this against the rules?
number6
> Also JT said something about sharing money with Stephen,
> but was cut off by Jeff. Isnt this against the rules?
Definitely against the rules ... they are filmed and watched all the
time ... and if there was any inkling of any deal before the game was
over they'd have both been tossed on their asses ...
I think that Stephen being involved in corporate life in Manhattan can
bring some investment opportunities to a Southern cattle rancher ...
Either as a financial advisor or in some partnership ... Post game ...
that is fine ...
madams53
"number6" <snum...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9824485b-b884-4a1d...@g20g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
On May 18, 10:57 am, "rick++" <rick...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Also JT said something about sharing money with Stephen,
> but was cut off by Jeff. Isnt this against the rules?
Definitely against the rules ... they are filmed and watched all the
time ... and if there was any inkling of any deal before the game was
over they'd have both been tossed on their asses ...
>
>
>
Yes, just like Rob and Amber were. That has always irritated me. I guess
sharing the money is ok as long as Survivor can get a cheesy proposal moment
out of it.
--
madamS
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject."
Sir Winston Churchill
7 LAMPSTICKS 7 FEASTS 7 AGES OF DISPENSATION 7 SEALS 7 TRUMPETS 7 BOWLS
> Also JT said something about sharing money with Stephen,
> but was cut off by Jeff. Isnt this against the rules?
I doubt JT "gave" any money to Stephen, but I wouldn't be surprised if
they have discussed business deals and JT said "we can use this for
that."
People don't give away $100,000.
Steven L.
> "number6" <snum...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:9824485b-b884-4a1d...@g20g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
> On May 18, 10:57 am, "rick++" <rick...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Also JT said something about sharing money with Stephen,
>> but was cut off by Jeff. Isnt this against the rules?
>
> Definitely against the rules ... they are filmed and watched all the
> time ... and if there was any inkling of any deal before the game was
> over they'd have both been tossed on their asses ...
>>
>>
> Yes, just like Rob and Amber were. That has always irritated me. I guess
> sharing the money is ok as long as Survivor can get a cheesy proposal moment
> out of it.
Rob's proposal to Amber came after all the votes had been cast. Hence,
it didn't affect the game.
--
Steven L.
Email: sdli...@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
do...@webtv.net
About Rob and Amber...'The Madam' said:
"...That has always irritated me. I guess sharing the money is ok as
long as Survivor can get a cheesy proposal moment out of it."
Maybe Stephen can take JT to Maine and propose.
(Why Maine? Cuz of L.L. Bean...they could register there.)
do...@webtv.net
"To directly share (give) your winnings is against the rules. To invest
your money and have a co-player as a partner is probably not."
Kee-rect! Just like with 'chips', right buddy? <wink wink>
do...@webtv.net
'The Madam' said...Rob and Amber again...
"That has always irritated me. I guess sharing the money is ok as long
as Survivor can get a cheesy proposal moment out of it."
Maybe JT whispered 'I love you' to Stephen.
It was a beautiful thing.
During the commercial break...Stephen said...'I'll tell my MOM...'Mrs.
C.'
7 LAMPSTICKS 7 FEASTS 7 AGES OF DISPENSATION 7 SEALS 7 TRUMPETS 7 BOWLS
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 07:57:24 -0700 (PDT), "rick++"
>
> <rick...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >Also JT said something about sharing money with Stephen,
> >but was cut off by Jeff. Isnt this against the rules?
>
> invest your money and have a co-player as a partner is probably not.
Think of BB10 and the Renegades.
7 LAMPSTICKS 7 FEASTS 7 AGES OF DISPENSATION 7 SEALS 7 TRUMPETS 7 BOWLS
DW beat me fair and square ;)
blue...@mindspring.com
"I wish I knew how to quit you"
AL000
"D-W" <DWF...@hotmail.com> wrote
> To directly share (give) your winnings is against the rules. To
> invest your money and have a co-player as a partner is probably not.
The winner can do whatever he wants with the money after the game is over,
even give the runner up the whole million. They just can't make any deals
during the game.
do...@webtv.net
Dubya said:
"But I think Stephen will have better investment ideas."
So you mean that Stephen's idea wouldn't be to make T-Shirts with JT's
picture...with 'I'm a winner' underneath?
Stephen went to YALE for god's sake.
He'd have a picture of JT with:
"I screwed Stephen" underneath.
:-) Even "I" like THAT one. :-)
do...@webtv.net
blueship zeroed in on what JT said to Stephen at the finale:
"I wish I knew how to quit you"
Sad but true.
derrick lawrence
> Also JT said something about sharing money with Stephen,
> but was cut off by Jeff. Isnt this against the rules?
madams53
"Steven L." <sdli...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b5GdnbQ1e9Q4CYzX...@earthlink.com...
> madams53 wrote:
>> "number6" <snum...@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:9824485b-b884-4a1d...@g20g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
>> On May 18, 10:57 am, "rick++" <rick...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Also JT said something about sharing money with Stephen,
>>> but was cut off by Jeff. Isnt this against the rules?
>>
>> Definitely against the rules ... they are filmed and watched all the
>> time ... and if there was any inkling of any deal before the game was
>> over they'd have both been tossed on their asses ...
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, just like Rob and Amber were. That has always irritated me. I guess
>> sharing the money is ok as long as Survivor can get a cheesy proposal
>> moment out of it.
>
> Rob's proposal to Amber came after all the votes had been cast. Hence, it
> didn't affect the game.
>
>
going to share the money in one form or another. That's what aggravated me.
bob wald
bob wald
quick to say no. you dont owe me anything...
i think the whispering had to do with that....
Steven L.
Only if Rob's infatuation with Amber lasted beyond their stay in Panama.
(We've had other trysts on Survivor that didn't last beyond the game.)
In which case Amber wouldn't have shared a penny with Rob.
In fact, we still don't know what Amber did with the prize money. Is it
in trust for herself, or is it in a joint account with Rob?
Steven L.
> Also JT said something about sharing money with Stephen,
> but was cut off by Jeff. Isnt this against the rules?
Players are not allowed to conspire *during the game* to share the prize
money as part of any kind of deal.
What a player decides after the final TC votes have been cast is
entirely up to him. He could donate the whole thing to another player,
for example.
madams53
"D-W" <DWF...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4v2415lpe4svaja9f...@4ax.com...
> to decide which one should "officially" get the check. As I recall,
> they were also the first F-2 who both received a car along the way.
>
>
Yes, but the team effort is against the spirit of sole survivor. I know it
was officially accepted, I just hated it.
Steven L.
I was noticing that at the Reunion: Neither J.T. nor Stephen had a
girlfriend there.
And come to think of it, during the game, neither one of them flirted
with the female Survivors either.
spam...@example.com
> madams53 wrote:
> > True, but proposal or not, marriage or not, I think everybody knew
> > they were going to share the money in one form or another. That's
> > what aggravated me.
> In fact, we still don't know what Amber did with the prize money. Is
> it in trust for herself, or is it in a joint account with Rob?
Since it was awarded - therefore earned and owned *before*
they got married - it's a pre-marital asset. Depending on
the state in which they live and how that asset is managed,
it may remain distinctly hers after they get married and
even if they get divorced afterwards.
At this point, though, presumably that's only a small part
of their combined assets. They've been on several other
reality shows etc. etc. And who knows what she did with the
after-tax cash left over from that first million - probably
took home only about $600k, immediately pissed away a couple
of hundred on celebrations, gifts, etc.
--
Steven L.
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:14:02 -0400, "Steven L."
> <sdli...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> do...@webtv.net wrote:
>>> blueship zeroed in on what JT said to Stephen at the finale:
>>>
>>> "I wish I knew how to quit you"
>>>
>>>
>>> Sad but true.
>> I was noticing that at the Reunion: Neither J.T. nor Stephen had a
>> girlfriend there.
>>
>> And come to think of it, during the game, neither one of them flirted
>> with the female Survivors either.
>
>
No, not that I can recall.
I'm not suggesting that they're gay.
But they might be what we used to call "mama's boys."
Steven L.
after the party,
stop by my hotel room."
robert underhill
D-W <DWF...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:12:41 -0500, "madams53"
> <mada...@somewhere.net> wrote:
>
> >
> Well, it WAS a team effort to end up as the F-2, leaving the jury only
> to decide which one should "officially" get the check. As I recall,
> they were also the first F-2 who both received a car along the way.
And at one point Rob interviewed about spending his money if he won, or
spending her money if she won.
--
Bob Underhill