Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Friends cast won't be reuniting
12 views
Skip to first unread message
Ubiquitous
Apr 18, 2013, 5:11:17 AM4/18/13
to
A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
An NBC insider dashed reports that there would be a reprisal of the hit
show, which sprang Jennifer Aniston, Matthew Perry, Courteney Cox, David
Schwimmer, Matt LeBlanc and Lisa Kudrow to fame, next year.
The NBC source told E! News that the story was "not true" while another
insider said that a reunion was something the network has "talked about,"
but there has been "no forward motion" on the idea.
Recently Matthew, who played Chandler, reunited with Courteney, who
starred as his girlfriend turned wife Monica in Friends, on his TV show
Go On.
Friends was broadcast between 1994 and 2004 and reports of a reunion of
the much-loved show have sparked a Twitter frenzy.
--
"The trend is undeniable, the far left intruding on the national
discourse, perverting the educational system, and generally behaving as
badly as any movement has since the late 1960s. Fair-minded Americans
will eventually reject this explosion of zealotry as they always have."
-- Bill O'Reilly
An NBC insider dashed reports that there would be a reprisal of the hit
show, which sprang Jennifer Aniston, Matthew Perry, Courteney Cox, David
Schwimmer, Matt LeBlanc and Lisa Kudrow to fame, next year.
The NBC source told E! News that the story was "not true" while another
insider said that a reunion was something the network has "talked about,"
but there has been "no forward motion" on the idea.
Recently Matthew, who played Chandler, reunited with Courteney, who
starred as his girlfriend turned wife Monica in Friends, on his TV show
Go On.
Friends was broadcast between 1994 and 2004 and reports of a reunion of
the much-loved show have sparked a Twitter frenzy.
--
"The trend is undeniable, the far left intruding on the national
discourse, perverting the educational system, and generally behaving as
badly as any movement has since the late 1960s. Fair-minded Americans
will eventually reject this explosion of zealotry as they always have."
-- Bill O'Reilly
Adam H. Kerman
Apr 18, 2013, 7:56:33 AM4/18/13
to
>A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
They all still hate Joey?
Ian J. Ball
Apr 18, 2013, 8:59:59 AM4/18/13
to
In article <kkon1h$vvs$1...@news.albasani.net>,
for a reunion.
Honestly, I hear a lot more interest in a "Saved By The Bell" reunion
than I've ever heard for a "Friends" reunion... :/
--
"Surf-crazed aliens... Of course." - Amber, "Alien Surf Girls",
Episode #1.1, "Wipeout".
Wait a minute... "Of course"?! "*Of course*"?!! Did I miss a step here??!!
"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
> >A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
>
> They all still hate Joey?
The show is not worth reviving. More to the point, *no one* is clamoring
> >A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
>
> They all still hate Joey?
for a reunion.
Honestly, I hear a lot more interest in a "Saved By The Bell" reunion
than I've ever heard for a "Friends" reunion... :/
--
"Surf-crazed aliens... Of course." - Amber, "Alien Surf Girls",
Episode #1.1, "Wipeout".
Wait a minute... "Of course"?! "*Of course*"?!! Did I miss a step here??!!
Ubiquitous
Apr 18, 2013, 9:47:13 AM4/18/13
to
>> In article <kkok7f$840$3...@dont-email.me>, web...@polaris.net wrote:
>>>A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
>>
>> They all still hate Joey?
>
>The show is not worth reviving. More to the point, *no one* is clamoring
>for a reunion.
>
>Honestly, I hear a lot more interest in a "Saved By The Bell" reunion
>than I've ever heard for a "Friends" reunion... :/
I _never_ liked that show!
>>>A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
>>
>> They all still hate Joey?
>
>The show is not worth reviving. More to the point, *no one* is clamoring
>for a reunion.
>
>Honestly, I hear a lot more interest in a "Saved By The Bell" reunion
>than I've ever heard for a "Friends" reunion... :/
Adam H. Kerman
Apr 18, 2013, 7:57:45 PM4/18/13
to
Ian J. Ball <ijball-...@mac.invalid> wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
>>They all still hate Joey?
>The show is not worth reviving. More to the point, *no one* is clamoring
>for a reunion.
>Honestly, I hear a lot more interest in a "Saved By The Bell" reunion
>than I've ever heard for a "Friends" reunion... :/
It's all right here on Usenet.
>"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
>>They all still hate Joey?
>The show is not worth reviving. More to the point, *no one* is clamoring
>for a reunion.
>Honestly, I hear a lot more interest in a "Saved By The Bell" reunion
>than I've ever heard for a "Friends" reunion... :/
Jim G.
Apr 19, 2013, 3:38:34 PM4/19/13
to
Ian J. Ball sent the following on Thu, 18 Apr 2013 05:59:59 -0700:
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Relax. It's North Korea, the nation-state equivalent of the short bus." -- Sterling Archer, ARCHER
> In article <kkon1h$vvs$1...@news.albasani.net>,
> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>
> > >A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
> >
> > They all still hate Joey?
>
> The show is not worth reviving. More to the point, *no one* is clamoring
> for a reunion.
>
> Honestly, I hear a lot more interest in a "Saved By The Bell" reunion
> than I've ever heard for a "Friends" reunion... :/
You're doing it again.
> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>
> > >A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
> >
> > They all still hate Joey?
>
> The show is not worth reviving. More to the point, *no one* is clamoring
> for a reunion.
>
> Honestly, I hear a lot more interest in a "Saved By The Bell" reunion
> than I've ever heard for a "Friends" reunion... :/
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Relax. It's North Korea, the nation-state equivalent of the short bus." -- Sterling Archer, ARCHER
Paul Hyett
Apr 20, 2013, 3:03:46 AM4/20/13
to
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 at 14:38:34, Jim G. <jimg...@geemail.com.invalid>
wrote in alt.tv.friends :
>Ian J. Ball sent the following on Thu, 18 Apr 2013 05:59:59 -0700:
>> In article <kkon1h$vvs$1...@news.albasani.net>,
>> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>
>> > >A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
>> >
>> > They all still hate Joey?
>>
>> The show is not worth reviving. More to the point, *no one* is clamoring
>> for a reunion.
>>
>> Honestly, I hear a lot more interest in a "Saved By The Bell" reunion
>> than I've ever heard for a "Friends" reunion... :/
>
>You're doing it again.
>
Doing what?
--
Paul 'Charts Fan' Hyett
wrote in alt.tv.friends :
>Ian J. Ball sent the following on Thu, 18 Apr 2013 05:59:59 -0700:
>> In article <kkon1h$vvs$1...@news.albasani.net>,
>> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>
>> > >A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
>> >
>> > They all still hate Joey?
>>
>> The show is not worth reviving. More to the point, *no one* is clamoring
>> for a reunion.
>>
>> Honestly, I hear a lot more interest in a "Saved By The Bell" reunion
>> than I've ever heard for a "Friends" reunion... :/
>
>You're doing it again.
>
--
Paul 'Charts Fan' Hyett
William December Starr
Apr 21, 2013, 8:54:35 PM4/21/13
to
> A Friends reunion is not on the cards, according to reports.
>
> An NBC insider dashed reports that there would be a reprisal of
> the hit show, which sprang Jennifer Aniston, Matthew Perry,
> Courteney Cox, David Schwimmer, Matt LeBlanc and Lisa Kudrow to
> fame, next year.
Because this came via Ubi the Ass I don't know who wrote the
>
> An NBC insider dashed reports that there would be a reprisal of
> the hit show, which sprang Jennifer Aniston, Matthew Perry,
> Courteney Cox, David Schwimmer, Matt LeBlanc and Lisa Kudrow to
> fame, next year.
above, but whoever it is should perhaps be informed of the
difference between 'reprise' and 'reprisal'.
Unless, of course, they did it on purpose. :-)
-- wds
anim8rFSK
Apr 21, 2013, 9:16:47 PM4/21/13
to
In article <kl21ob$912$1...@panix2.panix.com>,
Google "An NBC insider dashed reports that there would be a reprisal"
1,660,000 hits
that's what they said
And they don't have a byline. I don't know who Ubi would have
attributed.
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
1,660,000 hits
that's what they said
And they don't have a byline. I don't know who Ubi would have
attributed.
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
David Johnston
Apr 22, 2013, 12:21:11 AM4/22/13
to
http://ca.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idCABRE93G0WG20130417
Jim G.
Apr 22, 2013, 3:56:01 PM4/22/13
to
Paul Hyett sent the following on Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:03:46 +0100:
Sorry. I didn't notice the crosspost, and what happens in RAT stays in
RAT.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Can you and your stupid hair let us in?" -- Carlton Lassiter, PSYCH
RAT.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
Mason Barge
Apr 22, 2013, 4:34:48 PM4/22/13
to
On 21 Apr 2013 20:54:35 -0400, wds...@panix.com (William December
When they get the cast assembled, I get dibs on David Schwimmer.
Michael Black
Apr 22, 2013, 9:47:55 PM4/22/13
to
how they'd filmed some future episode while filming the last real
episodes. SOmething about then airing it in the future, like ten years
later. I'm hazy, it's almost been ten years, yet then there were counter
stories saying the first ones were rumors.
But perhaps the idea had been to have a "reunion" by filming at the time.
Michael
anim8rFSK
Apr 23, 2013, 1:18:17 AM4/23/13
to
In article <alpine.LNX.2.02.1...@darkstar.example.org>,
I remember that, although I thought it was a one year later reunion.
Mason Barge
Apr 23, 2013, 7:08:13 PM4/23/13
to
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:47:55 -0400, Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca>
wrote:
Oh, a *reunion*. I thought we were talking about reprisals.
wrote:
0 new messages