And just for the record, "educated" whites have a more deep seated
hatred of your type, due to the simple fact you shitskins are taking
their seats in college and universities around the world thanks to
handout nigger programs like AA. Basically forcing stupid people down
the throats of academia in the world. How disgusting and base is that
?
The class of "white trash" people who you seem to know so much about
wouldn't probably kill you as quickly as a professor type would love
to fill you full of buckshot. But due to all these nigger loving laws,
people don't say or do what they really feel like doing, because ZOG
will have them lose their jobs, or lock them up for life, for an
imagined crime of some sort.
Give me a break man, you uppity niggers are really fucking annoying.
You better learn your place, or you'll die a hideous death. You can do
as your told, worship and revere us, stay in your own sections. Or
we're just gonna kill you uppity type of bongo banging chimps. This
isn't a joke, stay the fuck in the city, don't come out in the
country, or you'll die.
You know how many niggers have died going down a pretty country road ?
You'll just be one more worthless welfare grabbing chimp fucker.
Your father the Humanzee is already dead, you'll be next !
Mein Kampf,
Roger m.
http://www.geocities.com/modernkayaker
DARKSTAR <DAR...@FILMS.NET> wrote in message news:<n83b80lbfqktruuje...@4ax.com>...
> Why do Whites hate White trash racists so much?
>
>Because they don't want their wives and daughters raped by you
>untouchables of the world,
Really? hmmm....My girl is White and she and her family love me.
So I guess you are wrong with your Blanket statement.
>they don't want their house robbed blind.
I doubt there is anything anyone else owns that would cause me to
think of robbery. Such a lame stereotype.
Poor people commit robberies...Check out the statistics of crime in
eastern Europe.
You will find my conclusions true.
>They don't like the odor of a filthy shitskin darkie going by their
>office desk(even on requireq janitorial duty).
Stereotypes....I never have smelled a stinky Black person...I have
smelled a stinky African! I have also smelled white trash (like you)
that smelled like wet canine.
> And last but not least,
>because people tire easily of the nigger's favorite racket of
>"discrimination" when faced with mental tasks they can't accomplish,
>or they've been caught in a certain type of criminal or unethical sort
>of behavior.
More Stereotypes..Should I start slinging the MANY stereotypes out
there about Neo-Nazi's?
One of them is that you Leather clad boys are gay.
Get over the stereotypes get some facts.
>And just for the record, "educated" whites have a more deep seated
>hatred of your type, due to the simple fact you shitskins are taking
>their seats in college and universities around the world thanks to
>handout nigger programs like AA. Basically forcing stupid people down
>the throats of academia in the world. How disgusting and base is that
First of all YOU are not in a position to talk about what educated
whites prefer...YOU are White Trash...Understand cave Monkey.
Don't confuse yourself. Educated whites give to this country.
What do Neo-Nazi, white trash, subterranean simians contribute?
Ill tell you, Nothing!!
You attempt to take claim for what your betters have done. That's why
they call you "White Trash", so to separate themselves from your
filth.
>The class of "white trash" people who you seem to know so much about
>wouldn't probably kill you as quickly as a professor type would love
>to fill you full of buckshot. But due to all these nigger loving laws,
>people don't say or do what they really feel like doing, because ZOG
>will have them lose their jobs, or lock them up for life, for an
>imagined crime of some sort.
Again you are speaking for a group of people your simian mind has no
concept of.
>
>Give me a break man, you uppity niggers are really fucking annoying.
>You better learn your place, or you'll die a hideous death.
Really? Come get me.
>You can do
>as your told, worship and revere us, stay in your own sections. Or
>we're just gonna kill you uppity type of bongo banging chimps. This
>isn't a joke, stay the fuck in the city, don't come out in the
>country, or you'll die.
LOL!!! I go where I please. You White Trash Chimps don't scare
me...Besides, I could smell you a mile off anyhow.
>You know how many niggers have died going down a pretty country road ?
Yup...Plenty...By petty murdering chimps.
>You'll just be one more worthless welfare grabbing chimp fucker.
>Your father the Humanzee is already dead, you'll be next !
Neo-Nazis don't scare me boy...Bring it.
>Mein Kampf,
Hitler is dead.
>Roger m.
>
>
>http://www.geocities.com/modernkayaker
>
DARKSTAR
>
>
>
>
>DARKSTAR <DAR...@FILMS.NET> wrote in message news:<n83b80lbfqktruuje...@4ax.com>...
>> Why do Whites hate White trash racists so much?
>>
TCMB Updated definition 2004
Typical CaveMonkey Behavior:
1) Characterized by the CaveMonkey avoiding a question or more likely
avioding the truth (see Tom Shelly example)
2) Lies; untruthful behavior
Tom wont answer the question posed to him. EVEN after I said that I
answered HIS questions Incorrectly.
He is commiting TCMB. He can't answer them.
He is guttless and cannot admit when he is wrong.
he makes claims and has done NOT one thing to back them up.
heres your opportunity...will he answer the question or just insist
that I admit to not knowing his questions once again.
TCMB all the way.
He will likely not answer the post or just snip the questions out from
it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Own up to? Liar?
WHAT?!!?!?
I said I didnt know what your specific part of the gaffers rig was?
I disagree on your questioning of the focus puller, however since you
are asking the question and believe me to be wrong so be it.
Doesnt scave me in the least.
Im WRONG CONCERNING YOUR QUESTION.
Is that better.
WHew...
OK.
NOW NO MORE AVOIDING THE QUESTIONS YOU OBVIOULY ARE HAVING TROUBLE
WITH.
IF they are not your area of expertise I will be GLAD to ask you one
in your area.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND TOM!! I WILL ASK YOU A QUESTION IN YOUR AREA OF
EXPERTISE!
Since you know so much about film THESE shouldnt take more that a few
minutes to answer.
If you are claiming that they are not in your field and you dont
know...hmmmmm gee that put you in the same place as me. (you wouldnt
want THAT would you) Except a film Student would be able to answer
them fairly well.
Now answer them. No more shenanigans.
Now I asked you some specifics which you are dodging in YOUR area of
Expertise? VIDEO. and in an area a HACK could have no hope with FILM
THEORY.
Why Dodge it? I know why...lack of education.
I have the education for real; worked hard to earn it, don't need your
questions to prove anything. But I BET you won't try to answer
mine....will you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Here goes again
My big question is this? If you took editing from a renowned editor,
how did you miss the part about using an editing table to cut a film?
Steenbeck is a standard.
I'm sorry but your addition yesterday made things even more confusing?
Didn't he teach you about cutting film? Or is that program just for
Video and Hi-def?
Now its my turn for questions and they are all based in your world of
Expertise First DIGITAL VIDEO PRODUCTION.
-What is the significance of HDR? and why?
-What is the best proper resolution for digital production? and Why?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And one that will show you never went to film school...
What is significance of Structuralism on the Auteur theory? What is
it and Why? Name the major players as well.
By the way Tommy boy these questions are SO easy to answer if you are
up to date on Video, and if you went to Film School.
Know that I will check your results with TURNITIN. COM to verify for
plagiarism....Good Luck
And you plagiarize....That will be a true humiliation....PLEASE pull
from a book, a website, or someones work.
DARKSTAR
TCMB Updated definition 2004
Typical CaveMonkey Behavior:
1) Characterized by the CaveMonkey avoiding a question or more likely
avoiding the truth
2) Lies; untruthful behavior
3) Homosexual activity (Banjo Parties, Gay Nazi Bars); innuendo
4) Violence, aggressive behavior, and or threats of Violence (Banjo
Party)
5) masturbation
6) Pedophilia, Bestiality, Necrophilia
7) Schizophrenia, Manic Depression. Feelings of inadequacy. (Viagra, small penis syndrome(see: MUH DICK)
CaveMonkey (Methus smokus liesus pasteus-cancerous Neanderthal man)
Scientists studying TCMB have found a direct correlation between Coors,
Jack Daniel's and TCMB (see also: Banjo Party; CaveMonkey; and Movies:
Deliverance)
--
Let's get neutered
You're so much more than a reproducer
It don't mean that you've failed
If you don't spend your nights chasing tail
You'll learn to be calm
When your equipment's gone
You'll be cuter
When you're neutered
-- From Meow TV, some good advice for tomcats, crackheads, and regular
Usenet users.
"Roger Morgan" <modern...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4f22bb8e.0404...@posting.google.com...
<Retarded racist bullshit snipped>.
"Joseph Thompson" <jr...@ragland.net> wrote in message
news:6wphc.300$uP.1...@eagle.america.net...
Rodney Peterson wrote:
>
> Consequently, if you were to take 100 as you call them "niggers" and
> move them to the whitest of the white, say Alaska or Canada in North America
> or Scandanavia and isolate them for 100 generations, you'd have white
> people.
You would have *no* people. DAFNz are too IQ-75 dumb to survive in the
cold climate where long-range planning, self-discipline, and
conservation of resources are required.
Mediterranean and Middle Eastern countries are a lot hotter than
sub-Saharan Africa. THEIR PEOPLES ARE NOT BLACK!
Artic countries are a lot colder than the White heartlands of Europe.
THEIR PEOPLES ARE NOT WHITE!
If you were to take 200 of your sort, move them to Higher education
and isolate them for 100 generations, you would still have stupid
cunts as a result.
This makes all of your nigger loving bullshit observations and
Really? considering this has never been performed...How did you come
to this conclusion?
Another dumb simian answer to follow...I'm sure.
Mein Kampf,
Roger M.
http://www.geocities.com/modernkayaker
KFC=Kitchen Fried Chimps !
"Rodney Peterson" <oceanstripc...@comcasr.net> wrote in message news:<Kq-dnVTL0aY...@comcast.com>...
You seem to have a deffinite chip on your shoulder. The generations beofre
you in your lineage must have been woodsmen, not creftsmen.
"Roger Morgan" <modern...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4f22bb8e.04042...@posting.google.com...
Regarding DNA, it is
> more than 99% similar among all human beings.
****And the only difference between diamonds and graphite is the carbon
bonding. Therefore, your point is........?
You, all your racist peers, and everyone else on the planet has
> African blood in your DNA and is the product of African heritage.
****And your of this proof is................????????
No proof, no merit, so noted.
There will be a test, wigger.
--
What NIGGERS are missing leaves the NIGGERS without an ability to think
about what NIGGERS are missing.
Therefore, NIGGERS need not respond.
I. M. White
> Far more people universally hate retarded racist morons spouting hateful
> bullshit than any one race itself. Incidentially, Roger, are you aware that
> your race is a direct result of where your ancestors lived in relation to
> the equator? If you were to take 200 of the whitest whites, move them to
> Africa and isolate them for 100 generations, you'd have black people as a
> result.
How do you know that?
> Consequently, if you were to take 100 as you call them "niggers" and
> move them to the whitest of the white, say Alaska or Canada in North America
> or Scandanavia and isolate them for 100 generations, you'd have white
> people. Makes all of your racist bullshit observations and opinions
> obsolete, meaningless and pointless.
Talk about bullshit!
Perfesser White
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
We all came from Adam and Eve. Nothing scientific about it, just stating my
opinion.
If that were true, wouldn't we all be incredibly inbred?
Not my opinion (thought it would explain the popularity
of American Idol), just stating something scientific.
As for the Adam and Eve storyline...well...
when they went out into the big, bad world,
they were not the only humans around.
Weren't they were simply the only human
around that had souls?
> If that were true, wouldn't we all be incredibly inbred?
> Not my opinion (thought it would explain the popularity
> of American Idol), just stating something scientific.
>
> As for the Adam and Eve storyline...well...
> when they went out into the big, bad world,
> they were not the only humans around.
> Weren't they were simply the only human
> around that had souls?
Since I have nothing to talk about until 8... I don't really have a strong
opinion on the matter, I don't really think it's a important theological
question but have heard some discussion on it, so I thought I'd chime in...
The people who I've heard that are stict literalist when it comes to the
Bible do believe that Adam and Eve's children did populate the earth
entirely by themselves. There is some verse that said after Cain killed
Abel Adam and Eve went on to have many other children, Cain probably married
one of the daughters or even another offspring of one of Adam and Eve's
children at some point, it could have been after they had produced whole
communities. At this point people were living hundreds of years and could
produce offspring much later in life than we can. God didn't oppose laws
against incest until much later in the Bible and such humans were so close
to the ideal in which they were created inbreading really wasn't a problem
since there were no genetic defects to worry about.
Similarly after the flood the earth was populated again entirely by Noah,
his wife, his three sons, and their wives.
Anyway, like I said, I don't really have a strong opinion whether all this
is true or not, but I've always found the question and different theories
interesting.
Jessica
God didn't oppose laws
> against incest until much later in the Bible and such humans were so close
> to the ideal in which they were created inbreading really wasn't a problem
Goodness! What is happening to my english skills! What this probably
should have said is something more like:
God didn't _impose_ laws against incest until much later in the Bible and
_since_ humans were so close to the ideal in which they were created
inbreeding really wasn't a problem...
Again, not neccessarily my opinion, but a theory I've heard.
Jessica
I suppose we would need someone with a
better understanding of biology to explain the
true biological problems with inbreeding.
I thought the problem had to do with a lack
of diversity in the available genes, not in
the defect level of those genes. If that is
the case, the Adam and Eve (but no one
else) storyline seems like it would cause
the ultimate problem.
It is odd that humans have a big problem
with inbreeding, but most other species
do not. Of course, there are animals, like
the cheetah, that are headed for extinction
specifically because of the problems of
inbreeding, so I guess it does effect the
animal world as well.
>Similarly after the flood the earth was populated again entirely by Noah,
>his wife, his three sons, and their wives.
3 unrelated genetic codes is a whole lot better
than 0 unrelated genetic codes.
Of course, as you suggest, the genetic material
back then was quite different than now since people
were told to have lived for hundreds of years.
Then again, they didn't have paperwork and SS
numbers to keep track of someone's real age.
This newsgroup can attest that a person like
Jan (S5) tends to be told in stories as quite
a bit older if one doesn't have the actual
date of her birth at hand. ;-)
> I suppose we would need someone with a
> better understanding of biology to explain the
> true biological problems with inbreeding.
> I thought the problem had to do with a lack
> of diversity in the available genes, not in
> the defect level of those genes. If that is
> the case, the Adam and Eve (but no one
> else) storyline seems like it would cause
> the ultimate problem.
I don't have a very good understand of biology or anything, so someone more
knowledgable chiming in would be helpful, but my understand it that the lack
of diversity is a problem because the probability of both parents carrying a
genetic disease is increased if they are related. For instance, some
diseases only show up if both parents pass on a recessive gene. If a
brother and sister reproduce, it's much more likely they are both carriers
of the same recessive gene simply because they could have both gotten it
from the same parents than two random, unrelated people, and if they both
pass on the same recessive gene to their offspring, the offspring is much
more likely to show up with the disease. Does that make sense? That's
always how I understood it, but I'm not sure, a large part of that is what I
inferred from that "The truth is out there" TV show with Moulder, I can't
remember the name. :->
> It is odd that humans have a big problem
> with inbreeding, but most other species
> do not. Of course, there are animals, like
> the cheetah, that are headed for extinction
> specifically because of the problems of
> inbreeding, so I guess it does effect the
> animal world as well.
I didn't know that. Then again, humans have a problem with many more things
than animals do.
> >Similarly after the flood the earth was populated again entirely by Noah,
> >his wife, his three sons, and their wives.
>
> 3 unrelated genetic codes is a whole lot better
> than 0 unrelated genetic codes.
True, but for reproduction, the farthest relative to mate with would have to
be first cousin, which I believe is still illegal in many states.
> Of course, as you suggest, the genetic material
> back then was quite different than now since people
> were told to have lived for hundreds of years.
> Then again, they didn't have paperwork and SS
> numbers to keep track of someone's real age.
> This newsgroup can attest that a person like
> Jan (S5) tends to be told in stories as quite
> a bit older if one doesn't have the actual
> date of her birth at hand. ;-)
True. I'm not sure where historians stand on the people in the Bible's life
spans anyway. There is so much disagreement whether the stories are truth
or alagory anyway, lifespan is probably a minor detail.
Jessica
"Jessica" <ca_tankg...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:diUhc.54299$2c7....@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
> X-Files lol
Thanks, I couldn't remember! :-)
Jessica
Evolution doesn't work that fast and I'm not so sure that skin color is directly
related to environment.
It doesn't seem to have made a difference in the skin color of American Indians,
who occupied the Western Hemisphere from the Arctic to Tierra Del Fuego and
everywhere in between for the last 10,000 years (or more).
As an example, the natives of the Andes still have a smaller average lung capacity
then native Tibetans, despite living there since the last ice age.
><racist bullshit snipped>
>
>We all came from Adam and Eve.
That's just one theory of several.
As info,
Perfesser White
>Nothing scientific about it, just stating my
>opinion.
>
"RedHeadBitch" <edo...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:R9Shc.2367$cl....@news01.roc.ny...
You are the coonclusion, monkey boy.
You seem to have no brain as demonstrated by not only your
incomprehensible statement but also your poor typing skills. Your
banana grasping digits are not up to the job, are they boy?
True but niggers came from Eve's other hole.
And did either of them have bellybuttons? That's the real question.
> Evolution is a scientific
> fact, Adam and Eve is a fairy tale.
You mean it could turn out to be totally false, then? Like a number of other
"scientific facts" have proven to be over the years?
--
hth
the_niggest
twitting negroez online since 2000AD
> I suppose we would need someone with a better understanding of
> biology to explain the true biological problems with inbreeding.
Inbreeding applifies the effects of any "bad genes" there may
be in the pool of people who are repeatedly breeding against
themselves. I'll go into more detail for those who haven't studied
this...
("Genes" are segments of chromosones in the nucleus of cells that
control specific traits of an organism. They're usually referred to as
if there's "a gene" for every trait, but in reality many genes
contribute to the control of most traits. Genes are paired and often
the effects of one of the gene pairs will override the other, which is
referred to as "dominant" and "recessive" gene traits.
This is usually demonstrated with plants or fruit flies, which can be
bred quickly to examine the effects of gene combinations. Genes are
paired because one set comes from the father and one from the mother
organism; since they each also have two pairs of genes this has the
effect of 'shuffling' gene combinations. Let's say two plants are
being bred and have a 'gene' that controls petal color. The dominant
gene is white, recessive is red. Assuming both genes are in the
population being bred you'll get the following combinations:
white/white
white/red
red/white
red/red
Only the last combination gets you red flower petals. Once you have
an organism with only recessive genes, it can only contribute those
genes to future generations, increasing the likelyhood that you'll
generate more organisms with both recessives.
Some recessive traits are mutations or flaws that cause the
resulting organism to have poor health; when populations inbreed these
traits can emerge and become dominant within that population unless
"fresh" genes are brought in from another group. Some royal families
in Europe developed hemophilia or mental defects due to inbreeding.)
> I thought the problem had to do with a lack of diversity in the
> available genes, not in the defect level of those genes. If that is
> the case, the Adam and Eve (but no one else) storyline seems like
> it would cause the ultimate problem.
Hmmm. "Yes." One begets the other (strangely apropos due to
the biblical discussion...). The lack of diversity in the gene set
exaggerates the effects of any defects.
I also agree that Adam and Eve could not have bred the entire
human population - there would be practically no genetic diversity in
the human race if they had. Two things - the story of Adam and Eve
can easily be taken as allegory without "invalidating" the Bible; also
(if I recall), the Bible itself says that Cain and Abel married women
from... other tribes(?) so Adam and Eve being 'first' did not
necessarily mean they were the 'only' humans available to breed.
HR
> As a side note...all the players that have ever
> appeared on Survivor have been hunter/gatherers
> while on the show. Even the ones given livestock,
> kill/eat the animals rather than collecting eggs
> and such. Does that mean that the Survivor
> cast members are all soul-less creatures? ;-)
I realize you're joking, but getting an egg a day from a
chicken won't feed a tribe, and they each want to get the most energy
from the animal as fast as they can because they don't know how long
they'll be around and they don't want to leave an advantage behind for
those that survive them.
HR
Good one. It reminds me of my Father's line: "If there is a chip on the
shoulder, you know that wood is nearby".
John