Tina Wesson to play Alex Rousseau according to imdb
Maureen Goldman
Notable TV Guest Appearances
"Lost" playing "Alex Rousseau" in episode: "Genesis: Part 1" (episode
# 2.1) 21 September 2005
Don't know if someone here was the source, but I recall a post saying
that the woman on the boat looked like former Survivor winner Tina
Wesson (age 44). With that substantiation that anything can be added
to the imdb listings, I think it safe to disregard the announcement
that Samuel L. Jackson will play Rose's husband, Bernard.
him...@animail.net
doesn't seem too likely. Of course, that could be how they're going to
deal with Walt aging too.
himiko
Gazorp
If this true, it's a huge mistake.
Tina from Survivor is too tongue-in-cheek. And who knows if she can act or
not.
Sam Jackson is one of the best in the business, but I think he's too much of
a big star for this role. On the other hand, it could turn out to be the
best casting decision they make.
Tina still sucks though. Maybe Colby and Richard Hatch will have cameos as
well?
Melroseman
Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But
I've proven my point! LOL!
--
New to alt.tv.lost? Please read the FAQ before posting:
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=ALT.TV.LOST+FAQ+EDITION
Kate
<melro...@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>Maureen Goldman wrote:
>
>> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0921895/
>>
>> Notable TV Guest Appearances
>>
>> "Lost" playing "Alex Rousseau" in episode: "Genesis: Part 1" (episode
>> # 2.1) 21 September 2005
>>
>> Don't know if someone here was the source, but I recall a post saying
>> that the woman on the boat looked like former Survivor winner Tina
>> Wesson (age 44). With that substantiation that anything can be added
>> to the imdb listings, I think it safe to disregard the announcement
>> that Samuel L. Jackson will play Rose's husband, Bernard.
>
>Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But
>I've proven my point! LOL!
So it was YOU who added that! Lol - yes, you proved your point. Tina
Wesson looks too old to play someone her own age so this header really
made me wonder.
Ryan Robbins
news:42a11...@netscape.ca...
> Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But
> I've proven my point! LOL!
So you enjoy becoming part of the problem?
Kelly
Jackson will guest appear, because 1) both he and Michelle Rodriguez
appeared in the movie SWAT together (so they clearly know the same
production people) and 2) Samuel is not shy about asking to be in projects
that he is also a fan of (i.e., Star Wars).
"Melroseman" <melro...@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:42a11...@netscape.ca...
Johnn...@webtv.net
>Tina from Survivor is too tongue-in-cheek. And
> who knows if she can act or not.
16 year old Alex. ...Jon
Maureen Goldman
>Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But
>I've proven my point! LOL!
Please don't do that again.
J. Anthony Crumpton
I agree. The info has spread to other boards; people are now taking
it as gospel.
-- J. Anthony Crumpton
"A good friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body."
Melroseman
> On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:57:46 -0700, Maureen Goldman
> <inksl...@FOGsunshine.net> wrote:
>
>>>Melroseman <melro...@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But
>>>I've proven my point! LOL!
>>
>>Please don't do that again.
>
> I agree. The info has spread to other boards; people are now taking
> it as gospel.
Just as they're taking the info on Oceanic Air's site as gospel. The
difference is, no one is jumping down those webmasters' throats telling
them to quit it. In fact, people seem to grasp onto any crummy excuse in
order to defend that site's info. And that's all I'm going to say about
this topic.
Kate
<tony_c...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:57:46 -0700, Maureen Goldman
><inksl...@FOGsunshine.net> wrote:
>
>>>Melroseman <melro...@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But
>>>I've proven my point! LOL!
>>
>>Please don't do that again.
>
>I agree. The info has spread to other boards; people are now taking
>it as gospel.
>
I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is,
and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it
either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it
- Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
Actually, Anthony - Melroseman did say he would do "something else"
(to prove his point) when you challenged him to make that web page. I
think that was your something else. :)
Kate
<melro...@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>Kate wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is,
>> and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it
>> either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it
>> - Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
>>
>> Actually, Anthony - Melroseman did say he would do "something else"
>> (to prove his point) when you challenged him to make that web page. I
>> think that was your something else. :)
>
>Someone's paying attention! Good going Kate! Now if you could solve
>some of Lost's mysteries, we'd really appreciate it. :)
I don't read many of these posts since the finale, but of course I
always pay attention to your posts. <g> As far as Lost's mysteries, I
give up. Thinking about them makes my brain hurt too much.
Melroseman
> I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is,
> and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it
> either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it
> - Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
>
> Actually, Anthony - Melroseman did say he would do "something else"
> (to prove his point) when you challenged him to make that web page. I
> think that was your something else. :)
Someone's paying attention! Good going Kate! Now if you could solve
some of Lost's mysteries, we'd really appreciate it. :)
--
Maureen Goldman
>I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is,
>and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it
>either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it
>- Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
As well as being about three times the age of the missing girl, Tina
Wesson isn't an actress.
Melroseman, now that you've proven your point, how about removing that
information from imdb? Even with its flaws, the website is a valuable
resource. Hopefully it's as easy to take away this prank listing as
it was to add.
Steven L.
Melroseman wrote:
> J. Anthony Crumpton wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:57:46 -0700, Maureen Goldman
>> <inksl...@FOGsunshine.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> Melroseman <melro...@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it.
>>>> But I've proven my point! LOL!
>>>
>>>
>>> Please don't do that again.
>>
>>
>> I agree. The info has spread to other boards; people are now taking
>> it as gospel.
>
>
> Just as they're taking the info on Oceanic Air's site as gospel. The
> difference is, no one is jumping down those webmasters' throats telling
> them to quit it. In fact, people seem to grasp onto any crummy excuse in
> order to defend that site's info. And that's all I'm going to say about
> this topic.
You may be embarrassing Tina Wesson by using her name for an experiment
like you did. I'm sure she wouldn't appreciate it if she found out
about it.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email: sdli...@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
David Chapman
> Melroseman, now that you've proven your point, how about removing that
> information from imdb? Even with its flaws, the website is a valuable
> resource. Hopefully it's as easy to take away this prank listing as
> it was to add.
It takes time. I've already asked them to remove the info and sent them
links to his dumbass postings here, so it should soon be taken down and the
problem won't arise again.
--
Who the f--k are you calling insolent?
smaug69
No, he's just showing that anyone can add anything to the IMDB and that
it is NEVER to be taken as the gosepl for ANYTHING. The fact that
Samuel Jackson's name has now been removed only reinforces this fact.
I've seen so much bullshit on IMDB over the years that even the stuff
I'm sure is right- mostly the technical aspects- I question and try and
find two other sources to support it.
smaug69
joke?
Steven L.
> Do you think Samuel Jackson would appreciates his name being used as a
> joke?
Not at all.
But I don't know who's responsible for that hoax.
I do know who's responsible for the Tina Wesson hoax.
J. Anthony Crumpton
>On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 10:25:04 -0700, J. Anthony Crumpton
><tony_c...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:57:46 -0700, Maureen Goldman
>><inksl...@FOGsunshine.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>Melroseman <melro...@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But
>>>>I've proven my point! LOL!
>>>
>>>Please don't do that again.
>>
>>I agree. The info has spread to other boards; people are now taking
>>it as gospel.
>>
>I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is,
>and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it
>either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it
>- Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
Actually, it spawned a brand new theory -- "they're aging" -- over at
The Fuselage!
>
>Actually, Anthony - Melroseman did say he would do "something else"
>(to prove his point) when you challenged him to make that web page. I
>think that was your something else. :)
Apparently... :-)
Kate
<tony_c...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:51:46 -0700, Kate <well...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 10:25:04 -0700, J. Anthony Crumpton
>><tony_c...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:57:46 -0700, Maureen Goldman
>>><inksl...@FOGsunshine.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Melroseman <melro...@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But
>>>>>I've proven my point! LOL!
>>>>
>>>>Please don't do that again.
>>>
>>>I agree. The info has spread to other boards; people are now taking
>>>it as gospel.
>>>
>>I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is,
>>and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it
>>either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it
>>- Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
>
>Actually, it spawned a brand new theory -- "they're aging" -- over at
>The Fuselage!
Seriously? I don't know about that Fuselage bunch over there....
Abrams is probably happy because anything that keeps the fans talking
is all good.
>>Actually, Anthony - Melroseman did say he would do "something else"
>>(to prove his point) when you challenged him to make that web page. I
>>think that was your something else. :)
>
>Apparently... :-)
I still don't know what everyone got so excited about. The good part
is that now when anybody says something is gospel because they read it
on IMDB, we can just point them to that thread.