Tonight's Episode (3/10)
Cheryl Moore
that Teri and Dean are great . |Also all of the cast are just superb.
What I thought of the show ws this , I like what there doing and I hate
it . Honestly dont you think that all this attention we are pouring on
this show is what the writers wanted. Even those who say they are not
going to watch couldn't possibly miss the culmination of this arc. I
hated how Clark had to suffer and I wish the writers would let him have a
spine and make some demonstrative move to reclaim his bride and their
relationship. But as much as I hated it look at the activity on these
boards and here on the net and the clubs. There is a lot of aggitation
and frustration. I can't believe any of us can turn away until our need
to see Clark get *** is fulfilled. All that aside I can watch Dean Cain
in a bad episode and unless he sign to do a movie we won't see him after
the next four shows until next season. I do believe one thing that when
we do finally get what we want we are going to really enjoy it.
Julie Bixby
Dars <bake...@gold.tc.umn.edu> wrote:
> I'm mad at the writer's for how this episode ended, especially
>regarding Lois & Clark's relationship. HOW COULD THEY HAVE HER THINK
>THAT SHE'S IN LOVE WITH THE DOCTOR!?!?!?!?!?!? Apparently she remembers
>that she works with Clark at the paper, but not their love/relationship.
>
> I hope the writers don't plan on having her stay with the doc &
>possibly marry him!! I would absolutely hate it!! HOW COULD THE WRITERS
>NOT LET HER REMEMBER THEIR RELATIONSHIP, LOVE, & ENGAGEMENT!?!?!?!?!?!?
>I'm beginning to really hate the writers!!!!
It's called "for convience's sake" that Lois remembers her working
relationship with Clark and not the romantic relationship. It's
only purpose is, as you mentioned (and I deleted), to strech things
out even longer, prolonging the inevitible. This type of thing
works on soap operas, and worked on "Cheers", but it didn't work
for "Remington Steele" and certainly isn't working well (IMHO)
for L&C. I still watch, but it's with a "ho-hum" attitude :-(.
--
Julie Bixby
ma...@cccd.edu Home Page: http://www.cccd.edu/~markb/julie/
Engage Romulan .sig cloaking device....
Matthew Davis
I used to watch Lois-n-Clark by myself on tape after church. (It comes
on right after church and I need to visit with other people.) Now,
there are about ten people getting together to watch the show, and they really
like it!
I like the way the last shows have all been connected. Some of the people
in the group really don't like the endings and the silly ploy's that have
conspired to give such divergent storylines.
Let's not be stupid here folks: Lois is not going to marry the doctor, The
show is not driving people away in mass, L&C is not going to turn into a
Soap Opera. Yes, we have seen our share of plot gimmicks in the last four
episodes. But, the focus of the show is still the same, and it is still
good wholesome intertainment!
I do enjoy reading all of these complaints. I think it is real neat that
we have this forum to spout off or praise our favorite bits and pieces!
Matt Davis
Rhonda Jones
>
>UQE...@prodigy.com (Cheryl Moore) wrote:
>
>(snip)
>>... I wish the writers would let him have a
their
>>relationship.
>
>Much as my feminist side hates to say it, I think that Clark/Superman
>needs to resort to the old "Me Tarzan - You Jane" tactic, haul Lois
>out of that hospital and tell her the truth!
>
>Margaret
>
>I agree TOTALLY! The current writing ethic is to emasulate any man
involved in a stable relationship! I wish the writers would get lives
of their own and write about the joys of love and togetherness
>
>