Would you be kind enough to tell us where you read this ??
DR
********************************************************
HOW DO YOU HAVE THIS??!!? Can you post it? Is there a URL to go to to
download it? I'd love to read this.....I'd love to read both scripts,
actually. Has McGoohan written any books?
Any assistance is greatly appreciated......
Kriss Bakkin
The Secular
http://home.earthlink.net/~larshus
I have noticed the beginning of a discussion about the movie script for
The Prisoner film. Under the circumstances, I thought I would take the
opportunity to let the readers of this newsgroup know how movie scripts
are handled by the writers and the film company producing the movie.
Simply put, the script draftsthat are being written, or have been
written, for films that are still in the pre-production stage are not
considered public information.
The film script and/or various drafts that Mr. McGoohan may have
written for the film are not available for public reading at this
point. The script drafts have only been made available to authorized
people working directly with the film production company. This is
simply standard operating procedure for any film production.
As with any unpublished work, a script may NOT be legally reproduced
in full or in part without the permission of the author
of the script. Mr. McGoohan has not authorized any printing of
his script, nor has he discussed it with anyone other than his
colleagues on the production.
Barbara Pruett
Webmaster for the
Patrick McGoohan Home Page
<remainder snipped>
The readers of this newsgroup and people beyond it who were richly
entertained and intellectually challenged by the original Prisoner TV series
are obviously very interested in the possibility of a Prisoner movie and
hungry for hard information. This includes all the "it's on, it's off" "he
is, he isn't involved" rumours, and sooner or later there are likely to be
leaks of real information.
It happens in connection with every other movie project of any worth, as
well as many projects with much thinner potential, so that it happens with
this one should come as no surprise to anyone involved with it.
It is also to be expected that the author of any proposed script, whoever
he/she is, and regardless of whether their involvement is current in any
capacity, will regard a leak as a breach of confidentiality which may
jeopardise the viability and potential success of the project. In addition,
any such leak could amount to a breach of contract if the "leaker" has a
legitimate right to hold the script, conditional on the terms in a signed
agreement.
It is, no question about it, a breach of copyright law if the published
reports quote from the script. I am not so sure about copyright law if
plotlines and integral concepts are discussed without quoting, but I would
assume that a studio would require *extremely* tight non-disclosure
agreements to be signed by anyone involved in a project, and that these
might well preclude *any* leaks of *any* kind.
So, if the source posting here holds a script legitimately, they are
probably bound by a non-disclosure agreement of some sort and now would be a
very good time to read it again.
It might also be a good time to consider carefully how much they enjoy
continued working in movies as, if these are leaks of real information, the
fact that this person has let them out would not be good news to have going
around in the business, in addition to any legal proceeding which might
result.
In conclusion, while I am very sympathetic to both sides in this matter,
what I *really* want is for the business to get its corporate finger out and
get on with making what *should* be as remarkable a piece of movie-making as
the original TV series was in it's medium.
--
Brian
Mark Hockley
Mark Hockley a écrit dans le message <368774ed...@news.tesco.net>...
Some while ago when he posted here, he made it plain that *he* has a
legitimate reason to have a copy of the script and he meant well by
discussing some of the contents of it here.
His motives have raised objections which have been voiced here by the
writer's spokesperson.
That's the situation.
--
Brian
While I thought the DC Comic Book series from a few years ago was utter
claptrap, I seem to recall that PMcG did okay the storyline. The idea of
moving the story on to another character and finding new topics of
discussion under THE PRISONER umbrella was a great one, I felt. Thus,
while I didn't care for the comic book series, I at least felt there was
something new going on.
I hope for the best with the movie. However, if the studios have any say
in the matter, I feel we'll probably end up with a rehash of ARRIVAL with a
little bit of FALL OUT mixed in during a 80-minute-long movie.
>Mark Hockley wrote:
>I've just re-read Patrick McGoohan's script for the
>proposed Prisoner
>movie again (I've read it at least half a dozen times now)
(snip)
>What they did get was pretty much the ideal conclusion to what is an
>enigmatic, often mystifying but ultimately rewarding puzzle.
>Admittedly, Patrick steers the story away from dwelling on why the
>things that happened in the series happened. He's not interested in
>answering those questions and rightfully so. Instead he takes the
>concept forward, using his own character of No.6 (now given a name,
>although a cryptic one) as the linchpin
(snip)
Mark knows what The Prisoner's real name is and he won't tell us?
I'll bet he went and killed Kenny, too :)
Roy Wilke