Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Boobs of the Week

348 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Lord Vader III

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 12:08:57 AM4/20/12
to
On 4/19/2012 3:31 PM, Larry in AZ wrote:
> And the award this week goes to....
>
> http://www.cbs.com/shows/survivor/photos/107059/season-24-episode-10/107061
>
> This young lady can sometimes look soooooo damned hot.

I saw that and was wondering where those came from. She's been doing a
pretty good job covering them up so far.

LVIII


Lloyd

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 9:40:03 AM4/20/12
to
In article <jmqnh8$qvg$1...@speranza.aioe.org>,
Well, they do have that great plastic surgeon on the tribe?? :)
Message has been deleted

R S

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:50:59 PM4/20/12
to
I think Cha Cha has a nice rack and ass as can be seen in the last
episode when she wore her 2 piece.

I think Cha Cha and Chelsa are the hootest ladies on her this season.

Brian Smith

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 1:55:15 AM4/21/12
to
"R S" <Rainm...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:29914-4F9...@storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net...
> I think Cha Cha has a nice rack and ass as can be seen in the last
> episode when she wore her 2 piece.
>
> I think Cha Cha and Chelsa are the hootest ladies on her this season.

Kat's definitely the cutest if you disregard Kourtney.

Brian


Message has been deleted

The Horny Goat

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 10:20:21 PM4/22/12
to
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 03:28:29 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<el...@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

>In article <HYrkr.7008$ay5....@newsfe14.iad>,
> "Brian Smith" <dcg_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > I think Cha Cha and Chelsa are the hootest ladies on her this season.
>>
>> Kat's definitely the cutest if you disregard Kourtney.
>
><snort> And then she opens her mouth.

Heh heh - yeah - and I'm not into tats so that disqualifies Kourtney
for me though she DOES have a wonderful figure!

Sarahh B

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 9:38:42 PM4/25/12
to
Chelsea seems very proud of her chest. Will probably be topless before
the season is over.

Hunter

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 6:18:21 AM4/26/12
to
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:31:30 +0000 (UTC), Larry in AZ
<use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:

>
>And the award this week goes to....
>
>http://www.cbs.com/shows/survivor/photos/107059/season-24-episode-10/107061
>
>This young lady can sometimes look soooooo damned hot.
-----
Totally agree. Christina has the best body of all the girls this
season. At first I didn't like her face much but it has grown on me
and I think she is quite pretty. Originally I placed her 6th in my
thread I always thought she had a smokin body but I thought her face
was not as attractive as I would've liked; but now I put her in third,
above Alicia Rosa and maybe even second place above Chelsea Meissner.
I think Kourtney Moon is still prettier than Christina her face being
the deciding factor but Christina has a better body. :-)

Sometimes it takes time for a face to grow on me. I had the same think
happen to me with Sandra Oh who plays Dr. Christina Yang on "Grey's
Anatomy" and "Flo" the Progressive Insurance spokes girl. :-) Didn't
quite like their faces for awhile but they have grown on me.

------>Hunter

"No man in the wrong can stand up against
a fellow that's in the right and keeps on acomin'."

-----William J. McDonald
Captain, Texas Rangers from 1891 to 1907

Hunter

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 10:48:28 AM4/26/12
to
-------
You haven't been paying attention this year if you think that. :-) Yes
she binds them down during challenges so they won't flop out but
around camp she has been bold in showing her cleavage almost as much
as Alicia has been, bless their hearts!!

Hunter

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 1:11:32 PM4/26/12
to
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:20:21 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcr...@home.ca>
wrote:
-----
To make sure we are on the same wave length Kourtney was the one who
was injured in the first episode and had to leave the game. She was
also the one with all the tattoos.

Kat is the one that has the reputation of being dumb. And admittedly
she is a bit dim, being surprised that there was bacon on the BLT she
bought being the latest example LOL! Still, she is very pretty.

Hunter

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 4:39:28 PM4/26/12
to
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 03:28:29 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<el...@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

>In article <HYrkr.7008$ay5....@newsfe14.iad>,
> "Brian Smith" <dcg_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > I think Cha Cha and Chelsa are the hootest ladies on her this season.
>>
>> Kat's definitely the cutest if you disregard Kourtney.
>
><snort> And then she opens her mouth.
---
Yeah, well, we are just talking about looks here. :-)
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Brian Smith

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 5:39:46 PM4/26/12
to
"Larry in AZ" <use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA04189444F4...@202.177.16.121...
> Waiving the right to remain silent, Sara...@webtv.net (Sarahh B) said:
>
>> Chelsea seems very proud of her chest. Will probably be topless before
>> the season is over.
>
> Why were they blurring the shot of Kat on the side of her right boob..?
> It
> was a two-shot of Kat talking to another girl at their camp.
>
> It's not like it was hanging out the side, as both were clearly covered in
> front by her bikini top.
>
> Does she have a tattoo there that they did not want to show..?

I was wondering about that blurring as well. Maybe they thought too much
side boob would get people excited.

That was Kim she was talking to during the blurring.

Brian


shawn

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 6:17:37 PM4/26/12
to
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:19:59 +0000 (UTC), Larry in AZ
<use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:

>Waiving the right to remain silent, Sara...@webtv.net (Sarahh B) said:
>
>> Chelsea seems very proud of her chest. Will probably be topless before
>> the season is over.
>
>I've never cared much for fake tits that look like baseballs shoved under the
>flesh.

I always think they should come with an air release valve attached so
they can increase/decrease size depending on their mood.

Michael Black

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 7:25:37 PM4/26/12
to
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Larry in AZ wrote:

> Waiving the right to remain silent, Sara...@webtv.net (Sarahh B) said:
>
>> Chelsea seems very proud of her chest. Will probably be topless before
>> the season is over.
>
> Why were they blurring the shot of Kat on the side of her right boob..? It
> was a two-shot of Kat talking to another girl at their camp.
>
> It's not like it was hanging out the side, as both were clearly covered in
> front by her bikini top.
How do you know, the side was blurred. I figured she had slipped out the
side.

Michael

Michael Black

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 7:27:02 PM4/26/12
to
The problem is, I think the blurring gets some people excited now. Not
that something is showing but the viewers dont' see it, but the blur
itself causes a pavlovian response.

Michael

Michael Black

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 7:29:30 PM4/26/12
to
For those times when they want to go diving? "Wait, I have too much
boyancy". Or "I want his attention, but not too much"?

I gather, from tv, that they have bras that allow adjustment like that,
and it works so long as there are clothes on. I'm sure it falls apart
when the bra comes off.

Michael

The Horny Goat

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 11:06:51 PM4/26/12
to
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:38:42 -0500, Sara...@webtv.net (Sarahh B)
wrote:

>Chelsea seems very proud of her chest. Will probably be topless before
>the season is over.

So you're saying the horndogs should be hoping for chocolate and
peanut butter??

The Horny Goat

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 11:09:04 PM4/26/12
to
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:11:32 GMT, Hunter <buffh...@my-deja.com>
(Hunter) wrote:

>>Heh heh - yeah - and I'm not into tats so that disqualifies Kourtney
>>for me though she DOES have a wonderful figure!
>-----
>To make sure we are on the same wave length Kourtney was the one who
>was injured in the first episode and had to leave the game. She was
>also the one with all the tattoos.
>
>Kat is the one that has the reputation of being dumb. And admittedly
>she is a bit dim, being surprised that there was bacon on the BLT she
>bought being the latest example LOL! Still, she is very pretty.

I'm pretty sure we're talking about the same contestants.

I'm equally pretty sure Kat has discovered how to play the dumb blonde
card to the hilt and wouldn't be surprised to find she's a PhD
candidate at the finale...

shawn

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 12:25:35 AM4/27/12
to
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:29:30 -0400, Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca>
Hence the advantage of the inflatable breast. Truth in advertising. No
surprises when the bra comes off. Other than the air release valve,
but you can't have everything.

shawn

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 12:29:20 AM4/27/12
to
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:09:04 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcr...@home.ca>
wrote:
I don't expect that but she isn't as dumb as she plays. That's not to
say she's a Mensa candidate but her confessionals show that she's not
as clueless as she often appears.

shawn

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 12:30:50 AM4/27/12
to
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:27:02 -0400, Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca>
wrote:
I noticed the blurring and ended up wondering just why they had it
since it clearly wasn't likely to be covering any more boobage than we
were alread seen. You could tell that since there wasn't much blurry
skin color in the blurred area. So maybe they were just trying to play
the game that you suggest above.

Brian Smith

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 12:49:51 AM4/27/12
to
"Michael Black" <et...@ncf.ca> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.64.12...@darkstar.example.net...
Based on how much conversation it generates I'd say you're right. And
clearly nothing was showing because you could see her front was covered up.

I also noticed in the immunity challenge that they blurred Christina's butt
as she was moving down the board on her knees. Unless I'm misremembering
something, her swimsuit bottom covers more than Kim's and I didn't notice
Kim getting blurred.

Brian


R S

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 7:24:43 AM4/27/12
to
Brian, yes as you say you are disremembering LOL.

Kim did not wear a bikini bottom to the immunity challenge so her ass
couldn't have been hanging out more than Christinia's. Kim wore her
black shorts.

I don't think I would want to look at Kim's boney ass anyway.

I beleive you were thinking of Chelsea because her ass cheeks were
hanging out of her bikini bottoms.

For the record I think Christina and Chelsea have the best looking asses
on there.

Alisha & Sabrinia are too fat. Kim's is to bony, Kat's is so so but
Christina's and Chelsea's is just right

doob it

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 8:37:36 AM4/27/12
to

Mikey B, said about possible boob appearance:

"The problem is, I think the blurring gets some people excited now. Not
that something is showing but the viewers dont' see it, but the blur
itself causes a pavlovian response."


Anyone ELSE hear a bell?

:-)

Sarahh B

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 8:41:39 AM4/27/12
to
I think Chelsea's boobs are natural, no implants. They are in
proportion to her butt in size and firmness. They have a natural shape
and slight sag which is not common with implants.

doob it

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 8:41:59 AM4/27/12
to

Mike said about buoyant bras...

"I gather, from tv, that they have bras that allow adjustment like that,
and it works so long as there are clothes on. I'm sure it falls apart
when the bra comes off."


And they say that TV doesn't teach us anything.

:-)

doob it

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 8:55:16 AM4/27/12
to

shawnEE said:

"Hence the advantage of the inflatable breast. Truth in advertising. No
surprises when the bra comes off. Other than the air release valve, but
you can't have everything."

You may joke, but I had the original PATENT on the inflatable breast, or
the IB1969 as it was known at the time.

I first rolled it out during Woodstock (the REAL one)...and with all the
rain...it saved several young nymphs from drowning.

You're welcome.

doob it

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 8:59:40 AM4/27/12
to

About Kat...shawn said:

"I don't expect that but she isn't as dumb as she plays. That's not to
say she's a Mensa candidate but her confessionals show that she's not as
clueless as she often appears."


I tink that being passed over by Kim for the reward really hurt her.

SO..she may not be stupid, but she trusted too much.


I have much the same problem.

doob it

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 9:05:04 AM4/27/12
to

shawn said:

"I noticed the blurring and ended up wondering just why they had it
since it clearly wasn't likely to be covering any more boobage than we
were alread seen. You could tell that since there wasn't much blurry
skin color in the blurred area. So maybe they were just trying to play
the game that you suggest above."

True.

They were just trying to cover my logo on her shirt...

http://d21c.com/doob/justdoob.gif

Michael Black

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 10:06:20 AM4/27/12
to
But they offered that earlier in the season, I distinctly remember peanut
butter (and maybe chocolate) and thought of Heidi.

Michael

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Brian Smith

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 4:23:22 PM4/27/12
to
"doob it" <do...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10152-4F9...@storefull-3112.bay.webtv.net...
It looks like all of them, except maybe Christina, actually believe that Kim
will take them to the end and that they are her number one ally. There's a
deleted scene clip on ew.com where Kat is doing a confessional and talking
about Kim and Chelsea's relationship. She says they are all good friends,
etc. but doesn't see Kim taking Chelsea (more or less too risky) and that
Kim will take her because she's Kim's true alliance (she didn't use those
exact words). Kat does have a good point about Chelsea but she's really
misreading the situation if she thinks she's at the top of Kim's list of
people to take. Given how hurt Kat was from not being taken on the reward,
Kim might have to seriously consider taking her to the end so she doesn't
vote against her. And since it seems no one thinks Kat is playing a good
game taking her to the end would be a good way of ensuring the third person
gets no votes.

> I have much the same problem.

Most of us do.

Brian




Brian Smith

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 4:26:56 PM4/27/12
to
"Larry in AZ" <use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA042869B357...@202.177.16.121...
> Waiving the right to remain silent, "Brian Smith" <dcg_...@hotmail.com>
> After all the full-frontal globular flesh of Skanklisha..? About 80
> percent of her boobs are usually visible....

You could jack that figure up to 90% and I still wouldn't excited with how
that ridiculous top looks on her. What were the wardrobe people thinking
when they gave that to her to wear?!

Brian


Brian Smith

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 4:29:37 PM4/27/12
to
"Sarahh B" <Sara...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:1017-4F9...@storefull-3251.bay.webtv.net...
> I think Chelsea's boobs are natural, no implants. They are in
> proportion to her butt in size and firmness. They have a natural shape
> and slight sag which is not common with implants.

They are implants. I remember posting some tweets from her after the episode
where Tarzan implied she hated him because she had unresolved issues with
her own plastic surgeon. She said she was very happy with the work her
surgeon did.

I see nothing wrong with her boob job. It looks "bad" now because she's lost
a lot of weight elsewhere.

Brian


Michael Black

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 7:00:08 PM4/27/12
to
I thought it was quite smart. It shows off the cleavage, but the piece
above the cleavage ensures that the breasts stay in place. There have
been instances on the show in the past where breasts have popped out
during challenges.

Michael

Message has been deleted

¤~Îñ©üßu§~®

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 7:38:37 PM4/27/12
to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:41:39 -0500, Sara...@webtv.net (Sarahh B)
wrote:

>I think Chelsea's boobs are natural, no implants. They are in
>proportion to her butt in size and firmness. They have a natural shape
>and slight sag which is not common with implants.

I bartended for 13yrs and have seen more boobs than most plastic
surgens. Take it from me, those babies are fake.

¤~Îñ©üßu§~®

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 7:43:52 PM4/27/12
to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:33:57 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<el...@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

>> I see nothing wrong with her boob job. It looks "bad" now because she's lost
>> a lot of weight elsewhere.
>>
>> Brian

What till she's older. I can tell you a woman who gets implants in her
20's has the most gross boobs EVER when she hits 40. They feel like
a grapefruit in a bag too big

Karen M

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 9:29:55 PM4/27/12
to
On Apr 26, 9:29 pm, shawn <nanoflo...@gNOTmail.com> wrote:

>
> I don't expect that but she isn't as dumb as she plays. That's not to
> say she's a Mensa candidate but her confessionals show that she's not
> as clueless as she often appears.

Am I the only one who caught Kat's comment that she thinks she's the
one running the game? She's either getting a VERY advantageous edit,
or she is far more clueless than she appears. I vote the latter:
dumber than a stump.


Karen

The Horny Goat

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 12:46:48 AM4/28/12
to
So do I - and the flip side of that is that I'm Wile E Coyote like in
remembering slights.

In other words - great friend but lousy foe

The Horny Goat

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 12:49:12 AM4/28/12
to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:17:57 +0000 (UTC), Larry in AZ
<use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:

>As for the bottom blurring of Christina, they tend to do that when the
>girl's swimsuits go into wedgie mode and disappear between the cheeks....

They're undoubtedly afraid in such situations that the women will turn
around and make KnowTheToe extremely happy!

The Horny Goat

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 12:51:11 AM4/28/12
to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:26:56 -0600, "Brian Smith"
<dcg_...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> After all the full-frontal globular flesh of Skanklisha..? About 80
>> percent of her boobs are usually visible....
>
>You could jack that figure up to 90% and I still wouldn't excited with how
>that ridiculous top looks on her. What were the wardrobe people thinking
>when they gave that to her to wear?!

That IS a ridiculous top and I'm sure they could show off her tatas in
much nicer form had they thought about it. I don't think her body is
the ugly part of Alicia ... her mind well maybe

The Horny Goat

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 12:57:10 AM4/28/12
to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:33:57 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<el...@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

>> I see nothing wrong with her boob job. It looks "bad" now because she's lost
>> a lot of weight elsewhere.
>>
>> Brian
>
>The CBS PR department speaks.

MOST women with boob jobs look horrible after losing 15-20 lbs under
"on the island" conditions.

Even if they didn't know it before Survivor fans certainly learned
that as long ago as season 2.

Anybody besides me remember how awful Tina looked around day 35? (So
did the Sainted E-Beth (tm) but it wasn't because of her plastic
surgeon!)

Brian Smith

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 2:03:34 AM4/28/12
to
"Karen M" <itsk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:686da34d-0cec-441e...@g38g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
I caught her comment but couldn't tell if she was being serious or not.
She's actually getting a bad edit. There's been way too many of the extra
clips where she comes across as being much brighter and much more aware of
what's going on than the TV edit alludes to.

Brian


Brian Smith

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 2:06:49 AM4/28/12
to
"Michael Black" <et...@ncf.ca> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.64.12...@darkstar.example.net...
Why is that a problem? :-)

Brian


Karen M

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 6:56:08 PM4/28/12
to
On Apr 27, 11:03 pm, "Brian Smith" <dcg_br...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> I caught her comment but couldn't tell if she was being serious or not.
> She's actually getting a bad edit. There's been way too many of the extra
> clips where she comes across as being much brighter and much more aware of
> what's going on than the TV edit alludes to.
>
> Brian

I just watched a bunch of the bonus clips. When she's parroting what
others have said, she sounds, oh, mid-range average intelligence. When
she's voicing her own thoughts--dumb as a stump, and definitely not
sharp enough to make a cynical reference to running the game.


Karen



zeppo

unread,
Apr 29, 2012, 7:54:12 PM4/29/12
to
On Friday, April 27, 2012 9:57:10 PM UTC-7, The Horny Goat wrote:

>
> Anybody besides me remember how awful Tina looked around day 35? (So
> did the Sainted E-Beth (tm) but it wasn't because of her plastic
> surgeon!)

IMO, even with the hair loss, Elizabeth still looked OK during the late stages of S2.
Tina OTOH looked like a freak.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

shawn

unread,
May 1, 2012, 2:09:59 AM5/1/12
to
On Tue, 1 May 2012 05:37:38 +0000 (UTC), Larry in AZ
<use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:

>Waiving the right to remain silent, "Brian Smith" <dcg_...@hotmail.com>
>said:
>
>>> After all the full-frontal globular flesh of Skanklisha..? About 80
>>> percent of her boobs are usually visible....
>>
>> You could jack that figure up to 90% and I still wouldn't excited with how
>> that ridiculous top looks on her. What were the wardrobe people thinking
>> when they gave that to her to wear?!
>
>I thought they brought their own wardrobe..?

They do. The wardrobe people then pick out what they want them to wear
(so they can cast them in a certain light.) Recently they have
started giving them additional items (swim suits and the like)
sometime after they initially start playing the game. I guess they
hope to avoid the pink droopy underwear situation again. ;)

Brian Smith

unread,
May 1, 2012, 4:44:22 AM5/1/12
to
"Larry in AZ" <use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA045E628A1C...@202.177.16.121...
> Waiving the right to remain silent, Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca> said:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Larry in AZ wrote:
>>
>>> Waiving the right to remain silent, Sara...@webtv.net (Sarahh B) said:
>>>
>>>> Chelsea seems very proud of her chest. Will probably be topless
>>>> before the season is over.
>>>
>>> Why were they blurring the shot of Kat on the side of her right boob..?
>>> It was a two-shot of Kat talking to another girl at their camp.
>>>
>>> It's not like it was hanging out the side, as both were clearly covered
>>> in front by her bikini top.
>> How do you know, the side was blurred. I figured she had slipped out
>> the side.
>
> I replayed it, and her boobs were definitely in front and covered. I
> can't
> locate a photo of the scene to prove what I'm saying.

There's no need to. Her boobs were definitely covered. This reminds me of
similar blurring last season around this point in the game when there was
the huge blowup between Sophie and Albert. There was a blurred side shot of
her boob but it was clear that they were covered up. For a show that loves
to have the girls walk around in bikinis they sure blur a lot.

Brian


Brian Smith

unread,
May 1, 2012, 4:58:06 AM5/1/12
to
"shawn" <nanof...@gNOTmail.com> wrote in message
news:7evup75np0r0hjl9t...@4ax.com...
I can't remember if it was last episode or the one or before but there's a
scene at camp where Kim is wearing a black bra. Where did that come from?!
I'm sure we've never seen her wearing it before and it seems awfully strange
that if she had it all along she wouldn't have worn it before.

And if the waves really did take one of Kat's shoes I wonder if they'd get
her a new pair of shoes? It would be funny if she had to compete with no
shoes.

Brian


Hunter

unread,
May 1, 2012, 6:00:25 AM5/1/12
to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:41:39 -0500, Sara...@webtv.net (Sarahh B)
wrote:

>I think Chelsea's boobs are natural, no implants. They are in
>proportion to her butt in size and firmness. They have a natural shape
>and slight sag which is not common with implants.
-----
No they are implants, not that I mind. :-)

That said I do think people automatically jump to conclusions when
they see a woman with big boobs that they are automatically implants.
I have seen HUGE breast on women that I know that they aren't at the
social economic level to have the resources to have a boob job.

------>Hunter

"No man in the wrong can stand up against
a fellow that's in the right and keeps on acomin'."

-----William J. McDonald
Captain, Texas Rangers from 1891 to 1907

Hunter

unread,
May 1, 2012, 8:03:56 AM5/1/12
to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:33:57 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<el...@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

>In article <FkDmr.21601$FQ1....@newsfe12.iad>,
>The CBS PR department speaks.
-------
Wouldn't it be more likely of the "CBS PR deprtment" to respond that
Chelsea's boobs *are* natural to a charge that they weren't? :-)
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Michael Black

unread,
May 1, 2012, 8:45:58 AM5/1/12
to
On Tue, 1 May 2012, Hunter wrote:

> I have seen HUGE breast on women that I know that they aren't at the
> social economic level to have the resources to have a boob job.
>
That's easy to explain. They run ads saying they want a "boob job" and
offer favors in exchange. I suppose some of those "I'm not a prostitute
but I'm having a hard time" ads may be fundraising for implants. I'm sure
I've seen someone post and say "I really want to do such and such, but I
need breast implants...", just like someone saying "I have all the skills
for this job, but I have to bring my own tools, and I can't afford
that...".

Michael

Michael Black

unread,
May 1, 2012, 8:48:24 AM5/1/12
to
On Tue, 1 May 2012, Larry in AZ wrote:

> Waiving the right to remain silent, "Brian Smith" <dcg_...@hotmail.com>
> said:
>
>>> After all the full-frontal globular flesh of Skanklisha..? About 80
>>> percent of her boobs are usually visible....
>>
>> You could jack that figure up to 90% and I still wouldn't excited with how
>> that ridiculous top looks on her. What were the wardrobe people thinking
>> when they gave that to her to wear?!
>
> I thought they brought their own wardrobe..?
>
Not during the period when all they had was the clothes on their back.
That seems to have disappeared, or maybe they just don't say anything.
Christina is still wearing a skirt at times, which suggests she didn't
pack a reasonable wardrobe.

Michael

Hunter

unread,
May 1, 2012, 1:33:52 PM5/1/12
to
On Tue, 1 May 2012 05:37:48 +0000 (UTC), Larry in AZ
<use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:

>Waiving the right to remain silent, Sara...@webtv.net (Sarahh B) said:
>
>> I think Chelsea's boobs are natural, no implants. They are in
>> proportion to her butt in size and firmness. They have a natural shape
>> and slight sag which is not common with implants.
>
>No way. They look like oranges underneath her flesh, and when she is seen
>lying on her back, they do not flatten out like normal breasts.
>
>--
> Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail
>
> "A lack of common sense is now considered a disability,
> with all the privileges that this entails."
>
>--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ne...@netfront.net ---
------
All true but those aren't neccessarily bad things. :-). Real or
"plastic" I don't mind. :-)

The Horny Goat

unread,
May 1, 2012, 1:53:06 PM5/1/12
to
On Tue, 1 May 2012 05:37:35 +0000 (UTC), Larry in AZ
<use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:

>Waiving the right to remain silent, Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca> said:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Larry in AZ wrote:
>>
>>> Waiving the right to remain silent, Sara...@webtv.net (Sarahh B) said:
>>>
>>>> Chelsea seems very proud of her chest. Will probably be topless
>>>> before the season is over.
>>>
>>> Why were they blurring the shot of Kat on the side of her right boob..?
>>> It was a two-shot of Kat talking to another girl at their camp.
>>>
>>> It's not like it was hanging out the side, as both were clearly covered
>>> in front by her bikini top.
>> How do you know, the side was blurred. I figured she had slipped out
>> the side.
>
>I replayed it, and her boobs were definitely in front and covered. I can't
>locate a photo of the scene to prove what I'm saying.

I bet you took a couple of hours researching frame by frame too!

UCLAN

unread,
May 1, 2012, 1:54:10 PM5/1/12
to
On 5/1/2012 5:03 AM, Hunter (Hunter) wrote:

> Wouldn't it be more likely of the "CBS PR deprtment" to respond that
> Chelsea's boobs *are* natural to a charge that they weren't? :-)

Why?

The Horny Goat

unread,
May 1, 2012, 1:54:09 PM5/1/12
to
On Tue, 01 May 2012 02:09:59 -0400, shawn <nanof...@gNOTmail.com>
wrote:

>They do. The wardrobe people then pick out what they want them to wear
>(so they can cast them in a certain light.) Recently they have
>started giving them additional items (swim suits and the like)
>sometime after they initially start playing the game. I guess they
>hope to avoid the pink droopy underwear situation again. ;)

If you're talking about the late lamented Philip he doubtless would
have looked better in a well sized swimsuit even if it was a bikini!

The Horny Goat

unread,
May 1, 2012, 2:01:37 PM5/1/12
to
On Tue, 1 May 2012 08:48:24 -0400, Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca> wrote:

>> I thought they brought their own wardrobe..?
>>
>Not during the period when all they had was the clothes on their back.
>That seems to have disappeared, or maybe they just don't say anything.
>Christina is still wearing a skirt at times, which suggests she didn't
>pack a reasonable wardrobe.

Who can forget Lillian in her Scout master uniform??

The Horny Goat

unread,
May 1, 2012, 2:05:14 PM5/1/12
to
On Tue, 01 May 2012 10:00:25 GMT, Hunter <buffh...@my-deja.com>
(Hunter) wrote:

>That said I do think people automatically jump to conclusions when
>they see a woman with big boobs that they are automatically implants.
>I have seen HUGE breast on women that I know that they aren't at the
>social economic level to have the resources to have a boob job.
>
>------>Hunter

And then there are women like my wife who was 34C (at that time she
looked like a competitive swimmer) when we married and after 3 kids
(now 24,22,20) is now 40D... ain't complaining - the old broad does
fine for her 50s - no T-Bird (probably the biggest 40+ hottie in
Survivor history though I liked this season's Monica) but no
complaints either.

Hunter

unread,
May 1, 2012, 9:09:08 PM5/1/12
to
-----
Because it seems more likely that they would deny they would be
implants than admit they were. After all in some people's mind having
inplants is a negative. It just fits more. It is like you expecting a
thief to deny stealling but he admits it. He doesn't cover it up.
Doesn't feel natural order of things LOL! This feels like a "dog bites
man" story

I guess I am used to people evading things so the "CBS PR department"
(and yes I know that was a slap at Brian Smith by another poster)
admitting it would feel strange.

What's next Wiliam Shatner admitting he wears a tupee? :-)

BTW, more power to her. No shame in it as people want to have her
think by jealous people. :-)

The Horny Goat

unread,
May 2, 2012, 5:25:14 AM5/2/12
to
On Tue, 01 May 2012 10:54:10 -0700, UCLAN <UC...@invalid.net> wrote:

Given that it was common knowledge that Tina Wesson winner of season 2
had implants why would CBS feel the subject needed discussed now? And
who could forget Sarah Queen of the Nile?

It's not like women with unnaturally large breasts were an innovation
on Survivor.

(I will say it's a tragedy that Jessie Camacho 2nd boot on one of the
early seasons felt it necessary to go under the knife - hers were as
near perfect as you are likely ever to see on Survivor)

Fvert

unread,
May 2, 2012, 9:09:23 PM5/2/12
to
In article <r6v1q79lnhr1jacjg...@4ax.com>,
The Horny Goat <lcr...@home.ca> wrote:

> Given that it was common knowledge that Tina Wesson winner of season 2
> had implants why would CBS feel the subject needed discussed now? And
> who could forget Sarah Queen of the Nile?


I thought Tina didn't get them until after she got back?


Brian
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Brian Smith

unread,
May 4, 2012, 1:20:31 AM5/4/12
to
"Larry in AZ" <use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA048A7EA7DB...@202.177.16.121...
> Waiving the right to remain silent, Hunter <buffh...@my-deja.com>
> (Hunter)
> said:
>
>> All true but those aren't neccessarily bad things. :-). Real or
>> "plastic" I don't mind. :-)
>
> I grew up in the age of real boobs. Never got to sample the fake
> stuff....

"Age of Real Boobs." Sounds like it could be the name of a porno with an
historical slant to it.

Brian


The Horny Goat

unread,
May 4, 2012, 2:42:47 AM5/4/12
to
On Wed, 02 May 2012 21:09:23 -0400, Fvert <fv...@nospam.invalid>
wrote:
Nope - Tina's titties were all silicone all the time.

The one who got surgery after she got back was season 3's Jessie
Camacho (booted 2nd) who I thought (and still do think) was one of the
prettiest contestants ever and definitely the winner of the "you're
perfect now why consider plastic surgery?" award.

[Hint: go to Google Images and look up her name - the first picture
shown was from Survivor - the other ones are later on]

Hunter

unread,
May 9, 2012, 2:01:19 PM5/9/12
to
On Thu, 3 May 2012 23:30:30 +0000 (UTC), Larry in AZ
<use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:

>Waiving the right to remain silent, Hunter <buffh...@my-deja.com> (Hunter)
>said:
>
>> All true but those aren't neccessarily bad things. :-). Real or
>> "plastic" I don't mind. :-)
>
>I grew up in the age of real boobs. Never got to sample the fake stuff....
>
>--
> Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail
>
> "A lack of common sense is now considered a disability,
> with all the privileges that this entails."
>
>--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ne...@netfront.net ---
----
How old are you? The "Age of "Fake" Boobs" started in the 1980s.
Silicone enhancement by injection has been around since at least the
1960s, but the modern implants got their start IIRC in the early
1980s.

Don't get me wrong a pair of 40DD real boobs are better than a pair
of 40DD enhanced ones but I don't mind either! What I do hate are
falsies! You know, some deprived girls put padding in the bras? That
is false advertising! What a disappointment!

doob it

unread,
May 9, 2012, 7:10:24 PM5/9/12
to

About breast implants...Brian said:

"I thought Tina didn't get them until after she got back?"


She had tushie implants TOO?


(see...he said...'got back'.)

doob it

unread,
May 9, 2012, 7:18:38 PM5/9/12
to

Brian Smiff said:

' "Age of Real Boobs." Sounds like it could be the name of a porno with
an historical slant to it. '


Or the name of a Usenet groups retrospective.

Hunter

unread,
May 10, 2012, 7:21:26 PM5/10/12
to
On Thu, 3 May 2012 23:30:40 +0000 (UTC), Larry in AZ
<use...@DELETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:

>Waiving the right to remain silent, Hunter <buffh...@my-deja.com> (Hunter)
>said:
>
>> That said I do think people automatically jump to conclusions when
>> they see a woman with big boobs that they are automatically implants.
>> I have seen HUGE breast on women that I know that they aren't at the
>> social economic level to have the resources to have a boob job.
>
>Here's a little test....
>
>http://www.forthecraic.net/flash/boobtest.swf
----
I just took it. I scored a 17 out of 20 so I am in the "16-18 You're a
natural! Congratulations, you win the World Cups." level! :-)

I will say it would've been harder if they had bras on and worst fully
clothes (but of course with significant cleavage showing).
0 new messages