"Brian Smith" wrote in message
news:7544d2e3-43c1-4196...@googlegroups.com...
>
>On Tuesday, February 6, 2024 at 4:39:45 PM UTC-7, zeppo wrote:
>> On Tuesday, February 6, 2024 at 10:51:54 AM UTC-8, Brian Smith wrote:
>> >None of them stood out for me. I did notice that Dave refers to himself
>> >by his last name. Wonder if Jeff will as well.
>> Of course he will. Probst loves that sort of thing.
>
>He used to make a big deal out of players needing to earn that privilege. A
>good somewhat recent example is Sarah. Not saying she didn't earn the
>"privilege," but in some cases the player is known by their first name and
>she's one of them.
I know Jeff used to make a big deal about players having to "earn" the right
to be addressed by their last name, but I'm not sure that really stands up.
A really recent example was S43 eventual-winner Mike Gabler who, as far as I
recall, was called Gabler from the very start of the game. He didn't do
anything to earn that naming. It's also hard to say that one of the
best-known "last name only" players, John Cochran, earned being called by
his last name. As I recall, Cochran simply requested he be called that way
in his very first appearance on the show, long before anyone could really
see what he could do.
There was also always a lot of inconsistency in how Jeff decided who he
would address this way. It couldn't just be player greatness. Parvati
Shallow by any measure is one of the great players, yet I never heard her
addressed as "Shallow". I don't recall Tyson being addressed as "Apostol"
or Sandra ever being called "Diaz-Twine". I don't recall Yul ever being
addressed as "Kwon". These were all winners. Yet a marginal player like
Mike Skupin - not necessarily one of the greats - gets to be called
"Skupin". And Jonathan Penner - who never finished higher than seventh and
was more entertaining than really good, got to be called "Penner". So go
figure.
>
--