Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Magnum's Daily Rate?

110 views
Skip to first unread message

Scott

unread,
Mar 14, 2001, 8:02:55 PM3/14/01
to
From No Need To Know:

GovtMan: "Well Whatdya say Magnum, are you in?"

TM: "For two hundred dollars a day plus expenses."

Gman:"Two Hundred dollars a day! What are you trying
to do, rip off your own government?"

TM: "I don't do that, but goodwill doesn't keep the
finance companies and landlords off my back."


I always got a good chuckle out of that last line.


From Skin Deep, Gary Holmes says:

"Magnum's fee is $500 per day."

(Also to those in the know I believe Higgins said in this
episode that there were 12 projectiles in the Buckshot
shell (don't know if he mentioned the size of same),
I thought there were 8-9 in 00-0 shot?)

I don't have that ep on tape does anyone know if this
is accurate?

From Paniolo:
D. Romas 250/day + exp
G. Holmes 200/day

Help, prices are changing faster than Walmart.
Anyone have any recollections of these or other eps that
TM mentions his all too infrequently collected daily rates?

BTW Rob, the addition of GH's comments is really quite a nice
addition to the site. The descriptions are thorough enough
to really jog the memory although if you haven't seen the ep
or it's been so long that you don't remember it, beware gentle
readers, spoilers ahead!

Scott

(Just as a heads up, Joanna Kern's appearance in Two Birds
Of A Feather did not appear in her listing on the "Guest" interface.)

David Wisniewski

unread,
Mar 14, 2001, 9:40:26 PM3/14/01
to
> (Also to those in the know I believe Higgins said in this
> episode that there were 12 projectiles in the Buckshot
> shell (don't know if he mentioned the size of same),
> I thought there were 8-9 in 00-0 shot?)
>
> I don't have that ep on tape does anyone know if this
> is accurate?

For a 12 gauge, usually 8 .33 caliber balls in a 00 load.


PS - I've started a new business: Dave's Firearm Consulting. Already
have two customers! :-)


--
David Wisniewski USPSA/IPSC A-28835
davi...@erols.com http://www.geocities.com/davidwiz_2000

New EGW Stuff: http://www.geocities.com/davidwiz_2000/egw.html

"While we're gone, if any talking animals tell you to buy some tacos
or beer, for God's sake do what they say."

-- Casey McCall, "Sports Night"

Rob Morrone

unread,
Mar 16, 2001, 1:12:17 PM3/16/01
to
If you guys want to talk about banning guns, take it to alt.politics.guns.

--

Rob - W7MPI
The Ultimate Magnum, P.I. Episode Library
http://www.ultimatemagnum/

...


Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2001, 12:09:30 PM3/16/01
to

Steve B> wrote........
> I disagree with the banning of a shotgun. It does shoot more projectiles
> but it doesn't have the stopping power that an assault rifle does. I am
not
> an authority on the subject by any means, but a rifle shooting a .223
> caliber bullet will have much more accuracy and stopping power. The
barrel
> is rifled, which sends the bullet at the target spinning. What happens
when
> a spinning projectile hits the target? It spreads and spins, mutilating
> everything in its path.


Then why, pray tell, should we not ban other rifles that
shoot that same .223 cartridge in the same semi - auto
fashion as an "assault rifle" when the substantive difference
between the two is that one has a kinder and gentler wood
stock and the other a military style appearance?


> You'll never kill a deer with a regular shotgun and shot.

I have shot deer on many occasions - with my camera
that is - but I dare say "Buckshot" has been used on same
an occasion or two.....

Scott

> "Scott" <zzz...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > David Wisniewski > wrote...


> > > > (Also to those in the know I believe Higgins said in this
> > > > episode that there were 12 projectiles in the Buckshot
> > > > shell (don't know if he mentioned the size of same),
> > > > I thought there were 8-9 in 00-0 shot?)
> >

> > > For a 12 gauge, usually 8 .33 caliber balls in a 00 load.
> >

> > Thanks David, you seem the most knowledgeable with
> > regard to the topic at hand. This fact points to the inanity
> > of banning a weapon based upon its appearance ie, the
> > assault rifle ban. (Inflammatory name as it is, people assault,
> > guns don't.) Someone intent on carnage could use a
> > shotgun to a much more devastating impact with each
> > shell containing 8 or 9 projectiles, each capable of killing.
> > So why not ban shotguns too?
> >
> > Just think, if Algore voters had read "Voting for Dummys"
> > we might be lining up like animals to the slaughter to
> > obtain his suggested "firearm license" while the criminals
> > enjoy a good laugh.


> >
> > > PS - I've started a new business: Dave's Firearm Consulting.
> > > Already have two customers! :-)
> >

> > Who's the other one? : )
> >
> > Even though I live in a liberal County the Forefathers had
> > a clue and we are shall issue, thus I am very happy with my
> > new Galco Fletch and its little friend.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > TC: "I wish I had me a rocket launcher"
> >
> > Rick: "You didn't need rockets when I was your gunner"
> >
> > Thomas: "Guys......this isn't Nam"

Steve B

unread,
Mar 16, 2001, 8:16:09 AM3/16/01
to
I disagree with the banning of a shotgun. It does shoot more projectiles
but it doesn't have the stopping power that an assault rifle does. I am not
an authority on the subject by any means, but a rifle shooting a .223
caliber bullet will have much more accuracy and stopping power. The barrel
is rifled, which sends the bullet at the target spinning. What happens when
a spinning projectile hits the target? It spreads and spins, mutilating
everything in its path.

A shotgun has a smooth bore and even though it has more projectiles, they
don't have the concentration or the velocity to do a lot of killing.
Damage, yes. That's why shotguns are used in riots because they can be
loaded with rock salt to disperse the crowd. Nice wide pattern. Lots of
people use shotguns for home defense because they are cheap and you should
be able to hit what you are aiming at in CQB even if you are no marksman.
Not a lot of stopping power, but anyone who takes some buckshot will
certainly be slowed down so you can get away.

Deer hunters use shotguns, but they change to a rifled slug barrel and shoot
one large projectile. Why? More velocity, accuracy, and more killing
power. You'll never kill a deer with a regular shotgun and shot.

Sorry to offend anyone who is against guns.

"Scott" <zzz...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:TYds6.575894$U46.17...@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com...
>
> David Wisniewski > wrote...


> > > (Also to those in the know I believe Higgins said in this
> > > episode that there were 12 projectiles in the Buckshot
> > > shell (don't know if he mentioned the size of same),
> > > I thought there were 8-9 in 00-0 shot?)
>

> > For a 12 gauge, usually 8 .33 caliber balls in a 00 load.
>

> Thanks David, you seem the most knowledgeable with
> regard to the topic at hand. This fact points to the inanity
> of banning a weapon based upon its appearance ie, the
> assault rifle ban. (Inflammatory name as it is, people assault,
> guns don't.) Someone intent on carnage could use a
> shotgun to a much more devastating impact with each
> shell containing 8 or 9 projectiles, each capable of killing.
> So why not ban shotguns too?
>
> Just think, if Algore voters had read "Voting for Dummys"
> we might be lining up like animals to the slaughter to
> obtain his suggested "firearm license" while the criminals
> enjoy a good laugh.
>

> > PS - I've started a new business: Dave's Firearm Consulting.
> > Already have two customers! :-)
>

Scott

unread,
Mar 15, 2001, 8:26:11 PM3/15/01
to

David Wisniewski > wrote...

> > (Also to those in the know I believe Higgins said in this
> > episode that there were 12 projectiles in the Buckshot
> > shell (don't know if he mentioned the size of same),
> > I thought there were 8-9 in 00-0 shot?)

> For a 12 gauge, usually 8 .33 caliber balls in a 00 load.

Thanks David, you seem the most knowledgeable with


regard to the topic at hand. This fact points to the inanity
of banning a weapon based upon its appearance ie, the
assault rifle ban. (Inflammatory name as it is, people assault,
guns don't.) Someone intent on carnage could use a
shotgun to a much more devastating impact with each
shell containing 8 or 9 projectiles, each capable of killing.
So why not ban shotguns too?

Just think, if Algore voters had read "Voting for Dummys"
we might be lining up like animals to the slaughter to
obtain his suggested "firearm license" while the criminals
enjoy a good laugh.

> PS - I've started a new business: Dave's Firearm Consulting.


> Already have two customers! :-)

Who's the other one? : )

Scott

unread,
Mar 20, 2001, 12:05:32 AM3/20/01
to

Rob Morrone > wrote

> If you guys want to talk about banning guns,
> take it to alt.politics.guns.


Earth to Rob. If you had followed the thread
you would know we were not espousing banning
anything, can you say devil's advocate?

Scott<----Imagines bashing Rosie wouldn't have resulted
in attempts at NG moderation.....

Scott > wrote.....


> Steve B> wrote........
> > I disagree with the banning of a shotgun. It does shoot more
projectiles
> > but it doesn't have the stopping power that an assault rifle does. I am
> not
> > an authority on the subject by any means, but a rifle shooting a .223
> > caliber bullet will have much more accuracy and stopping power. The
> barrel
> > is rifled, which sends the bullet at the target spinning. What happens
> when
> > a spinning projectile hits the target? It spreads and spins, mutilating
> > everything in its path.
>
>
> Then why, pray tell, should we not ban other rifles that
> shoot that same .223 cartridge in the same semi - auto
> fashion as an "assault rifle" when the substantive difference
> between the two is that one has a kinder and gentler wood
> stock and the other a military style appearance?
>
>
> > You'll never kill a deer with a regular shotgun and shot.
>
> I have shot deer on many occasions - with my camera
> that is - but I dare say "Buckshot" has been used on same
> an occasion or two.....
>
> Scott
>
>
>

> > "Scott" > wrote in message

Rob Morrone

unread,
Mar 20, 2001, 12:16:50 PM3/20/01
to
Scott,

This is an unmoderated group. That doesn't mean that anything goes. It
means that we are self-policing. It has always been the policy to let off
topic discussions run for a time, and then suggest that they be moved to a
more appropriate discussion area.

So don't get your knickers in a twist.
--

Rob - W7MPI
The Ultimate Magnum, P.I. Episode Library
http://www.ultimatemagnum/

"Scott" <zzz...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:wyBt6.595283$U46.17...@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com...

0 new messages