Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

0T re: TimothyHarrison-aka-SeamusMacRae-aka-JerryGerrone-aka-WalterPlonkite-aka-Twisted

2 views

Skip to first unread message

murphy

unread,

Oct 8, 2010, 8:10:51 PM10/8/10

Steve Crook writes:

>On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:44:14 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote in
>Message-Id: <44f5j1....@news.alt.net>:
>
>> There are people I unequivocally despise. They lack morals, character, and
>> honesty. They whine, complain and act sorely put upon. They put a sleazy
>> spin on important issues. They turn topical discussion groups into
>> self-aggrandizement. In case you can't tell, I'm talking about Tim here.
>> But first, allow me pose a question. Is Tim actually concerned about what
>> any of us think about him or does he just want to fix blame for his own lack
>> of self-esteem, low social standing and general overall laughing-stock
>> status? After reading this post, you'll indisputably find it's the latter.
>
None of the poast persuaded myself of
anything..
.. well, anything more than that already
set in stone, in respect of
yourself/Tim(PaulGD)/WBJ, Sir Krunt :-/

>You might want to also consider the possibility that Tim is the persona
>of an accomplished Troll. If you were on his side of the fence, making
>people dance to your tune, you'd be revelling in it.
>(Apologies if you consider this possibility later in your post but I
>don't have the attention span to read it.)
>
Steve.
Sir Krunt is at his usual 'troll', firing up that VB script
loaded with the same ol' dictionary DB. The similarities in
production to his previous efforts cannot be ignored.
This is the feature that denies Sir Krunt and Paul G D(Tim)
allocation of the status ^Troll^, tho' surely none are
more deserved of "living under a bridge"<BSEG>
Carrying on in this way in a support froup is entirely
unnecessary, and unproductive -- for them -- as there
are places they can pit their 'skills' amongst those
who would quickly provide comparative example
which would rather dampen their inflated ego(s).
If nothing else, there is the message of this post.
Those motivated to saturate this froup with inane,
banal, lame 'trolling'... take your arse out of the
threads.
On with it.. lest I too be bundled with Sir Krunt's
known MO of "superfluous verbosity".

Steve.
It is too easy for a server Admin to confim
"who is who", at a mere glance from a few
lines of logged data. For the mere plebe then
it is seen as impossible to *know* "who is who".
I agree this is in fact so, the plebes are not able
to *know*.
Yet being cognant of two critical indicators of
performance enable _anyone_ willing to spend
the time in profiling a target the surety of
producing a valid result from the work.
Plebes will always remain peasants in that
respect of contribution to group interaction.

Just two elements can be relied on;
a.) the fact that these 'rogues' are produced
somewhere in time from an acute deflating
of ego, in having it pointed out (bluntly) they
cannot just dive in and produce comment in
however format with whatever content claiming a
"right to free speech". In doing so, impinging on
the rights of any audience and/or the erosion of
values set for particular mediums.
This whether it be a BBS, bLog, mIRC, ICQ
or UseNET.
There are literally thousands of social misfits, the
clinically insane and idealists who litter the byways
as bodies in proof of the Fact.
Pangborne, Lambe and Bullis are just a sample
of those still active today who will attest to the
bruisings they have suffered in wearing out
numerous keyboards in attempts to deny
others _their_ right to free speech.

b.) the fact that *none* of those are at all
interested in the mechanisms which allow this
seen "freedom of speech".
Crikey..!.. it is simply a matter of
changing ISP, or switching to @home/AOL/GG
and/or opening a new account in the NNTP
enabled Browser of choice.. innit..???
[sigh]
The three (jerkoffs) posting here (AFN)
right now, believing so, will tell you where
that folly leads.
Even changing location has not worked, for
those bothered to.
The tools to enable investigation proving
"who is who" are right at the fingertips of anyone
with a willingness to embrace the workings of
NNTP/SMTP/HTTP, and the time to absorb product
from databases as Google(DejaVu)/Knight and
the Wayback Machine, plus those private databases
one will stumble across.

My post is not going to take anyone from
Usenet 1.0.1 through to Usenet 5.10.10 and
'graduation'. This is just what these types
exist on, folks handing them information on
a plate AND supplying the fork and spoon..!
[note--->cHuck - STFU]
What my post should illustrate is the very
reality of possible "elusive" existence as
an accomplished Troll... should one do the
work required to "cover ones tracks".
Now what one does after accruing that
information is generally the product of
the journey. Very few true "Trolls" are
destructive, they value the medium
way too highly to erode any single part of it.
There is a LOT of fun to be had "out there"
<BSEG>
Soooooo... using just those two elements
and calling up any single issue of repetitive
utterance from our aspiring Tim/Paul it is
rather easy to easily prove two things.

1. Steve, you are very much in error.
"Tim is the persona of an accomplished Troll".
Most definitely NOT :->>
Sorry for the bad news today.

2. "Tim" is in fact the very latest 'invention'
of one Paul G D[xxxxxxxxx] with
Extravagan <extra...@frogsoup.xelon.com>
(and others) being the "gap filler" between today
and Paul's last effort of over 700 posts into AFN
as Seamus MacRae.
Something few (obviously) will ever forget.
Yet Paul has done more.. much much more.
As anyone taking the journey will concur with.

{WARNING}
Close perusal of some links provided may
initiate a mind bending reverse loop, similar to
those experienced when viewing a cleverly
designed fractal image deliberately built so
as to bring the viewer down, mentally unhinged.
You will discover this type of work is one of
Paul's fortés. Paul's early work as "Twisted" is
most dangerous, in production, making
Sir Krunt's tomes look like a kiddees primer..!

I have had a number of eMail conversations with
Paul.. some he knows of, others he hasn't a clue
to whom he is 'chatting'. It is my considered
opinion Paul will never be cured of his need to
be "wanted", forever frustrated by a condition
I doubt he has any control over.
Living in a very dark place yet fruiting magnificently
(as do some of the fungi he so
dutifully studies - producing some truly
splendid work, I will add)
there is nothing left for Paul but to put away NNTP
to go back whence he sprung from.. the
World Wide Web.
Today he appears to have adjusted
there and survives quite happily.
Probably because he knows all his work can
be erased by a single Admin in just one
keypress.
That is the force with which to control
Tim/Paul. Nothing else, in persuasion or
pleading, will even dent that ego.

murphy
--

"dog... quit grinnin' it IS only a small wabbit..!"
http://www.oneil.com.au/footrot/

murphy

unread,

Oct 9, 2010, 12:53:07 AM10/9/10

[..]

murphy

unread,

Oct 9, 2010, 1:07:29 AM10/9/10

Steve Crook writes:
ref: <44f5j1....@news.alt.net> <slrniaphtp...@news.mixmin.net>

murphy

unread,

Oct 9, 2010, 1:18:50 AM10/9/10

squelch
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=&as_epq=calls+me+a+liar&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=100

murphy

unread,

Oct 9, 2010, 2:05:35 AM10/9/10

0 new messages