Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

MASH final season

87 views
Skip to first unread message

Joe

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 2:24:50 PM3/26/05
to
Is it true that the last season of MASH was shot on 35mm film ?

Gumbo ...

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 3:25:34 PM3/26/05
to
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:24:50 +1000, Joe <j...@home.net> wrote:

>>Is it true that the last season of MASH was shot on 35mm film ?

The final episode, "Goodbye, Farewell and Amen" was but the rest of
the episodes were not...


D. Gordon

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 5:28:06 PM3/26/05
to
What type of film were the rest of the 11th season eps shot on? And how
do the two types of film differ?

Parry

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 5:51:37 PM3/26/05
to
D. Gordon wrote:
>And how do the two types of film differ?
That question can go on for hours
theres many different types of film
and also some used to use Video too


--
Parry
Mandospanker
http://www.atomichounddog.co.uk


D. Gordon

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 6:16:15 PM3/26/05
to
Joe my question is aimed at you solely, if you'd be good enough to
explain some of the differences all the same I'd appreciate it.

Gazzoo

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 6:56:36 PM3/26/05
to

> >>Is it true that the last season of MASH was shot on 35mm film ?

> >>The final episode, "Goodbye, Farewell and Amen" was but the rest of
> >>the episodes were not...


Sorry that's incorrect, every MASH episode of every season was shot on
35mm film.

35mm was the standand format for filmed shows since the start of TV,
(there might have been a few cheapies that were shot on 16mm, but I
can't think of any). With the advent of digital/HDTV in recent years
35mm might have been supplanted, but from 1950 to 2000 I can assure you
that 99% of filmed shows were done on 35mm.

What makes you think otherwise?


BG

Gumbo ...

unread,
Mar 27, 2005, 12:08:41 AM3/27/05
to

Were you there?

Unless my eye's are gone... You can tell the difference of the look of
the film from the episodes and from the final movie... I'm just going
by what has been said about the last season... Now if I am wrong then
please prove me wrong by showing me some proof...

Joe

unread,
Mar 27, 2005, 12:31:59 AM3/27/05
to
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:16:15 -0500, story...@webtv.net (D. Gordon)
wrote:

>Joe my question is aimed at you solely, if you'd be good enough to
>explain some of the differences all the same I'd appreciate it.


16mm is smaller, cheaper and generally lower quality than 35mm film.

It's a fact that a lot of TV shows are shot on 16mm whereas most films
are 35mm.

Joe

unread,
Mar 27, 2005, 12:33:06 AM3/27/05
to
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:56:36 -0600, Gazzoo <dir...@comcast.net> wrote:

Are you sure about this ?

It is my understanding that the first 10 seasons of MASH were shot on
16mm film with the last being 35mm.

Joe

unread,
Mar 27, 2005, 1:06:33 AM3/27/05
to

According to the Internet Movie Database (www.imdb.com), only the last
season was shot on 35mm film, the first ten being shot on 16mm

Furthermore, I found the following memorabillia which shows that MASH
was shot on 16mm film: See

http://www.retrocollection.com/pages/tvc3.htm


Gazzoo

unread,
Mar 27, 2005, 2:29:07 AM3/27/05
to
In article <48ic41tevsm2u58cn...@4ax.com>, Joe
<j...@home.net> wrote:

> According to the Internet Movie Database (www.imdb.com), only the last
> season was shot on 35mm film, the first ten being shot on 16mm
>
> Furthermore, I found the following memorabillia which shows that MASH
> was shot on 16mm film: See
>
> http://www.retrocollection.com/pages/tvc3.htm

I've worked in television for almost 25 years, I can assure you that,
in this case, IMDB is incorrect.

The confusion might be that up until the early '80s most filmed shows
were DISTRIBUTED on 16mm film to local stations for syndicated reruns.
I remember it actually being big news that my local station (FOX-32 in
Chicago) was switching it's airing of M*A*S*H from 16mm film to video
transfers of the original 35mm network prints.

There are still literally thousands of the old 16mm prints floating
around the collectors market, thus explains the "memorabilia".

BG

D. Gordon

unread,
Mar 28, 2005, 9:03:07 AM3/28/05
to
IMDb is sometimes wrong, Gazoo.

Ed

unread,
Mar 28, 2005, 1:58:06 PM3/28/05
to

"D. Gordon" <story...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:2799-424...@storefull-3118.bay.webtv.net...
> IMDb is sometimes wrong, Gazoo.
>

Correct! I've found them to be wrong with some MASH as well.


Gazzoo

unread,
Mar 28, 2005, 5:45:57 PM3/28/05
to
In article <2799-424...@storefull-3118.bay.webtv.net>, D. Gordon
<story...@webtv.net> wrote:

> IMDb is sometimes wrong, Gazoo.

That was my point

Gumbo ...

unread,
Apr 1, 2005, 3:33:03 AM4/1/05
to
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 01:29:07 -0600, Gazzoo <dir...@comcast.net> wrote:

>>I've worked in television for almost 25 years, I can assure you that,
>>in this case, IMDB is incorrect.
>>

>>BG

Not doubting you but a little proof would be nice...

Ed

unread,
Apr 1, 2005, 12:25:01 PM4/1/05
to

"Gumbo ..." <Gu...@mkx.org> wrote in message
news:bbmp41189vqvb0h2b...@4ax.com...

If you mean the IMDB, of the four things I found wrong, the one I can
remember is them listing only Sal Viscuso as the PA announcer.


jm

unread,
Apr 1, 2005, 1:23:27 PM4/1/05
to

> I've worked in television for almost 25 years, I can assure you that,
> in this case, IMDB is incorrect.

I second your assurance. A 35mm camera was on the floor for the nine
years I worked on stage 9.

jm

D. Gordon

unread,
Apr 2, 2005, 9:27:24 AM4/2/05
to
Yeah Ed
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
I


Alan Alda was announcing in the ep where HoJohn stole all that stuff.

Iggy17ren

unread,
Apr 2, 2005, 5:43:46 PM4/2/05
to

Really? heheheheh


D. Gordon

unread,
Apr 2, 2005, 8:44:11 PM4/2/05
to
Yes, Iggy. Hawk asked (over the intercom) for several 4077th personnel
to report to a certain tent.Spearchucker was among the personnel he
asked for. I note Spear. especially because he'd soon be out of sight
and mind for the remainder of the series.

Iggy17ren

unread,
Apr 2, 2005, 11:21:26 PM4/2/05
to

I know. :-) Some of the characters we in line to enter the tent before
their names were called. Radar at least I believe. Ho John's name was not
called but he was there anyway. (IIRC) Despite he was the suspect.


Christopher Range

unread,
Oct 19, 2005, 4:04:37 AM10/19/05
to
I have found the IMDB to be an utter joke because tons of data is missing.

Christopher

David Brunt

unread,
Oct 19, 2005, 7:16:11 AM10/19/05
to
"Christopher Range" <chris...@charter.net> wrote

> I have found the IMDB to be an utter joke because tons of data is missing.

IMDB is largely made up of outside contributions from Fred on the street, so
is only as good as their reseach.

It also means that a lot of erronious information gets listed.


0 new messages