Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
"It's Like A Turf War": Alyssa Milano Says She'll Stay On Twitter Despite Trolls, Jokes She'll Wear `A Helmet'
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Ubiquitous
Nov 29, 2022, 8:38:35 PM11/29/22
to
“Charmed” star Alyssa Milano said on Tuesday that she planned to stay
on Twitter despite the trolls and her recent dust-up with billionaire
and self-described “Chief Twit” Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
“turf war” and that it was important not to “cede that territory.”
Milano joined the co-hosts of ABC’s midday talk show “The View” on
Tuesday, and she complained that Musk could have donated money to
UNICEF instead of buying the social media platform, saying that if he
had donated $40 billion instead, he could have put an end to world
hunger.
WATCH:
Milano says she'll still use Twitter because "We can't cede
that territory. It's like a turf war."
Divisive Whoopi says to "leave that for them" because there's
no way for the left to "get the control" of Twitter they
"need."
pic.twitter.com/bIeaJTMWM0
— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) November 29, 2022
“You know, your name popped up over the weekend when you tweeted that
you returned your Tesla,” Joy Behar began, prompting a visible reaction
from Milano. The actress, after tweeting that she had returned her
Tesla and obtained a Volkswagen EV, was quickly informed that the
German car company had been founded by “literal Nazis.”
Milano responded by saying that she didn’t understand why Musk had
bought Twitter in the first place, arguing that if he had wanted to
change the world he should have donated the money to an organization
like UNICEF.
“You buy Twitter to destroy it — for $40 billion — $40 billion. Elon
Musk — imagine if he donated that money to UNICEF? He would change the
world! There would be — there would be no hunger,” she said.
Sunny Hostin then asked Milano whether she would stay on Twitter if it
continued to be a “hellscape,” and the “Who’s the Boss?” alum said she
wasn’t planning to go anywhere.
“I was always on the receiving end of trolls,” Milano said. “So to me
it doesn’t feel any different. I always open Twitter with … you know
what I mean, like with a helmet on because I’m so scared like
something’s going to come out and hit me.”
“Do you think you’ll stay on it?” Hostin asked.
“Yeah, because we can’t cede that territory,” Milano insisted. “It’s
like a turf war now. That’s how I look at it, and we can’t — I can’t …”
Whoopi Goldberg interrupted, saying that there was no way to wrest
Twitter back from the trolls and it was best to simply “leave that for
them” and move on.
--
Let's go Brandon!
on Twitter despite the trolls and her recent dust-up with billionaire
and self-described “Chief Twit” Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
“turf war” and that it was important not to “cede that territory.”
Milano joined the co-hosts of ABC’s midday talk show “The View” on
Tuesday, and she complained that Musk could have donated money to
UNICEF instead of buying the social media platform, saying that if he
had donated $40 billion instead, he could have put an end to world
hunger.
WATCH:
Milano says she'll still use Twitter because "We can't cede
that territory. It's like a turf war."
Divisive Whoopi says to "leave that for them" because there's
no way for the left to "get the control" of Twitter they
"need."
pic.twitter.com/bIeaJTMWM0
— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) November 29, 2022
“You know, your name popped up over the weekend when you tweeted that
you returned your Tesla,” Joy Behar began, prompting a visible reaction
from Milano. The actress, after tweeting that she had returned her
Tesla and obtained a Volkswagen EV, was quickly informed that the
German car company had been founded by “literal Nazis.”
Milano responded by saying that she didn’t understand why Musk had
bought Twitter in the first place, arguing that if he had wanted to
change the world he should have donated the money to an organization
like UNICEF.
“You buy Twitter to destroy it — for $40 billion — $40 billion. Elon
Musk — imagine if he donated that money to UNICEF? He would change the
world! There would be — there would be no hunger,” she said.
Sunny Hostin then asked Milano whether she would stay on Twitter if it
continued to be a “hellscape,” and the “Who’s the Boss?” alum said she
wasn’t planning to go anywhere.
“I was always on the receiving end of trolls,” Milano said. “So to me
it doesn’t feel any different. I always open Twitter with … you know
what I mean, like with a helmet on because I’m so scared like
something’s going to come out and hit me.”
“Do you think you’ll stay on it?” Hostin asked.
“Yeah, because we can’t cede that territory,” Milano insisted. “It’s
like a turf war now. That’s how I look at it, and we can’t — I can’t …”
Whoopi Goldberg interrupted, saying that there was no way to wrest
Twitter back from the trolls and it was best to simply “leave that for
them” and move on.
--
Let's go Brandon!
BTR1701
Nov 30, 2022, 12:16:05 AM11/30/22
to
On Nov 29, 2022 at 5:35:31 PM PST, "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> CHARMED star Alyssa Milano said on Tuesday that she planned to stay
sold the company assets off and donated the proceeds to UNICEF also but
strangely Milano never had a problem with them keeping their millions. Hell,
Milano herself could sell off most of her assets and donate them to UNICEF and
live a life of austerity in service to others but strangely, she doesn't. She
just sits at a table with a bunch of other clucking hens on TV and decrees
what people she doesn't like should and shouldn't be doing with their money.
And no, Alyssa, you bubblehead, $40 billion dollars would not end world
hunger. Governments around the world have spent a hundred times that over the
years and we still have hunger.
> CHARMED star Alyssa Milano said on Tuesday that she planned to stay
> on Twitter despite the trolls and her recent dust-up with billionaire
> and self-described "Chief Twit" Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
> "turf war" and that it was important not to "cede that territory".
>
> Milano joined the co-hosts of ABC's midday talk show THE VIEW on
> and self-described "Chief Twit" Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
> "turf war" and that it was important not to "cede that territory".
>
> Tuesday, and she complained that Musk could have donated money to
> UNICEF instead of buying the social media platform, saying that if he
> had donated $40 billion instead, he could have put an end to world
> hunger.
Yeah, and the leftists that owned Twitter before Musk bought it could have
> UNICEF instead of buying the social media platform, saying that if he
> had donated $40 billion instead, he could have put an end to world
> hunger.
sold the company assets off and donated the proceeds to UNICEF also but
strangely Milano never had a problem with them keeping their millions. Hell,
Milano herself could sell off most of her assets and donate them to UNICEF and
live a life of austerity in service to others but strangely, she doesn't. She
just sits at a table with a bunch of other clucking hens on TV and decrees
what people she doesn't like should and shouldn't be doing with their money.
And no, Alyssa, you bubblehead, $40 billion dollars would not end world
hunger. Governments around the world have spent a hundred times that over the
years and we still have hunger.
anim8rfsk
Nov 30, 2022, 1:03:33 AM11/30/22
to
Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> “Charmed” star Alyssa Milano said on Tuesday that she planned to stay
> on Twitter despite the trolls and her recent dust-up with billionaire
> and self-described “Chief Twit” Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
> “turf war” and that it was important not to “cede that territory.”
>
And yet she gave back her Tesla.
> “Charmed” star Alyssa Milano said on Tuesday that she planned to stay
> on Twitter despite the trolls and her recent dust-up with billionaire
> and self-described “Chief Twit” Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
> “turf war” and that it was important not to “cede that territory.”
>
> Milano joined the co-hosts of ABC’s midday talk show “The View” on
> Tuesday, and she complained that Musk could have donated money to
> UNICEF instead of buying the social media platform, saying that if he
> had donated $40 billion instead, he could have put an end to world
> hunger.
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
anim8rfsk
Nov 30, 2022, 1:03:34 AM11/30/22
to
hungry people want is for them to start eating properly and become a
menace.
What does she think musk would do with $40 billion? Buy everybody on earth
a happy meal? What’s going to happen the next day?
Ubiquitous
Nov 30, 2022, 9:12:55 AM11/30/22
to
atr...@mac.com wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2022 at 5:35:31 PM PST, "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> CHARMED star Alyssa Milano said on Tuesday that she planned to stay
>> on Twitter despite the trolls and her recent dust-up with billionaire
>> and self-described "Chief Twit" Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
>> "turf war" and that it was important not to "cede that territory".
>>
>> Milano joined the co-hosts of ABC's midday talk show THE VIEW on
>> Tuesday, and she complained that Musk could have donated money to
>> UNICEF instead of buying the social media platform, saying that if he
>> had donated $40 billion instead, he could have put an end to world
>> hunger.
>
>Yeah, and the leftists that owned Twitter before Musk bought it could have
>sold the company assets off and donated the proceeds to UNICEF also but
>strangely Milano never had a problem with them keeping their millions. Hell,
>Milano herself could sell off most of her assets and donate them to UNICEF
>and live a life of austerity in service to others but strangely, she doesn't.
>She just sits at a table with a bunch of other clucking hens on TV and
>decrees what people she doesn't like should and shouldn't be doing with their
>money.
It's a fact that Leftists are the elast charitable.
> On Nov 29, 2022 at 5:35:31 PM PST, "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> CHARMED star Alyssa Milano said on Tuesday that she planned to stay
>> on Twitter despite the trolls and her recent dust-up with billionaire
>> and self-described "Chief Twit" Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
>> "turf war" and that it was important not to "cede that territory".
>>
>> Milano joined the co-hosts of ABC's midday talk show THE VIEW on
>> Tuesday, and she complained that Musk could have donated money to
>> UNICEF instead of buying the social media platform, saying that if he
>> had donated $40 billion instead, he could have put an end to world
>> hunger.
>
>Yeah, and the leftists that owned Twitter before Musk bought it could have
>sold the company assets off and donated the proceeds to UNICEF also but
>strangely Milano never had a problem with them keeping their millions. Hell,
>Milano herself could sell off most of her assets and donate them to UNICEF
>and live a life of austerity in service to others but strangely, she doesn't.
>She just sits at a table with a bunch of other clucking hens on TV and
>decrees what people she doesn't like should and shouldn't be doing with their
>money.
>And no, Alyssa, you bubblehead, $40 billion dollars would not end world
>hunger. Governments around the world have spent a hundred times that over
>the years and we still have hunger.
Ubiquitous
Nov 30, 2022, 9:17:41 AM11/30/22
to
anim...@cox.net wrote:
> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> “Charmed” star Alyssa Milano said on Tuesday that she planned to stay
>> on Twitter despite the trolls and her recent dust-up with billionaire
>> and self-described “Chief Twit” Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
>> “turf war” and that it was important not to “cede that territory.”
>
>And yet she gave back her Tesla.
Didn't she vow to leave the country when Trump was elected the first time?
> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> “Charmed” star Alyssa Milano said on Tuesday that she planned to stay
>> on Twitter despite the trolls and her recent dust-up with billionaire
>> and self-described “Chief Twit” Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
>> “turf war” and that it was important not to “cede that territory.”
>
>And yet she gave back her Tesla.
>> Milano joined the co-hosts of ABC's midday talk show “The View” on
>> Tuesday, and she complained that Musk could have donated money to
>> UNICEF instead of buying the social media platform, saying that if he
>> had donated $40 billion instead, he could have put an end to world
>> hunger.
>
>OMG. Of course he couldn't. She is really that freaking stupid, isn't she?
Oh, but of course!
>> UNICEF instead of buying the social media platform, saying that if he
>> had donated $40 billion instead, he could have put an end to world
>> hunger.
>
>OMG. Of course he couldn't. She is really that freaking stupid, isn't she?
anim8rfsk
Nov 30, 2022, 2:04:57 PM11/30/22
to
Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> anim...@cox.net wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>>> “Charmed” star Alyssa Milano said on Tuesday that she planned to stay
>>> on Twitter despite the trolls and her recent dust-up with billionaire
>>> and self-described “Chief Twit” Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
>>> “turf war” and that it was important not to “cede that territory.”
>>
>> And yet she gave back her Tesla.
>
> Didn't she vow to leave the country when Trump was elected the first time?
>
I don’t know about Milano but Raven swore she would leave if a Republican
> anim...@cox.net wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>>> “Charmed” star Alyssa Milano said on Tuesday that she planned to stay
>>> on Twitter despite the trolls and her recent dust-up with billionaire
>>> and self-described “Chief Twit” Elon Musk, arguing that it was like a
>>> “turf war” and that it was important not to “cede that territory.”
>>
>> And yet she gave back her Tesla.
>
> Didn't she vow to leave the country when Trump was elected the first time?
>
was even nominated for president, that she was going to Canada, that she
was taking her whole family with her, and that she already had her tickets.
I’ve actually seen that clip.
>>> Milano joined the co-hosts of ABC's midday talk show “The View” on
>>> Tuesday, and she complained that Musk could have donated money to
>>> UNICEF instead of buying the social media platform, saying that if he
>>> had donated $40 billion instead, he could have put an end to world
>>> hunger.
>>
>> OMG. Of course he couldn't. She is really that freaking stupid, isn't she?
>
> Oh, but of course!
>
> --
> Let's go Brandon!
>
>
>
0 new messages