Does Marge have blue pubic hair?
Elvis
On 21 Apr 1997, TSmith9444 wrote:
>
> And what of Homer? Does he fart alot? Is grandpa inpotent? Do Ned and
> Maude perform oral sex on each other? Does Ms. Crobopple have any
> venerial diseases? Does Principal Skinner masturbate frequently? Is
> Groundskeeper Willie a pedophile? Have Bart, Millhouse, and Martin ever
> played any sexual discovery games with each other? Does Smithers have
> AIDS? Will Lisa grow up to be a lesbian? These are only some of the
> things that I really want to know...
>
yes.
__o
_`\<,_ --- Dave
Thangyuh. Thangyuh vurry mudge. . . . (*)/ (*)
Bermuda likes my sig!!! Bermuda likes my sig!!! Bermuda likes my sig!!!
Webrunner
Oh and btw lisa will not grow up to be a lesbian.. remember the fortune
teller episode?
Webrunner <^^runnersoft^@^foxnet.net^^> wrote in article <5jg4fu$ag4$6@news
>...
>I have a question.. where did these questions come from? And what were
you
>smoking at the time?
>
> TSmith9444 wrote in article <19970421154...@ladder01.news.aol.com
>
>..
TSmith9444
Attreides
Marge does not have blue pubes, because she dyes her hair. Unless, of
course, she was blue before she went gray. But just because she has blue
hair doesn't mean that she has blue pubes. I know girls with blonde hair,
yet have black pubic hair; and redheads without red hair down there.
As far as the other questions, my answer is 'no.'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
"God created Arrakis to train the faithful." --Muad'dib
"It's a mistake to assume that your enemies
are ignorant, and you are clever." --Richard Cypher
"The Keeper exists to consume the living." --Prelate Annalina
Webrunner
I have a question.. where did these questions come from? And what were you
smoking at the time?
TSmith9444 wrote in article <19970421154...@ladder01.news.aol.com>
...
Princess Amanda
TSmith9444 wrote:
>
> And what of Homer? Does he fart alot? Is grandpa inpotent? Do Ned and
> Maude perform oral sex on each other? Does Ms. Crobopple have any
> venerial diseases? Does Principal Skinner masturbate frequently? Is
> Groundskeeper Willie a pedophile? Have Bart, Millhouse, and Martin ever
> played any sexual discovery games with each other? Does Smithers have
> AIDS? Will Lisa grow up to be a lesbian? These are only some of the
> things that I really want to know...
Um....I think you're giving the Simpsons too much thought...delving
too much! It's just a cartoon show! And it's for FOX, not some adult
channel. I think you think too much...
~*CyberMandee*~
Doc Quack
attr...@aol.com (Attreides) wrote:
>>And what of Homer? Does he fart alot? Is grandpa inpotent? Do Ned and
>>Maude perform oral sex on each other? Does Ms. Crobopple have any
>>venerial diseases? Does Principal Skinner masturbate frequently? Is
>>Groundskeeper Willie a pedophile? Have Bart, Millhouse, and Martin ever
>>played any sexual discovery games with each other? Does Smithers have
>>AIDS? Will Lisa grow up to be a lesbian? These are only some of the
>>things that I really want to know...
>
> Marge does not have blue pubes, because she dyes her hair. Unless, of
>course, she was blue before she went gray. But just because she has blue
>hair doesn't mean that she has blue pubes. I know girls with blonde hair,
>yet have black pubic hair; and redheads without red hair down there.
> As far as the other questions, my answer is 'no.'
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------
However, all of the drawings of Marge as a six month old baby, a two
year old and even at five, all show her as having blue hair on her
head. I really don't think that she would have dyed her hair at such
an early age, and hence, if she dyes it at her current age, it's to
cover up gray hairs that her family has induced. (That isn't falling
out, that is.)
Now, since Marge is obviously a natural blue hair (!), there is a very
good chance indeed that she has blue pubes.
However, Lisa, Bart and Maggies blond hair had to come from someplace,
and it doesn't seem to be from Homer's side of the family.
Now, what blonde male hangs around?......
Doc
Zyta Lang
You know.... not until reading this newsgroup did I understand the true to
life meaning of the word '''nerd''' Not only do we pulverize each episode
down to individual quarks, moronically analysing and criticising each one in
a maddening fit to reveal their every flaw; hackle over the geographic
location of some fucking TOON TOWN; mindlessly and without foreseeable end
troll for best character lines; ad infinity to the power of itself.... but
now, we've stooped to the absolute lowest sub-sea level plateau possible;
debating cartoon characters' pubic hair. Has anyone here ever considered
blowing their brains out? Such an act could possibly be the only relief
from the frenzic, dehumanizing idiocy which dwells herein.
Let me swallow my pride, become a part of this wretched mess for a second
and offer you all a kind word of advice. Turn your televisions OFF. Go
outside. Take a deap breath. Look about at all the things you've been
missing since you first devoted your lives to sitting on your asses and
criticising network television <gag>. Then find something else to do. If
The Simpsons was really worth watching when it started out, good; you were
fortunate enough to witness a rare thing; worthwhile material spewing out of
a cathode ray tube. Now that it's over, and IT IS OVER whether you
psychopaths want to accept that fact or not, get a life and move on to
something of substance .... or at least something new.
Anywho, thank you all for your faded attention. I myself will now move on
to alt.flame so I may witness intelligence firsthand, and then on to
alt.cascade in order to observe users who have lives. Then I think I'll
jump in my swimming pool and relax, possibly thinking about what some ill,
shut-in geek is saying in reply to my post as he picks it apart bit by bit,
pointing out every capitolization error, spelling error, grammatical mis-
construction, and possibly assigning it a production code....
Matt Groening, I hope you're reading this. Just look at the mess you created.
A Pelican in the Stirrups
In <19970421154...@ladder01.news.aol.com> tsmit...@aol.com
(TSmith9444) writes:
>
>And what of Homer? Does he fart alot? Is grandpa inpotent? Do Ned
and
>Maude perform oral sex on each other? Does Ms. Crobopple have any
>venerial diseases? Does Principal Skinner masturbate frequently? Is
>Groundskeeper Willie a pedophile? Have Bart, Millhouse, and Martin
ever
>played any sexual discovery games with each other? Does Smithers have
>AIDS? Will Lisa grow up to be a lesbian? These are only some of the
>things that I really want to know...
Ahh, I love AOL...
Graham KGW.
Ondre Lombard
On Tue, 22 Apr 1997, Zyta Lang wrote:
> Doc Quack wrote:
> You know.... not until reading this newsgroup did I understand the true to
> life meaning of the word '''nerd''' Not only do we pulverize each episode
> down to individual quarks, moronically analysing and criticising each one in
> a maddening fit to reveal their every flaw; hackle over the geographic
> location of some fucking TOON TOWN; mindlessly and without foreseeable end
> troll for best character lines; ad infinity to the power of itself.... but
> now, we've stooped to the absolute lowest sub-sea level plateau possible;
> debating cartoon characters' pubic hair. Has anyone here ever considered
> blowing their brains out? Such an act could possibly be the only relief
> from the frenzic, dehumanizing idiocy which dwells herein.
Very humorous paragraph. Although you may be talking about the weekly
submissions for episode capsules posted each week, these are for "episode
capsules," which, since 1991, have been produced to fully illustrate as many
sublte references the series showcases all the time. Even voice actress
Yeardley Smith said, (not a quote) that you'd have to watch every single
movie, listen to every single piece of music, watch every TV show, etc. to get
all the references and subtle jokes. People try to the best of their ability
to point out these things, and it makes watching episodes of The Simpsons a
bit more enjoyable. Don't take it so seriously.
Although, I will admit, posts trolling best character lines/best
episodes/best character(s) are quite pointless because they usually simply
stir up emotions and conflicts over the series. The only polls I'd ever take
seriously are the ones which have an end tally, by that meaning that people's
votes would summarize who the best/worst character is by percentage on the
newsgroup. But that is rarely the case, so they tend to be rather annoying.
Lastly, I too, was incredibly shocked and severely disappointed at the
level the newsgroup has stooped to when I discovered this thread. (That and
the cruel "SOMEBODY PLEASE KILL LISA SIMPSONS!!!!!" thread). It was even more
shocking to see people seriously replying to it.
> Let me swallow my pride, become a part of this wretched mess for a second
> and offer you all a kind word of advice. Turn your televisions OFF. Go
> outside. Take a deap breath. Look about at all the things you've been
> missing since you first devoted your lives to sitting on your asses and
> criticising network television <gag>. Then find something else to do. If
> The Simpsons was really worth watching when it started out, good; you were
> fortunate enough to witness a rare thing; worthwhile material spewing out of
> a cathode ray tube. Now that it's over, and IT IS OVER whether you
> psychopaths want to accept that fact or not, get a life and move on to
> something of substance .... or at least something new.
I'll take it, you're a jaded ex-fan, by which I have no comment on
this.
> Anywho, thank you all for your faded attention. I myself will now move on
> to alt.flame so I may witness intelligence firsthand, and then on to
> alt.cascade in order to observe users who have lives. Then I think I'll
> jump in my swimming pool and relax, possibly thinking about what some ill,
> shut-in geek is saying in reply to my post as he picks it apart bit by bit,
> pointing out every capitolization error, spelling error, grammatical mis-
> construction, and possibly assigning it a production code....
>
> Matt Groening, I hope you're reading this. Just look at the mess you created.
Don't blame Matt. It's my understanding there was a higher level of
intelligence on this newsgroup when The Simpsons had more intelligence.
Ondre
Mr.Natural
tsmit...@aol.com (TSmith9444) wrote:
>And what of Homer? Does he fart alot? Is grandpa inpotent? Do Ned and
>Maude perform oral sex on each other? Does Ms. Crobopple have any
>venerial diseases? Does Principal Skinner masturbate frequently? Is
>Groundskeeper Willie a pedophile? Have Bart, Millhouse, and Martin ever
>played any sexual discovery games with each other? Does Smithers have
>AIDS? Will Lisa grow up to be a lesbian? These are only some of the
>things that I really want to know...
In order:
(title question) - a good likelihood of that
- what of him?
- I am sure of it
- there can be no doubt
- never!
- if so, it is not unsurprising
- I doubt it (mother might find out)
- perhaps, but he must keep his desires under wraps, or he would have
been caught by now
- no
- no
- no (remember the "flash-forward" episode)
--------------------------------
smar...@compusmart.ab.ca
Me fail English? That's unpossible! - R. Wiggum
Zyta Lang
Ondre Lombard <pi...@cyberverse.com> spewed:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 1997, Zyta Lang wrote:
> >
> > You know.... not until reading this newsgroup did I understand the true to
> > life meaning of the word '''nerd''' Not only do we pulverize each episode
> > down to individual quarks, moronically analysing and criticising each one
> > in a maddening fit to reveal their every flaw; hackle over the geographic
> > location of some fucking TOON TOWN; mindlessly and without foreseeable end
> > troll for best character lines; ad infinity to the power of itself.... but
> > now, we've stooped to the absolute lowest sub-sea level plateau possible;
> > debating cartoon characters' pubic hair. Has anyone here ever considered
> > blowing their brains out? Such an act could possibly be the only relief
> > from the frenzic, dehumanizing idiocy which dwells herein.
>
> Very humorous paragraph. Although you may be talking about the weekly
> submissions for episode capsules posted each week, these are for "episode
> capsules," which, since 1991, have been produced to fully illustrate as many
> sublte references the series showcases all the time. Even voice actress
> Yeardley Smith said, (not a quote) that you'd have to watch every single
> movie, listen to every single piece of music, watch every TV show, etc. to
> get all the references and subtle jokes. People try to the best of their
> ability to point out these things, and it makes watching episodes of The
> Simpsons a bit more enjoyable. Don't take it so seriously.
I was commenting on the sub-moronic discussion about cartoon pubic hair,
and using the absurd idiocy otherwise found in the nitpicking to back up
my point. I wasn't taking it seriously. If I were, I'd be submitting
alerts to the newsgroup every time a cartoon character's mouth wasn't in
perfect synchronization with the voice track and shaming the animators for
their inability to maintain standards set in the past. If you people enjoy
pointing things out, I don't care. I'm not against it. I was stating that
some users take things much too far by picking apart episodes like a team
of cellular biologists trying to diagnose a new exotic form of cancer. If
it comes down to the show falling on its face, so what? I saw the show
where Poochie was introduced and personally think Lisa's line regarding the
characters having less impact due to desensitization is a load of shit.
Though I'm no monument of intelligence myself, I'm not a complete idiot
either. I know damn well that they aren't producing episodes like they
have before. But I see absolutely no reason to give it a second thought.
It's their production. Why should I care? If the situation were reversed
and they were the viewers, do you think they'd care about what I was doing?
I doubt it. They'd turn the channel.
> Lastly, I too, was incredibly shocked and severely disappointed at the level
> the newsgroup has stooped to when I discovered this thread. (That and the
> cruel "SOMEBODY PLEASE KILL LISA SIMPSONS!!!!!" thread). It was even more
> shocking to see people seriously replying to it.
Well, I hope nobody took me for one of those jerks who's against people's
right to speak their minds freely. It's mostly that topics like those are
apt to drive away intelligent discussion because it shows that users are
more interested in mindless and childish agendas. And if I may become a
part of the stinking-opinions class of posters, it's a wonder why the
producers of this show are gearing it towards mindless `slapstick tripe`
in recent times; their primary exposure to fans is this newsgroup, and
look at what goes on here. You're making your own bed, guys....
> I'll take it, you're a jaded ex-fan, by which I have no comment on this.
No, not really. I still watch the show, but no more or less than I ever
have. It hardly takes precedence over something else I might be involved
in when it airs, and if I am watching and the show turns out to be a bad
or uninteresting episode, I just turn the television off instead of sitting
there allowing my blood pressure to rise in disapproval.
> > Matt Groening, I hope you're reading this. Just look at the mess you
> > created.
>
> Don't blame Matt. It's my understanding there was a higher level of
> intelligence on this newsgroup when The Simpsons had more intelligence.
Don't take this harshly, but as one of those who's devoted to pointing out
"subtle sarcasm," you sure didn't seem to see it in this case....
Elvis
On 22 Apr 1997, Bradley Temperley wrote:
[The question]
> "Does Marge have blue
> pubes?" is a curly one.
Great play on words!
BTW, even though this post was an obvious troll, I think it's one of the
funniest trolls I've ever seen, and one of the best questions asked on
this newsgroup!
ming...@worldnet.att.net
why is this important? is the show THAT uninteresting that there is a
need to think about these things? i don't think the answers to these
questions would add any value to this newsgroup or the cartoon.
Maksim Raginski
|> Aside of the new low achieved by discussing the aforementioned topic, what
|> I was trying to point out was the outright irrepressible analyzation of
|> episodes going so far as to try and diagnose the writer's mental state when
|> penning a certain line in such and such an episode, or reading wild and
|> absurd notions into the possible motifs behind this and that etcetera. I
|> mean, good god, lets be realistic here. It's a television show. By reading
|> some of the obsessive-compulsive articles here, I bet 50% of this user base
|> will die of simultaneous heart attacks the day Fox announces cancellation.
|> The show is seemingly on their minds 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. That's
|> just not right, and it phases me how these people find time to go to the
|> bathroom. And, no, I'm not wasting my time out here to bash people and
|> troll for hate and discontent. There's a reasonable number of users who
|> don't take things as far as the majority does. But....
|>
Actually, Zyta, I am very grateful to you for raising this point because I too
cannot hide my disappoitment at the fact that such an intellectual and self-aware
satire as The Simpsons has horribly degraded. You are also right about the fact
that this degradation has eventually resulted in the demise of this newsgroup.
However, I am still a Simpsons fan. Why? Because, for once, I am too forgiving.
All the previous seasons, the writers have been demonstrating great skill at
such aspects of their trade as parody, use of irony, clever references, excellent
knowledge of dialects, and so forth. The voices have been (and, despite this
season's utter failure, still are) exceptional. Yes, the show is getting worse,
and yes, some people are going overboard trying to ferret out little bits and
pieces that, most probably, haven't been intended as such anyway. But let's look
at it this way: it's the same way with literary critics. When I was in high
school, our American Lit teacher claimed to have found fifty(!) symbols on a
single page of "Scarlet Letter" in de-quarto format! That's as ridiculous as
looking for what you have called "quarks" in The Simpsons episodes.
Now, I don't intend to say that I have never found any references or flaws in the
show. For once, the show is horrendously inconsistent (chronologically,
thematically, plotwise, etc.), but it is entirely out of the realm of
consistency! But, as a fan, I think it is most advantageous to look at the show
*critically.* It's always easier to rave about everyone and everything without
questiioning a bit. The Simpsons are not an authority; it's just a comedy show,
greatly satirical yet, as I've mentioned before, self-aware. And if there is
something that's gone from the show this season, it's this self-awareness. I hop
you at least agree with me on this issue.
Max
Doc Quack
zyt...@ix.netcom.com (Zyta Lang) wrote:
>Doc Quack wrote:
>> > Marge does not have blue pubes, because she dyes her hair. Unless, of
>> >course, she was blue before she went gray. But just because she has blue
>> >hair doesn't mean that she has blue pubes. I know girls with blonde hair,
>> >yet have black pubic hair; and redheads without red hair down there.
>> > As far as the other questions, my answer is 'no.'
>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >---------------------------------------------
>>
>> However, all of the drawings of Marge as a six month old baby, a two
>> year old and even at five, all show her as having blue hair on her
>> head. I really don't think that she would have dyed her hair at such
>> an early age, and hence, if she dyes it at her current age, it's to
>> cover up gray hairs that her family has induced. (That isn't falling
>> out, that is.)
>>
>> Now, since Marge is obviously a natural blue hair (!), there is a very
>> good chance indeed that she has blue pubes.
>>
>> However, Lisa, Bart and Maggies blond hair had to come from someplace,
>> and it doesn't seem to be from Homer's side of the family.
>>
>> Now, what blonde male hangs around?......
>>
>> Doc
>
>You know.... not until reading this newsgroup did I understand the true to
>life meaning of the word '''nerd''' Not only do we pulverize each episode
>down to individual quarks, moronically analysing and criticising each one in
>a maddening fit to reveal their every flaw; hackle over the geographic
>location of some fucking TOON TOWN; mindlessly and without foreseeable end
>troll for best character lines; ad infinity to the power of itself.... but
>now, we've stooped to the absolute lowest sub-sea level plateau possible;
>debating cartoon characters' pubic hair. Has anyone here ever considered
>blowing their brains out? Such an act could possibly be the only relief
>from the frenzic, dehumanizing idiocy which dwells herein.
>
>Let me swallow my pride, become a part of this wretched mess for a second
>and offer you all a kind word of advice. Turn your televisions OFF. Go
>outside. Take a deap breath. Look about at all the things you've been
>missing since you first devoted your lives to sitting on your asses and
>criticising network television <gag>. Then find something else to do. If
>The Simpsons was really worth watching when it started out, good; you were
>fortunate enough to witness a rare thing; worthwhile material spewing out of
>a cathode ray tube. Now that it's over, and IT IS OVER whether you
>psychopaths want to accept that fact or not, get a life and move on to
>something of substance .... or at least something new.
>
>Anywho, thank you all for your faded attention. I myself will now move on
>to alt.flame so I may witness intelligence firsthand, and then on to
>alt.cascade in order to observe users who have lives. Then I think I'll
>jump in my swimming pool and relax, possibly thinking about what some ill,
>shut-in geek is saying in reply to my post as he picks it apart bit by bit,
>pointing out every capitolization error, spelling error, grammatical mis-
>construction, and possibly assigning it a production code....
>
>Matt Groening, I hope you're reading this. Just look at the mess you created.
It's not your grammar that needs correcting, young lady! It's your
pitiful excuse for a sense of humor! I'll be the very first to say
that the original posting was very tongue in cheek. It's my hope that
most people here would find the concept humorous and get a smile out
of such outlandish topics and reasoning. I spent more than ten hours
each day in very demanding and serious work and I absolutely need a
totally wacky way to let off steam. I'm being serious in this posting
since I actually believe that your statement is what you really think,
without the ability to understand what the discussion is really about!
I sincerely hope that you do find a life in one of the areas you
mention, because it's very likely you're unable to appreciate the one
you currently have.
Doc
Cafe Rondo
Yoor darn r-r-r-right she's got blue pubic 'air! 'Ow do I know, you
ask? Because I 'ate 'er, that's 'ow. That's right, I 'ate 'er! And when
yoo 'ate someone that much, yoo just know those things.
Ron from Nijmegen
--"That's right, money. Your money's happiness is all that moneys."
Doc Quack
Jens Lorkowski <hae...@uni-duisburg.de> wrote:
>Elvis wrote:
>>
>> On 21 Apr 1997, Attreides wrote:
>>
>> > I know girls with blonde hair,
>> > yet have black pubic hair; and redheads without red hair down there.
>>
>> Sounds like your friends are dyeing their has as well, my friend.
>>
>> __o
>> _`\<,_ --- Dave
>> Thangyuh. Thangyuh vurry mudge. . . . (*)/ (*
>
>O.k. folks,
>I do not know if there is any sense in this discussion, but you should
>already have recognized (if you are interestded in women besides OFF)
>that a lady's hair color is not coherent with her pubic hair color at
>all. The color of a girl's eyebrows will probably give you a better hint
>of the pubic hair's color.
>
>Greetings from Germany
>
>Jens Lorkowski
Hello Jens, I always love visiting your country, I've always felt
welcome there.
In the main part, you're correct. As Simpsons fans, we were
discussing Marge's hair color, which is blue.
Now this seems to be a strange color for hair, even in the universe
the Simpsons are in, although there are other shades which also seem
to be natural. The twins have purple hair, for example, while Bart,
Lisa and Maggie's hair is the same as their skin color.
There was one brief shot of Bart, Lisa and Maggie as normal children
and all three had white hair. (as well as five fingers and no
overbite)
In flashbacks to Marge's childhood, she was shown as blue haired, even
at the age of one. Other ages shown were kindergarten, elementary
school and high school. In high school, Marge wore her hair down
until she started dating Home. Getting the bee hive hair style was
reverting back to her earlier style.
In all of those scenes, Marge has always been blue haired, so it's not
likely a dye job. (I don't think that any of the characters have
eyebrows, except for Maggie's rival, and he has only one all the way
across.)
This being the case, we can safely assume that Marge has blue pubes!
At least unless there are some more daring drawings in the future.
I'd have bet that we'd never see a totally nude couple on any cartoon
show, but the Simpsons have already done that! And without any cover!
(I have the caps to prove it!)
Ah well, I tend to ramble....
Doc
Mikhovitch
On 22 Apr 1997, Elvis wrote:
> On 21 Apr 1997, Attreides wrote:
>
> > I know girls with blonde hair,
> > yet have black pubic hair; and redheads without red hair down there.
>
> Sounds like your friends are dyeing their has as well, my friend.
>
> Thangyuh. Thangyuh vurry mudge. . . . (*)/ (*)
> Bermuda likes my sig!!! Bermuda likes my sig!!! Bermuda likes my sig!!!
>
Yeah, but in episode 2f01, Homer says "Oh *no*, Marge has been as grey as
a mule since she was seventeen..."
I don't know about you, but *I* certainly don't think she would have blue
as well...
O O :: Remove spamitech from my email addy to reply ::
-oooO--(_)---Oooo-------------------------------------------------------
.MiK. Any sufficiently complicated technology
TIAS (c) Labs. 1997 is no diferrent from Magick
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.oooO Oooo. Brisbane, Gold and Sunshine Coasts
( Y ) ( Y ) Aah! No Spam! No.... Spam!!! AAArrrrgggghhh!!...
--\ (-----) /-----------------------------------------------------------
\_) (_/
NSman
Zyta Lang <zyt...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in article
<13Fd2a4.C85...@ix.netcom.com>...
>
> Let me swallow my pride, become a part of this wretched mess for a
second
> and offer you all a kind word of advice. Turn your televisions OFF.
OFF?! Where where?! What channel?
Doc Quack
"NSman" <NS...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I don't think that Zyta, in her finite wisdom, was describing Our
Favorite Family.
:)
Doc
AbeScott
Damn this post! You got me all thinking! You know how I feel about
thinking!
Disco Abe
--
"Cloning is unetchical. Man trying to be god."--Dr. John Freedman, PHD.
"God Shmod, I want my monkey-man!!!'--Bart Simpson
"The ardor of arboreality is an adventure we have spurned"---Look it up, nerf-hearder!
Cecil Ashitey
Well, maybe two...
1. Was that an actual genuine Simpsons animation frame?
2. Was that in an actual Simpsons cartoon?
from Smoothy