looking forward to RD7
Pat Bennett
Reckon it must be pretty good if CB was going to leave but this
series made him decide to come back again, as SFX said he
wasn't happy with the scripts. What do you lot reckon?
vote Doctor Who
see Ceefax page 668
or watch
Aunties Tv Favourites on Friday 11th October BBC1 8.30pm
and vote Doctor Who on 0891 60 70 85. Calls cost max 10p.
Matthew Manzano
In message <53dt42$n...@susscsc1.rdg.ac.uk>
Pat Bennett <P.Bennett> writes:
> Reckon it must be pretty good if CB was going to leave but this
> series made him decide to come back again, as SFX said he
> wasn't happy with the scripts. What do you lot reckon?
Well it says something doesn't it. Here's me keeping my fingers crossed !
--
Mons.
"Where will this end ?"
"In Fire."
David McShane
<199610082...@zetnet.co.uk> looked like a custard cream,
especially when Matthew Manzano <m.ma...@zetnet.co.uk> wrote on it
with a cherry flavoured pen:
>In message <53dt42$n...@susscsc1.rdg.ac.uk>
> Pat Bennett <P.Bennett> writes:
>
>> Reckon it must be pretty good if CB was going to leave but this
>> series made him decide to come back again, as SFX said he
>> wasn't happy with the scripts. What do you lot reckon?
>
>Well it says something doesn't it. Here's me keeping my fingers crossed !
Could mean a new Brittas Empire!?
--
David McShane
Lee
'Pat Bennett <P.Bennett>' said: "There's an old android saying which
goes '<53dt42$n...@susscsc1.rdg.ac.uk>', which roughly translated
means:
>Reckon it must be pretty good if CB was going to leave but this
>series made him decide to come back again, as SFX said he
>wasn't happy with the scripts. What do you lot reckon?
>
From what I've seen of Series seven <grin>, it IS good, Darn good.
--
This we can probably attribute to the unexpected behaviour of the
cytoplasms.
Tony Gilbert
Pat Bennett did say these few words in alt.tv.red-dwarf on the subject
of looking forward to RD7
>Reckon it must be pretty good if CB was going to leave but this
>series made him decide to come back again, as SFX said he
>wasn't happy with the scripts. What do you lot reckon?
I went to the preview screening of RD VII last Saturday.I can say that
what I watched ( 3 episodes ) was very good and very funny.
And it was a pleasant surprise to have the cast there doing a bit of
talking in between the episodes.
--
Tony Gilbert.
IRC: Mission.
PGP Key.
ARosin
In article <53dt42$n...@susscsc1.rdg.ac.uk>, Pat Bennett <P.Bennett>
writes:
>Reckon it must be pretty good if CB was going to leave but this
>series made him decide to come back again,
Have you ever seen The Brittas Empire?
Anyway, did anyone else see a clip with CB in on Telly Addicts (can't
pretend
I only watched it once accidently, now) were he played Neil Kinnock?
Ang - the greatest Prime Minister Labour never had.
---
The hand that signed the paper felled a city;
Five sovereign fingers taxed the breath,
Doubled the globe of dead and halved a country;
These five kings did a king to death.
Matthew Manzano
In message <326c9d7f...@news.zetnet.co.uk>
lee.w...@zetnet.co.uk (Lee) writes:
> 'Pat Bennett <P.Bennett>' said: "There's an old android saying which
> goes '<53dt42$n...@susscsc1.rdg.ac.uk>', which roughly translated
> means:
> >Reckon it must be pretty good if CB was going to leave but this
> >series made him decide to come back again, as SFX said he
> >wasn't happy with the scripts. What do you lot reckon?
> >
> From what I've seen of Series seven <grin>, it IS good, Darn good.
From what you've seen. You've seen.
/me cracks his knuckles and rolls up his sleaves.
You been to a screening then have you ? Bastard.
Matthew Manzano
In message <VHB$+AAtJB...@swoon.demon.co.uk>
Tony Gilbert <to...@swoon.demon.co.uk> writes:
> Pat Bennett did say these few words in alt.tv.red-dwarf on the subject
> of looking forward to RD7
> >Reckon it must be pretty good if CB was going to leave but this
> >series made him decide to come back again, as SFX said he
> >wasn't happy with the scripts. What do you lot reckon?
> I went to the preview screening of RD VII last Saturday.I can say that
> what I watched ( 3 episodes ) was very good and very funny.
It was funny then was it. Good. How funny ? Could you perhaps compare
it with the other series' ( i.e. was it as funny as series one or
series 4 ?). Also, is it more dialouge driven then series 6 ?
Nosey ? Me ? No !
Laurie JP Sage
In article <YPKVREA$pBXy...@mcshane1.demon.co.uk>,
David McShane <da...@mcshane1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Reckon it must be pretty good if CB was going to leave but this
>>> series made him decide to come back again, as SFX said he
>>> wasn't happy with the scripts. What do you lot reckon?
>>
>>Well it says something doesn't it. Here's me keeping my fingers crossed !
>
>Could mean a new Brittas Empire!?
Oh good god. Let's hope not.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++Laurie++++++++++++++++
Matthew Manzano
David McShane
<AE85A994...@goblinc.demon.co.uk> looked like a custard cream,
especially when Laurie JP Sage <sa...@goblinc.demon.co.uk> wrote on it
with a cherry flavoured pen:
>David McShane <da...@mcshane1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>>> Reckon it must be pretty good if CB was going to leave but this
>>>> series made him decide to come back again, as SFX said he
>>>> wasn't happy with the scripts. What do you lot reckon?
>>>
>>>Well it says something doesn't it. Here's me keeping my fingers crossed !
>>
>>Could mean a new Brittas Empire!?
>
>Oh good god. Let's hope not.
The jokes are a bit sour in it, but just how he manages to act a prat
like Brittas is worth my half-hour, it would dismiss the theory of him
having problems with playing the fall guy.
--
David McShane's misheard lyrics jukebox: "Don't know much about history,
don't much about biology, don't much about the diet coke, da da da da, and
I know that if you love me too, what a wonderful world this would be."
Laurie JP Sage
In article <Gski5LA7...@mcshane1.demon.co.uk>,
David McShane <da...@mcshane1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>Could mean a new Brittas Empire!?
>>
>>Oh good god. Let's hope not.
>
>The jokes are a bit sour in it, but just how he manages to act a prat
>like Brittas is worth my half-hour, it would dismiss the theory of him
>having problems with playing the fall guy.
<cough> <hack> <shnork>
We are talking the same series aren't we? The last one? The one that
was...was...okay. I'll be diplomatic. Effluent.The one that one of the
regular cast members dropped out of purely *because* of the scripts? Oh
dearie dearie dearie me.
_-Laurie-_
Where are we?
Some place we
rebecca_ulph
Raz said...
> [...]
> -------------------------------------------
Rebecca "itchy trigger finger" Ul...@bbc.co.uk
> ----------------------------------------------
Rebecca runs away and writes "I must learn to use my neswsreader properly" 500 times...
There's also another 6 eps of Brittas to go not 4, so I really ballsed up well and proper.....
R.
Cma
In article <542auo$p...@lex.zippo.com>,
Rebecca Ulph wrote:
>Rebecca runs away and writes "I must learn to use my neswsreader properly" 500
>times...
Just *don't* post them all here!
Cma___________
Neat sig, tidy sig
... Cma sig
Cma
>>>>Could mean a new Brittas Empire!?
Because I'd read the original, I didn't read this bit of quoted text. So
when Laurie said:
><cough> <hack> <shnork>
>
>We are talking the same series aren't we? The last one? The one that
>was...was...okay. I'll be diplomatic. Effluent.The one that one of the
>regular cast members dropped out of purely *because* of the scripts? Oh
>dearie dearie dearie me.
I thought she was talking about RD6. And for a minute I nearly agreed.
Cma___________________________
This space intentionally blank
Gail Siu
Matthew Manzano <m.ma...@zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
>In message <326c9d7f...@news.zetnet.co.uk>
> lee.w...@zetnet.co.uk (Lee) writes:
>> 'Pat Bennett <P.Bennett>' said: "There's an old android saying which
>> goes '<53dt42$n...@susscsc1.rdg.ac.uk>', which roughly translated
>> means:
>> >Reckon it must be pretty good if CB was going to leave but this
>> >series made him decide to come back again, as SFX said he
>> >wasn't happy with the scripts. What do you lot reckon?
>> >
>> From what I've seen of Series seven <grin>, it IS good, Darn good.
>From what you've seen. You've seen.
>/me cracks his knuckles and rolls up his sleaves.
>You been to a screening then have you ? Bastard.
>--
>Mons.
>"Where will this end ?"
>"In Fire."
Hello,
I just subscribed to this newsgroup, and was wondering if anyone knew
when or if the newest red-dwarf series was ever coming to the US?
Julian Oliver
On Wed, 09 Oct 1996 23:14:03 GMT, lee.w...@zetnet.co.uk (Lee)
wrote:
>From what I've seen of Series seven <grin>, it IS good, Darn good.
You obviously didn't see ep 2, which is bum.
--
Julian Oliver, London NW11, UK.
jul...@winfield.demon.co.uk, or http://www.winfield.demon.co.uk/
Ho hum diddly di
Wum pum pum pum
David McShane
<AE8A96BC...@goblinc.demon.co.uk> looked like a custard cream,
>>>
>>
>>The jokes are a bit sour in it, but just how he manages to act a prat
>>like Brittas is worth my half-hour, it would dismiss the theory of him
>>having problems with playing the fall guy.
>
><cough> <hack> <shnork>
You wanna get that throat seen to, pheraps a dentists mirror will help.
<Hands Laurie a dentist's mirrror>
>We are talking the same series aren't we? The last one? The one that
>was...was...okay. I'll be diplomatic. Effluent.The one that one of the
>regular cast members dropped out of purely *because* of the scripts? Oh
>dearie dearie dearie me.
I'm talking Red Dwarf series seven<I haven't used the abreviations as
I've killfiled them>, where CB only appears in four eps, I was trying to
work out why.
--
David McShane, I made this
Laurie JP Sage
In article <326ba21b...@news.demon.co.uk>,
jul...@winfield.demon.co.uk (Julian Oliver) wrote:
>>From what I've seen of Series seven <grin>, it IS good, Darn good.
>
>You obviously didn't see ep 2, which is bum.
Oh, I think we did actually...Raz, C, was that the one we were saying was a
bit iffy?
Ep 8's a cop out.
_-Laurie-_
Guess whose sig machine I stole?ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
Laurie JP Sage
In article <pHVZjDA5...@mcshane1.demon.co.uk>,
David McShane <da...@mcshane1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
><AE8A96BC...@goblinc.demon.co.uk> looked like a custard cream,
>especially when Laurie JP Sage <sa...@goblinc.demon.co.uk> wrote on it
>with a cherry flavoured pen:
>>In article <Gski5LA7...@mcshane1.demon.co.uk>,
>>David McShane <da...@mcshane1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>>>Could mean a new Brittas Empire!?
>>>>
>>>>Oh good god. Let's hope not.
>>>
>>>The jokes are a bit sour in it, but just how he manages to act a prat
>>>like Brittas is worth my half-hour, it would dismiss the theory of him
>>>having problems with playing the fall guy.
>>
>><cough> <hack> <shnork>
>
>You wanna get that throat seen to, pheraps a dentists mirror will help.
><Hands Laurie a dentist's mirrror>
Oh, yes...thank you <shoves dentist's mirror down ear, wiggles it about a
bit, wipes it off on T-shirt and hands it back with a grin>. That's better.
>>We are talking the same series aren't we? The last one? The one that
>>was...was...okay. I'll be diplomatic. Effluent.The one that one of the
>>regular cast members dropped out of purely *because* of the scripts? Oh
>>dearie dearie dearie me.
>
>I'm talking Red Dwarf series seven<
You were? Oooo...I think I got thrown by the line: "but just how he manages
to act a prat like Brittas is worth my half-hour"
<grin>
> where CB only appears in four eps, I was trying to
>work out why.
I thought it'd been established that he didn't like doing the last one. Or,
more realistically, that he got more dosh for doing something that clashed.
Long separated by c
Lee
I span my nipple nuts and was boxed off to Alaska when
sa...@goblinc.demon.co.uk (Laurie JP Sage) said:
>In article <326ba21b...@news.demon.co.uk>,
>jul...@winfield.demon.co.uk (Julian Oliver) wrote:
>>
>>You obviously didn't see ep 2, which is bum.
>
>Oh, I think we did actually...Raz, C, was that the one we were saying was a
>bit iffy?
Naw 2 was good. Much better than Emohawk. :)
>Ep 8's a cop out.
Rather.
--
He planned to unite the elven kingdoms, even if he had to kill every
last elf in Ansalon to do it.
Weis and Hickman - Dragons of Summer Flame.
Lee
I span my nipple nuts and was boxed off to Alaska when "Rebecca Ulph"
<Rebecc...@bbc.co.uk> said:
>I agree - we were all obviously at the same screening. (Saturday 5.30)
Yup.
>I thought 2 was very good, 3 not very hot,
whaow. 3 not very hot? 3 was the best of the lot. specially the [Sav
looks at the assembled crowd of atrdians all blocking they're ears and
trails off. :( ]
>Laurie, were you sitting in the back row of the seats on the
>floor? I thought I heard somebody say "hello, this is Laurie" but I was't
>sure.....
Sav goes back in time and Waves. Yup that sounds like us.
--
I just get these strong urges to take naps by the fire instead of shouting taunts
at minotaur-they get *really* angry...Especially when you go 'mooo' at them.
Tasslehoff Burrfoot.
Rebecca Ulph
Lee said:
> >Oh, I think we did actually...Raz, C, was that the one we were saying
was a
> >bit iffy?
>
> Naw 2 was good. Much better than Emohawk. :)
I agree - we were all obviously at the same screening. (Saturday 5.30) I
thought 2 was very good, 3 not very hot, and 8 OK but glossed over
somewhat. Laurie, were you sitting in the back row of the seats on the
floor? I thought I heard somebody say "hello, this is Laurie" but I was't
sure.....
---------------------------------------------
Rebecc...@bbc.co.uk
---------------------------------------------
Rebecca Ulph
Lee <lee.w...@zetnet.co.uk>wrote in article
<326efe09...@news.zetnet.co.uk>...
>
> whaow. 3 not very hot? 3 was the best of the lot. specially the [Sav
> looks at the assembled crowd of atrdians all blocking they're ears and
> trails off. :( ]
Hmm. I guess we shall have to agree to disagree! (Of course, this assumes
I've got the numbers of the eps the right way round - NBR was no.2 wasn't
it??)
> Sav goes back in time and Waves. Yup that sounds like us.
RU waves back...! I should have been braver and stood up and said Hi at the
time rather than being a scaredy cat...
---------------------------------------------
Rebecc...@bbc.co.uk
---------------------------------------------
Cma
In article <326efe09...@news.zetnet.co.uk>,
lee.w...@zetnet.co.uk (Lee) wrote:
>I span my nipple nuts and was boxed off to Alaska when "Rebecca Ulph"
><Rebecc...@bbc.co.uk> said:
>
>>I agree - we were all obviously at the same screening. (Saturday 5.30)
>
>Yup.
>
>>I thought 2 was very good, 3 not very hot,
>
>whaow. 3 not very hot? 3 was the best of the lot.
Yeah, sorry Becca, you're in a minority here. Ouroboros is excellent.
>>Laurie, were you sitting in the back row of the seats on the
>>floor? I thought I heard somebody say "hello, this is Laurie" but I was't
>>sure.....
>
>Sav goes back in time and Waves. Yup that sounds like us.
It does, doesn't it. Bugger. Wish we'd know you were there. Woulda been
nice to put a face to the name. It was Martin, the audience guy who
introduced Laurie to whoever it was he sat us next to... You *heard* him
and you didn't ask her if she was *the* Laurie... What were you thinking?
Cma_________
Yeah, right.
2
Jeff Peck
> Lee said:
>
> > >Oh, I think we did actually...Raz, C, was that the one we were saying
> was a
> > >bit iffy?
> >
> > Naw 2 was good. Much better than Emohawk. :)
>
> I agree - we were all obviously at the same screening. (Saturday 5.30) I
> thought 2 was very good, 3 not very hot, and 8 OK but glossed over
> somewhat. Laurie, were you sitting in the back row of the seats on the
> floor? I thought I heard somebody say "hello, this is Laurie" but I was't
> sure.....
I take it you were both at the taping. Could you quietly, without
posting it anywhere, e-mail me with the juicy details (preferably all of
them). Personally, I don't give a damn about spoilers, but I must be
careful for all those out there who don't want to know.
Thanks,
Jeff Peck
Laurie JP Sage
In article <01bbbf6e$782c5660$1520...@OLNPC11.tv.bbc.co.uk>,
"Rebecca Ulph" <Rebecc...@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>> Naw 2 was good. Much better than Emohawk. :)
>
>I agree - we were all obviously at the same screening. (Saturday 5.30) I
>thought 2 was very good, 3 not very hot, and 8 OK but glossed over
>somewhat. Laurie, were you sitting in the back row of the seats on the
>floor? I thought I heard somebody say "hello, this is Laurie" but I was't
>sure.....
Hurrah! Yup, that was me =). Sat with Lee, C & Raz...darn, how come I
didn't managed to do anything memorable this time? <curses> ;>
_-Laurie-_
Lemon entry, my dear Watson.
Re: my returnce Inner-peaces, The Answer 1-900-825-6000 xt 9793THE LOCATOR--
Laurie JP Sage
In article <326fb6b2...@news.zetnet.co.uk>,
lee.w...@zetnet.co.uk (Lee) wrote:
>>Oh, I think we did actually...Raz, C, was that the one we were saying was a
>>bit iffy?
>
>Naw 2 was good. Much better than Emohawk. :)
Ahh, but I liked that one we saw after 2...(perhaps it was 3). However, 2
*did* have...um, y'know, that bit in it. Even tho' C said that, er, y'know,
that bit wasn't so good, I didn't mind and....
This really *doesn't* work without spoilers, does it?
[they'd get more laughs if they left the sound off the special fx ;)]
Lee
I span my nipple nuts and was boxed off to Alaska when
>Ooooh, getting complicated now. It's all these darn numbers around, I go
>with C on the above one, thought Nanarchy was a bit dubious but was swayed
>by NBR (whatever C says ;) 'cos it had the um....<darn>
I take it your talking about the bit at the start.
Laurie JP Sage
In article <AE92D08D...@droog.demon.co.uk>,
C...@droog.demon.co.uk (Cma) wrote:
>In article <326efe09...@news.zetnet.co.uk>,
>lee.w...@zetnet.co.uk (Lee) wrote:
>
>>I span my nipple nuts and was boxed off to Alaska when "Rebecca Ulph"
>><Rebecc...@bbc.co.uk> said:
>>
>>>I agree - we were all obviously at the same screening. (Saturday 5.30)
>>
>>Yup.
>>
>>>I thought 2 was very good, 3 not very hot,
>>
>>whaow. 3 not very hot? 3 was the best of the lot.
>
>Yeah, sorry Becca, you're in a minority here. Ouroboros is excellent.
Ooooh, getting complicated now. It's all these darn numbers around, I go
with C on the above one, thought Nanarchy was a bit dubious but was swayed
by NBR (whatever C says ;) 'cos it had the um....<darn>
>>Sav goes back in time and Waves. Yup that sounds like us.
>
>It does, doesn't it. Bugger. Wish we'd know you were there. Woulda been
>nice to put a face to the name. It was Martin, the audience guy who
>introduced Laurie to whoever it was he sat us next to... You *heard* him
>and you didn't ask her if she was *the* Laurie... What were you thinking?
Perhaps she was thinking that I was *the* Laurie <hehehe>
Next time, Beck, *ve mussst see youuu*
_-Laurie-_
Ha Haaa!˜ Œ«ˆ Œ®x Œ±h Œ´X Œ·H Œº8 Œ½( ŒÀ ŒÃ
Laurie JP Sage
>>Laurie, were you sitting in the back row of the seats on the
>>floor? I thought I heard somebody say "hello, this is Laurie" but I was't
>>sure.....
>
>Sav goes back in time and Waves. Yup that sounds like us.
Laurie assumes the all-powerful stance.
For Laurie IS The Gestalt.
A. Rosin
In article <AE8ED01A...@goblinc.demon.co.uk>,
sa...@goblinc.demon.co.uk (Laurie JP Sage) writes:
>Oh, I think we did actually...Raz, C, was that the one we were saying was
a
>bit iffy?
>Ep 8's a cop out.
>
Oh come on, stop it. Have a heart. Could everybody who has seen
any of RD VII put their hand up now please, yes, thankyou. Very clever.
The rest of the class are a few months behind, and have a lot of catching
up to do.
Ang - slipping into Brown Owl mode again!
---
Return of the chat-sigs...
During the Gulf War...
"I'm a Scud Missile baby, and your Tel Aviv".
David McShane
<AE903AA4...@goblinc.demon.co.uk> looked like a custard cream,
>to act a prat like Brittas is worth my half-hour"
That was in response to your, "Oh God, let's hope not," I forwarded
Brittas as a possible reason why CB didn't do all eight RD eps, you said
that it was already known that he got paid more to do something which
clashed, I think I presupposed that, therefore I might possibly have
thought it, I just wondered if BE was a significant factor or if he was
doing something else.<Nothing springs to mind, except, maybe, hold on a
sec, move away from the redisplay newsgroup button, that's good, right,
hut humm<Or whatever other noise is deemed appropriate when clearing
one's throat>>: How about a multiplicity remake, with four Rimmer's on
screen, whiling away evenings with flared nostril competitions, yeah!
--
Random quote from a drunk in my family, "They were playing cricket
on the dartboard," there is apparently such a game, but it works better if you
don't tell the audience that, David McShane
Rebecca Ulph
> Yeah, sorry Becca, you're in a minority here. Ouroboros is excellent.
Hmm. Oh well, wouldn't do if we all agreed all the time would it?!! I
didn't dislike it at all, just preferred the others, particularly NBR!
> >>Laurie, were you sitting in the back row of the seats on the
> >>floor? I thought I heard somebody say "hello, this is Laurie" but I
was't
> >>sure.....
> >
> >Sav goes back in time and Waves. Yup that sounds like us.
>
> It does, doesn't it. Bugger. Wish we'd know you were there. Woulda been
> nice to put a face to the name. It was Martin, the audience guy who
> introduced Laurie to whoever it was he sat us next to... You *heard* him
> and you didn't ask her if she was *the* Laurie... What were you thinking?
>
> Cma_________
> Yeah, right.
Um, well, I don't know really - I guess I was just being a scaredy-cat...I
wasn't sure Laurie would recognise my name anyway - I don't post that much.
Oh well. I was sitting at the very end of the raised seating nearest you
guys; I have long dark hair and was wearing a dark blazer and jeans....
---------------------------------------------
Rebecc...@bbc.co.uk
---------------------------------------------
Charles Daniels
>> Yeah, sorry Becca, you're in a minority here. Ouroboros is excellent.
> Hmm. Oh well, wouldn't do if we all agreed all the time would it?!! I
> didn't dislike it at all, just preferred the others, particularly NBR!
I thought Heartache was brilliant.
--
: Fidonet: Charles Daniels 1:203/42 .. speaking for only myself.
: Internet: Charles...@42.gigo.com
Laurie JP Sage
In article <54ku6v$p...@lex.zippo.com>,
Rebecca Ulph wrote:
>>Hurrah! Yup, that was me =). Sat with Lee, C & Raz...darn, how come I
>>didn't managed to do anything memorable this time? <curses> ;>
>
>Oh I don't know - the hat was quite memorable!
Hey...hey, hey, hey - that was a *bandana*, alright? /me looks 'ard
<grin>
>What do you normally do??
Ohh, y'know, the usual. Rats in jumpers, painting oneself blue and
streaking.
And if you want to see memorable hats, I got this second jester one just
today...
/me grins and gestures to red & yellow hat with bells and earflaps tied
tight under chin that she's wearing as she types....
_-Laurie-_
Her hair glistened in the rain like nose hair after a sneeze.
Laurie JP Sage
In article <54ktsf$o...@lex.zippo.com>,
Rebecca Ulph wrote:
>Well, er, I don't really know, I guess I'm just a scaredy cat. I wasn't quite
>sure I'd heard right, so I ummmed and ahhed about coming over but in the end
>didn't. I wasn't convinced Laurie would recognise my name to be honest - I don't
>post that much. My fault, silly me.
Tish, p'shaw, nonsense, piffle, murturtle, waddle, phodex, woo!
We wouldn't have leapt to our feet and said "Rebecca! Rebecca Ulph!" :)
And if we didn't, I'm sure the words "I read atvr-d." would have at least
got you a drink in the pub afterwards ;)
[she said, swaggering at being able to say "drink in the pub"]
Laurie JP Sage
In article <3270a171...@news.zetnet.co.uk>,
lee.w...@zetnet.co.uk (Lee) wrote:
>>by NBR (whatever C says ;) 'cos it had the um....<darn>
>
>I take it your talking about the bit at the start.
Ohhh, no, not the *very* start. Ahhh, do you mean the...well, the sort
of...second start? <grin>
Okay...the bits I kept going on and on about afterwards. Yeah. I liked
those. =)
_-Laurie-_
It's a case of shoot first, then get up really clo
Laurie JP Sage
In article <SgjnKKAq...@mcshane1.demon.co.uk>,
David McShane <da...@mcshane1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>That was in response to your, "Oh God, let's hope not," I forwarded
>Brittas as a possible reason why CB didn't do all eight RD eps, you said
>that it was already known that he got paid more to do something which
>clashed,
Eeep! I did?? I shouldn't have. I know full well that's just me
postulating, bad me. That's the sort of thing libel's made of, I'd best be
more careful next time, just remember that. Yes.
(Bad Laurie, bad, *bad* Laurie. No biscuit for you)
Rebecca Ulph
Laurie JP Sage <sa...@goblinc.demon.co.uk> wrote in article
> Hey...hey, hey, hey - that was a *bandana*, alright? /me looks 'ard
Ooooohh, RU hides under desk...! Fulsome apologies...
> >What do you normally do??
>
> Ohh, y'know, the usual. Rats in jumpers, painting oneself blue and
> streaking.
Is *that* all?? I work in Television centre remember - I see a lot odder
behaviour than that! (and that's just from my workmates)..
> And if you want to see memorable hats, I got this second jester one just
> today...
>
> /me grins and gestures to red & yellow hat with bells and earflaps tied
> tight under chin that she's wearing as she types....
Do you habour secret fantasies of running away with the circus then
Laurie??! Or is your head just cold?? :-)
> _-Laurie-_
> Her hair glistened in the rain like nose hair after a sneeze.
What a lovely mental image that conjures up...!
---------------------------------------------
Rebecc...@bbc.co.uk
---------------------------------------------
(all opinions mine not the beeb's)
Lee
On Sat, 26 Oct 1996, Laurie JP Sage wrote:
> [she said, swaggering at being able to say "drink in the pub"]
As opposed to saying "Bite of lemon in the pub"
Oh well I can see you've been dying for me to tell this story... :)
After finishing her drink, the girl seldomly known as Ms Sage was agahst
to kind this strange bloke come round and steal her slice of lemon
containing glass. Not knowing that this is fairly normal behavior in such
establishments (it was her first time), she yelled out something like
"Under hand my drinking vessel, man of questionable parenthood, for sooth
it suits my tastes to have that lemon before me."
No I cannot tell a lie it was more like "Oy! I haven't finished with that
lemon."
With that the poor man kindly appologised and handed back the glass
carrying lemon. Lemon was promptly consumed before any other lemon thieve
pounced upon it, much to Sav's amusement.
This activity was missed by Raz, who was tucking into his chip adorned
vinegar, and C who was merrily chatting away to fellow fan club
organisers.
The less said about the quacking the better. :)
Lee
I span my nipple nuts and was boxed off to Alaska when
>Ohhh, no, not the *very* start. Ahhh, do you mean the...well, the sort
>of...second start? <grin>
>
>Okay...the bits I kept going on and on about afterwards. Yeah. I liked
>those. =)
Ahh gottcha. So the very start didn't do anything for you then? :):)
Still wondering if the very start will be shown or wether it was just
an audiance warm-up piece.
--
Sav appologises if this is annoying people, but we're really not
letting much slip. :)
Laurie JP Sage
In article <32809908...@news.zetnet.co.uk>,
lee.w...@zetnet.co.uk (Lee) wrote:
>>Okay...the bits I kept going on and on about afterwards. Yeah. I liked
>>those. =)
>
>Ahh gottcha. So the very start didn't do anything for you then? :):)
Hmm...a wee bit tacky...but I don't see what was wrong with the, well, the.
Er. Cma didn't like it for the...y'know, teeth...green. I like that bit of
the beginning tho =)
>Still wondering if the very start will be shown or wether it was just
>an audiance warm-up piece.
Oh, noooo...I reckon that'll *definitely* be shown. Unless it's too long
and has to be cut. It has the explanation of why he's...um...er, y'know.
Why he's doing it.
And it's funny (oh, alright, I admit it.)
_-Laurie-_
Got a flat roof? Face it. It could leak. 3鈷 3省 3頂 3物 3� 3寤 3栞 3｡h 3､X 3ｧH 3ｪ8 3ｭ( 3ｰ
Lee
I span my nipple nuts and was boxed off to Alaska when
sa...@goblinc.demon.co.uk (Laurie JP Sage) said:
>>Still wondering if the very start will be shown or wether it was just
>>an audiance warm-up piece.
>
>Oh, noooo...I reckon that'll *definitely* be shown. Unless it's too long
>and has to be cut. It has the explanation of why he's...um...er, y'know.
>Why he's doing it.
Hmmm. Nah, that gets explained later. The first bit seemed to me to
stand totally apart from the rest of the episode (apart from the
appearance of you know who). Just seemed odd to put it before the
credits. Oh yeah and the whole thing seemed a little tooo tacky to be
shown on TV.
--
and for those not following this thread, here's a little music. o~ da
~o
Laurie JP Sage
In article <3283e085...@news.zetnet.co.uk>,
lee.w...@zetnet.co.uk (Lee) wrote:
>Hmmm. Nah, that gets explained later. The first bit seemed to me to
>stand totally apart from the rest of the episode (apart from the
>appearance of you know who).
True, but it was also an OB with lots of extras *and* a stunt, which would
make it a pretty expensive treat just for the audience.
>Just seemed odd to put it before the
>credits.
Ah, but USTV has been doing that for ages, so I just figgered RD was taking
advantage of that sorta format for that ep.
>Oh yeah and the whole thing seemed a little tooo tacky to be
>shown on TV.
Sort of like the other effects we saw? ;)
_-Laurie-_
And on her feet, dangerous as it may seem,
Lee
I span my nipple nuts and was boxed off to Alaska when
sa...@goblinc.demon.co.uk (Laurie JP Sage) said:
>In article <3283e085...@news.zetnet.co.uk>,
>lee.w...@zetnet.co.uk (Lee) wrote:
>
>>Hmmm. Nah, that gets explained later. The first bit seemed to me to
>>stand totally apart from the rest of the episode (apart from the
>>appearance of you know who).
>
>True, but it was also an OB with lots of extras *and* a stunt, which would
>make it a pretty expensive treat just for the audience.
Annother out takes tape I suppose. :)
>>Just seemed odd to put it before the
>>credits.
>
>Ah, but USTV has been doing that for ages, so I just figgered RD was taking
>advantage of that sorta format for that ep.
Yeah, but why only that episode?
>>Oh yeah and the whole thing seemed a little tooo tacky to be
>>shown on TV.
>
>Sort of like the other effects we saw? ;)
Well they did say they were going to spruce it up.
--
This we can probably attribute to the unexpected behaviour of the
cytoplasms.
Charles Daniels
>>>Hmmm. Nah, that gets explained later. The first bit seemed to me to
>>stand totally apart from the rest of the episode (apart from the
>>>appearance of you know who).
>>
>>True, but it was also an OB with lots of extras *and* a stunt, which would
>>make it a pretty expensive treat just for the audience.
> Annother out takes tape I suppose. :)
Here's an out there kinda guess. In Smeg Outs there is the Poker playing
scene. Is it possible that the Poker Playing scene was shown to the
audience before the credits and was never meant to be included? This
was a least a special effects oriented shot that would have cost SOME
money but was never used in the original broadcast. If so this could
be similar to whatever you saw.
>>Ah, but USTV has been doing that for ages, so I just figgered RD was taking
>>advantage of that sorta format for that ep.
> Yeah, but why only that episode?
Variety? There is no REAL reason not to have one STICK OUT episode
to get extra attention. Also if it did something IMPORTANT - introdunced
a new character or got rid of a character this could be used to emphasize
it's importance.
>>>Oh yeah and the whole thing seemed a little tooo tacky to be
>>>shown on TV.
>>
>>Sort of like the other effects we saw? ;)
> Well they did say they were going to spruce it up.
Did the version you see look kinda tacky like the Poker scene?
Lee
I span my nipple nuts and was boxed off to Alaska when
>>>>Oh yeah and the whole thing seemed a little tooo tacky to be
>>>>shown on TV.
>>>
>>>Sort of like the other effects we saw? ;)
>
>> Well they did say they were going to spruce it up.
>
>Did the version you see look kinda tacky like the Poker scene?
Well if we're talking about the first bit, there was a shall we say
rather large prop stand-in thingy (hows that for vauge?) that there is
no way they can improve without some really expensive computer
graphics (I think we're talking Chris' salary for two series sort of
money) :). Otherwise, there was a naff scene that could easily be
improved and I'm sure adding sound would take care of the rest.
There was one scene in the last episode that just didn't work at all
without sound, and I can't wait to see it for real.
--
Speaking only for MegaCorp Inc.