'Survivor' tale of woe contested back home
By Andrew Ryan, Globe Staff | December 18, 2007
Denise Martin became a blue-collar folk hero on the television program
"Survivor: China," selling herself as a hardworking lunch lady from
Douglas who earned $7 an hour serving mystery meat in an elementary
school cafeteria.
During the live broadcast of the show's finale Sunday, Martin's
hard-luck story got a little harder: She described being demoted because
she had become too popular at Douglas Intermediate Elementary School.
"They didn't give me my job back," said Martin, 40, who finished fourth
in the reality show and missed the $1 million grand prize. "I'm a
janitor now. I clean toilets. I wash the floors in the bathroom. I
vacuum the kids' rugs."
The producer surprised Martin with $50,000 to help "get her life back,"
but her story is not sitting well in Douglas.
"None of that is true," said schools Superintendent Nancy T. Lane, who,
like many in the rural town 50 miles southwest of Boston, had been
faithfully watching the show. "It made me sit up on the couch . . .
flabbergasted."
Lane said Martin was hired as a cafeteria worker at $7.37 an hour in
2004, but was promoted on March 30 this year to janitor, a job that now
pays her more than $17 an hour. The promotion to janitor, Lane said,
came before Martin even tried out for "Survivor."
Martin could not be reached yesterday for comment. Lane said Martin
apologized yesterday by phone from Hollywood.
Since the finale aired on CBS, the computer server at the Douglas Public
Schools office has crashed under thousands of "vitriolic" e-mails from
as far away as South Korea.
Lane spent much of her day on the phone with a lawyer for CBS, but was
given little solace.
"They did explain to me today that reality doesn't necessarily mean
factual," she said.
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/12/18/survivor_tale_of_woe_contested_back_home/
[
Well, some folks have always claimed that Survivor is fake. Maybe they
were right just this once.
]
--
Steven L.
Email: sdli...@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
Survivor isn't the 'fake', though. Denise is the fake.
The only question I have is: why has she not yet been fired? It is silly
for the school district to put up with this for even 1 day. No doubt, they
are waiting for the Christmas break so they can remove her from employment
and have 2 weeks of non-school time for the publicity to die down.
but maybe the puppet master in THIS scam was Fatty McHusband.
:-)
Fired for what? Playing a game?
Unsure what that last comment is supposed to mean, but I think
Denise's quote about reality versus fact is interesting. Evidently
her previous understanding was that reality could be "made up" as
needed ???
Do you remember this classic game show (today we might consider it a
reality show):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_for_a_Day
Denise just reinvented it--and won it.
> but I think
> Denise's quote about reality versus fact is interesting.
That quote was from Ms. Lane, Denise's employer.
Sounded delightfully postmodern, didn't it.
> The only question I have is: why has she not yet been fired? It is silly
> for the school district to put up with this for even 1 day. No doubt, they
> are waiting for the Christmas break so they can remove her from employment
> and have 2 weeks of non-school time for the publicity to die down.
She's a government employee, not an independent contractor, yes? So
presumably there's a long due process they have to go through before she
can be fired.
All Denise did was lie about her employer's behavior (the local
government) in public. It won't be easy to get her fired just for that.
In fact, it happens all the time, as you hear on the news.
Whistleblower laws and other protections make it difficult to fire a
government employee just for griping about how she's treated on the job.
If Denise had been telling the truth, she would definitely have been
covered by the whistleblower laws. How her misstatements will be dealt
with is an open question.
The only one who suffered real damages was Mark Burnett Productions
(they're out $50,000). He got defrauded, not the Douglas MA school system.
The title of this thread is certainly a bit misleading, as it never
appears that Denise has apologized, at least in this article.
Well duh! Do you see anywhere in your life that a severly anorexic
girl would even stay till the end of any competition, especially one
as Survivor?
> The title of this thread is certainly a bit misleading, as it never
> appears that Denise has apologized, at least in this article.
Did you miss this paragraph?
This give credence that it is NOT fake. If someone planed out using this
so easily and quickly to disprove story then I can't see anyone being
able to keep anything secret over there. They would be too stupid.
I hope CBS didn't get a chance to cut a check yet and give it to her. If
so....
Give the $50,000 back you mullett headed....
To the school management: I apologize deeply to you all. Now really fire
the pig! I don't see how she can show her face at that school again
anyway but if she does....
--
----->Hunter
"No man in the wrong can stand up against
a fellow that's in the right and keeps on acomin'."
-----William J. McDonald
Captain, Texas Rangers from 1891 to 1907
Until I see a story breaking about how a doctor has treated her for an
eating disorder I will believe her when she says it is genetic. That kind
of story would had broke almost as soon as the first episode aired just
like the Lunch Cow's lie.
> Lane said Martin was hired as a cafeteria worker at $7.37 an hour in
> 2004, but was promoted on March 30 this year to janitor, a job that now
> pays her more than $17 an hour. The promotion to janitor, Lane said,
> came before Martin even tried out for "Survivor."
17 and hour not 7? That stupid bitch! Wow, she should feel so much
shame for pulling that shit on tv.
Personally I don't know how she can show her face around town.
She did this morning on the Early Show.
> Fired for what? Playing a game?
>
Slander, lible, defamation of character.
$7 to $17!
It's not like the school district is losing sales by having Denise as
an employee; however if I were the one doing performance reviews
during her probationary period I might be a bit tougher on her. But
there's no justifiable firing offense here. Burnett, on the other
hand, could withdraw his offer of $50K.
Now that would be a fireable offense. She did open a can of worms by
saying she "lost her lunch lady job" by being on Survivor. Should be
interesting to see how this all plays out.
>Waiving the right to remain silent, bob36...@webtv.net (bob wald) said:
>
>> she said she ws fired from her old job..''true''
>
>Not true.
>
>> she said she had a new job. ''true''.
>
>Not true.
>
>> she said she didnt like the new job she had to take. ''true''.
>
>Not true.
>
>> Whats the problem????
>
>Your reading comprehension.
rotflmao - Excellent response !!! I started to respond to bob as well
but figured it would not be worth the effort since he obviously did
not have a clue.
The exact quote appears to be: "They didn't give me my job
back," Martin, 40, said during the live broadcast. "I'm a
janitor now. I clean the toilets. I wash the floors in the
bathrooms. I vacuum the kids' rugs."
See cbsnews.com. Search for {Denise Martin}.
Off the top of my head, I think the Douglas public schools
system cannot sue for slander, for various legal reasons,
not the least of which it has always had a chance to respond
and set the record straight.
Hell no...he's jumping for joy. He did what he did without slandering
anyone.
I hope Denise isn't the one that made the next installment of
Survivor...if that were the case, CBS must be fuming.
..
--
We must change the way we live,
or the climate will do it for us.
Okay, I did miss the second sentence. Still, an apology reported from
a second-hand source shouldn't warrant a headline.
I wonder how she explained telling an outright lie on national tv...
The "second hand source" is the person being apologized too. I would
call Ms. Lane a first hand source, she was present and witnessed the
apology when it happened.
> I wonder how she explained telling an outright lie on national tv...
Watch her explanation here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3628035n
She does not believe that she lied. It was all just a big misunderstanding.
Damn. Doesn't play for me.
> Obveeus wrote:
>> "cloud dreamer" <St...@Global.Warming> wrote:
>>
>>> I wonder how she explained telling an outright lie on national tv...
>>
>> Watch her explanation here:
>> http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3628035n
>>
>> She does not believe that she lied. It was all just a big
>> misunderstanding.
>
>
> Damn. Doesn't play for me.
You know that if you flew south for the winter like a normal creature...
;-)
Her explanation was that she did indeed apply for and accept the janitorial
job before she went on Survivor. When she came back, she realized that she
wanted to spend more time with her family so she asked for her old job back.
Apparently her version of 'asked' simply meant that she asked the head
person on the lunch lady crew. She still whined that that request was
turned down without explanation. She claimed that she didn't mean to
mislead anyone.
The principal pointed out that Denise did not make her job change (back to
her old job) request official. In other words, she never asked the
principal or the HR head that would control job changes for the lunch lady
position. If she was told by the lunch lady head of staff that she couldn't
have her 'old job' back, it was because that job is currently filled. The
principal stated that she could apply for it and wait for the next available
position as is the standard job change proceedure which Denise knows, having
done it before to get the janitorial job in the first place.
Wow. There's a difference between being "demoted" and asking for her old
job back. Even without the lack of official status to asking, it's still
miles from what her description was on the show. Certainly no mention of
the doubling of pay. She was whining for attention...and she got it.
Shameful.
> Wow. There's a difference between being "demoted" and asking for her old
> job back. Even without the lack of official status to asking, it's still
> miles from what her description was on the show.
Yep. It was a demotion in Denise's mind only. She might truly consider it
to be a 'lowlier' job, but the massive increase in pay and move to full-time
hours isn't something that many people would agree is a 'demotion'.
Millions of viewers saw Denise apologize on the CBS Early Morning show
today...
>On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:36:24 -0800 (PST) tricks...@yahoo.com
>(tricks...@yahoo.com) stepped to the mic and said...
>
>> Well duh! Do you see anywhere in your life that a severly anorexic
>> girl would even stay till the end of any competition, especially one
>> as Survivor?
>>
>If you, and everyone else, continues to insist that Courtney is anorexic
>I suggest that you watch the program "Insider" at 7:30pm EST. They are
>doing a piece on an unrecognizable actress named Isabelle who is
>"severely anorexic" and the difference between Courtney (and Keira
>Knightly, BTW) with her thin ectomorphic build and this Insider actress
>is the difference between night and day. This woman can barely hold
>herself erect. Courtney functioned the whole 39 days perfectly fine.
>This woman truly is just skin and bones, and sagging skin at that.
>Courtney doesn't even come close. Remember Karen Carpenter before she
>died. Can anyone honestly say that Courtney comes anywhere close to how
>she looked?
Actually Karen was back up to near normal weight (115-120?) after her
anorexia. It was her heart that gave out after the weight
fluctuations. But I know what you mean, she was scary thin in a lot
of her earlier pictures - somewhere in the 80-85 lb range I believe.
Which is not far from the weight Courtney had at the end of the show.
But the difference is, she played a mean set of drums while Courtney
couldn't swing a knife with 2 hands in one of the earlier challenges!
She may have preferred normal hours to the money for an odd shift.
--
John Duncan Yoyo
------------------------------o)
Save the Cheerleader-
Collect the whole set.
> In article <13mftm2...@corp.supernews.com>, sdli...@earthlink.net
> says...
> > Obveeus wrote:
> >
> > > The only question I have is: why has she not yet been fired? It is
> > > silly
> > > for the school district to put up with this for even 1 day. No doubt,
> > > they
> > > are waiting for the Christmas break so they can remove her from
> > > employment
> > > and have 2 weeks of non-school time for the publicity to die down.
> >
> > She's a government employee, not an independent contractor, yes? So
> > presumably there's a long due process they have to go through before she
> > can be fired.
> >
> > All Denise did was lie about her employer's behavior (the local
> > government) in public. It won't be easy to get her fired just for that.
> > In fact, it happens all the time, as you hear on the news.
> > Whistleblower laws and other protections make it difficult to fire a
> > government employee just for griping about how she's treated on the job.
> > If Denise had been telling the truth, she would definitely have been
> > covered by the whistleblower laws. How her misstatements will be dealt
> > with is an open question.
> ----
> It was a flat out lie so she isn't covered by the Whisteblower laws. You
> are right generally about the other protections though.
It wasn't a flat out lie. She said that she didn't get her old job
(lunch lady) back, and that's technically true. Before she went on the
show she applied for a different job (janitor), and that's the job she
returned to. But she'd changed her mind about wanting the new job, and
hasn't been able to return to the old one.
The way she said it may have suggested that she was demoted, but she
never actually said this. She was just upset that she's not able to do
the job she now wants, and this emotion apparently colored the way she
described it.
Yes, she may have given a poor impression of her school district, but it
seems to me like it was inadvertent, possibly a consequence of the
pressure of being on TV.
--
Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
Look, Probst stated a couple of times that Denise had a very different
response than James when she returned home before asking her what
happened. Clearly, Probst and all the producers knew exactly what
Denise's story was before she told it on air, so the whole "Burnett
just heard your story backstage" was totally staged. And the fact
that Denise has these lame excuses makes me believe that it was the
show's producers that came up with the story for her to tell. $50,000
is not a lot to pay for the kind of attention this has garnered for
Survivor... although, I'll bet Denise wishes she had not gone along
with it now.
Wow. What a conspiracy theory. And like most good conspiracy
theories, it has a ring of truthiness*.
*truthiness - Copyright 2006 Stephen Colbert
Well, Survivor also lied then when promoting her as a "lunch lady" when she
was already a night custodian. I don't know why they just didn't go with
that to start with. I wonder if the third graders still all like her?
No. She said she was "demoted" to janitor on her return because she was
too well known. That is a flat out lie.
Not once did she say she "asked" for the janitor job BEFORE she left or
that it was better pay...and that the job had been awarded to her. Not
once did she say SHE decided she wanted the old job back (now filled by
someone else because she had accepted the janitor job).
The only part that was "technically true" (and it's a stretch) was that
she couldn't get her old job back when she did "ask" her old boss but
she never went through official channels to make the request and was
told she could apply for the position when it was available.
She lied. Flat out lied.
as often happens...they can find many things wrong (write-ups?) for less
than perfect job performance.
She could be watched closely and would have to be sure and do nothing
wrong.
Normally no big thing...but after the 'fame', media exposure and
money...it may be harder for her to do the mundane job tasks.
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:01:56 -0500, Jeri Jo Thomas
> <kata...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:36:24 -0800 (PST) tricks...@yahoo.com
> >(tricks...@yahoo.com) stepped to the mic and said...
> >
> >> Well duh! Do you see anywhere in your life that a severly anorexic
> >> girl would even stay till the end of any competition, especially one
> >> as Survivor?
> >>
> >If you, and everyone else, continues to insist that Courtney is anorexic
> >I suggest that you watch the program "Insider" at 7:30pm EST. They are
> >doing a piece on an unrecognizable actress named Isabelle who is
> >"severely anorexic" and the difference between Courtney (and Keira
> >Knightly, BTW) with her thin ectomorphic build and this Insider actress
> >is the difference between night and day. This woman can barely hold
> >herself erect. Courtney functioned the whole 39 days perfectly fine.
> >This woman truly is just skin and bones, and sagging skin at that.
> >Courtney doesn't even come close. Remember Karen Carpenter before she
> >died. Can anyone honestly say that Courtney comes anywhere close to how
> >she looked?
>
> Actually Karen was back up to near normal weight (115-120?) after her
> anorexia. It was her heart that gave out after the weight
> fluctuations.
Yep. The cure killed her, not the disease.
--
R.I.P. Bionic Woman:
The latest reason the WGA should revoke Laeta Kalogridis's union card,
or shut their doors in shame.
"you bunch of nutss! she was fired!!!!!
shes working somewheres else..
maybe shes making twice as much but working twice as hard.. n dont want
it. but its that or nothing...
you people really are not very smart."
How can you argue with the 'perfesser'?
:-)
And that is probably more the impetus for her lying. She feels that
she is now famous and should not be doing those "lowly" tasks.
Plus, now some of the kids I am sure DO recognize her. No longer is
she an anonymous, invisible school drone. Now she is the one everyone
laughs and points at as the Survivor loser who stupidly plodded along
a path of doom instead of being smart enough to make strategic moves,
the one who performed more dismally at challenges than virtually any
previous player and the flabby lard-ball who showed way too much skin
on national TV.
>In article <22725-476...@storefull-3174.bay.webtv.net>,
>bob36...@webtv.net says...
>> you bunch of nutss! she was fired!!!!!
>> shes working somewheres else..
>> maybe shes making twice as much but working twice as hard.. n dont want
>> it. but its that or nothing...
>> you people really are not very smart.
>---
>You have a very strange idea of being fired. She was promoted or given a
>higher paying position as janitor BEFORE the show started.
I wouldn't call it a promotion. She simply took a different job at
the school.
--
Bigolhomo
That paid 2.5x as much as her old job.
> Well, Survivor also lied then when promoting her as a "lunch lady"
> when she was already a night custodian. I don't know why they just
> didn't go with that to start with. I wonder if the third graders
> still all like her?
From what I've pieced together, she was a lunch lady (shouldn't that be
lunch person?) when she applied and would have put that on her
application. She may well have just not bothered to update it.
> People lives are affected by lies like this.
Are those people on TV? No? Then what's it matter?
:) smiley included for the humour impaired.
> Until I see a story breaking about how a doctor has treated her for
> an eating disorder I will believe her when she says it is genetic.
Genetics, and she doesn't eat very much, and she doesn't exercise or
strength train.
> If you, and everyone else, continues to insist that Courtney is
> anorexic I suggest that you watch the program "Insider" at 7:30pm
> EST. They are doing a piece on an unrecognizable actress named
> Isabelle who is "severely anorexic" and the difference between
> Courtney (and Keira Knightly, BTW) with her thin ectomorphic build
> and this Insider actress is the difference between night and day.
You don't have to be near death to have anorexia nervosa, just like you
don't have to be a homeless bum to be an alcoholic.
Not all underweight people undereat....just like not all overweight
people overeat.
> kenny blankenship wrote:
>
> > You don't have to be near death to have anorexia nervosa, just like
> > you don't have to be a homeless bum to be an alcoholic.
>
> Not all underweight people undereat....just like not all overweight
> people overeat.
Yes they do. I don't count swallowing food then regurgitating it, eating
it. Yes some very small percentage fat people have a thyroid problem,
but that just means they overeat for their condition.
You can't gain weight without consuming more calories than you burn.
You can't lose weight without consuming fewer calories than you burn.
And before someone tries to make the stupid argument about exercise
levels, you can increase or decrease your weight while eating the same
amount of food by altering how many calories you burn.
For purposes of this discussion "consume calories" means having the food
energy absorbed into your blood stream. Stomach surgery or laxatives
(for example) allow you to absorb a smaller percentage of the calories
in the food you ingested than you would otherwise.
> Nevertheless, I don't believe Courtney is anorexic. She might not be
> a big eater, but she's an eater.
From Wikipedia (so you know it's true :)
"Anorexia nervosa is a psychiatric diagnosis that describes an
eating disorder characterized by low body weight and body image
distortion with an obsessive fear of gaining weight."
I certainly don't know Courtney well enough to make a diagnosis to
whether she has or doesn't have Anorexia Nervosa. My not being a
psychiatrist doesn't help. She commented about being fat at the reunion
show but I didn't catch exactly what she said. I do think she was saying
it in a joking manner though so I don't think it points to AN.
Thyroid is not the only thing that can contribute to being overweight.
"I certainly don't know Courtney well enough to make a diagnosis to
whether she has or doesn't have Anorexia Nervosa. My not being a
psychiatrist doesn't help."
Correct.
The only one here qualified to diagnose is 'Perfesser Wald.'
"Not all underweight people undereat....just like not all overweight
people overeat."
Is that sorta like that...
"You can fool all of the people some of the time...and some of the
people all of the time" thingie? :-)
Maybe it is me but I got bad vibes from that principle, she appeared to be
cold and a bit condescending to me. I also thought the statement was enough
and the tv match up was over the top.
I think it's safe to say her comment was meant in a joking manner
given the smile and the laugh and that her voice went much like it has
with the rest of her sarcastic responses to questions. ;)
[Denise "woe is me"]
> winning hence the woe is me attitude. I don't care for that attitude
> as she had an amazing experience and Peih-Gee provided her with a
> once in a lifetime opportunity that most karate instructor/students
> would have given their eye teeth for.
As lovely a reward as that was - and it was wonderful - the
Shaolin Temple is nowhere near as remote or exclusive or
whatever as it was portrayed in the commentary by JP.
It's, in the words of a martial artist friend of mine,
"a big tourist trap". I'm not sure if it's quite that
bad, but it's a major tourist stop which has, since it
opened to the public for tourism, "attracted nearly
three million domestic and oversea tourists".
There was a big uproar in '06 when a luxury sports car
was given as a gift to the abbot of the temple to
honor his contributions to the local tourist industry.
Obviously, Survivor paid them up enough to clear the
place of non-Survivor tourists so they could film
those shots which made it look like the Survivors were
the only non-monk folks around. Probably made it even
nicer than it is - but it's certainly available to anyone
who tours China. Likely out of the reach of a typical
lunch-lady's family, but certainly not out of reach for
any American tourist who can afford to travel overseas.
--
"I think it's safe to say her comment was meant in a joking manner given
the smile and the laugh and that her voice went much like it has with
the rest of her sarcastic responses to questions. ;)"
However...she didn't do the big 'eye roll' that made her a legend. :)
Given how clearly she and the school had been wronged, I wasn't surprised by
the fact that the principal approached the subject in a very careful,
methodical manner to make sure everything said in the interview was
accurate. Schools should hope for quality leadership like thta.
>I also thought the statement was enough and the tv match up was over the
>top.
I thought that it was pretty silly that this whole thing was on TV as well.
However, The Early Show isn't really a news show, it is a morning
entertainment show. So, maybe I shouldn't be surprised that they would
devote a segment of their national show to clearing up a local media story
simply because it helped advertise their primetime fare.
The show didn't say that no one got to see the temple, just that very few
visitors got to spend the night there.
That being said, I think this season's China locale did more of a tourist
infomercial than any of the past seasons have done for their locale. I
think that is a good thing. The more people all interact (financially and
culturally), the less likely they are to feel the need to claim superiority
or go to war.
> That being said, I think this season's China locale did more of a tourist
> infomercial than any of the past seasons have done for their locale. I
> think that is a good thing. The more people all interact (financially and
> culturally), the less likely they are to feel the need to claim superiority
> or go to war.
Survivor: Iran
d'oh.
(just kidding around. you're right, of course)
--
I agree. I was really unhappy we didn't get to see more of the area
the Survivors were in when in Guatemala. They really should have spent
more time on the ruins and the area around there. As it was it could
have been anywhere with old ruins (and yes.. there are quite a few
places like that especially in Central America.)
Yup...time for Survivor: Baffin Island
*****WHOOSH*****
> Baffin Island, for instance is NORTH of Canada, has polar bears and
> no trees.
I'm pretty sure the Canadians that live there would be surprised to find
out that Baffin Island is not part of Canada.
> I think it's safe to say her comment was meant in a joking manner
> given the smile and the laugh and that her voice went much like it
> has with the rest of her sarcastic responses to questions. ;)
The joking manner could also be a coping mechanism to cover the truth...
> Thyroid is not the only thing that can contribute to being overweight.
They all do have one thing in common, they consume more calories then
they burn.
Thyroid doesn't even contribute to being overweight if you take the
little pill that fixes that (costs about $3 a month generic.)
I have had hypothyroidism for 25 years, and I have never been overweight
because of it.
Likewise my mom, my uncles and aunts, my sisters, my cousins, and my
daughters.
Thyroid is no excuse for being overweight.
The blood test for thyroid disorders is far too broad. There was a time
when a TSH of 10 was considered normal and people would go years
suffering from hypothyroidism with a TSH of 6 or 8 or 9....yet the
doctors would refuse to give them the medication because the lab said
they were "normal." The threshold was lowered to around 5 in most
countries...while other countries have or want to lower it further.
Britain believes it should be as low as 1.5 if symptoms are present.
Having a thyroid condition isn't an "excuse" IF it's diagnosed. Hundreds
of thousands are walking around with undiagnosed hypothyroidism (ie
their doctors glace at the blood work, see an N in the High/Low/Normal
column and don't question the number).