Limit To Crudity
Capt. Adam Thorowgood
I guess we all have noticed that there are limits to which
the writers of TS will go. Notice that ALL the Simpsons will
burp; Homer is projected as crudest when scratching his ass;
Bart when swearing; even Maggie burps.
Would it be as funny if they went a notch or two further? What
if Homer cut some very large farts from time to time, would that
add or take away from the humor? And what about most current
shows and sitcoms dominated by NY "jewish" writers: notice that
each season of SAT NITE LIVE, they just love the masturbation
issue. Look at SIENFELDT and the constant referencing to
masturbation. Would TS be funnier with crude references to
masturbation --as a scene where Lisa and her girlfrieds
observe Bart "beating off" in his treehouse. [Of course,
we're all familiar with the jewish writers of the movie
FAST TIMES AT RIDGEMONT HIGH --and again the "wished for"
masturbation scene in that movie which followed that plot.]
I am very surprised and really pleased that these outre
elements/outer limits of humor have NOT been introduced
into The Simpsons ---yet.
Nathan Mulac DeHoff
On Fri, 10 Oct 1997 00:03:41 -0600, in article
<343DC5...@replay.anon.net>, the one known as Capt. Adam Thorowgood
wrote thusly:
>
>I guess we all have noticed that there are limits to which
>the writers of TS will go. Notice that ALL the Simpsons will
>burp; Homer is projected as crudest when scratching his ass;
>Bart when swearing; even Maggie burps.
>
>Would it be as funny if they went a notch or two further? What
>if Homer cut some very large farts from time to time, would that
>add or take away from the humor?
has its limits.
Oh, and in "King-Size Homer," Bart did say, "I think it's ironic that for
once, Dad's butt prevented the release of toxic gas," or something like
that.
>And what about most current
>shows and sitcoms dominated by NY "jewish" writers: notice that
>each season of SAT NITE LIVE, they just love the masturbation
>issue. Look at SIENFELDT and the constant referencing to
>masturbation. Would TS be funnier with crude references to
>masturbation --as a scene where Lisa and her girlfrieds
>observe Bart "beating off" in his treehouse. [Of course,
>we're all familiar with the jewish writers of the movie
>FAST TIMES AT RIDGEMONT HIGH --and again the "wished for"
>masturbation scene in that movie which followed that plot.]
>
Are you implying that all shows with Jewish writers contain references to
masturbation? If so, I find your anti-semitism disgusting. Oh, and Bart
is only ten years old. If they were going to put in a masturbation
reference (which I certainly hope to God they do not), they would surely
use a different character.
>I am very surprised and really pleased that these outre
>elements/outer limits of humor have NOT been introduced
>into The Simpsons ---yet.
I'm glad, too. Let's hope the show never gets as crude as you suggest.
--
Nathan Mulac DeHoff
vo...@geocities.com or ln...@grove.iup.edu
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Corridor/5447/
"I'm having a wonderful time, but I'd rather be whistling in the dark."
joha...@ix.netcom.com
Capt. Adam Thorowgood wrote:
(nothing worth repeating)
Has it come to this for you netnazis? Are you so desperate for some
faint semblence of relevance that you've taken to harassing a TV show?
After the endless flamewars on alt.revisionism and similar newsgroups,
are you people so broken in spirit that you have to pick a fight with
the likes of Bart and Lisa Simpson? I'm very, very disappointed, this
is like seeing Martin Bormann mugging preschoolers for their milk money.
John
ericp...@spamsucks!!!pb.net
> "Capt. Adam Thorowgood" <C...@replay.anon.net> writes:
> I guess we all have noticed that there are limits to which
> the writers of TS will go. Notice that ALL the Simpsons will
> burp; Homer is projected as crudest when scratching his ass;
> Bart when swearing; even Maggie burps.
>
> Would it be as funny if they went a notch or two further? What
> if Homer cut some very large farts from time to time, would that
> shows and sitcoms dominated by NY "jewish" writers: notice that
> each season of SAT NITE LIVE, they just love the masturbation
> issue. Look at SIENFELDT and the constant referencing to
> masturbation. Would TS be funnier with crude references to
> masturbation --as a scene where Lisa and her girlfrieds
> observe Bart "beating off" in his treehouse. [Of course,
> we're all familiar with the jewish writers of the movie
> FAST TIMES AT RIDGEMONT HIGH --and again the "wished for"
> masturbation scene in that movie which followed that plot.]
>
> elements/outer limits of humor have NOT been introduced
> into The Simpsons ---yet.
>
>>>>
Hey; the sky's the limit, man. How about if Bart picked his nose
and flicked the boogers on Lisa? How about if Marge got mad
at Homer and flung a dirty diaper in his face? Maybe, instead of
just belching, Barney can throw up all over Homer, or on Moe?
How about Santa's Little Helper jumping on Snowball 2 and
humping her? Rather than have Homer fart, it would be even
funnier if there was a whole episode about Marge's flatuence
problem. Like, she could fart in the Kwicky-Mart and empty out
the whole place!
Here's a typical dialog exchange from the new-improved
grody-to-the-max Simpsons:
HOMER: (eating) Marge, thisis the best jelly donut I've ever
tasted!
MARGE: That's my used tampon, Homer.
HOMER: (shocked) Tampon?!! (pause) Ah, but what are ya
gonna do? (resumes eating)
If the show could begin to do gross stuff like that, it would be
it's best season ever!
Then again, maybe not. (The hypothosis above are still pretty
funny to post here though, right?)
cz...@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca
Capt. Adam Thorowgood (C...@replay.anon.net) wrote:
: I guess we all have noticed that there are limits to which
: the writers of TS will go. Notice that ALL the Simpsons will
: burp; Homer is projected as crudest when scratching his ass;
: Bart when swearing; even Maggie burps.
A baby burping? Horrible! And they show this on television?
"Oh, won't somebody *please* think of the children!"
Go away, lil' troll.
--
***********************************************
Life is one crushing defeat after another
until you just wish Flanders was dead!
Homer J. Simpson
***********************************************
Andrew Gill
Constance L. Crouch wrote in message <61pbqp$pjp$3...@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>...
>NO.
>
>Well you did =ask=...|->
>
>Connie
Um, Connie (et alia), do you even know what rhetorical means?
---------------------------------------------------------
The official "Write My Signature" contest email address:|
----> fruadman_tru...@juno.com |
The prize? I'll use the best Sig! |
-----------------------------------Temporary Sig Follows:
My standards are too contradictory--I'm not good enough for any woman who's
good enough for me...
Sheila
Capt.Adam Thorowgood wrote:
> I guess we all have noticed that there are limits to which
> the writers of TS will go. Notice that ALL the Simpsons will
> burp; Homer is projected as crudest when scratching his ass;
> Bart when swearing; even Maggie burps.
Since they're made out to be the epitome of a "white trash" family
why not move boldly into the realm of incest, too. Bart could start
dating Lisa. I can just see the episode now where after their first
"encounter" Bart is shocked to discover that...yes, Lisa does suffer
from the dreaded "thunder thighs" syndrome which is the reason for
the absurd and Flintstonesque smock that Lisa consistently wears.
I'm not sure what he might discover if that necklace was to be removed.
Or, we could have an episode in which Marge genuinely carries on an
affair with Flanders. He would have some bizarre sex ritual wearing
a baptismal robe and chanting about "baptising Willy" during sex.
To me the greatest crassness is those old people. I can't stand to
look at those crappy old folks.
Constance L. Crouch
Andrew Gill (fruadman_tru...@juno.com) wrote:
:Connie wrote:
::NO. Well you did =ask=...|->
:Um, Connie (et alia), do you even know what rhetorical means?
Um, why, yes, Andrew, I -do.-
Now here's a riddle for -you:- How do you frustrate a turkey?
Connie
sylvestra
Constance L. Crouch <so...@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu> wrote in article
<6278pt$li5$1...@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>...
I've got the answer! Ask her to explain "rhetorical".