Can a Straight Man Love Sex and the City?
Ubiquitous
Craig Blankenhorn / Warner Bros. Michael Patrick King—the writer, director,
and producer of Sex and the City 2—says most straight men can barely say
“Manolo” when talking to him. But is there hope?
“This is Michael Patrick King,” I said to the reporter on the other end of the
phone.
“Hey, man,” he said. “Thanks for calling me right back, I’m on deadline.”
“I hear you,” I said, and we shared the knowing laugh of one writer held
captive by a deadline to another.
And then out of our shared camaraderie, came a long awkward pause on his end
of the phone until he finally uttered, “So, I guess we should talk about
shoes.”
Now the long awkward pause was on my end of the phone. “OK,” I said. “But I
thought we were going to talk about the movie.”
When the first movie came out, I did see some cool hetero couples in their
early 30s walking hand-in-hand out of the theater. And I would reach for my
cellphone to snap a picture—like I’d been walking in the woods and had
suddenly come upon Big Foot.
To which he replied: “Yeah, I know, but my wife would kill me if I didn’t talk
about…”
And then he sputtered out the clumsiest word to ever escape a straight man’s
lips. “… Manolos.”
• Rebecca Dana: Carrie Bradshaw’s Battle of the BrandsI have been through this
uncomfortable man/shoe scenario more times than Carrie Bradshaw has bought
Manolo Blahnik shoes. OK, that’s an exaggeration; I haven’t been through
anything that many times. But I have certainly been put in this exact same
man-Manolo moment as many times as I’ve typed the word Manolo in a script. And
that’s a lot.
For the life of me, I don’t understand why these guys get so tense about
saying the word. Hell, “Man” is right there in the first syllable of Manolo.
But trust me, it happens. Having been the spokesman for Sex and the City
through the television series, the movie, and now the sequel, I can tell you
right now that straight men need help in these interviews.
So I try to help. It’s just something they think they can’t relate to. I try
not to take it personally, and put myself in their places. I imagine that I am
the reporter and I have been asked to interview, say, a spokesman for the Tea
Party. I guess after that long uncomfortable silence, I would clumsily mutter
something like, “So, I guess we should talk about Obama,” desperately clinging
to the only word that I see repeated over and over on their posters.
And it’s not just the press. It seems a lot of straight men need a word coach
or a lawyer when it comes to discussing Sex and the City.
First comes the disclaimer: “My wife makes me watch it with her.” I always
imagine these guys tied to a chair, like Malcolm McDowell in A Clockwork
Orange, head in a vice, forced in the direction of HBO on Demand. I picture
their loving wife or girlfriend sitting next to them, sipping a Cosmo, tears
of joy glistening in the corners of her eyes as she leans over and says, “That
wasn’t so bad was it?”
There is also the “I was so drunk last night, I don’t remember a thing”
straight man approach. This usually involves some sort of denial that leads to
a confession: “I was flipping around on the remote, and at first I didn’t know
what it was—then I realized what I was watching—and I thought, ‘Hey, let me
see what the fuss is all about.’” At this point, I lean in expectantly, hoping
to hear his positive reaction to the show or the movie—but nothing comes.
He’ll confess to watching to see what the fuss is all about, but that’s as far
into the fuss about the fuss as he’s going to go.
I cling to my family members for support—my brothers-in-law and nephews who
swear to me that they love Sex and the City. Even as I tell myself, “They’re
straight and they like it,” there is a nagging voice in the back of my head
that counters, “But they’re family—perhaps they are giving you a pass.” Like
the family members at a piano recital who nod on supportively as the beloved
child performing hits some deafening clinkers to end the program.
Occasionally, I notice signs that this uncomfortable straight male silence is
generational. When the first movie came out, I did see some cool hetero
couples in their early 30s walking hand-in-hand out of the theater. And I
would reach for my cellphone to snap a picture—like I’d been walking in the
woods and had suddenly come upon Big Foot. I needed proof.
Recently, I heard that Jonah Hill—young, cool, straight, brilliant, funny
Jonah Hill—told a reporter that he is excited to see Sex and the City 2. As
much as I am thrilled with that information, a good part of my more realistic
self thinks: He’s just going to see it to get laid. (And if that is the case,
I am happy to help a brother out.)
But there have been signs of evolutionary leaps. In the past several weeks, a
few male reporters have boldly told me they enjoyed the sequel, a break away
from the herd mentality. Even if the next sentence that rushes out of their
mouths is, “I’m going to take my wife.” Firmly establishing that their
heterosexuality is intact. Baby steps.
I myself have been an up-close-and-personal witness to one man’s Sex-ual
evolution.
It happened on a flight from New York to Los Angeles. There was a straight
businessman sitting next to me. I say he was straight by using my writer’s
superpowers of observation: his wedding ring, his Scotch on the rocks, his
sensible business suit, his age, and his laptop screen saver. (It was a photo
of him and his wife in khaki shorts holding hands on a volcano site in Hawaii.
He was either straight or a lesbian. I went with straight.)
So imagine my surprise when I saw him scan the movie selections on the airline
personal movie player and select Sex and the City. I was in shock—and also
incredibly uncomfortable for the next couple of hours. As I pretended to
follow the plot of my own selection—one of those blue-tinted, high-tech
conspiracy movies staring Leonardo DiCaprio or Matt Damon, or both—I kept
glancing over at the businessman watching Carrie and Big’s romantic wedding
fall apart. To be honest, I couldn’t look directly into his face to see how he
was enjoying it, that would be like looking into the face of the Medusa and I
was afraid I would turn to stone. So I glanced over and over again to take in
his body language. The rolling of his feet, the short bursts of breath—could
it possibly be a laugh? The wringing of his hands, the dropping of his ice
cream into his lap.
Let’s just say it was like being held hostage. And the captor is your movie. I
have no idea what happened to Leo or Matt in their movie, but I know I’d been
put through an exorcism sitting next to mine.
After we landed, I did manage to cheat a slight glance up to his face. I
scanned for any sign. A smile, a contented smirk, even a frown—something—but
there was nothing. He seemed unaltered. If there had been a moment of Sex
evolution, it had now retreated back into the slime.
Just as I gave up all hope, his businessman friend who had been sitting behind
him asked him, “What movie did you watch?”
At that moment, it seemed to me that everything stopped. My heart stopped;
even the overly processed cabin air stopped. My businessman paused, what felt
to me like such a long pause that it surely put all the long uncomfortable
reporter pauses to shame. Finally he said, “I watched that Sex and the City—it
was pretty good.” His friend replied: “Yeah? I’ll have to check it out.”
It was then that I had a realization: Gay, straight—doesn’t matter. We’re all
just men standing on a plane wondering what’s taking them so long to open the
cabin door.
Plus: Check out more of the latest entertainment, fashion, and culture
coverage on Sexy Beast—photos, videos, features, and Tweets.
| Michael Patrick King is the writer, director and producer of
| Sex and The City 2. He won multiple Emmys, Golden Globes, and
| DGA awards as the writer, director and executive producer of
| Sex and the City on HBO. King also created and directed the
| Emmy-nominated show The Comeback.
RichA
> by Michael Patrick King
>
> Craig Blankenhorn / Warner Bros. Michael Patrick King—the writer, director,
> and producer of Sex and the City 2—says most straight men can barely say
> “Manolo” when talking to him. But is there hope?
>
> “This is Michael Patrick King,” I said to the reporter on the other end of the
> phone.
>
> “Hey, man,” he said. “Thanks for calling me right back, I’m on deadline.”
>
> “I hear you,” I said, and we shared the knowing laugh of one writer held
> captive by a deadline to another.
>
> And then out of our shared camaraderie, came a long awkward pause on his end
> of the phone until he finally uttered, “So, I guess we should talk about
> shoes.”
>
> Now the long awkward pause was on my end of the phone. “OK,” I said. “But I
> thought we were going to talk about the movie.”
>
> When the first movie came out, I did see some cool hetero couples in their
> early 30s walking hand-in-hand out of the theater. And I would reach for my
> cellphone to snap a picture—like I’d been walking in the woods and had
> suddenly come upon Big Foot.
>
The series was clever and well-written, unlike most TV series so no
matter what the content, at least it wasn't revoltingly stupid.
However, this latest movie seems to be a disaster. Whose idea was it
to go to terrorist land?