Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts

Dark Frontier is a bitter sweet pill

1 view
Skip to first unread message

knowled...@webtv.net

unread,
Feb 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/18/99
to
   DF was over all a good ST event. There's lot's to think about
though-

1. This was definately a different queen. The FC queen was an
emotional hotheaded b!tch! This one was calm and collect. Maybe the
borg are doubling up their dose of Vulcan assimilations.

2. What in the WORLD was up with all that green tintage? The dark,
grayishness in FC was so much more mysterious and deep. And what the
heck was that green spotlight that kept following the queen around
everywhere she walked? Does she do a show for the borg as a night job?
All that greenness just made the borg look like lemmings.

3.  I still hold out that Alice should have played the queen. No
offense to Thompson, she's an excellent actress, but Krige just made the
queen so unique and real and the quirks in her mannerisms were cool.
It's a crying shame. ALICE WHERE ARE YOU??????  I'm sorry, I've
just got to rant about this. Alice made the queen so self-involved, so
sadistic, so mentally twisted, so dark, so calculating yet at the same
time so emotional and desperate when her plans weren't working, and also
mindless and borg-like in a way. She did an EXCELLENT performance. I
was PISSED beyond redemption when I found out she wasn't playing the
queen. Alice come back!

4. THE MUSIC WAS LACKING BIG TIME! Music is a powerful tool to help a
movie have depth, feeling and emotion. The music could have been so
much more deep and could have added so much more to the feeling of the
movie.

5. One thing I've always felt about Voyager is the lack of uniqueness
to the episodes. If you compare a standard TNG episode to "Yesterday's
enterprise", the "mood" is so different. Granted this is supposed to be
a different history and set of background, but a lot would be added to
Voyager if that hard-to-define uniqueness could be added to each
episode. DF almost captured this, but not quite.

6. I didn't like the queen's comments about what species she came from.
I think that destroyed her character big time.

7. The BIG ISSUE-----Did DF destroy the borg????? Well, I think it
was a bitter sweet pill. The downsides are obvious:

   A. The borg were SO MUCH weaker here than they have EVER been.
Their power is part of what made them interesting.
   B. FC queen could create a force field with a thought. The DF
queen seemed so less in control of her own ship when confronted with
Janeway. She seemed so weak.
   C. The green tints made the borg seem like lime-popping
leprechauns. That color has GOT to go.
   D. I think some of the darkness of the borg was lost somehow.
   
   The upsides were:

   A. The other types of borg ships. The cubes were making things
unbearably monotonous. The new shapes, (the spheres, the "probes" the
strange diamond-shaped vessels) were the best idea ever. They added a
real depth to the borg society.
   B. That "station". More depth.
   C. The background screams when the race was being assimilated.
Anything that makes the borg seem unfeeling and incompassionate add to
the original premise about their character.
   

8. The show needs to add DEPTH! DEPTH I SAY! The vastness of borg
space, the sheer number of borg, the coldness of their character, the
size of the ships, anything.

9. The show needs to concentrate more on interpersonal relationships
and less on technobabblish plots. DF was pretty good on this front, I
believe.

   I don't think the damage is as severe as most people make it
out to be. The show was pretty good. It would have made a much better
movie on the big screen with a bigger budget though.


Woody Hanscom

unread,
Feb 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/18/99
to
>4. THE MUSIC WAS LACKING BIG TIME! Music is a powerful tool to help a
>movie have depth, feeling and emotion. The music could have been so
>much more deep and could have added so much more to the feeling of the
>movie.

I'd have to watch it again (hurrah for VCR's) to really make a judgement,
but there was at least one instance where it _really_ caught my ear.
During one of the shots of the shuttle approaching the borgplex, there
were a couple low, twangy notes like someone plucking two of the lower
strings on a piano. Caught my ear mainly because the last time I can
remember hearing that theme used was in ST:TMP as the Enterprise is making
its entrance into V'ger. Visually similar shots (though the one in ST:TMP
was much more visually impressive (okay, and about half an hour longer)
than VOY:DF's borgplex entrance), good use of old themes.

Which brought another thought into my feeble little brain. In advance,
please forgive me if this has been hashed and re-hashed many times over in
the past, I just subscribed to these groups after watching VOY:DF.

Has anyone ever thought much of the possiblity that the planet that
transformed the Voyager probe into V'ger was the Borg home planet, before
they got to the point of striking out on their own and assimilating
everything that sneezed twice in their general direction? The general
purpose seems to be very similar - it's not that big a step from "learn
all that is learnable, collect all the possible knowlege in the universe,
then merge with the creator" to the Borg's assimilation of other species
and knowledge bases into their own. Additionally, it was hypothesized in
ST:TMP that the Voyager probe had fell through a black hole to this
'machine planet', been repaired/reprogrammed there, and sent away. Mix in
a little time distortion along with the black hole, and V'ger could have
been sent on its voyage back to Earth long before the Borg advanced to a
point where they could move out on their own, and still have time to fill
its databanks and make it back home. Just a thought...would be interested
to hear if others have explored this line of reasoning. Would love to see
it explored in a show at some point, but that may just be fanboy drooling
(grin).

Incidentally, what happened to all the knowledge that V'ger transmitted to
Earth?

And while I'm at it, I suppose I could throw in the Transformers
homeworld/Borg homeworld parallells, too...<grin>. Are there any?
Probably...I'm just blowing smoke out of my ass at this point, but if I
can think of it now, it's probably been beaten to death before now...

[ Woody Hanscom | djw...@geocities.com | http://home.gci.net/~djwoody/ ]
[=======================================================================]
[ Northern Nights - Your source for local Alaskan music and information ]
[---------------- http://home.gci.net/~djwoody/nnights/ ----------------]

Maureen Goldman

unread,
Feb 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/18/99
to
knowled...@webtv.net wrote:

> 6. I didn't like the queen's comments about what species she came from.
> I think that destroyed her character big time.

That part stood out for me as well. Couldn't figure out whether it meant
that her head was the only part remaining from an individual, if this meant
that she had been "promoted" to Queen, or ? The detail seemed jarring and
out of place. Didn't keep me from enjoying the two-parter, but this was
not a point at which I wanted to rethink the concept of The Borg Queen.

Maureen Goldman

unread,
Feb 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/18/99
to
knowled...@webtv.net wrote:

>    The upsides were:
>
>    A. The other types of borg ships. The cubes were making things
> unbearably monotonous. The new shapes, (the spheres, the "probes" the
> strange diamond-shaped vessels) were the best idea ever. They added a
> real depth to the borg society.
>    B. That "station". More depth.
>    C. The background screams when the race was being assimilated.
> Anything that makes the borg seem unfeeling and incompassionate add to
> the original premise about their character.

One scene I found effective was when Seven stopped a runaway and he was
changed in front of her.

The small group that she saved reminded me somewhat of Clarissa Starling in
"The Silence of the Lambs"... "I thought that if I could save just one...."
I still don't know why the Queen let them go, although I'm sure it wasn't
out of compassion.    


Ronald Stewart

unread,
Feb 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/18/99
to
>Has anyone ever thought much of the possiblity that the planet that
>transformed the Voyager probe into V'ger was the Borg home planet, before
>they got to the point of striking out on their own and assimilating
>everything that sneezed twice in their general direction? The general
>purpose seems to be very similar - it's not that big a step from "learn
>all that is learnable, collect all the possible knowlege in the universe,
>then merge with the creator" to the Borg's assimilation of other species
>and knowledge bases into their own. Additionally, it was hypothesized in
>ST:TMP that the Voyager probe had fell through a black hole to this
>'machine planet', been repaired/reprogrammed there, and sent away. Mix in
>a little time distortion along with the black hole, and V'ger could have
>been sent on its voyage back to Earth long before the Borg advanced to a
>point where they could move out on their own, and still have time to fill
>its databanks and make it back home. Just a thought...would be interested
>to hear if others have explored this line of reasoning. Would love to see
>it explored in a show at some point, but that may just be fanboy drooling
>(grin).


Yes, I was surprised that V'ger was not mentioned when the Borg first 'came
into being'. Judging from the quick increase in race numbers (don't remember
what any alpha quadrant #s are, sorry), the Borg have been assimilating in
their current fashion for only a relatively short period of time, so I once
considered the possibility that V'ger & Decker were the founders of the
Borg race. It sure would make a great story. Also (prior to D-quadrant
invasion by V'ger) would have explained why the Borg were humanoid to some
extent.
N.B. When writing a script for the series(es), you are asked not to take
anything mentioned in any ST books as fact necessarily. This is to avoid
continuity errors - it is considered that only occurrences in the series are
set in stone. Of course, there are still many errors in the series alone,
but...
Just filling in space as MS Outlook is complaining about my lack of content.
Isn't this enough for you??
- Ron Stewart

mca...@erols.com

unread,
Feb 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/18/99
to
Maureen Goldman wrote:
> The small group that she saved reminded me somewhat of Clarissa Starling in
> "The Silence of the Lambs"... "I thought that if I could save just one...."
> I still don't know why the Queen let them go, although I'm sure it wasn't
> out of compassion.

DF seemed to try to make the Queen a cunning and mysterious semi-individual
unlike the drones who are all straight-forward. Even the FC queen was
a straight shooter.

The claim that Seven was planted on Voyager is also a part of this. This kind
of revisionist history costs nothing, so they threw it in. Unlike the straight
story of Seven's family which was so patently against canon. How can anyone
forget the episode with first contact with borg (and a Q episode too)?!

--
MikeC

Please reply to the group.

HTW

unread,
Feb 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/19/99
to


Gene Roddenberry was said to have mentioned a possible plausible
connection between the Borg and V'ger back when the first borg episode
"Q Who" was produced for TNG. As far as a script...I wrote a Voyager
spec script several years ago with the story of Voyager coming upon the
Borg Home planet and discoveing the V'ger connection. Ultimately it got
rejected...they don't want freelancers to write Borg Sequels... and now
it wouldn't work because of stories like First Contact.

Kenn Prevans

--
Healing the Warrior
There's a trivial Star Trek reference on my site at:
http://www.metalab.unc.edu/warrior/htwnavig.htm#gator

Rich Harbor

unread,
Feb 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/19/99
to

HTW wrote in message <36CD61D5...@replythrumysite.edu>...

>Ronald Stewart wrote:
>>
>> >Has anyone ever thought much of the possiblity that the planet that
>> >transformed the Voyager probe into V'ger was the Borg home planet,
before


Read the book "The Return" written by William Shatner. The book kicks but
and it explains the connection between V'ger and the Borg.

(-: IDIC

J.S. Harbour

unread,
Feb 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/19/99
to
The plausible connection between Decker/V'ger and the Borg was invalidated by
Guinan when she spoke of the Borg assimilating her race hundreds of years ago.
Remember, she was around in Earth's 19th century (doing who knows what), and
knew of the Borg back then also.

But I think Will Decker died after he joined V'ger, because now he's in 7th
Heaven.

(sorry, bad pun, couldn't resist)

HTW wrote:
>
> Ronald Stewart wrote:
> >
> > >Has anyone ever thought much of the possiblity that the planet that
> > >transformed the Voyager probe into V'ger was the Borg home planet, before

--

J.S. Harbour

Download a free copy of Ultimate Star Trek Trivia at:
http://www.doitnow.com/~noraxon/harbour/trivia

jrw

unread,
Feb 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/19/99
to
"J.S. Harbour" wrote:

> The plausible connection between Decker/V'ger and the Borg was invalidated by
> Guinan when she spoke of the Borg assimilating her race hundreds of years ago.
> Remember, she was around in Earth's 19th century (doing who knows what), and
> knew of the Borg back then also.
>
> But I think Will Decker died after he joined V'ger, because now he's in 7th
> Heaven.
>

Ah yes... but so is Jillian from ST:IV.

Now ain't that weird???

-jwardl

The Shadow

unread,
Feb 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/19/99
to

>"J.S. Harbour" wrote:
>> But I think Will Decker died after he joined V'ger, because now he's in
7th
>> Heaven.

jrw wrote:
>Ah yes... but so is Jillian from ST:IV.
>
>Now ain't that weird???


But have they worked with Kevin Bacon ?

GeneK

unread,
Feb 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/19/99
to
I don't recall any mention of the Borg by the 19th century Guinan. I do recall
her asking Data if her father had sent him to Earth to find her, though. I
think that that was supposed to represent a more happy-go-lucky time in Guinan's
life, probably *before* the Borg assimilation. It's still 500 years from that
point to TNG, plenty of time for the Borg to show up and still be "hundreds of
years" before TNG.

GeneK

Kryptonkid

unread,
Feb 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/19/99
to
And the V'Ger/Borg connection was made in William Shatner's novel 'The
Return.'

Sam Lawson

unread,
Feb 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/20/99
to
"J.S. Harbour" wrote:
> But I think Will Decker died after he joined V'ger, because now he's in 7th Heaven.

> Ah yes... but so is Jillian from ST:IV.

> But have they worked with Kevin Bacon?

Well, Wil Weaton did a cameo (in SF uniform) in She's Having a Baby.
(It was at the end when they every one in the world suggested baby
names.)

Guinan

unread,
Feb 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/20/99
to

GeneK wrote:

> I don't recall any mention of the Borg by the 19th century Guinan. I do recall
> her asking Data if her father had sent him to Earth to find her, though. I
> think that that was supposed to represent a more happy-go-lucky time in Guinan's
> life, probably *before* the Borg assimilation. It's still 500 years from that
> point to TNG, plenty of time for the Borg to show up and still be "hundreds of
> years" before TNG.

Guinan mentions the Borg in Generations.. when they assimilated her race and what
was left of
her people escaped on ships. They were rescued by the Enterprise B.
I've always assumed her planet was in the Delta quadrant (Borg Space).
You do the math..

Guinan
--
Visit Guinan's Bar and Grille
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Chamber/2541/

GeneK

unread,
Feb 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/20/99
to
...except, of course, that no one knows where Guinan's home world was,
your assumption notwithstanding. The 19th century Guinan never says
anything to the effect that she knows anything about the Borg, what
we see onscreen is Guinan happily vacationing on Earth in the 19th
century, then 400 years later a desperate refugee in the 23rd century.
This suggests that the Borg assimilation of her homeworld took place
sometime between those 2 events.

Although I hate the idea that V'ger interacted in some way with the
Borg, mostly because I hate this tendency some people seem to have
to want to make *everything* in Trek history interconnect, there's
really nothing in canon that makes it impossible. Even if the Borg
*had* assimilated Guinan's world in the Delta Quadrant in the 19th
century, there's nothing in that that invalidates the possibility
that sometime in the late 20th/early 21st century the Voyager 6
probe might disappear into a black hole, emerge near the Borg home
world in the Delta Quadrant, get rebuilt by the Borg and start its
way home, returning to Earth space some 200+ yrs later in the 23rd
century...

Genek

David

unread,
Feb 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/21/99
to
GeneK wrote:

> ...except, of course, that no one knows where Guinan's home world was,
> your assumption notwithstanding. The 19th century Guinan never says
> anything to the effect that she knows anything about the Borg, what
> we see onscreen is Guinan happily vacationing on Earth in the 19th
> century, then 400 years later a desperate refugee in the 23rd century.
> This suggests that the Borg assimilation of her homeworld took place
> sometime between those 2 events.
>

In "Q Who" Guinan said the Borg attactked her world a century before.


Rojan

unread,
Feb 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/21/99
to
Hi I have visited you Bar and Grill and it's great. I'll probably try a few
recipes. If I ever try gargh I'll have to eat it not live (he he he)

See ya

Rojan

ro...@videotron.ca

Guinan wrote in message <36CF6DF5...@hotmail.com>...


>
>
>GeneK wrote:
>
>> I don't recall any mention of the Borg by the 19th century Guinan. I do
recall
>> her asking Data if her father had sent him to Earth to find her, though.
I
>> think that that was supposed to represent a more happy-go-lucky time in
Guinan's
>> life, probably *before* the Borg assimilation. It's still 500 years from
that
>> point to TNG, plenty of time for the Borg to show up and still be
"hundreds of
>> years" before TNG.
>

>Guinan mentions the Borg in Generations.. when they assimilated her race
and what
>was left of
>her people escaped on ships. They were rescued by the Enterprise B.
>I've always assumed her planet was in the Delta quadrant (Borg Space).
>You do the math..
>

GeneK

unread,
Feb 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/21/99
to
Yes, that's the *name*...but that doesn't tell you where it was,
how far away it was from Federation space, how long it would take
for the Borg to move on from there to the Federation, etc. It's
not useful information if you're trying to track the flow of Borg
assimilations.

GeneK


Eric Newman wrote:
>
>
> Isn't Guinan an El Aurian?

Eric Newman

unread,
Feb 22, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/22/99
to
On Sat, 20 Feb 1999 22:20:37 -0800, GeneK
<gene@genek_hates_spammers.com> wrote:

>...except, of course, that no one knows where Guinan's home world was,
>your assumption notwithstanding.

Isn't Guinan an El Aurian?

yvettesanders

unread,
Feb 22, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/22/99
to

GeneK wrote:

> The 19th century Guinan never says anything to the effect that she knows anything
> about the Borg, what we see onscreen is Guinan happily vacationing on Earth in the
> 19th
> century, then 400 years later a desperate refugee in the 23rd century.
> This suggests that the Borg assimilation of her homeworld took place
> sometime between those 2 events.
>

Let me see if I have this straight.......

Guinan is vactioning on Earth sometime between 1801 and 1900? When the heck did this
happen???

FWIW, the 21st Century also doesn't begin until January 1, 2001.

Just thought I'd pass this along.

Yvette


GeneK

unread,
Feb 22, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/22/99
to
"Time's Arrow." Data's head is found in an archeological dig under
San Francisco, he is eventually thrown back in time to the Sf in
the 1800's, where he meets Sam Clemens (Mark Twain), a very young
Jack London and Guinan. Sound familiar?

GeneK

Ronald Stewart

unread,
Feb 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/24/99
to
Yes, but books are not officially considered 'truth'...
- Ron

GeneK

unread,
Feb 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/24/99
to
The biggest problem with this idea, IMO, is that V'ger as portrayed
was *immensely* more powerful than the Borg have been shown to be.
According to Spock's observations when he passed through V'ger, it
had deconstructed and recorded *entire planets.* If the Borg had
had that kind of technology and power 70+ years before TNG, they
would have included it in their cubes...wouldn't they?

Genek

The Gene Genie

unread,
Feb 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/25/99
to
GeneK wrote:
>
> The biggest problem with this idea, IMO, is that V'ger as portrayed
> was *immensely* more powerful than the Borg have been shown to be.
> According to Spock's observations when he passed through V'ger, it
> had deconstructed and recorded *entire planets.* If the Borg had
> had that kind of technology and power 70+ years before TNG, they
> would have included it in their cubes...wouldn't they?
>
> Genek

I have to agree. In the film "First Contact", if the Borg had had the
technology V'ger had then there would have been no need for a battle
because it could have just *recorded* them. Thus making them practically
invincable.
Ta.

--
"The Gene Genie lives on his back"

The Gene Genie

unread,
Feb 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/25/99
to
Forgot something. When I meant they, I mean the Borg being invincible.
Might be self explanitory but I just wanna make sure.

Howard

unread,
Mar 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/10/99
to
Regarding the V'Ger thing. V'Ger is borg note in startrek the motion picture
the world of machines. V'Ger also believed its creator was a machine note
the borg queen was was not organic she was a machine.
Servo
Rojan wrote in message ...

Garth Bryan Marlin

unread,
Mar 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/10/99
to

Howard wrote:

> Regarding the V'Ger thing. V'Ger is borg note in startrek the motion picture
> the world of machines. V'Ger also believed its creator was a machine note
> the borg queen was was not organic she was a machine.

She was both, a cyborg. Thats why she died when her organic components were
destroyed. And she said that the borg were like humans before they moved beyond
the organic.


Wong

unread,
Mar 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/10/99
to
In one of William Shatner's Star Trek novels - I think it's "The Return" -
he specifically mentioned that V'ger was part of Borg or something.

Anyone who can get hold of the novel should read it.
============================================
Howard wrote in message ...


>Regarding the V'Ger thing. V'Ger is borg note in startrek the motion
picture
>the world of machines. V'Ger also believed its creator was a machine note
>the borg queen was was not organic she was a machine.

Adeel Rahman

unread,
Mar 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/10/99
to
yes, supposedly spock went to the borg homeworld and was not assimilated
because the collective already saw him as "borg" because his mind/meld
with V'ger back in one of the movies left a borg imprint or whatever in
his mind...

debbyt...@ussvoyager.com

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to
In article <F9EDF134EC158F3E.7AE67F043C76EDA2.5DCD72C43D341C0A@library-
proxy.airnews.net>,

"Howard" <se...@ezaccess.net> wrote:
> Regarding the V'Ger thing. V'Ger is borg note in startrek the motion picture
> the world of machines. V'Ger also believed its creator was a machine note
> the borg queen was was not organic she was a machine.

Remember...McCoy said they just may have witnessed a new form of life being
born...Which was both human and machine...Decker was human...Ilia was a
probe... So there you have mechanical and organic components...That's just my
opinion...I could be wrong... :-)

Debby
------
Resistance is futile...
You will be assimilated...
Thank you and have a nice day... :-)

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Dangermouse

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to

V'Ger is not Borg. End of story

(and no, Avenger isn't canon!)


--
"When two hunters go after the same prey they usually end up shooting each
other in the back - and we don't want to shoot each other in the back, do
we?"

http://members.aol.com/vulcancafe
-------

GeneK

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to
If the merging of Decker and V'ger was the crucial point at which a combined
humanoid/machine lifeform was created, that would not be the origin of the
Borg, as the Borg who traveled back to Cochran's time in FC were attempting
to use the E-E to communicate with the Borg of that time... so the Borg
predate ST:TMP by at least that long. And the "planet of living machines"
that rebuilt V'ger would not have been the Borg either, or V'ger would have
recognized "carbon units" as life forms...

GeneK

Dangermouse

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to

debbyt...@ussvoyager.com wrote
> Remember...McCoy said they just may have witnessed a new form of life
being
> born...Which was both human and machine...Decker was human...Ilia was a
> probe... So there you have mechanical and organic components...That's
just my
> opinion...I could be wrong... :-)

And you are - the Borg have been around for centuries, possibly millenia.

Guinan

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to

Howard wrote:

> Regarding the V'Ger thing. V'Ger is borg note in startrek the motion picture
> the world of machines. V'Ger also believed its creator was a machine note
> the borg queen was was not organic she was a machine.

> Servo
>

In First Contact, the Borg Queen mentions that they used to be organic and added
machinery..
The head and shoulders of the BQ were partly organic.

debbyt...@ussvoyager.com

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to
In article <36E7F44F.958A08C3@genek_hates_spammers.com>,

GeneK <gene@genek_hates_spammers.com> wrote:
> If the merging of Decker and V'ger was the crucial point at which a combined
> humanoid/machine lifeform was created, that would not be the origin of the
> Borg, as the Borg who traveled back to Cochran's time in FC were attempting
> to use the E-E to communicate with the Borg of that time... so the Borg
> predate ST:TMP by at least that long. And the "planet of living machines"
> that rebuilt V'ger would not have been the Borg either, or V'ger would have
> recognized "carbon units" as life forms...
>
> GeneK
>
> debbyt...@ussvoyager.com wrote:
> >
> > Remember...McCoy said they just may have witnessed a new form of life being
> > born...Which was both human and machine...Decker was human...Ilia was a
> > probe... So there you have mechanical and organic components...That's just
my
> > opinion...I could be wrong... :-)
>

I guess I was wrong... :-)

debbyt...@ussvoyager.com

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to
In article <01be6bdc$73786600$LocalHost@lgwujvnl>,

"Dangermouse" <mas...@sol.co.ukDEATH-TO-SPAMMERS> wrote:
>
>
> debbyt...@ussvoyager.com wrote
> > Remember...McCoy said they just may have witnessed a new form of life
> being
> > born...Which was both human and machine...Decker was human...Ilia was a
> > probe... So there you have mechanical and organic components...That's
> just my
> > opinion...I could be wrong... :-)
>
> And you are - the Borg have been around for centuries, possibly millenia.

Thank you... :-)

Devil_Man

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999 08:50:23 -0800, GeneK
<gene@genek_hates_spammers.com> wrote:

>If the merging of Decker and V'ger was the crucial point at which a combined
>humanoid/machine lifeform was created, that would not be the origin of the
>Borg, as the Borg who traveled back to Cochran's time in FC were attempting
>to use the E-E to communicate with the Borg of that time... so the Borg
>predate ST:TMP by at least that long.

Damn, that's a good point.

Herhubby

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:19:38 GMT, debbyt...@ussvoyager.com wrote:

>In article <01be6bdc$73786600$LocalHost@lgwujvnl>,
> "Dangermouse" <mas...@sol.co.ukDEATH-TO-SPAMMERS> wrote:
>>
>>
>> debbyt...@ussvoyager.com wrote
>> > Remember...McCoy said they just may have witnessed a new form of life
>> being
>> > born...Which was both human and machine...Decker was human...Ilia was a
>> > probe... So there you have mechanical and organic components...That's
>> just my
>> > opinion...I could be wrong... :-)
>>
>> And you are - the Borg have been around for centuries, possibly millenia.
>

Quick question - - How many means of time travel have we seen?

1 - Guardian of Forever
2 - Iconians' portal (?)
3 - The ol' slingshot, normally computed by a Vulcan
4 - 29th century whatever gadget
5 - Q
6 - Possibly the Traveler - wasn't really clear
7 - the Nexus
8 - Oh yeah, that Borg whatsit in "First Contact"
9 - Whatever the hell happened in the slipstream

How many did I forget? At least two or three, I'm sure

It is at least possible that the V'ger/Decker/Ilia merger and
disappearance could have created enough energy/temporal
displacement/(insert technobabble here) to have squirted the first
Borg out a few millennia ago into the Delta quadrant.

Gary Marek

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to
Don't forget the Bajoran Orb of Time.
~Gary


thre...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to
The ultimate means of time travel: Going forwards in time at a rate of
24 hours per day. What's so neat about this method of time travel is
that it works in real life :-)


DBR

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to

Herhubby wrote


>9 - Whatever the hell happened in the slipstream
>


This was just normal time passing by. Subtract this one.

Dangermouse

unread,
Mar 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/12/99
to

Herhubby <herhubb...@hotmail.com> wrote


> Quick question - - How many means of time travel have we seen?
>
>

> It is at least possible that the V'ger/Decker/Ilia merger and
> disappearance could have created enough energy/temporal
> displacement/(insert technobabble here) to have squirted the first
> Borg out a few millennia ago into the Delta quadrant.

A ludicrous credibility-destroying piece of hackwork worthy of Brannon at
his most jaded. It'll probably be next year's season finale...

Nick Farrell

unread,
Mar 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/12/99
to
In article <7c8o38$50q$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
debbyt...@ussvoyager.com writes

>
>Remember...McCoy said they just may have witnessed a new form of life being
>born...Which was both human and machine...Decker was human...Ilia was a
>probe... So there you have mechanical and organic components...That's just my
>opinion...I could be wrong... :-)

True but then the Borg would not have it in for humanity.

>
>Debby
>------
>Resistance is futile...
>You will be assimilated...
>Thank you and have a nice day... :-)
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--
Nick Farrell

debbyt...@ussvoyager.com

unread,
Mar 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/12/99
to
In article <GQwrdCAP...@edfu.demon.co.uk>,

Nick Farrell <Ni...@edfu.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <7c8o38$50q$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
> debbyt...@ussvoyager.com writes
> >
> >Remember...McCoy said they just may have witnessed a new form of life being
> >born...Which was both human and machine...Decker was human...Ilia was a
> >probe... So there you have mechanical and organic components...That's just my
> >opinion...I could be wrong... :-)
>
> True but then the Borg would not have it in for humanity.

No, the Borg have it in for EVERY species they meet...

Dangermouse

unread,
Mar 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/12/99
to

Wong <w...@interlog.com> wrote in article
<7c7bie$hrs$1...@news.interlog.com>...


> In one of William Shatner's Star Trek novels - I think it's "The Return"
-
> he specifically mentioned that V'ger was part of Borg or something.

And it's not canon.

Fortunately.

David B.

unread,
Mar 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/12/99
to
debbyt...@ussvoyager.com wrote:

> In article <GQwrdCAP...@edfu.demon.co.uk>,
> Nick Farrell <Ni...@edfu.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > In article <7c8o38$50q$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
> > debbyt...@ussvoyager.com writes
> > >
> > >Remember...McCoy said they just may have witnessed a new form of life being
> > >born...Which was both human and machine...Decker was human...Ilia was a
> > >probe... So there you have mechanical and organic components...That's just my
> > >opinion...I could be wrong... :-)
> >
> > True but then the Borg would not have it in for humanity.
>
> No, the Borg have it in for EVERY species they meet...
>

Unless, they're the Kazon...


Dantalas Trollslayer

unread,
Mar 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/13/99
to
> Nick Farrell
>

<G> Great name, any relation?

debbyt...@ussvoyager.com

unread,
Mar 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/13/99
to
In article <01be6cad$990164e0$03efb094@lgwujvnl>,

"Dangermouse" <mas...@sol.co.ukDEATH-TO-SPAMMERS> wrote:
>
>
> Wong <w...@interlog.com> wrote in article
> <7c7bie$hrs$1...@news.interlog.com>...
> > In one of William Shatner's Star Trek novels - I think it's "The Return"
> -
> > he specifically mentioned that V'ger was part of Borg or something.
>
> And it's not canon.
>
> Fortunately.

What specifically do the writers use when they want to use "canon"???...There
seems to be no such thing in the scheme of the Star Trek world...There are a
lot of contradictory things going on...One is canon...One is not...What is
canon???...I'm sorry...I'll calm down now...That word just sets me off... :-)

debbyt...@ussvoyager.com

unread,
Mar 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/13/99
to
In article <36E9F3D2...@hotmail.com>,

The Borg do have their standards... :-)

GeneK

unread,
Mar 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/13/99
to
The writers don't use anything, they disregard past episodes and films
whenever they want to. We just have higher standards here in the
newsgroups... :)

GeneK

Dangermouse

unread,
Mar 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/13/99
to

debbyt...@ussvoyager.com wrote
> What specifically do the writers use when they want to use
"canon"???...There
> seems to be no such thing in the scheme of the Star Trek world...There
are a
> lot of contradictory things going on...One is canon...One is not...What
is
> canon???...I'm sorry...I'll calm down now...That word just sets me off...
:-)

Canon is whatever the writers feel it is from day to day, basically.

Maureen Goldman

unread,
Mar 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/14/99
to
"Dangermouse" <mas...@sol.co.ukDEATH-TO-SPAMMERS> wrote:

> Canon is whatever the writers feel it is from day to day, basically.

There's another illusion shattered.

David B.

unread,
Mar 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/15/99
to
Maureen Goldman wrote:

Heartbreakin' ain't it...?


debbyt...@ussvoyager.com

unread,
Mar 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/15/99
to
In article <01be6d7c$8e295bc0$LocalHost@lgwujvnl>,

"Dangermouse" <mas...@sol.co.ukDEATH-TO-SPAMMERS> wrote:
>
>
> debbyt...@ussvoyager.com wrote
> > What specifically do the writers use when they want to use
> "canon"???...There
> > seems to be no such thing in the scheme of the Star Trek world...There
> are a
> > lot of contradictory things going on...One is canon...One is not...What
> is
> > canon???...I'm sorry...I'll calm down now...That word just sets me off...
> :-)
>
> Canon is whatever the writers feel it is from day to day, basically.
>

So the Trek Universe does not have a "Bible"???...

Nick Farrell

unread,
Mar 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/15/99
to
In article <01be6d0d$a77de240$edf537cb@authoriu>, Dantalas Trollslayer
<dbou...@wh.camtech.net.au> writes

>> Nick Farrell
>>
>
><G> Great name, any relation?
To whom??? Terry or every other Farrell on Star Trek <S>

Dunno we have some missing US relatives somewhere and it is a rarish
name..


--
Nick Farrell

Dangermouse

unread,
Mar 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/15/99
to

debbyt...@ussvoyager.com wrote

>
> So the Trek Universe does not have a "Bible"???...

Of course it does.

And it gets ignored whenever they feel like it.

debbyt...@ussvoyager.com

unread,
Mar 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/15/99
to
In article <01be6eff$9c383e00$LocalHost@lgwujvnl>,

"Dangermouse" <mas...@sol.co.ukDEATH-TO-SPAMMERS> wrote:
>
>
> debbyt...@ussvoyager.com wrote
> >
> > So the Trek Universe does not have a "Bible"???...
>
> Of course it does.
>
> And it gets ignored whenever they feel like it.

Must have a lot of dust on that sucker...Looks like it's been in storage for
the past 10-15 years or so...:-)

0 new messages