'Every man dies, but not every man really lives.' - Mel Gibson
ami wrote in message <36C1999F...@inter.net.il>...I know the posts in this ng are fan oriented and i should post it on: alt.tv.dawsons-creek.suck
but there were few posts about the flaws in the show and frankly, there's more bad things
than good things. and it turn to be funny than dramatic like good ol' a. spelling production:to prove my point: (last ep. of season 1)
dawson:"when was the last time you saw your father?"
joey: "2 years ago. about the first time he was trafficing marihuana while cheating my dying mother
whith a bleach one cocktail waitress".
dawson:"well, its only for today. you'll get through it. I promiss".this is the first time dawson asks her about her father and its very weird because both of them saying
they like brother and sister-soulmates-15 years of friendship etc. so they must had to talk about it earlier
its a big issue to reveil in a 20 seconds dialogue. I agree that the viewrs should know the background
story about joey but she can tell that to someone that doesn't completely know her/sopoused to know her
like jen, pacey or mrs. leery.
Anyway, you might be right that there are some inconsistency and factual
errors in the show. In "Full Moon Rising" when the pump to the aquarium
breakes down, they say the lobsters only survive for 15 minutes. This is
funny cause real lobsters can survive several hours without any water at
all. After they've fixed the pump, they never put the lobsters back in
the aquarium either.
Does this make the show any worse, I think not. Just because there are
some factual errors doesn't hurt the show as long as it has a great
story with talented actors.
Mammoth
Anyways regarding the issues. There is some things to think about.
* Dawson may not know when was the last time Joey saw her dad.
* Who would keep track of their friends visitation with parents?
* Dawson may very much know about all those facts.
* Joey may want to emphasize that her dad is a crimial to Dawson.
* by saying all those things she is expressing anger toward her dad.
* She just want Dawson to get the idea that she doesn't really want to see
him.
At the visitation room Mr Potter already know who Dawson was. There was no
introduction.
Dawson was kind enough not to express his opinion on Mr Potter's situation
and talked to him like any other person. I thought that was nice.
FK
: )Cari
FK wrote in message <79tc4q$s...@sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com>...
ami <ami...@inter.net.il> wrote in message news:36C1999F...@inter.net.il...
I know the posts in this ng are fan oriented and i should post it on: alt.tv.dawsons-creek.suck
but there were few posts about the flaws in the show and frankly, there's more bad things
than good things. and it turn to be funny than dramatic like good ol' a. spelling production:
to prove my point: (last ep. of season 1)
dawson:"when was the last time you saw your father?"
joey: "2 years ago. about the first time he was trafficing marihuana while cheating my dying mother
whith a bleach one cocktail waitress".
dawson:"well, its only for today. you'll get through it. I promiss".
this is the first time dawson asks her about her father and its very weird because both of them saying
they like brother and sister-soulmates-15 years of friendship etc. so they must had to talk about it earlier
its a big issue to reveil in a 20 seconds dialogue. I agree that the viewrs should know the background
story about joey but she can tell that to someone that doesn't completely know her/sopoused to know her
like jen, pacey or mrs. leery.
They say all those things because so the viewers will know what's going on. It's a given, like an evil master mind explaining his/her plan to take over the world outloud and then a crazy laugh.
FK wrote in message <79tc4q$s...@sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com>...
>
>You are all getting way too picky about the show. Just enjoy it. If you
>don't then don't watch it OK.
>
>Anyways regarding the issues. There is some things to think about.
>* Dawson may not know when was the last time Joey saw her dad.
>* Who would keep track of their friends visitation with parents?
>* Dawson may very much know about all those facts.
>* Joey may want to emphasize that her dad is a crimial to Dawson.
>* by saying all those things she is expressing anger toward her dad.
>* She just want Dawson to get the idea that she doesn't really want to see
>him.
>
>At the visitation room Mr Potter already know who Dawson was. There was no
>introduction.
>
>Dawson was kind enough not to express his opinion on Mr Potter's situation
>and talked to him like any other person. I thought that was nice.
>
>FK
>
A light challenge: I'd like anyone reading to see if they can find a
wonderful TV show that has never had any consistancy problems...if so,
lets hear about it.
> Take Andy's medication for example. The writers should have studied
> the forms of particular medications a little more before they had Andy
> popping pills that looked more like heavy antibiotics. And Xanax is
> relatively mild. But with all meds that are prescribed by a
> psychiatrist, this also begs the question, how come we never see Andy
> checking in with her psychiatrist?? It is federal law that a
> psychiatrist visits with their patient on a fairly regular basis to
> assess whether or not they still need their medication or whether it
> should be changed or increased. But DC showed Andy opening the
> cabinets and pulling out some pills that she hadn't taken for a long
> time - without calling a doctor and asking whether or not this was a
> good idea. This doesn't show Andy being the responsible person that
> the show portrays her as - this is unrealistic.
I disagree on this point though. I think Andie's responsibility is
really only a facade. I thinks she struggles so hard to keep her school
priorities in such perfect order because she has no control over the
chaotic emotional whims she experiences, and the only thing she was able
to think about when she took those pills was regaining control of
herself. She's desperate to maintain some semblance of control, because
she takes great pride in it, but she's ashamed that she has to resort to
pills to be able to do it. Of course she didn't consult a doctor, she
didn't want anyone to know. That makes perfect sense to me...
> I know a lot of you will feel like sending me angry emails, telling me
> I don't know what I'm talking about. And that's okay. I am certainly
> up for debate regarding this and other issues. I love the show. I
> never miss it. Perhaps the writers have Andy slated for a psych-ward
> visit (which would explain the irresponsibility regarding her
> self-medicating behaviors)...and that would explain that.
I wouldn't flame ya! You have a very valid point and we can discuss it
like mature adults (even if this one of us is just a teenager, but only
for 2 more years ;)
As for Ami, I get the feeling although she tried to make a good argument
for her "case", she basically just wanted heated reactions. How
disappointed she'll be with us :)
~Sinfi
*praying for the day spell-checkers are available for wide spread use*
Oh, wait a minute...they are...
*praying for the day people have the presence of mind to use a
spell-checker*
Tank_Commander
"General of the allied forces"
"DCW Hardcore Champ and all around HELL RAISER!!!... with an intellect.
ami wrote in message <36C1999F...@inter.net.il>...
I know the posts in this ng are fan oriented and i should post it on:
alt.tv.dawsons-creek.suck
but there were few posts about the flaws in the show and frankly,
there's more bad things
than good things. and it turn to be funny than dramatic like good ol'
a. spelling production:
to prove my point: (last ep. of season 1)
dawson:"when was the last time you saw your father?"
joey: "2 years ago. about the first time he was trafficing marihuana
while cheating my dying mother
whith a bleach one cocktail waitress".
dawson:"well, its only for today. you'll get through it. I promiss".
this is the first time dawson asks her about her father and its very
weird because both of them saying
they like brother and sister-soulmates-15 years of friendship etc. so
they must had to talk about it earlier
its a big issue to reveil in a 20 seconds dialogue. I agree that the
viewrs should know the background
story about joey but she can tell that to someone that doesn't
completely know her/sopoused to know her
like jen, pacey or mrs. leery.
-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeeds.com/ The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
-----------== Over 66,000 Groups, Plus a Dedicated Binaries Server ==----------
Well then I should be suing my doctor because she never follows up on me! I've
been going only like maybe once every two months...
Shana
"I'm not crazy...I'm neurochemically challenged!"
Maybe it has to do with FDA laws. Like they can't serve the lobsters if
they've been out of the water & not on ice for over 15 minutes.
Granted, I don't know WHY they wouldn't be able to serve them, but it's
a possibility. I work at McD's, and I found out recently that the M&M's
we use for flurries have a shelf life of 3 days. Once they're out of
the package and in the dispenser, you can't serve them after 3 days!
WHY? I know I've eaten M&M's that were much older than that, and they
were fine. :)
Mickey
http://www.angelfire.com/il/mjones/index.html
"You see, once you've mastered the concept of projectile over gravity-"
"You throw up?"
-Pinky and the Brain
> Does this make the show any worse, I think not. Just because there are
> some factual errors doesn't hurt the show as long as it has a great
> story with talented actors.
>
> Mammoth
>
I can't recall this episode verbatim, but the lobsters needed to have
the pump working for the aeration. Water wasn't the problem; oxygen
was.
Tank_Commander
"General of the allied forces"
"DCW Hardcore Champ and all around HELL RAISER!!!... with an intellect"
ami wrote in message <36C1999F...@inter.net.il>...
I know the posts in this ng are fan oriented and i should post it on:
alt.tv.dawsons-creek.suck
but there were few posts about the flaws in the show and frankly,
there's more bad things
than good things. and it turn to be funny than dramatic like good ol'
a. spelling production:
to prove my point: (last ep. of season 1)
dawson:"when was the last time you saw your father?"
joey: "2 years ago. about the first time he was trafficing marihuana
while cheating my dying mother
whith a bleach one cocktail waitress".
dawson:"well, its only for today. you'll get through it. I promiss".
this is the first time dawson asks her about her father and its very
weird because both of them saying
they like brother and sister-soulmates-15 years of friendship etc. so
they must had to talk about it earlier
its a big issue to reveil in a 20 seconds dialogue. I agree that the
viewrs should know the background
story about joey but she can tell that to someone that doesn't
completely know her/sopoused to know her
like jen, pacey or mrs. leery.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Tank_Commander
"General of the allied forces"
"DCW Hardcore Champ and all around HELL RAISER!!!... with an intellect.
ami wrote in message <36C6CCAF...@inter.net.il>...
I don't think it's wrong to give an opinion about this show or other
maybe "suck" is a strong word. maybe I used it to catch your eyes.
I think its a must for you to discusse about things you hate or bother
you
but do it in polite and kind way. don't get me wrong i still like it
but not totally head-in-the-clouds like a late 80's fundamental
humeinist - sorry for the comparison.
I think it's refreshing to hear different opinions that not totally like
yours. I passed the
teenage phase [23] and I'm hope there's a place for older viewrs in this
ng same as teens.
isn't the point of establishing newsgroups and the web for enabling free
of speach?
so if it really bothers you don't keep reading posts with criticism.
Tank_Commander wrote:
-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
There is a difference between an opinion and a flame. Someone who just
says "Dawson's Creek sucks" and gives no reason why is bordering on a
flame. At any rate, they are posting an irrelavent, pointless message.
But when someone says something like "Dawson's Creek sucks because the
storylines are unrealistic," or "the acting has declined," they are
stating a valid opinion. True, sucks is a strong word; it may not be
the most polite way to say it, but at least they are giving reasons for
their argument.
I don't even remember what the original post was, so I'm not going to
comment on it or any others.
Mickey
http://www.angelfire.com/il/mjones/index.html
"I'd probably be stupid enough to wait forever."