Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Did the Obama administration make Ford pull this ad?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Neil Boortz

unread,
Sep 28, 2011, 9:41:04 AM9/28/11
to
We talked about this on the air today. Ford had a commercial where a real
customer said that they chose Ford because they did not take government
bailout money. They decided to pull the ad. Did the White House pressure
them to do that?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teWLm7F4ksI&amp






David Johnston

unread,
Sep 28, 2011, 10:30:19 AM9/28/11
to
On Sep 28, 7:41 am, "Neil Boortz" <NeilBoo...@boortz.com> wrote:
> We talked about this on the air today. Ford had a commercial where a real
> customer said that they chose Ford because they did not take government
> bailout money. They decided to pull the ad. Did the White House pressure
> them to do that?
>

Pressure them how?

Barb May

unread,
Sep 28, 2011, 1:24:18 PM9/28/11
to
Neil Boortz wrote:
> We talked about this on the air today. Ford had a commercial where a
> real customer said that they chose Ford because they did not take
> government bailout money. They decided to pull the ad. Did the White
> House pressure them to do that?

Neil Boortz continues to repeat things he knows aren't true. Is he
insane? Or is he just another right-wing craven liar?

--
Barb


John Gilmer

unread,
Sep 28, 2011, 1:28:36 PM9/28/11
to
Tee hee!

Maybe the same way the got the bondholders of GM and Chrysler to give up
ALL their rights (losing 100% of their investments)!

According to a Drudge link, the pressure on Ford might also have come
from the Unions which are doing quite well, thank you.

But not to worry: there will be plenty more opportunities to use the
bail out against the domestic competition. GM has hidden behind the
reorganization to walk away from doing some repairs on its older cars.
Obama said that the government would back up these warranties. Ford
can produce an ad saying that Ford supports its older cars/trucks but if
you have an older GM product the best you can to is have it towed to the
White House!


Barb May

unread,
Sep 28, 2011, 2:27:24 PM9/28/11
to
John Gilmer wrote:

> According to a Drudge link,

Yeah, there's a reliable source.

--
Barb


David Johnston

unread,
Sep 28, 2011, 3:30:40 PM9/28/11
to
On Sep 28, 11:28 am, John Gilmer <jlgil...@localnet.com> wrote:
> On 9/28/2011 10:30 AM, David Johnston wrote:
>
> > On Sep 28, 7:41 am, "Neil Boortz"<NeilBoo...@boortz.com>  wrote:
> >> We talked about this on the air today. Ford had a commercial where a real
> >> customer said that they chose Ford because they did not take government
> >> bailout money. They decided to pull the ad. Did the White House pressure
> >> them to do that?
>
> > Pressure them how?
>
> Tee hee!
>
> Maybe the same way the got the bondholders of GM and Chrysler to give up
> ALL their rights (losing 100% of their investments)!

Since the whole point of the ad was that Ford didn't get into such
dire straits that the government had to rescue it, the ad wouldn't
have been true if that was the case.

>
> According to a Drudge link, the pressure on Ford might also have come

> from the Unions which are doing quite well, thank you.\

Is there any reason to think that's true?

Not Sure

unread,
Sep 28, 2011, 6:49:54 PM9/28/11
to
On Sep 28, 11:27 am, "Barb May" <barb...@nonofyourbusinessx.tv> wrote:
> John Gilmer wrote:
> > According to a Drudge link,
>
> Yeah, there's a reliable source.

It certainly is, since it scared you so much you had to snip the rest
of the message. What's wrong, clouddipshit, is your fat ass losing
hope in your Messiah? :)

>
> --
> Barb

trotsky

unread,
Sep 28, 2011, 8:07:40 PM9/28/11
to
How does one tell the difference?

Message has been deleted
0 new messages