Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Nate doesn't know who Humbert Humbert is?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Gary J. Weiner

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 1:37:01 AM4/8/02
to
Is he a freakin' moron?


--
Gary J. Weiner - webm...@hatrack.net
http://www.hatrack.net
HatRack Web Design & Hosting - Hang your web with us

Charlie S.

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 12:57:20 PM4/8/02
to
"Gary J. Weiner" <webm...@hatrack.net> wrote in message news:<3CB12C7D...@hatrack.net>...

> Is he a freakin' moron?
>
I don't think it was written in there to show he's a freakin' moron.
I think it's written in there to demonstrate how different these 2
people are.

Cubit

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 12:57:20 PM4/8/02
to
Who is Humbert Humbert?


SFU-Fan

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 1:11:14 PM4/8/02
to
"Cubit" <1.408.578.0874@Spam.not> wrote in message
news:3cb1cc6c$1_5@news1...
> Who is Humbert Humbert?
>
Humbert Humbert is the protagonist in Vladimir Nabokov's 1955 novel
"Lolita," about an older European man trying to seduce a somewhat vulgar
12-year-old American girl.

I never read the book, I only saw the movie with Jeremy Irons. Even at
that, I had to go look up "Humbert Humbert" to refresh my memory anyway, so
I guess I'm a freakin' moron, too.

Jack

Shammie

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 1:26:58 PM4/8/02
to
>From: "SFU-Fan"

>Humbert Humbert is the protagonist in Vladimir Nabokov's 1955 novel
>"Lolita," about an older European man trying to seduce a somewhat vulgar
>12-year-old American girl.
>
>I never read the book, I only saw the movie with Jeremy Irons. Even at
>that, I had to go look up "Humbert Humbert" to refresh my memory anyway, so
>I guess I'm a freakin' moron, too.

I guess I am too, I thought it was the name of a band!


--
You give me the sweetest taboo

Vicstanley

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 1:43:45 PM4/8/02
to
>Subject: Re: Nate doesn't know who Humbert Humbert is?
>From: "SFU-Fan" SFU-Fa...@socal.rr.com
>Date: 04/08/2002 12:11 PM Central Daylight Time

>Humbert Humbert is the protagonist in Vladimir Nabokov's 1955 novel
>"Lolita," about an older European man trying to seduce a somewhat vulgar
>12-year-old American girl.

"Protagonist" only in the sense that he was relatively less vile than Clare
Quilty.

Harv Laser

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 2:31:11 PM4/8/02
to

"SFU-Fan" <SFU-Fa...@socal.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Saks8.34949$zN.13...@twister.socal.rr.com...

You can redeem yourself from Moronity, by forgetting the re-make, and
watching the original Stanley Kubrick version of the movie, starring James
Mason, Sue Lyons, (she was 14 when the film was made, and, per the law, not
old enough to see herself in the film in a theatre).. Shelly Winters, and
Peter Sellers.. This is yet another classic masterpiece that didn't need to
be re-made. At all. Ever. Period..

Harv

dratsaB

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 3:40:58 PM4/8/02
to
<snip>

>
> You can redeem yourself from Moronity, by forgetting the re-make, and
> watching the original Stanley Kubrick version of the movie, starring James
> Mason, Sue Lyons, (she was 14 when the film was made, and, per the law,
not
> old enough to see herself in the film in a theatre).. Shelly Winters, and
> Peter Sellers.. This is yet another classic masterpiece that didn't need
to
> be re-made. At all. Ever. Period..
>
> Harv

I second that emotion!


Vicstanley

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 5:27:30 PM4/8/02
to
>Subject: Re: Nate doesn't know who Humbert Humbert is?
>From: "Harv Laser" hla...@socal.rr.com
>Date: 04/08/2002 1:31 PM Central Daylight Time

>You can redeem yourself from Moronity, by forgetting the re-make, and
>watching the original Stanley Kubrick version of the movie, starring James
>Mason, Sue Lyons, (she was 14 when the film was made, and, per the law, not
>old enough to see herself in the film in a theatre).. Shelly Winters, and
>Peter Sellers..

One thing (among many others) that outraged me about the remake was that
Melanie Griffith was much too attractive to portray Lolita's mother. I felt no
empathy for Irons' perceived hopeless marital dilemma, whereas Shelly Winters
convincingly portrayed a smothering monster that would drive any
self-respecting man to murder, much less child molestation. Kathy Bates or
Kathleen Turner would have been much more suitable. I also did not need to see
Frank Langella in a horrifying scene of full frontal nudity that surely must
have taken its toll on Whoopie Goldberg too.


> This is yet another classic masterpiece that didn't need to
>be re-made. At all. Ever. Period..

This and Psycho and Failsafe and Night of the Living Dead.


Harv Laser

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 8:42:46 PM4/8/02
to

"Vicstanley" <vicst...@aol.coma> wrote in message
news:20020408172730...@mb-mv.aol.com...

> > This is yet another classic masterpiece that didn't need to
> >be re-made. At all. Ever. Period..
>
> This and Psycho and Failsafe and Night of the Living Dead.

And Seven Days In May, and 12 Angry Men.. sigh.. when is Hollywood gonna
learn that remaking classic films is just an utter waste of time and
resources.. I guess when they figure out that taking popular teevee series
from the 50s and 60s and turning them into $100 million movies is also
stupid.. Wild Wild West? The Flintstones? Dozens of others??.. C'mon.. what
a joke..

A friend and I have this running joke about how eventually they will turn
"Hazel" into a $100 million movie..

And.. they remade Fail Safe!?!? :( ..

Harv

The Magnificent Bastard

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 8:54:53 PM4/8/02
to
On Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:42:46 GMT, Harv Laser enlightened the world with this
nugget of wisdom...

It must be a regular laugh riot hanging out with you and your friends. What
do you guys do for kicks?

>
> And.. they remade Fail Safe!?!? :( ..
>
> Harv
>
>
>
>

--
_ () () ||
/\, /;| , __ ., ||^ ., ,--, ,--, , __ _||_
//;| //||,-;| ,-;|\`,-,\ ||_||_ || //'` //'`\\ \`,-,\-,,-`
// ||// |//`); //`)| || || ||-,,-` |||( |`====' || || ||
// | / ((_//\((_/,| || |; || || || \\.,.\\.,-, || |; ||
// ` `-' `-'|| `' `' `' || `' '--' '--' `' `' \\
//_____ ____ || _______ ))________ ____ _______ __\\.__
|| \ // \ _// // `, |// \|| `\ `' `\
|| | // \-' ,, _ |_ ___|/ || \ \
|| D) / // , \ || ( \\_/|| | // , || | |\ |
|| <,// /\\ \ \\ \ || | // /\\ || D) / ||| |
|| \/ /__\\ _\ \\ \ || |// /__\\|| / |// |
|| D) | // `\ )) | || |/ || < `' |
|| | || |_// | || | || \ /
|| / _______ \\ / || | _______|| |\ \ /
||_______/___| ||_``.____,' ||___|___| ||___|\\____\____/

-P- -R- -O- -D- -U- -C- -T- -I- -O- -N- -S- -2- -0- -0- -2- ©

- posted via the T2T network using E-TROLL USENET ENTERPRISE EDITION -

Vicstanley

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 9:12:06 PM4/8/02
to
>Subject: Re: Nate doesn't know who Humbert Humbert is?
>From: "Harv Laser" hla...@socal.rr.com
>Date: 4/8/02 7:42 PM Central Daylight Time

>And.. they remade Fail Safe!?!? :( ..
>

It was the Sept. 2000 live "real time" made-for-TV classic starring George
Clooney.

dratsaB

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 9:23:49 PM4/8/02
to
<snip>

> > This is yet another classic masterpiece that didn't need to
> >be re-made. At all. Ever. Period..
>
> This and Psycho and Failsafe and Night of the Living Dead.

AND "Carnival of Souls"


dratsaB

unread,
Apr 8, 2002, 9:25:21 PM4/8/02
to

<snip>

I guess when they figure out that taking popular teevee series
> from the 50s and 60s and turning them into $100 million movies is also
> stupid.. Wild Wild West? The Flintstones? Dozens of others??.. C'mon..
what
> a joke..
>
> A friend and I have this running joke about how eventually they will turn
> "Hazel" into a $100 million movie..
>
> And.. they remade Fail Safe!?!? :( ..
>
> Harv

They are casting a remake of "The Honeymooners" right now!


Pat Suarez

unread,
Apr 9, 2002, 2:46:23 AM4/9/02
to

Figures. Herk Harvey's 60's masterpiece freaked me out when I saw it as a
young teen. Hollywood, please leave this one alone. You got stupid with
"Little Shop"; don't get stupid here.

For those who remember the original "Little Shop of Horrors", Mel Welles
played Gravis Mushnik to a T; but, boy oh boy, I think Ed O'Ross could
bring that character off almost as well.

Patrick Suarez

Liam Devlin

unread,
Apr 9, 2002, 12:18:23 AM4/9/02
to

AFAIK no one's done a remake or a sequel to Casablanca.

Gary J. Weiner

unread,
Apr 9, 2002, 12:45:47 AM4/9/02
to
Liam Devlin wrote:
>
> Harv Laser wrote:


> > A friend and I have this running joke about how eventually they will turn
> > "Hazel" into a $100 million movie..
> >
> > And.. they remade Fail Safe!?!? :( ..
> >
> > Harv
>
> AFAIK no one's done a remake or a sequel to Casablanca.

Sorry...

http://us.imdb.com/Title?0084994

--
Gary J. Weiner - webm...@hatrack.net
http://www.hatrack.net
HatRack Web Design & Hosting - Hang your web with us

-----
"I, personally, was out of town that Easter. I have no
blood on my hands. The same is true of some other Jews
living in the Greater New York area. In fact, most of
us have an alibi." - Zev Chafets responding to Charlie
Ward's assertion that the Jews killed Jesus.

SFU-Fan

unread,
Apr 9, 2002, 1:17:44 AM4/9/02
to
"Liam Devlin" <Li...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3CB26B8D...@optonline.net...

So far, it has escaped a big screen sequel. Warner Brothers DID try twice
to spin it off into a television series. First in 1956, and then again in
1981 with David Soul as Rick Blaine, Hector Elizondo as Captain Renault, and
Scatman Crothers as Sam. They both died quick, fiery, well-deserved deaths.
On the much better side, the best tribute came from Bugs (Rick), Daffy
(Sam), and Tweety Bird (Ugarte) and company with "Carrotblanca," which was
hilarious. It was the only one I ever saw, but based on what I saw in the
documentary "You Must Remember This," included on the excellent "Casablanca"
DVD, I didn't miss anything. Let's hope they leave this one alone.

Jack


dratsaB

unread,
Apr 9, 2002, 6:52:04 PM4/9/02
to
<snip>

> >
> > AND "Carnival of Souls"
>
> Figures. Herk Harvey's 60's masterpiece freaked me out when I saw it as a
> young teen. Hollywood, please leave this one alone. You got stupid with
> "Little Shop"; don't get stupid here.
>
> For those who remember the original "Little Shop of Horrors", Mel Welles
> played Gravis Mushnik to a T; but, boy oh boy, I think Ed O'Ross could
> bring that character off almost as well.
>
> Patrick Suarez
>

1. Carnival of Souls (1962)
2. Carnival of Souls (1998)
...aka Wes Craven Presents 'Carnival of Souls' (1998)

If you haven't seen it .. trust me ... the 1998 remake is awful! By far, one
of the worst movies I have ever had to sit through.

Liam Devlin

unread,
Apr 10, 2002, 1:19:01 AM4/10/02
to
"Gary J. Weiner" wrote:
>
> Liam Devlin wrote:
> >
> > Harv Laser wrote:
>
> > > A friend and I have this running joke about how eventually they will turn
> > > "Hazel" into a $100 million movie..
> > >
> > > And.. they remade Fail Safe!?!? :( ..
> > >
> > > Harv
> >
> > AFAIK no one's done a remake or a sequel to Casablanca.
>
> Sorry...
>
> http://us.imdb.com/Title?0084994

ACK! David Soul played the Bogart role? I'm sure the world's going to
end soon.

I've learned something today, ignorance really is bliss.

Doug Thacker

unread,
Apr 15, 2002, 1:36:07 AM4/15/02
to
"Harv Laser" <hla...@socal.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Plls8.34963$zN.13...@twister.socal.rr.com>...

And having thus redeemed yourself, you might actually, dare I suggest
it? read the book, in comparison to which, the classic masterpiece
mentioned above is an utter bore.

Doug

0 new messages