Who do you believe O.J. or his ex-lawyer

[Jeff Gersten]

On CNN they said that O.J.'s ex-lawyer was contradicting everything O.J.
testified to. It was a "he said he said." And who did you believe.

Let's see a murderer (convicted in civil court) now serving 33 years for
armed robbery, or his ex-lawyer?

I think I'll vote for the murderer. I don't think a lawyer is capable of
telling the truth. But, I have no doubt given the level of proof needed,
that the judge will not grant O.J. a new trial.

Did any of you watch any of that trial in Nevada? Say what you want
about O.J., he was railroaded in that Nevada courtroom. One of the Las
Vegas police force was even quoted as saying, "they couldn't get him in
California, but we'll get him in Nevada."

[7...@gmail.com]

I'd vote for the lawyer, not the double murderer.

BTW, in the Las Vegas case they had him dead to right. They had video
of him holduing people at gun point in the hotel room (re: kidnapping)

That is what nailed him, not the lawyer.

[David / Amicus]

OJ has to get out else he won't be able to search golf courses looking
for the real killers.


FREE THE JUICE

[D.F. Manno]

In article <20871-51...@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net>,

JeffG...@webtv.net (Jeff Gersten) wrote:

> On CNN they said that O.J.'s ex-lawyer was contradicting everything O.J.
> testified to. It was a "he said he said." And who did you believe.

Hard to say. On one hand you have a lying, scheming prick. And on the
other you have O.J. Simpson.

--
D.F. Manno | dfm...@mail.com
GOP delenda est!

[7...@gmail.com]

On Fri, 17 May 2013 14:57:08 -0700, Ami...@webtv.net (David / Amicus)
wrote:

>OJ has to get out else he won't be able to search golf courses looking
>for the real killers.
>
>
>FREE THE JUICE

If he wants to find the real killer all he has to do is look in the
mirror.