P/T
Mohap
> I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love
P/T I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T
I
> Love P/T
WHY?! WHY?! WHY?! WHY?! WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?!
WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!WHY?! WHY?!
PeachTrek
That is all I have to say bout that.
Except this.
I CANNOT WAIT TO SEE LINEAGE!! (or any other little P/T moments)
Benji, Devil With The Black Dress On
PeachTrek <peac...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20001125221213...@ng-ch1.aol.com...
Wow! That was obnoxious!!
> That is all I have to say bout that.
No it's not.
> Except this.
I knew it.
> I CANNOT WAIT TO SEE LINEAGE!! (or any other little P/T moments)
You've aggravated me. To repent you must set yourself on fire.
Shammie
>PeachTrek <peac...@aol.com> wrote
big-time snip
> Wow! That was obnoxious!!
ROFL!!
>You've aggravated me. To repent you must set yourself on fire.
heeheeeeee
Colin Hayman
>
> > I Love P/T (X 343)
>
> WHY?! (X 180)
ROTFL! Very clever, Mohap. :)
And peachtrek -- glad to see there are still some vocal P/Ters left.
All the anti-P/T stuff kinda gets depressing.
- Colin, slight P/Ter
(P.S.: Wasn't my snipping technique clever? Huh? Huh? :)
PeachTrek
PeachTrek
think they are good for each other I think they are good for each other I think
they are good for each other I think they are good for each other I think they
are good for each other I think they are good for each other I think they are
good for each other I think they are good for each other I think they are good
for each other I think they are good for each other I think they are good for
each other I think they are good for each other I think they are good for each
other I think they are good for each other
Bozo the Evil Klown
Just saying that you like Picard/Trelaine slash is already saying too, too
much.....
<Runs away, grinning evilly>
*****************************************
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
"I think so..... but even if we *did* turn Brannon Braga's brain around, who
would notice?"
Benji, Devil With The Black Dress On
Yeah, but the message might have been taken more seriously if you had
said something *once* instead of scrolling it for about 3kb.
Spin
Usually after someone writes something like this, I start to wonder if they
have body parts in the 'fridge...
Benji, Devil With The Black Dress On
they
> have body parts in the 'fridge...
LMAO!!
--
====================================
"The world shudders as the worm gets its wings."
1-888-EXCITE-2, Extension 7038692437
-remove MYPANTS to reply-
Andrea
Benji said:
.
> > Hey I just thought those of us that like P/T should say SOMETHING.
>
> Yeah, but the message might have been taken more seriously if you had
> said something *once* instead of scrolling it for about 3kb.
Ditto. Although I must say Peachtrek's messages provide some nice insight in
the average P/T-er's thought processes.
Andrea :)
King of Cyberia
in town, when PeachTrek hit the dance floor and oozed
karmic vibes to the groove of the "Shake Your Booty" disco music:
\Hey I just thought those of us that like P/T should say SOMETHING.
Please write a 2,000 word essay refuting or supporting this
statement:
"Paris and Torres have no chemistry. They are unable to
like what the other likes, and when they do manage to
date, Paris always treats her in a subordinate position."
If you fail to meet our standards, you will receive a failing
grade. Good luck.
--
</stern professor mode off>
You are becoming emotionally distraught. There is no point
in furthering this discussion.
(Tim Russ)
Shammie
>> > Hey I just thought those of us that like P/T should say SOMETHING.
>>
>> Yeah, but the message might have been taken more seriously if you had
>> said something *once* instead of scrolling it for about 3kb.
>
>Ditto. Although I must say Peachtrek's messages provide some nice insight in
>the average P/T-er's thought processes.
LOL! ouch!
Shammie
PeachTrek blabbered her MENSA disseration, but I snipped it because it was too
"heavy" for me.
>Usually after someone writes something like this, I start to wonder if they
>have body parts in the 'fridge...
LMAO!!
Ronda Sexton
Colin Hayman wrote:
While it is good to see we still have some vocal P/T fans left.(I am one
of them.) Her post qualifies more as spam than a post. It wasted
bandwidth. Some of our regs have to pay per the amount of time they are
on line. Downloading a message that has no points of discussion wastes
time.
Ronda
PeachTrek
for these things kay. so chill people. I was just having a little bit of fun.
PeachTrek
together.
Michele
> While it is good to see we still have some vocal P/T fans left.(I am one
> of them.) Her post qualifies more as spam than a post. It wasted
> bandwidth. Some of our regs have to pay per the amount of time they are
> on line. Downloading a message that has no points of discussion wastes
> time.
>
Oh my gosh Rhonda has turned into Kalef ( sp ) Run for the hills guys
Michele
> Well you know what. SUE ME! I have AOL I have no idea that people have to pay
> for these things kay. so chill people. I was just having a little bit of fun.
Not every pay a monthly fee like me or aol users even if it is a monthly fee.
Some services offer an hour by hour stuff. Believe me i rather down load this
then half the only one sentence replies certain posters do in every single thing
they post. Those take my computer forever to download. I don' t think you want me
to name them.
Bozo the Evil Klown
>for these things kay. so chill people. I was just having a little bit of fun.
<Spock>
"It was *extremely* little, Ensign."
</Spock>
Seriously, many people *do* pay non-flat fees for their net access. A little
bit of consideration will be reciprocated many times over- just like anything
else.
Michele
>
>
> Seriously, many people *do* pay non-flat fees for their net access. A little
> bit of consideration will be reciprocated many times over- just like anything
> else.
>
how long does it take for you guys to download one post or am I not getting what
you guys are talking about.
Michele
> >Well you know what. SUE ME! I have AOL I have no idea that people have to pay
> >for these things kay. so chill people. I was just having a little bit of fun.
>
> <Spock>
> "It was *extremely* little, Ensign."
> </Spock>
>
> Seriously, many people *do* pay non-flat fees for their net access. A little
> bit of consideration will be reciprocated many times over- just like anything
> else.
>
> *****************************************
>
> "Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
>
> "I think so..... but even if we *did* turn Brannon Braga's brain around, who
> would notice?"
It is also a little hypocritical to tell her not to do it when there are plenty of
others who just post one or two word comments in a post that is 5 pages long.
Andrea
Michele said:
I agree. I know I do it myself, but it *is* stupid to quote an entire
message and only add one line. Not only does it cost people money (like me,
I pay per minute on-line), but also, it makes it almost impossible to keep
up with the ng on work days. And I've seen worse posts than PeachTrek's. At
least it was all *new* (though not very original <eg>).
From now on, I'll seriously do the snipping thing. Snipping is *good*.
Andrea :)
Julianna Feigl
Now *that* really helps. Now we all know *why* you think they are good
for each other...
Julianna
--------
Tuvok:
The main reason to watch Voyager!
Julianna Feigl
>Hey I just thought those of us that like P/T should say SOMETHING.
It might have helped if it had been something *constructive*...
Julianna Feigl
wrote:
>
>Benji said:
>.
>> > Hey I just thought those of us that like P/T should say SOMETHING.
>>
>> Yeah, but the message might have been taken more seriously if you had
>> said something *once* instead of scrolling it for about 3kb.
>
>Ditto. Although I must say Peachtrek's messages provide some nice insight in
>the average P/T-er's thought processes.
>
ROTFLOL!!!!
Michele
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 11:12:38 +0100, "Andrea" <en...@club.tip.nl>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Benji said:
> >.
> >> > Hey I just thought those of us that like P/T should say SOMETHING.
> >>
> >> Yeah, but the message might have been taken more seriously if you had
> >> said something *once* instead of scrolling it for about 3kb.
> >
> >Ditto. Although I must say Peachtrek's messages provide some nice insight in
> >the average P/T-er's thought processes.
> >
>
> ROTFLOL!!!!
>
> Julianna
> --------
> Tuvok:
> The main reason to watch Voyager!
It is funny how you defend only a small group of friends but not others just
because they disagree with you. It is sad.
Michele
Wickeddoll
Natalie
> That is all I have to say bout that.
>
> Except this.
>
> I CANNOT WAIT TO SEE LINEAGE!! (or any other little P/T moments)
>
Julianna Feigl
<evil_lo...@q3arena.com> wrote:
>X-No-Archive: yes
>
>"Andrea" <en...@club.tip.nl> wrote in message
>news:8vqo7p$t6i$6...@nereid.worldonline.nl...
>>
>> Benji said:
>> .
>> Ditto. Although I must say Peachtrek's messages provide some nice insight
>in
>> the average P/T-er's thought processes.
>>
>
>LOL! You're evil <g>
>
Nope. She's right.
Arlie
for each other... <<
Sounds to me like she's trying to brainwash herself. <g>
-- Arlie
If voting could really change things, it would be illegal.
Michele
> Michele doth write thus:
>
> >> Seriously, many people *do* pay non-flat fees for their net access. A
> >little
> >> bit of consideration will be reciprocated many times over- just like
> >anything
> >> else.
> >>
> >
> >how long does it take for you guys to download one post or am I not getting
> >what
> >you guys are talking about.
>
> It depends on the size of the post, how busy the lines are and how wonky AOLame
> is feeling; I pay a flat rate but I can still sympathize with those who pay per
> minute.
>
I do also, there are several posts and posters in here where It takes forever to
download a post.
Andrea
Natalie said:
> Brannon? Is that you?
>
> Natalie
>
> "PeachTrek" <peac...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:20001125221213...@ng-ch1.aol.com...
> > I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love P/T I Love
> P/T I
<snip>
ROTFL!!
Andrea :)
Andrea
Michele said:
> Julianna Feigl wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 11:12:38 +0100, "Andrea" <en...@club.tip.nl>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Benji said:
> > >.
> > >Ditto. Although I must say Peachtrek's messages provide some nice
insight in
> > >the average P/T-er's thought processes.
> > >
> >
> > ROTFLOL!!!!
> >
> > Julianna
> > --------
> > Tuvok:
> > The main reason to watch Voyager!
>
> It is funny how you defend only a small group of friends but not others
just
> because they disagree with you. It is sad.
Never thought I'd defend Julianna, but here goes:
Julianna and me are not friends. She hates Tom. She hates Chakotay. It would
take several sessions of drinking and talking and trying to find things to
agree on, including a "Well, I don't actually *hate* them" line from her
before we could ever become friends.
Okay, so that's the weirdest speech I've ever used to defend anybody.
:))
Andrea :)
Bozo the Evil Klown
>> Seriously, many people *do* pay non-flat fees for their net access. A
>little
>> bit of consideration will be reciprocated many times over- just like
>anything
>> else.
>>
>
>how long does it take for you guys to download one post or am I not getting
>what
>you guys are talking about.
It depends on the size of the post, how busy the lines are and how wonky AOLame
is feeling; I pay a flat rate but I can still sympathize with those who pay per
minute.
*****************************************
Bozo the Evil Klown
>pay
>> >for these things kay. so chill people. I was just having a little bit of
>fun.
>>
>> <Spock>
>> "It was *extremely* little, Ensign."
>> </Spock>
>>
>little
>> bit of consideration will be reciprocated many times over- just like
>anything
>> else.
>>
>>
>> "Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
>>
>> "I think so..... but even if we *did* turn Brannon Braga's brain around,
>who
>> would notice?"
>
>plenty of
>others who just post one or two word comments in a post that is 5 pages long.
The subject came up; I responded to it. *If* you plan to sue me over it please
use a properly-chilled lawyer. Hearing a Breen lawyer trying to say all those
Latin words would make it worth it. <EG>
Pooh Big Tigger
Parris and Torres
They are a good couple and I can't wait to see how they find out that she is
pregant.
I see that they have good chemistry
their a cute couple and I havent gotten tired of them
The Parris clan Rules!!
nana
Benji, Devil With The Black Dress On
news:t5532tg88pagkr3gf...@4ax.com...
>
>
I have to agree with you there, Jules.
King of Cyberia
in town, when Benji, Devil With The Black Dress On hit the dance
floor and oozed karmic vibes to the groove of the "Shake Your
Booty" disco music:
\>Jules-
\> It might have helped if it had been something *constructive*...
\
\ I have to agree with you there, Jules.
<makes sure PeachTree is listening>
She's from AOHell. What, you expect deep mental processes from
those people? :-p'''
--
You are becoming emotionally distraught. There is no point
in furthering this discussion.
(Tim Russ)
Arlie
Who are they?
Julianna Feigl
>Bozo the Evil Klown wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Seriously, many people *do* pay non-flat fees for their net access. A little
>> bit of consideration will be reciprocated many times over- just like anything
>> else.
>>
>
>how long does it take for you guys to download one post or am I not getting what
>you guys are talking about.
I think it depends on lots of things: length of post, modem, whether
or not the server is busy etc.
Julianna Feigl
<wicke...@nofeckingspamhotmail.com> wrote:
>Brannon? Is that you?
>
ROTFLOL!!!
>Natalie
>
Julianna
--------
Tuvok:
The main reason to watch Voyager!
>"PeachTrek" <peac...@aol.com> wrote in message
Julianna Feigl
wrote:
does that mean, in order to be friends with you one has to agree with
you on your favorite TV-characters????
>Okay, so that's the weirdest speech I've ever used to defend anybody.
>
one could say that...
Julianna Feigl
>>> Now *that* really helps. Now we all know *why* you think they are good
>for each other... <<
>
>Sounds to me like she's trying to brainwash herself. <g>
>
ROTFLOL!!!
Maybe it's posthypnotic suggestion or something! :-)
Julianna Feigl
On" <zim...@MYPANTSuss-enterprise.org> wrote:
>Julianna Feigl <glacierqu...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:t5532tg88pagkr3gf...@4ax.com...
>> On 26 Nov 2000 05:02:56 GMT, peac...@aol.com (PeachTrek) wrote:
>>
>> >Hey I just thought those of us that like P/T should say SOMETHING.
>>
>>
>> It might have helped if it had been something *constructive*...
>
> I have to agree with you there, Jules.
>
:-)))
PeachTrek
>She's from AOHell. What, you expect deep mental processes from
>those people? :-p'''
And on a further note why would you expect a deep mental note from people who
make a big deal about nothing. Please people give it a rest your all gonna have
heart attacks.
Don't Worry! Be Happy
Arlie
who
make a big deal about nothing. <<
This from a P/Ter....
Benji, Devil With The Black Dress On
> ><makes sure PeachTree is listening>
> >She's from AOHell. What, you expect deep mental processes from
> >those people? :-p'''
>
who
> make a big deal about nothing.
Irritating crap, (which sadly enough seemed to be the only instance I've
ever seen of on-topic non-advertisement SPAM), is certainly not nothing.
> Please people give it a rest your all gonna have
> heart attacks.
That was just stupid.
--
====================================
"I am the god of f*ck."
1-888-EXCITE-2, Extension 7038692437
-remove MYPANTS to reply-
Ta'
"Arlie" <arl...@aol.comNoSpam> wrote in message
news:20001127163824...@ng-ch1.aol.com...
> >> And on a further note why would you expect a deep
mental note from people
> who
> make a big deal about nothing. <<
>
...who make someting of nothing... <g>
Colin Hayman
>
> >> And on a further note why would you expect a deep mental note from people
> who
> make a big deal about nothing. <<
>
> This from a P/Ter....
That's a bit much. Sorry, a /lot/ much. I don't care how heavily
anti-P/T you are, it's wrong to dismiss someone's opinions on that
basis.
Julianna Feigl
>>> And on a further note why would you expect a deep mental note from people
>who
>make a big deal about nothing. <<
>
>This from a P/Ter....
>
LOL!
Ta'
"Colin Hayman" <qber...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3A22D940...@hotmail.com...
> Arlie wrote:
> >
> > >> And on a further note why would you expect a deep
mental note from people
> > who
> > make a big deal about nothing. <<
> >
> > This from a P/Ter....
>
heavily
> anti-P/T you are, it's wrong to dismiss someone's opinions
on that
> basis.
True. *But*, its like AOL and WebTV peeps. Are they ~all~
stupid twits? No. Just enough to give a bad name that is
easily applied whenever the situation warrants. Same with
P/T'ers... There are some very nice P/T'ers out there...
they are just overshadowed by the louder, dumber segment.
Michele
So who is considered the louder and dumber set? Think real hard
before you answer that and what do you mean louder and dumber.
Arlie
mental note from people
> who
> make a big deal about nothing. <<
>
> This from a P/Ter....
...who make someting of nothing... <g> <<
Who by definition make a big deal out of nothing. :-D
Michele
Why are you guys so mean spirited to people who dont like the
same characters you do or have an different opinion about a
set of characters
Arlie
anti-P/T you are, it's wrong to dismiss someone's opinions on that
basis. <<
I wasn't dismissing anyone's opinions. I was merely pointing what I perceive
to be a certain irony in the situation.
Arlie
same characters you do or have an different opinion about a
set of characters <<
We aren't. We just have something called a sense of humor.
Ta'
"Michele" <bel...@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:3A22E108...@qwest.net...
> Ta' wrote:
>
> > "Colin Hayman" <qber...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:3A22D940...@hotmail.com...
> > > >
> > > > >> And on a further note why would you expect a deep
> > mental note from people
> > > > who
> > > > make a big deal about nothing. <<
> > > >
> > > > This from a P/Ter....
> > >
how
> > heavily
> > > anti-P/T you are, it's wrong to dismiss someone's
opinions
> > on that
> > > basis.
> >
~all~
> > stupid twits? No. Just enough to give a bad name that
is
> > easily applied whenever the situation warrants. Same
with
> > P/T'ers... There are some very nice P/T'ers out there...
> > they are just overshadowed by the louder, dumber
segment.
>
> So who is considered the louder and dumber set? Think real
hard
> before you answer that and what do you mean louder and
dumber.
Well, not to put too fine a point on it...
Rhonda and PeachTrek would be two fine examples.
Did you think I was implying you, Michele? Tsk. Tsk. I've
said its easy to push your buttons, but I've never called
you dumb or stupid.
Ta'
> Arlie wrote:
>
> > >> >> And on a further note why would you expect a deep
> > mental note from people
> > > who
> > > make a big deal about nothing. <<
> > >
> > > This from a P/Ter....
> >
> >
> > Who by definition make a big deal out of nothing. :-D
> >
> >
> > If voting could really change things, it would be
illegal.
>
the
> same characters you do or have an different opinion about
a
> set of characters
No, we just see the chemisty that P/T'ers do. Infact, I
havnt seen jack crap between the two of them since... S.3 at
least...
Julianna Feigl
>
>"Colin Hayman" <qber...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3A22D940...@hotmail.com...
>> Arlie wrote:
>> >
>> > >> And on a further note why would you expect a deep
>mental note from people
>> > who
>> > make a big deal about nothing. <<
>> >
>> > This from a P/Ter....
>>
>> That's a bit much. Sorry, a /lot/ much. I don't care how
>heavily
>> anti-P/T you are, it's wrong to dismiss someone's opinions
>on that
>> basis.
>
>True. *But*, its like AOL and WebTV peeps. Are they ~all~
>stupid twits? No. Just enough to give a bad name that is
>easily applied whenever the situation warrants. Same with
>P/T'ers... There are some very nice P/T'ers out there...
>they are just overshadowed by the louder, dumber segment.
>
unfortunately you are right
Julianna Feigl
>Ta' wrote:
>
>> "Colin Hayman" <qber...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:3A22D940...@hotmail.com...
>> > Arlie wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >> And on a further note why would you expect a deep
>> mental note from people
>> > > who
>> > > make a big deal about nothing. <<
>> > >
>> > > This from a P/Ter....
>> >
>> > That's a bit much. Sorry, a /lot/ much. I don't care how
>> heavily
>> > anti-P/T you are, it's wrong to dismiss someone's opinions
>> on that
>> > basis.
>>
>> True. *But*, its like AOL and WebTV peeps. Are they ~all~
>> stupid twits? No. Just enough to give a bad name that is
>> easily applied whenever the situation warrants. Same with
>> P/T'ers... There are some very nice P/T'ers out there...
>> they are just overshadowed by the louder, dumber segment.
>
>So who is considered the louder and dumber set? Think real hard
>before you answer that and what do you mean louder and dumber.
Did you see Peachtrek's posts? *that*'s what he meant by louder and
dumber
Pooh Big Tigger
> >> The Parris clan Rules!! << >>
I meant the the future Parris clan
Tom, Be'lana and the baby:)
Andrea
Pooh Big Tigger said:
> I for one like
> Parris
Paris.
and Torres
> They are a good couple and I can't wait to see how they find out that she
is
> pregant.
Well, it's just a simple test, you know. I doubt many grown ups who live on
a Federation starship actually experience the Blue Lagoon effect.
> I see that they have good chemistry
> their a cute couple and I havent gotten tired of them
>
> The Parris clan Rules!!
Paris.
<sigh>
Andrea :)
Andrea
Julianna said:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:19:09 +0100, "Andrea" <en...@club.tip.nl>
> wrote:
> >Never thought I'd defend Julianna, but here goes:
> >
> >Julianna and me are not friends. She hates Tom. She hates Chakotay. It
would
> >take several sessions of drinking and talking and trying to find things
to
> >agree on, including a "Well, I don't actually *hate* them" line from her
> >before we could ever become friends.
> >
>
> does that mean, in order to be friends with you one has to agree with
> you on your favorite TV-characters????
Oh no. I'd be totally friendless in that case. :)) It's just that if we did
the bonding thing, I could say Tuvok has the best body on Voy, and you could
say that you didn't actually *hate* Tom and Chakotay, and we'd both be happy
and *then* we could start having *friendly* arguments.
Andrea :))
TomKatLover
called stupid for being on AOL.
But I would like to enject one statement about the chemistry question. I keep
seeing comments like: They have nothing in common. Have any off you ever heard
the quote "Opposites attract.". My husband and I don't have much more in common
than the fact we love each other and have two wonderful kids. He likes golf,
bowling and working on cars. I like Trek, books, stamp collecting and the
internet. He is quiet and even tempered and I am
out-spoken with a gaelic temper. But we have been two parts of one heart for
over 35 years and we don't give a damn if we like the same things as long as
we like each other.
Andrea
TomKatLover said:
Good point. But then again, I suppose the two of you do occasionnally have
*fun* together, have late night conversations about things that you're both
interested in, I suppose you listen patiently when he's enthusiastically
telling you about a golf match, and that he's happy for you whenever you
find a rare stamp. It's that being interested in *each other*, enjoying
being together now and again and just *talk*, to find out more about each
other's thoughts and dreams and everything, that the P/T relationship
lacks. IMHO.
Andrea :)
Julianna Feigl
wrote:
LOL! No grammar, no idea how to spell her favorite character's name...
but an ardent P/T-er...
Arlie
>> >> The Parris clan Rules!! << >>
>I meant the the future Parris clan
>
>Tom, Be'lana and the baby:)
>
LOL! No grammar, no idea how to spell her favorite character's name...
but an ardent P/T-er... <<
And why is it the "Parris" clan? Why not the "Tores" clan? She didn't take
his name....
-- Arlie
I used to have a handle on life, but it broke.
Arlie
then
called stupid for being on AOL. <<
Don't worry. If it weren't that, it would be something else. This *is*
Usenet, after all.
>> I keep
seeing comments like: They have nothing in common. <<
Not from me. My complaint is that they are too similar to have any chemistry.
It's conflict/contrast that creates chemistry. Just about any couple is
reasonably fun to watch when they are interested in each other but won't admit
it. Gets boring once they get together, though, unless they have contrasting
personalities.
The writers try to fake chemistry by having Tom and B'Elanna fight over silly
things, but it doesn't hide the fact that underneath it, they are far too
similar to be an interesting couple.
(Note: I am talking about dramatic chemistry here, not to be confused with
real-life relationships.)
Julianna Feigl
wrote:
>
>Julianna said:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:19:09 +0100, "Andrea" <en...@club.tip.nl>
>> wrote:
>
>> >Never thought I'd defend Julianna, but here goes:
>> >
>> >Julianna and me are not friends. She hates Tom. She hates Chakotay. It
>would
>> >take several sessions of drinking and talking and trying to find things
>to
>> >agree on, including a "Well, I don't actually *hate* them" line from her
>> >before we could ever become friends.
>> >
>>
>> does that mean, in order to be friends with you one has to agree with
>> you on your favorite TV-characters????
>
>Oh no. I'd be totally friendless in that case. :)) It's just that if we did
>the bonding thing, I could say Tuvok has the best body on Voy,
you can say that anytime you want, there's nothing wrong with saying
the truth :-)
>and you could
>say that you didn't actually *hate* Tom and Chakotay,
they are too unimportant to be hated. Two utterly useless characters
IMO.
> and we'd both be happy
>and *then* we could start having *friendly* arguments.
about what?????
Colin Hayman
>
> LOL! No grammar, no idea how to spell her favorite character's name...
> but an ardent P/T-er...
Below the belt.
A person's spelling doesn't necessarily reflect /anything/ about her
intelligence or state of mind -- especially on the Internet, where
correct spelling and grammar are very much optional.
I also doubt you'd enjoy being laughed at and talked about in the third
person in reply to one of your messages. Just a thought.
Julianna Feigl
>>>><< ng-
>>> >> The Parris clan Rules!! << >>
>>I meant the the future Parris clan
>>
>>Tom, Be'lana and the baby:)
>>
>
>LOL! No grammar, no idea how to spell her favorite character's name...
>but an ardent P/T-er... <<
>
>And why is it the "Parris" clan? Why not the "Tores" clan? She didn't take
>his name....
>
I think it might be the Toress-clan now... or the "daughters of
Miral"-clan or something... :-)
Julianna Feigl
>>> Well another typical day on the ng. First I am insulted for being a PTer,
>then
>called stupid for being on AOL. <<
>
>Don't worry. If it weren't that, it would be something else. This *is*
>Usenet, after all.
>
>>> I keep
>seeing comments like: They have nothing in common. <<
>
>Not from me. My complaint is that they are too similar to have any chemistry.
>It's conflict/contrast that creates chemistry. Just about any couple is
>reasonably fun to watch when they are interested in each other but won't admit
>it. Gets boring once they get together, though, unless they have contrasting
>personalities.
>
>The writers try to fake chemistry by having Tom and B'Elanna fight over silly
>things, but it doesn't hide the fact that underneath it, they are far too
>similar to be an interesting couple.
>
the fact that she lost her brains the moment she got involved with him
and that she is now being written as the submissive girlfriend doesn't
really help...
>(Note: I am talking about dramatic chemistry here, not to be confused with
>real-life relationships.)
>
I know
Julianna Feigl
wrote:
>Julianna Feigl wrote:
>>
>> LOL! No grammar, no idea how to spell her favorite character's name...
>> but an ardent P/T-er...
>
>Below the belt.
>
>A person's spelling doesn't necessarily reflect /anything/ about her
>intelligence or state of mind -- especially on the Internet, where
>correct spelling and grammar are very much optional.
>
>I also doubt you'd enjoy being laughed at and talked about in the third
>person in reply to one of your messages. Just a thought.
Happens all the time. After all, this is usenet. :-)
Arlie
>his name....
>
I think it might be the Toress-clan now... or the "daughters of
Miral"-clan or something... :-) <<
Toress founding a Klingon Klan! (Is that like a Quake Klan?) I like it!
Arlie
and that she is now being written as the submissive girlfriend doesn't
really help... <<
There is that.
But I'm hoping that now that they're married, she'll regain her brains, and her
backbone, and he'll become a henpecked husband. <g>
Julianna Feigl
>>>>And why is it the "Parris" clan? Why not the "Tores" clan? She didn't take
>>his name....
>>
>
>I think it might be the Toress-clan now... or the "daughters of
>Miral"-clan or something... :-) <<
>
>Toress founding a Klingon Klan! (Is that like a Quake Klan?) I like it!
>
The Parris-clan, OTOH, is Old Owen with the rest of the family...
Wickeddoll
Natalie
"Andrea" <en...@club.tip.nl> wrote in message
news:9015ea$9pj$1...@nereid.worldonline.nl...
>
> TomKatLover said:
>
> > Well another typical day on the ng. First I am insulted for being a
PTer,
> then
> > called stupid for being on AOL.
> > But I would like to enject one statement about the chemistry question. I
> keep
King of Cyberia
\And on a further note why would you expect a deep mental note
\from people who make a big deal about nothing.
You posted "I LOVE P/T" a few hundred times in a gratuitous
attempt for attention, and you scold _US_ making a bit deal?
Pot, Kettle, *black eye*
\Please people give it a rest your all gonna have
\heart attacks.
In this forum, we are expected to explain and elaborate upon our
opinions. No matter what the heck one believes. If I did what you
did in creative writing class, I would be flunked right away.
If I turned in the swill that the Voy writers throw at us to the
teacher, guess what would happen.
Yes, an F.
\
\Don't Worry! Be Happy
No. You refuse to obey our moral code and answer our questions.
--
You are becoming emotionally distraught. There is no point
in furthering this discussion.
(Tim Russ)
Shammie
>Pot, Kettle, *black eye*
LOL!
Michele
> >No. You refuse to obey our moral code and answer our questions.
>
> Uhm and how exactly did I not answer your questions? Was I asked a question?
> And a bout your uhm so called moral code... well uhm I am so sorry I did not
> obey it, your highness.
Just ignore him for some reason he thinks he is the king of the ng.
PeachTrek
Allie Andrews
Colin Hayman <qber...@hotmail.com> wrote
> Below the belt.
Indeed :-(
Being dyslexic I ardently hate it when someone is derided for thier
spelling. I get along fine becasue I was lucky enough to have a teacher that
recognised my problem and I was taught accordingly. Even so I still can't
work out how to spell words that are new to me or I don't often use. I spell
them so badly that it takes a number of attempts before the spell checker
will even recognise them to correct. With character names you can forget it.
I sometimes cut and paste the names from other people's posts to make sure I
get it right.
It is sad when people choose to make fun of someone becasue of thier
spelling - you don't know the reasons behind it.
Allie
x
Allie Andrews
Julianna Feigl <glacierqu...@hotmail.com>
> Happens all the time. After all, this is usenet. :-)
Doesn't mean you have to do it. :-(
Julianna Feigl
>>> the fact that she lost her brains the moment she got involved with him
>and that she is now being written as the submissive girlfriend doesn't
>really help... <<
>
>There is that.
>
>But I'm hoping that now that they're married, she'll regain her brains, and her
>backbone, and he'll become a henpecked husband. <g>
Would be great, but for some reason I don't think optimism is
justified right now...
Julianna Feigl
<stevechr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>X-No-Archive: yes
>Peachie, just ignore it, you're being razzed. What you did was no big
>deal, don't worry about it. People just get bored and decide to pick on
>the occasional poster, don't take it seriously.
>
>Why don't you post something with a tad more intellectual content next
>time, like why you think P/T is a good relationship?
Do you really want to see yet another post that consists in one
sentence copied and pasted 500 times???
Andrea
Natalie said:
> PERFECTLY put, Andrea
>
> Natalie
Wow thanks. :)
Andrea :)
Andrea
Julianna said:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 19:21:48 +0100, "Andrea" <en...@club.tip.nl>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Julianna said:
> >
> >> On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:19:09 +0100, "Andrea" <en...@club.tip.nl>
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> >Never thought I'd defend Julianna, but here goes:
> >> >
> >> >Julianna and me are not friends. She hates Tom. She hates Chakotay. It
> >would
> >> >take several sessions of drinking and talking and trying to find
things
> >to
> >> >agree on, including a "Well, I don't actually *hate* them" line from
her
> >> >before we could ever become friends.
> >> >
> >>
> >> does that mean, in order to be friends with you one has to agree with
> >> you on your favorite TV-characters????
> >
> >Oh no. I'd be totally friendless in that case. :)) It's just that if we
did
> >the bonding thing, I could say Tuvok has the best body on Voy,
>
> you can say that anytime you want, there's nothing wrong with saying
> the truth :-)
Okay, Tuvok has the best body on Voy, it's just the head that turns me off.
<ducks and runs>
>
> >and you could
> >say that you didn't actually *hate* Tom and Chakotay,
>
> they are too unimportant to be hated. Two utterly useless characters
> IMO.
Oh come on, in order to let Tuvok have the best Voy body, there *have* to be
other people on Voy.
:))
>
> > and we'd both be happy
> >and *then* we could start having *friendly* arguments.
>
> about what?????
Voyager of course. :))
Andrea :)
Andrea
Julianna said:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:16:08 GMT, Steve Christianson
> <stevechr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >X-No-Archive: yes
> >
> >
> >
> >PeachTrek wrote:
> >>
> >Peachie, just ignore it, you're being razzed. What you did was no big
> >deal, don't worry about it. People just get bored and decide to pick on
> >the occasional poster, don't take it seriously.
> >
> >Why don't you post something with a tad more intellectual content next
> >time, like why you think P/T is a good relationship?
>
>
> Do you really want to see yet another post that consists in one
> sentence copied and pasted 500 times???
Seriously, I'd really like to see one of the P/T-ers post some serious,
intelligent thoughts on why P/T is meant to be. I'm awfully sorry if I
offend anyone, but so far I've never come across a P/T fan who could offer
more than pointing back at Blood Fever, as if that ep should explain it all.
Several people - including me - have stated that they *did* see the
chemistry in earlier eps. I want to know why P/T-ers *still* believe. What
is it that other people don't see? *Why* did they get married? What drove
them in Drive?
Really, I'm prepared to have a normal, polite discussion about the whole
thing, but I do need some well-founded P/T-ers point of view to start with.
Andrea :)
Shammie
>Seriously, I'd really like to see one of the P/T-ers post some serious,
>intelligent thoughts on why P/T is meant to be. I'm awfully sorry if I
>offend anyone, but so far I've never come across a P/T fan who could offer
>more than pointing back at Blood Fever, as if that ep should explain it all.
>Several people - including me - have stated that they *did* see the
>chemistry in earlier eps. I want to know why P/T-ers *still* believe. What
>is it that other people don't see? *Why* did they get married? What drove
>them in Drive?
>
>Really, I'm prepared to have a normal, polite discussion about the whole
>thing, but I do need some well-founded P/T-ers point of view to start with.
::::sound of crickets::::
Julianna Feigl
wrote:
You are asking for a full blizzard sent your way... though actually he
has the best head, too. The most expressive eyes at least.
>
>>
>> >and you could
>> >say that you didn't actually *hate* Tom and Chakotay,
>>
>> they are too unimportant to be hated. Two utterly useless characters
>> IMO.
>
>Oh come on, in order to let Tuvok have the best Voy body, there *have* to be
>other people on Voy.
>
>:))
>
well, there are: Neelix, Harry, the Doc, Janeway, B'Elanna, Carey,
Vomit, Icheb, Naomi, Seven, Chell, Tabor, etc. the list is endless!
>>
>> > and we'd both be happy
>> >and *then* we could start having *friendly* arguments.
>>
>> about what?????
>
>Voyager of course. :))
>
And how would that be different from what we are doing now???
Julianna Feigl
wrote:
>
>Julianna said:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:16:08 GMT, Steve Christianson
>> <stevechr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >X-No-Archive: yes
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >PeachTrek wrote:
>> >>
>> >Peachie, just ignore it, you're being razzed. What you did was no big
>> >deal, don't worry about it. People just get bored and decide to pick on
>> >the occasional poster, don't take it seriously.
>> >
>> >Why don't you post something with a tad more intellectual content next
>> >time, like why you think P/T is a good relationship?
>>
>>
>> Do you really want to see yet another post that consists in one
>> sentence copied and pasted 500 times???
>
I haven't seen any. The only thing they ever say is: "they have
*great* chemistry." The fact that nobody except them sees it is
obviously irrelevant. If you tell them that Tommy abuses B'Elanna and
that she has become completely submissive which is not a positive
development for her they will ignore this point and tell you you are
reading too much into what is basically bad writing only detracting
from their favorite couple. Etc.
I'm sure 99.9% of them wouldn't want to be in a relationship like the
one B'Elanna is in right now. Even less a marriage of that kind. But
they still think it's the best couple ever.
(shrug)
Arlie
thing, but I do need some well-founded P/T-ers point of view to start with. <<
We used to have one here. Her name was Julie. Maybe she'll come back and
answer your challenge.
Colin Hayman
>
> >From: "Andrea"
>
> >Really, I'm prepared to have a normal, polite discussion about the whole
> >thing, but I do need some well-founded P/T-ers point of view to start with.
>
Is that so, Shammie?
You know what? /I'll/ do it. I have to go to class now, but if you
guys actually are interested in hearing from someone who's not anti-P/T,
and nobody else wants the job, I'll do what I can.
(But only if you really do intend to listen to me. I know there are
anti-P/Ters who simply don't pay any attention to opposing arguments. I
don't think you guys are in that category -- I hope I don't have to
change that belief.)
TomKatLover
>Seriously, I'd really like to see one of the P/T-ers post some serious,
>intelligent thoughts on why P/T is meant to be. I'm awfully sorry if I
>offend anyone, but so far I've never come across a P/T fan who could offer
>more than pointing back at Blood Fever, as if that ep should explain it all.
>Several people - including me - have stated that they *did* see the
>chemistry in earlier eps. I want to know why P/T-ers *still* believe. What
>is it that other people don't see? *Why* did they get married? What drove
>them in Drive?
>
>thing, but I do need some well-founded P/T-ers point of view to start with.
>
I doubt you will ever see such a post, because all PTers know that on this ng
anything they post will be shot down simply because it is a PT post.
Basicly we feel why give the people on this ng another chance to make fun of
them and deride Tom and insult Robbie McNeill. But we saw the chemistry as far
back as Faces before TPTB did.
A proud member of the PTC and PTF.
Wickeddoll
"Steve Christianson" <stevechr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3A256D...@yahoo.com...
> X-No-Archive: yes
> > >deal, don't worry about it. People just get bored and decide to pick on
> > >the occasional poster, don't take it seriously.
> > >
> > >Why don't you post something with a tad more intellectual content next
> > >time, like why you think P/T is a good relationship?
> >
> > Do you really want to see yet another post that consists in one
> > sentence copied and pasted 500 times???
>
>
> Russ is being ass-fucked by TPTB. However, that's life, isn't it?
> PeachTrek has every right to post here. Julianna, you bitch at everyone
> who doesn't kiss Tuvok's ass and when you're chastized for it you
> complain that you're being criticized for your "opinion." Get over
> yourself. Peachie is just as entitled to her opinion as you are yours,
> and since you are an older person at least my age or more it is
> embarassing for you that you must continue to make a complete fool of
> yourself. In short, I like you, but I am tired of your bullshit and your
> picking on people because they don't suck Tim Russ's dick as avidly as
> you wish.
>
> Congratulations. You managed to piss me off enough to express what half
> the NG has felt for years.
>
Oh my...
I don't believe P/T works, but I certainly don't hold it against anyone who
does. I think we tend to get too personal with our opinions of other's
perceptions of the characters/actors on this show. I thought this post was
a bit over the top, but I took it in the spirit I thought it was given. A
light-hearted way of expressing one's enthusiasm for an aspect of the show
they like. I think some of the attacks on 'Peachie' went beyond
good-natured fun.
I think we could all stand to step back and lighten up a bit at times.
Natalie, climbing off the soapbox
Michele
>
> Oh my...
>
> I don't believe P/T works, but I certainly don't hold it against anyone who
> does. I think we tend to get too personal with our opinions of other's
> perceptions of the characters/actors on this show. I thought this post was
> a bit over the top, but I took it in the spirit I thought it was given. A
> light-hearted way of expressing one's enthusiasm for an aspect of the show
> they like. I think some of the attacks on 'Peachie' went beyond
> good-natured fun.
>
> I think we could all stand to step back and lighten up a bit at times.
>
> Natalie, climbing off the soapbox
You do realize who you are talking about. I have to agree with Steve and
Natalie, and I want to say another thing I am appauld that some people who call
themselves regulars can be so rude to a person who is new to the group. I really
did not see a problem with Peach's post and I am glad to see new faces.
Hopefully she wasnt scared off by a few people. I just happen to think P/t is a
great couple given a chance.
Michele
> I doubt you will ever see such a post, because all PTers know that on this ng
> anything they post will be shot down simply because it is a PT post.
> Basicly we feel why give the people on this ng another chance to make fun of
> them and deride Tom and insult Robbie McNeill. But we saw the chemistry as far
> back as Faces before TPTB did.
>
> A proud member of the PTC and PTF.
I have to agree with you and it is so nice to see many p/t fans coming out. I hope
more come out of the dark corners of the ng.
Michele
Arlie
Natalie, and I want to say another thing I am appauld that some people who call
themselves regulars can be so rude to a person who is new to the group. I
really
did not see a problem with Peach's post and I am glad to see new faces.
Hopefully she wasnt scared off by a few people. <<
PeachTrek isn't new. Wasn't she the one who started a flamewar here last year
by calling DJ a Nazi?
If that didn't scare her off, I doubt anything Julianna says will.
Wickeddoll
Michele?
Natalie
"Arlie" <arl...@aol.comNoSpam> wrote in message
news:20001129183524...@ng-cg1.aol.com...