Just wondering?
Sleepless in TF
The most sensitive area of an immortals body is the neck. A wound deep
enough may not heal 100% and therefore will leave a scar. Duncan cut
Kalas' throat with cut glass from a broken window. Duncan may have put an
unsual amount of pressure when he slashed Kalas, creating a deep wound.
Since the way to kill an immortal is to take off their head, and that
wound seemed to be a fourth deep, it would reason to be a major, major cut
and wouldn't heal back to it's original condition. (Does that make
sense?)
Monica
=====
"She caught your eye like one of those pointy hook latches that used to
dangle from screen doors and would fly up whenever you banged the door
open again." by Rich Murphy.
>Just wondering?
There is a precedent for Kalas' neck scar. Remember the Kurgan in
Highlander? He too had had a near death incident and was scarred
permanently. Of course, on the other hand, DM had a sword slice through
the side of his neck in one episode and does not have a scar. The only
thing that I can figure is that it's the primary arteries and such that
don't regenerate. These cuts must have come very close to severing the
spine which is (I guess) the act which actually releases the quickening.
I think that they may have just ignored the cut through DM's neck since
he wouldn't look that good with a scar. Though perhaps they would argue
that the cut wasn't as deep as it looked...
Just my $.02.
-
JAMES MARTIN NCL...@prodigy.com
Remember, no matter where you go, there you are...
B. Banzai
Mark D
In article <4pnhmn$15...@usenetz1.news.prodigy.com> Linda Maughan wrote:
>An immortal's body repairs itself self after it has been injured, this we
>all know. I understand why St. Cloud did not grow a new hand after
>Duncan cut it off, but I do not understand why the cut on Kalas' neck
>left a scar and did not repair it self. A preimmortal will scar, but
>once they become immortal they should not. Does anyone have any thoughts
>on the subject?
>
>Just wondering?
>
>Sleepless in TF
>
I forget where, but I've heard that neck wounds leave scars to remind
immortals of their vulnerability, or something to that effect.
Paige
"Lord what fools these mortals be!" -- Puck, (A Midsummer Night's Dream)
There is evidence of this in the first Highlander movie with the cut on
the Kurgan's neck by Ramirez.
Chuck
Mac is too pretty to scar. Of course, Muhammad Ali would probably disagree.
sanjo.
Perhaps the neck marks the dividing line between where the quickening resides and where
it doesn't. You know, below the neck, the quickening, above the neck--nothing.
sanjo.
My personal, no real supporting evidence, theory on neck scars is that
they heal to the same extent, although faster, as the same injury would
heal on a mortal.
Duncan's neck injury was a shallow slice from a sharp blade. Kalas' was
a deep cut from a jagged piece of broken glass.
--
Patricia Shanahan
Ps...@cris.com
> I believe I have an answer to question concerning necks and
immortals. THe neck is the one vulnerable point on an immortal. If
their heads coem off their shoulders, they die. What better way to
emphasize this vulnerability by having neck injuries heal inadequately?
By the way, Kalas wasn't the only immortal to have been depicted with
a neck injury. The Kurgen in the original movie hade a scar given to
him by Ramirez.
In <4pnhmn$15...@usenetz1.news.prodigy.com> FZS...@prodigy.com (Linda
Maughan) writes:
>
>An immortal's body repairs itself self after it has been injured, this
we
>all know. I understand why St. Cloud did not grow a new hand after
>Duncan cut it off, but I do not understand why the cut on Kalas' neck
>left a scar and did not repair it self. A preimmortal will scar, but
>once they become immortal they should not. Does anyone have any
thoughts
>on the subject?
>
>Just wondering?
>
>Sleepless in TF
>
>it would reason to be a major, major cut
>and wouldn't heal back to it's original condition. (Does that make
>sense?)
>
>
So much sense that that's how the folks behind the show have been viewing
it for awhile. (At *least* Oct 95 when they said that at the Gathering II)
Only very deep cuts to the neck (Kalas and the Kurgan, deep enough to mess
up the voice box) leave scars after Immie-dom. Any scars they do have are
from before their "first death."
Chris
Banz...@aol.com
][
@#####|)======================>
][
"Certifiable, and damned proud of it!"
- Dick Solomon
>> I believe I have an answer to question concerning necks and
>immortals. THe neck is the one vulnerable point on an immortal. If
>their heads coem off their shoulders, they die. What better way to
>emphasize this vulnerability by having neck injuries heal inadequately?
> By the way, Kalas wasn't the only immortal to have been depicted with
>a neck injury. The Kurgen in the original movie hade a scar given to
>him by Ramirez.
This is something I've often wondered about. I think everyone has surmised
the reasoning is that the neck is their most vulnerable point, but if external
cutting scars, why do they heal after, say, a hanging? If the skin doesn't
heal quickly and properly, why would it be that the head will reattach itself
to the spinal cord? Any thoughts on this one?
-Kaz
->would someone please post the highlander win95 theme. My hard drive
->crasked and I lost it
How about someone post a pointer to said highlander Win95
theme?
John
Fritz get up for god's sake. Get up! They've killed Fritz. They've
killed Fritz. Those lousy stinking yellow fairies, they've killed
Fritz! Those horrible atrocity-filled vermin. Those despicable
animal warmongers. They've Killed Fritz Max - Wizards