Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

James Kirk Roberts

386 views
Skip to first unread message

Paul Yearwood

unread,
Oct 11, 2003, 6:15:06 AM10/11/03
to
I admit that I may have missed part of last week's show, but when did Bud
and Harriet have the baby? They had episodes about the birth of Littel AJ
and the death of Baby Sarah. Now, everyone shows up for the christening of
James Kirk Roberts.

Loved the glacier that passed from Harriet to Bud when Mikey spilt the beans
about the Star Trek connection.

As to the return of Harm to JAG, I'm sure the office will be too quiet for a
while then Big AJ will try to recruit him back.

Paul

Stephen Rabinowitz

unread,
Oct 11, 2003, 6:44:52 AM10/11/03
to
Me also, when did Harriet have the baby, I am sure it was not it last weeks
episode. Last week she looked pregnant walking around & this week holding
the baby. Wonder if an episode is out of order.
"Paul Yearwood" <pfyea...@mw.net> wrote in message
news:3f87d82c$0$43852$39ce...@news.twtelecom.net...

Karen

unread,
Oct 11, 2003, 11:33:20 AM10/11/03
to
in article EaRhb.27749$mQ2....@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net, Stephen
Rabinowitz ste...@earthlink.net> at <nospam wrote on 10/11/03 5:44 AM:

> Me also, when did Harriet have the baby, I am sure it was not it last weeks
> episode. Last week she looked pregnant walking around & this week holding
> the baby. Wonder if an episode is out of order.

I think they just decided not to base an episode on it this time. "Had off
screen" you might say. The James Kirk thing was VERY funny.

Karen

Karen

unread,
Oct 11, 2003, 11:35:08 AM10/11/03
to
P.S. We were talking about baby names at work the other day and one of the
gals said the doctor brought the baby in and said "Here's Stephanie".
Husband had just picked the name! That was it. So, it can happen. It gets on
paper and thats it.

karen

Patty Winter

unread,
Oct 11, 2003, 3:24:02 PM10/11/03
to
In article <3f87d82c$0$43852$39ce...@news.twtelecom.net>,

Paul Yearwood <pfyea...@mw.net> wrote:
>I admit that I may have missed part of last week's show, but when did Bud
>and Harriet have the baby?

As others have mentioned, you didn't miss anything. The baby was born
sometime between the two episodes. It would have been nice to have a
brief mention of it before the reference to the upcoming christening.

>Loved the glacier that passed from Harriet to Bud when Mikey spilt the beans
>about the Star Trek connection.

That whole part of the scene was great. As soon as someone called the
baby "Jimmy" and asked about his middle name, then Harriet started on
about the traditional Celtic name "Kirk," I knew that Bud had pulled
a fast one on her. :-) Then he saw Mike catch on and tried to get him
to keep quiet with the "ixnay on the amenay" remark, but either Mike
didn't hear him or chose to ignore him, and I knew that Bud was about
to be in big trouble. ;-)


Patty

kirk

unread,
Oct 11, 2003, 6:08:34 PM10/11/03
to

> >Loved the glacier that passed from Harriet to Bud when Mikey spilt the
beans
> >about the Star Trek connection.
>


Hey, both of his kids are named after Admirals :)


Maureen Goldman

unread,
Oct 11, 2003, 6:09:12 PM10/11/03
to
>"Paul Yearwood" <pfyea...@mw.net> wrote:
>I admit that I may have missed part of last week's show, but when did Bud
>and Harriet have the baby? They had episodes about the birth of Littel AJ
>and the death of Baby Sarah. Now, everyone shows up for the christening of
>James Kirk Roberts.

I think the christening was an indication that several weeks had
passed. Can't help thinking that there must be some sort of training
involved with CIA work.

>Loved the glacier that passed from Harriet to Bud when Mikey spilt the beans
>about the Star Trek connection.

How could she not already know? While that was cute, it just wasn't
plausible.

Patty Winter

unread,
Oct 11, 2003, 6:54:27 PM10/11/03
to

LOL! Bud could try that line of reasoning with Harriet, but somehow
I don't think that it would smooth things over...


Patty

ldydrlng

unread,
Oct 12, 2003, 2:15:50 AM10/12/03
to
Maureen Goldman wrote:

> >Loved the glacier that passed from Harriet to Bud when Mikey spilt the beans
> >about the Star Trek connection.
>
> How could she not already know? While that was cute, it just wasn't
> plausible.

For Harriet? Yeah, it's plausible:) Her character tends to miss the obvious.

marie

Maureen Goldman

unread,
Oct 12, 2003, 10:07:56 AM10/12/03
to
>"kirk" <ki...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Hey, both of his kids are named after Admirals :)

ROTFL! Good point!

Paul Yearwood

unread,
Oct 12, 2003, 11:44:41 AM10/12/03
to

"Paul Yearwood" <pfyea...@mw.net> wrote in message
news:3f87d82c$0$43852$39ce...@news.twtelecom.net...
After a review of the tapes, I found that Harm mentioned to the old spook
that he survived his probation period. The call is reversed. First down.
Also under further consideration, the way Big AJ put down Big Bud, maybe
Harm was needed in the CIA and it was a plot with the Admiral's endorsement,
or he wanted to make a point to Harm that the cowboy needed to loose his
spurs.
Paul
>
>


Maureen Goldman

unread,
Oct 12, 2003, 1:13:56 PM10/12/03
to

>> >Loved the glacier that passed from Harriet to Bud when Mikey spilt the beans
>> >about the Star Trek connection.

>> Maureen Goldman

>> How could she not already know? While that was cute, it just wasn't
>> plausible.

> >ldydrlng <ldyd...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>For Harriet? Yeah, it's plausible:) Her character tends to miss the obvious.

Harriet is married to a Trekkie. Unless she has left the room every
time the subject came up or whenever Bud played a tape, this should be
a very familiar name.

ARGGUY

unread,
Oct 12, 2003, 3:04:49 PM10/12/03
to
For next week's 'comic relief': It would be a real 'hoot' to have
William Shatner do a cameo as the clergyman at the christening!! ;-)

Russ

YNC USN-ret

ldydrlng

unread,
Oct 13, 2003, 2:28:17 AM10/13/03
to
Maureen Goldman wrote:

> > >ldydrlng <ldyd...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >For Harriet? Yeah, it's plausible:) Her character tends to miss the obvious.
>
> Harriet is married to a Trekkie. Unless she has left the room every
> time the subject came up or whenever Bud played a tape, this should be
> a very familiar name.

That's what I meant by missing the obvious:)

marie

Norman Koller

unread,
Oct 13, 2003, 11:39:30 AM10/13/03
to
Maureen Goldman wrote:
>>"Paul Yearwood" <pfyea...@mw.net> wrote:
>>I admit that I may have missed part of last week's show, but when did Bud
>>and Harriet have the baby? They had episodes about the birth of Littel AJ
>>and the death of Baby Sarah. Now, everyone shows up for the christening of
>>James Kirk Roberts.
>
>
> I think the christening was an indication that several weeks had
> passed. Can't help thinking that there must be some sort of training
> involved with CIA work.
>
>
Harm mentioned that he had been checked out on 7 different aircraft, so
some time had to pass. After making a big deal of her first two births,
it made sense to low key the third.

Norm

David S Chesler

unread,
Oct 15, 2003, 9:16:32 PM10/15/03
to
Norman Koller wrote:
> Harm mentioned that he had been checked out on 7 different aircraft, so
> some time had to pass.

I figured he was referring to his ability as a pilot -- he mentioned
his Stearman -- rather than some Company-specific rating. But have
we ever seen him operate a heavy transport? I don't know how much
the abilities cross over, but short of a commercial jetliner, isn't
a C130 the polar opposite of the fighters he usually flies?

--
- David Chesler <che...@post.harvard.edu>
Iacta alea est

LadyC

unread,
Oct 15, 2003, 10:56:00 PM10/15/03
to
Norman Koller <nor...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<Mm6dnbNCDYr...@comcast.com>...
Low Key yes, but this was damn near invisible! Harriet cant complain
to much about the babys name, at least its not Bud the Third. Of
course, then Bud might nickname the kid "trip" (as in
StarTrek:Enterprise's Trip)

kirk

unread,
Oct 15, 2003, 11:40:55 PM10/15/03
to

"David S Chesler" <che...@post.harvard.edu> wrote in message
news:3F8DF121...@post.harvard.edu...

> Norman Koller wrote:
> > Harm mentioned that he had been checked out on 7 different aircraft, so
> > some time had to pass.
>
> I figured he was referring to his ability as a pilot -- he mentioned
> his Stearman -- rather than some Company-specific rating. But have
> we ever seen him operate a heavy transport? I don't know how much
> the abilities cross over, but short of a commercial jetliner, isn't
> a C130 the polar opposite of the fighters he usually flies?


Harm is natural "stick and rudder" pilot. He can fly almost anything, even
without previous training. Here is a partial list of the aircraft that Harm
has piloted:

In the season 1 episode "Smoked", Harm flew and landed the business jet. He
also took that plane aerobatic.

In the season 1 episode "Black Ops", Harm flew the AWACS-enabled DC-3 (OK
everyone jump on me because its not a DC-3).

In the season 1 episode "Recovery", Harm flew and landed the Shuttle
emulator.

In the season 2 episode "Full Engagement", Harm flew his Stearman for the
first time. He subsequently flew the Stearman several other times.

In the season 3 episode "Tiger, Tiger", Harm tells Josh that he can fly the
helicopter (Sea Stallion?).

In the season 3 episode "To Russia With Love", Harm flies the MIG-29 (a
Russian F-14 rip-off).

In the season 4 episode "The Black Jet", Harm flies the F-117 and does a
carrier landing!

In the season 5 episode "The Bridge at Kang So Ri", Harm takes over the
controls of the 747.

It isn't too much of a stretch to believe that he qualified in seven
aircraft types.


The next big question is: How many of the Navy's F-14s has Harm killed? I
get the feeling that he would granted "Ace" status in any other country's
air force :)

Joe Davila

unread,
Oct 16, 2003, 12:29:02 AM10/16/03
to
> The next big question is: How many of the Navy's F-14s has Harm killed?
I
> get the feeling that he would granted "Ace" status in any other country's
> air force :)

Yeah, I'm waiting for Harm to crash his first CIA plane.

Joe
USN (RET)


0 new messages