LIAR Robert Irvine canned by Food Network; "Dinner: Impossible" chef lied about Princess Diana wedding cake
Taylor
Posted Feb 29th 2008 1:55PM by TMZ Staff, NTVLand
"Dinner: Impossible" chef Robert Irvine has been fired from the Food
Network's kitchen!
After it was discovered that Robert lied about having designed
Princess Diana's wedding cake, Food Network honchos investigated the
situation and today released a statement saying they "have not renewed
Robert's contract for future seasons" and "will be looking for a
replacement host."
Robert apologized for his actions adding, "I was wrong to exaggerate
in statements related to my experiences regarding the Royal Family."
See Also
"Impossible" Chef Caught in Possible Lies
http://www.tmz.com/2008/02/29/food-network-cans-impossible-chef/
___________________________
www.sexasnatureintendedit.com
Filed under: TV
JohnBL
> Taylor <desperatehousewi...@gmail.com> dropped this news:40ec324c-2ded-
> 457f-bcfc-e4e984b39...@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com: in rec.food.cooking
>
> > Food Network Cans "Impossible" Chef
> > Posted Feb 29th 2008 1:55PM by TMZ Staff, NTVLand
>
>
> Not sure where I read it but apparently he has been in Florida spinning a
> tale of lies and possibly bilking investors out of a lot of money to
> allegedly open 2 new restaurants. Watched his show once. Didn't like it or
> him and never watched it again.
>
> Michael
>
> --
> "Ingredients as fresh as they were 27 years ago."
> -- Slogan of the Biscuitville restaurant.
>
> To email - michael at lonergan dot us dot com
I liked both him and his show. It was one of the few gimmick-
competition shows on Food Network that was both fun and, in its own
somewhat limited way, informative. At the time of the show's
premiere, some posters on this forum praised Food Network for hiring
an honest-to-goodness chef for once (ironic, I know).
He's got nobody but himself to blame for his downfall, of course. The
network had no choice but to fire him if they were to maintain any
semblance of credibility and integrity. A shame, but an appropriate
end result for a career built largely on lies.
What puzzles me now is what HAS this guy done? Does he have any chef
credentials at all or is his entire resume a fabrication? Pretty
amazing that he was able to land a network gig without some
confirmation of his past work record.
John L
Anim8rFSK
<81070c54-463a-4d40...@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
JohnBL <Car...@aol.com> wrote:
> He's got nobody but himself to blame for his downfall, of course. The
> network had no choice but to fire him if they were to maintain any
> semblance of credibility and integrity.
Um
This *is* the channel that presents Sandra Lee as a cook.
--
Star Trek 09:
No Shat, No Show.
http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg
JohnBL
> In article
> <81070c54-463a-4d40-a133-ded8b08f9...@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
>
> JohnBL <Car...@aol.com> wrote:
> > He's got nobody but himself to blame for his downfall, of course. The
> > network had no choice but to fire him if they were to maintain any
> > semblance of credibility and integrity.
>
> Um
>
> This *is* the channel that presents Sandra Lee as a cook.
Well...yeah, okay. I didn't consider her because I avoid her at all
costs. Unless I'm in the mood for some perverse laughs.
JL
Janet Bostwick
>>> This *is* the channel that presents Sandra Lee as a cook.
>>
>> Well...yeah, okay. I didn't consider her because I avoid her at all
>> costs. Unless I'm in the mood for some perverse laughs.
>
> network? I doubt she mis-represented herself either. Stupid is
> really hard to hide. Stupidity was not Irvine's problem with his
> show.
>
> Michael
I wish I was stupid like she is. . .her drive and ambition have made her
mega bucks. I really don't like her presentations or food, but I have to
respect her business sense. I mean. . .Kurtain Kraft? Remember that? I
believe that she is sincere in her belief that there are many folks out
there that do not have time for much and she is showing them how to achieve
a meal in less time. Currently the Food Network alone has at leat 3 shows
based on that premise. None of them appeal to me, but I would eat Sandra
Lee's food before I would eat anything from "Quick Fix Meals" with Robin
Miller. Not only does Robin Miller purchase prepared items, she pre-preps
all her own stuff, then pre-cooks it for the entire week and morphs
everything into something else. And. . .seasons hardly at all. She
advocates living on leftovers for your entire life.
Janet
Janet Bostwick
> "Janet Bostwick" <nos...@cableone.net> dropped this
> news:13slcnd...@news.supernews.com: in rec.food.cooking
>
>
>> I wish I was stupid like she is. . .her drive and ambition have made
>> her mega bucks.
>
> either). IMO she also got where she is by marrying into bucks so she
> could finance her desire to be in the spotlight. I don't consider that
> drive and ambition. Martha Stewart has drive and ambition. Rachel Ray
> (gag) has drive and ambition. IMO SL has nothing. I have to as
> myself if the wallet hadn't been around, where would she have been?
>
I don't know when she married, but I do know that she was applying her own
brand of semi-home made to her own life while she was taking care of her
step siblings at a very early age. Her ideas spring from life experience
during this time. http://www.semihomemade.com/sandra-lee/biography.htm
>> I really don't like her presentations or food, but I
>> have to respect her business sense. I mean. . .Kurtain Kraft?
>> Remember that?
>
> it.
It was a way of making a designer drapery with little more that some loops,
I think. She info mercialed that and finally got onto QVC in one of their
product search efforts. She had a whole line of decorating items and
magazines before she ever was approached for making the current tv show.
She made plenty big bucks from her interior designing stuff. And she worked
very had to be successful with it.
>
>> I believe that she is sincere in her belief that there
>> are many folks out there that do not have time for much and she is
>> showing them how to achieve a meal in less time.
>
> the kind of people that don't want to learn how to cook at all. RR
> has shows that will help people with time constraints. I don't like
> RR but her recipes put SL's to shame.
I hesitantly agree -- just because I find serious fault with RR's stuff.
And certainly, RR could never be accused of being budget friendly with her
huge steaks etc.
It's a good thing we all have different views so the world continues to go
round ;o}
Janet
>
>> Currently the Food
>> Network alone has at leat 3 shows based on that premise. None of
>> them appeal to me, but I would eat Sandra Lee's food before I would
>> eat anything from "Quick Fix Meals" with Robin Miller.
>
> I don't watch Robin Miller so I can't express an opinion on her show.
>
> Michael
>
pe...@home.com
wrote:
And Rachel Ray, who I believe was plucked from doing grocery store
demos.
Ubiquitous
>Taylor <desperate...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Food Network Cans "Impossible" Chef
>>
>> http://www.tmz.com/2008/02/29/food-network-cans-impossible-chef/
>
>Not sure where I read it but apparently he has been in Florida spinning
>a tale of lies and possibly bilking investors out of a lot of money to
>allegedly open 2 new restaurants.
I posted an article about that. Apaprently he was planning on opening a
restaurant in St Petersberg with his name
http://www.sptimes.com/2008/02/17/Southpinellas/TV_chef_spiced_up_his.shtml
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.tv.food-network/browse_frm/thread/da2fe1db09a451f2/d5b2c926bc4
b10df?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=weberm%40polaris.net#d5b2c926bc4b10df
--
It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
for them, it's failing.
Holy Moses
wrote:
>In article
><81070c54-463a-4d40...@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
> JohnBL <Car...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> He's got nobody but himself to blame for his downfall, of course. The
>> network had no choice but to fire him if they were to maintain any
>> semblance of credibility and integrity.
>
>Um
>
>This *is* the channel that presents Sandra Lee as a cook.
LOL. Touche.
Pennyaline
> "Janet Bostwick" <nos...@cableone.net> dropped this
> news:13slcnd...@news.supernews.com: in rec.food.cooking
>
>
>> her mega bucks.
>
> either). IMO she also got where she is by marrying into bucks so she
> could finance her desire to be in the spotlight. I don't consider that
> drive and ambition. Martha Stewart has drive and ambition. Rachel Ray
> (gag) has drive and ambition. IMO SL has nothing. I have to as myself if
> the wallet hadn't been around, where would she have been?
Oh no, Sandra Lee's not lazy. Culinarily talentless, yes. But she's
taken the things she does know and finagled them into megabucks --
admirably crafty. And if the viewing public is willing to accept her
doggie paddle as water ballet, it's money in the bank for her.
>> I really don't like her presentations or food, but I
>> have to respect her business sense. I mean. . .Kurtain Kraft?
>> Remember that?
>
> I don't know what Kurtan Kraft was. I can't recall ever hearing about it.
It's a set of plastic forms over and through which one may weave their
own fabric to make fabulous and fashionable window treatments on the cheap!
>> I believe that she is sincere in her belief that there
>> are many folks out there that do not have time for much and she is
>> showing them how to achieve a meal in less time.
>
> I respectfully disagree. I think her demographic audience is more of the
> kind of people that don't want to learn how to cook at all. RR has shows
> that will help people with time constraints. I don't like RR but her
> recipes put SL's to shame.
I agree with this but will add that the remainder of SL's target
demographic are people who believe that what she and they are doing
really is cooking.
>> Currently the Food
>> Network alone has at leat 3 shows based on that premise. None of them
>> appeal to me, but I would eat Sandra Lee's food before I would eat
>> anything from "Quick Fix Meals" with Robin Miller.
>
> I don't watch Robin Miller so I can't express an opinion on her show.
Hideous. Her show and her talents are straight out of the Ina Garten
mold, but with her own patronizing "You people need to be shown how to
do the simplest things" vibe.
Pennyaline
> JohnBL <Car...@aol.com> dropped this
> news:81070c54-463a-4d40...@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
> in rec.food.cooking
>> What puzzles me now is what HAS this guy done? Does he have any chef
>> credentials at all or is his entire resume a fabrication? Pretty
>> amazing that he was able to land a network gig without some
>> confirmation of his past work record.
>>
>> John L
>
At first sight he reminded me of the Monty Python animation in which the
98 pound weakling takes the Charles Atlas body building course -- the
"after" demonstration shows a pair of arms inflated 'til they explode!
pavane
"Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:MKidnRyF1Juk2Vba...@comcast.com...
| It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
| the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
| our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
| for them, it's failing.
|
Yes, it is too bad for everyone that "our military victory" has failed.
pavane
Goomba38
> "Janet Bostwick" <nos...@cableone.net> dropped this
> news:13slcnd...@news.supernews.com: in rec.food.cooking
>
>
>> her mega bucks.
>
> either). IMO she also got where she is by marrying into bucks so she
> could finance her desire to be in the spotlight. I don't consider that
> drive and ambition. Martha Stewart has drive and ambition. Rachel Ray
> (gag) has drive and ambition. IMO SL has nothing. I have to as myself if
> the wallet hadn't been around, where would she have been?
>
did come up from nothing, from a broken family and left basically
raising her younger siblings and working to put herself through college.
She did have influence from two grandmothers though. The room mates and
friends from that time that the show interviewed recall that money was
tight yet for them all yet apparently her dorm room or apartment during
those years was light years ahead of the others. She could sew and bake
as those were the skills she'd used to provide some resemblance of
"family life" for her siblings. Either she, or the friends interviewed,
said something about the use of package spices or mixtures as a way to
extend her limited budget when she couldn't afford or maintain a pantry
of ingredients. A lightbulb went off in my head that she was creative to
figure out how to do more with less. Now, having said that, I do think a
LOT of what she shows now is rediculous, perhaps she's exhausted the few
creative uses of package goods and yet the show demands more?
I dunno...after watching the bio my impression of her changed greatly.
> I don't know what Kurtan Kraft was. I can't recall ever hearing about it.
It was a homegrown device to make simple panels of fabric "fake" the
appearance of professionally made draperies, particularly those puffy
ones. Again, that biography I saw showed her as a college aged student
working her ass off to take this curtain appliance to state fairs to
sell it and finally using her hardgained savings fortune to buy time
slot on one of those shopping network channels where she struck gold.
There was no rich man "wallet" involved in her early fortune. It was all
her own hard work.
I don't know if a "wallet" since that time gave her more exposure, but
it was obviously her own hard work that kicked her off.
Anim8rFSK
Goomba38 <Goom...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Michael "Dog3" wrote:
> > "Janet Bostwick" <nos...@cableone.net> dropped this
> > news:13slcnd...@news.supernews.com: in rec.food.cooking
> >
> >
> >> I wish I was stupid like she is. . .her drive and ambition have made
> >> her mega bucks.
> >
> > IMO she is just plain lazy and has no culinary talent (not that I do
> > either). IMO she also got where she is by marrying into bucks so she
> > could finance her desire to be in the spotlight. I don't consider that
> > drive and ambition. Martha Stewart has drive and ambition. Rachel Ray
> > (gag) has drive and ambition. IMO SL has nothing. I have to as myself if
> > the wallet hadn't been around, where would she have been?
> >
> I thought all that too until I saw her biography on FoodTV.
Is that the one that never even mentions the zillionaire she married?
Anim8rFSK
"Michael \"Dog3\"" <don'ta...@donttell.huh> wrote:
> Goomba38 <Goom...@comcast.net> dropped this
> news:_92dnZ-o36YITFba...@comcast.com: in rec.food.cooking
>
> <scissored for space>
>
> > I thought all that too until I saw her biography on FoodTV.
>
> Hmmmm... I haven't seen it. If it was on FoodTV I would be a bit
> skeptical about the hard luck story of it all. I'll have to see if I can
> find it and watch is.
>
>
> > I dunno...after watching the bio my impression of her changed greatly.
>
> I don't know if it will change my impression of her but I'll watch it if
> I can find it. However, my impression of her cooking will most likely
> never change :)
>
> > I don't know if a "wallet" since that time gave her more exposure, but
> > it was obviously her own hard work that kicked her off.
>
> I don't know much about her "past" accomplishments but I *think* that
> Wallet was instrumental in getting her on FoodTV to begin with. Quite
> honestly, I'm not that interested in SL to do a lot of research. Try as
> she might, she'll never be Martha Stewart ;o)
IIRC, according to the bio, there was no wallet. She's never been
married. (rolls eyes)
Janet Bostwick
can't be a success without a rich husband? (Most biographies make little
mention of a former spouse.) A mentor may get a woman a start, but in her
case, how does that force millions of people to purchase her lifestyle
do-dads and magazines? How does that force QVC into taking on a product
that has no possibilities for sale? She was a long-time contributor at QVC
after being selected during one of their new product searches. How does that
force the networks (ABC, NBC and CBS) into featuring her frequently on their
programs? SL was around for a long, long time before ever getting on Food
TV. From what I've heard, she was approached by Food TV, not the other way
around.
Janet
Default User
> Yes, it is too bad for everyone that "our military victory" has
> failed.
What's really too bad is that people still keep hitting the same troll
bait, day after day.
Brian
Janet Bostwick
>
>> O.k., now you guys are getting my dander up. . .are you saying that a
>> woman can't be a success without a rich husband?
>
> Lee, not women in general. My apologies if that is what you have
> read into what I have written.
>
>> (Most biographies make little mention of a former spouse.)
>
>
> http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/12/O29G.html
>
Sorry, it doesn't take too much to get an old woman's libber's dander up;o}
Janet
Mark Thorson
>
> don'ta...@donttell.huh wrote:
> >Taylor <desperate...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Food Network Cans "Impossible" Chef
> >>
> >> http://www.tmz.com/2008/02/29/food-network-cans-impossible-chef/
> >
> >Not sure where I read it but apparently he has been in Florida spinning
> >a tale of lies and possibly bilking investors out of a lot of money to
> >allegedly open 2 new restaurants.
>
> I posted an article about that. Apaprently he was planning on opening a
> restaurant in St Petersberg with his name
>
> http://www.sptimes.com/2008/02/17/Southpinellas/TV_chef_spiced_up_his.shtml
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.tv.food-network/browse_frm/thread/da2fe1db09a451f2/d5b2c926bc4
> b10df?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=weberm%40polaris.net#d5b2c926bc4b10df
Ah, St. Petersburg! That's next door to Clearwater,
the worldwide Mecca for the Church of Scientology.
Anybody know if Irvine is a Scientologist? That would
explain so much.
Anim8rFSK
"Janet Bostwick" <nos...@cableone.net> wrote:
> Anim8rFSK wrote:
> > In article <_92dnZ-o36YITFba...@comcast.com>,
> > Goomba38 <Goom...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Michael "Dog3" wrote:
> >>> "Janet Bostwick" <nos...@cableone.net> dropped this
> >>> news:13slcnd...@news.supernews.com: in rec.food.cooking
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I wish I was stupid like she is. . .her drive and ambition have
> >>>> made her mega bucks.
> >>>
> >>> IMO she is just plain lazy and has no culinary talent (not that I do
> >>> either). IMO she also got where she is by marrying into bucks so
> >>> she could finance her desire to be in the spotlight. I don't
> >>> consider that drive and ambition. Martha Stewart has drive and
> >>> ambition. Rachel Ray (gag) has drive and ambition. IMO SL has
> >>> nothing. I have to as myself if the wallet hadn't been around,
> >>> where would she have been?
> >>>
> >> I thought all that too until I saw her biography on FoodTV.
> >
> > Is that the one that never even mentions the zillionaire she married?
> >
> > --
> > Star Trek 09:
> O.k., now you guys are getting my dander up. . .are you saying that a woman
> can't be a success without a rich husband?
No, we're saying "woman has lame ideas; woman marries filthy rich
sponsor; woman gets TV show; filthy rich sponsor dumps her for Martha
Stewart; woman writes bio ignoring filth rich husband and claiming to be
totally self made" doesn't ring true.
pavane
"Default User" <defaul...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:632pkiF...@mid.individual.net...
Yeah, that is tough. But it is better to light a single candle
than to curse the darkness.
pavane
Janet Bostwick
nor can I disprove it. Martha Stewart? Figures how? Neverheless, men and
women through the ages have taken advantage of a monied marriage to get
ahead. Why the ire?
Janet
Anim8rFSK
"Janet Bostwick" <nos...@cableone.net> wrote:
We know the dates close enough. Marries Wallet, gets show.
> nor can I disprove it. Martha Stewart? Figures how?
The wallet dumped her to team up with Martha Stewart. Literally.
Neverheless, men and
> women through the ages have taken advantage of a monied marriage to get
> ahead. Why the ire?
> Janet
We don't care that she got the show -- the show is hysterical. It's
just annoying she's lying about HOW she got it, but in the end, that's
pretty funny too.
Edwin Pawlowski
"Janet Bostwick" <nos...@cableone.net> wrote in message
> Neverheless, men and women through the ages have taken advantage of a
> monied marriage to get ahead. Why the ire?
> Janet
No ire from me. I just want to get my turn to do so.
Goomba38
> We don't care that she got the show -- the show is hysterical. It's
> just annoying she's lying about HOW she got it, but in the end, that's
> pretty funny too.
>
Where has she "lied" on how she ever got it or discussed the FoodTV show
in particular? I know how she got the QVC show-she bought it herself
with her own hard earned money!
I laugh about her "tricks" as much as the next guy, but I'll give her
respect for her own hard work and accomplishments too.
Janet Bostwick
> In article <13spb3q...@news.supernews.com>,
>> Unless you can come up with the date of her marriage, you can't
>> prove that,
>
> We know the dates close enough. Marries Wallet, gets show.
If you know the dates, then cite a reference for proof. Wallet would have
to have been around since before 1989 in order to make the difference you
are stating. Without that you are simply being irrational and looking very
envious.
Janet
Janet Bostwick
Exactly as I initially stated.
Janet
Anim8rFSK
Goomba38 <Goom...@comcast.net> wrote:
You do realize she's an incompetent joke, and we're laughing at her,
don't you?
Goomba38
>> Where has she "lied" on how she ever got it or discussed the FoodTV show
>> in particular? I know how she got the QVC show-she bought it herself
>> with her own hard earned money!
>> I laugh about her "tricks" as much as the next guy, but I'll give her
>> respect for her own hard work and accomplishments too.
>
> You do realize she's an incompetent joke, and we're laughing at her,
> don't you?
>
And I join in on the laughter for the most part...but what I am trying
to say is that after learning where she came from, how she worked her
self up (no help from a man in those early years) and found success on
her own with that curtain idea of hers (again, no man involved) my
admiration for her grew. It almost made sense her logic in using all
those packaged goods. She certainly doesn't need to continue to do so in
her own life (she can afford a well stocked pantry now!) but perhaps
she's just showing poor college students (as she was) how to put
together something other than fast food wrappers and survive?
Anim8rFSK
Goomba38 <Goom...@comcast.net> wrote:
They'd be better off eating the wrappers. Literally.
Virginia Tadrzynski
"Mark Thorson" <nos...@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:47CC64D3...@sonic.net...
Maybe that's the next filler line on his bio for his next job.
-ginny
Virginia Tadrzynski
What really fried my grits was catching her as I was flipping through the
channels on the 700 Club (Pat Robertson's venue) telling all and sundry that
she was 'inspired to write her bio' just for the Christian audience and how
her shows are 'for Jesus'.........is there nothing this woman won't stop at.
I admit, she is enterprising, to get herself as far as she has with the
'talent' she has, but come on.....a show where she puts down more alcohol
than the Galloping Gourmet did in his sloshed days....and she says she's
'doing it for Jesus'..........please. I understand that she is whoring her
product (her shows, her book, her 'cookbooks', etc) but somewhere underneath
most whores have some sense of right and wrong, and this is just plain
wrong.
-ginny
record hunter
> Michael "Dog3" wrote:
> > "Janet Bostwick" <nos...@cableone.net> dropped this
> >news:13slcnd...@news.supernews.com:in rec.food.cooking
>
> >> I wish I was stupid like she is. . .her drive and ambition have made
> >> her mega bucks.
>
> > IMO she is just plain lazy and has no culinary talent (not that I do
> > either). IMO she also got where she is by marrying into bucks so she
> > could finance her desire to be in the spotlight. I don't consider that
> > drive and ambition. Martha Stewart has drive and ambition. Rachel Ray
> > (gag) has drive and ambition. IMO SL has nothing. I have to as myself if
> > the wallet hadn't been around, where would she have been?
>
> taken the things she does know and finagled them into megabucks --
> admirably crafty. And if the viewing public is willing to accept her
> doggie paddle as water ballet, it's money in the bank for her.
>
> >> I really don't like her presentations or food, but I
> >> have to respect her business sense. I mean. . .Kurtain Kraft?
> >> Remember that?
>
> > I don't know what Kurtan Kraft was. I can't recall ever hearing about it.
>
> own fabric to make fabulous and fashionable window treatments on the cheap!
>
> >> I believe that she is sincere in her belief that there
> >> are many folks out there that do not have time for much and she is
> >> showing them how to achieve a meal in less time.
>
> > I respectfully disagree. I think her demographic audience is more of the
> > kind of people that don't want to learn how to cook at all. RR has shows
> > that will help people with time constraints. I don't like RR but her
> > recipes put SL's to shame.
>
> I agree with this but will add that the remainder of SL's target
> demographic are people who believe that what she and they are doing
> really is cooking.
>
> >> Currently the Food
> >> Network alone has at leat 3 shows based on that premise. None of them
> >> appeal to me, but I would eat Sandra Lee's food before I would eat
> >> anything from "Quick Fix Meals" with Robin Miller.
>
> > I don't watch Robin Miller so I can't express an opinion on her show.
>
> Hideous. Her show and her talents are straight out of the Ina Garten
> mold, but with her own patronizing "You people need to be shown how to
> do the simplest things" vibe.
Ewww. She's nothing like Ina. Ina cooks. Robin creates leftovers.
Anim8rFSK
"Virginia Tadrzynski" <ta...@enter.net> wrote:
Yes. That was the point that laughing turned to loathing.
> I admit, she is enterprising, to get herself as far as she has with the
> 'talent' she has, but come on.....a show where she puts down more alcohol
> than the Galloping Gourmet did in his sloshed days....and she says she's
> 'doing it for Jesus'..........please. I understand that she is whoring her
> product (her shows, her book, her 'cookbooks', etc) but somewhere underneath
> most whores have some sense of right and wrong, and this is just plain
> wrong.
> -ginny
What she said.
Ubiquitous
>Yes, it is too bad for everyone that "our military victory" has failed.
By definition, it didn't fail.
--
It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
for them, it's failing.
Anonymouse
Hi,
I wonder what they'll do when they find out that one of their editors,
Charles Holbrook, has a history as a drug dealer.
Default User
Who are they?
Brian
--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
Nancy Young
"Default User" <defaul...@yahoo.com> wrote
> Anonymouse wrote:
>> I wonder what they'll do when they find out that one of their
>> editors, Charles Holbrook, has a history as a drug dealer.
>
> Who are they?
And who cares about their history, I don't.
nancy
Goomba38
congratulate him on his rehabilitation?
Who cares, if he's not currently a drug dealer?
notbob
> I wonder what they'll do when they find out that one of their editors,
> Charles Holbrook, has a history as a drug dealer.
Probably promote him to head of sales.
nb
Mark Thorson
What's the problem? Were the drugs not good?
And who's Charles Holbrook?
Melba's Jammin'
notbob <not...@nothome.com> wrote:
<wipes TaB from screen>
--
-Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor
Pray for the abatement of her pain.
theChas.
sugar...when they cut Emeril.
*******************************
"Anonymouse" <nob...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:1eWdnb7IOqLfbG7a...@comcast.com...
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what they'll do when they find out that one of their editors,
> Charles Holbrook, has a history as a drug dealer.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Nancy2
>
> I don't know when she married, but I do know that she was applying her own
She married some guy who is mega in the planned community/home
building/real estate development genre - who is currently a partner of
Martha Stewart - something like B & D Homes, or such. He and SLop are
divorced.
N.