Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Story on "Angel" from Cinescape Online

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Anne

unread,
Apr 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/15/99
to
----------
In article <01be87c5$0e6bb780$b76c11ce@default>, "Scanner"
<mrmo...@ihug.com.au> wrote:
>The series' format looks to be a supernatural update of Charlie's Angels,
>with Slayer Faith, teenage witch Amy and the bitchy Cordelia acting as
>Angel's Angels, so to speak. With the reformed vampire unable to act during
>the day, his lovely assistants will be working on their own half the time,
>aided by Whistler, a demon dedicated to maintaining the balance between
>good and evil.

This is a loathsome idea, IMHO.
Being old enough to remember Charlie's
Angels, I find any association to that
show, however remote, to be a big
turn-off. What are they thinking of???
I can only hope that this is Cinescape's
take on the Angel show, rather than
JW's. I hope to god he isn't thinking
of emulating Charlie's Angels. Maybe
it's finally time to get rid of the TV
(well, after the end of BtVS season
3, anyway).
:-(

Anne

unread,
Apr 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/15/99
to
----------
In article <19990416014427...@ng118.aol.com>, pinkb...@aol.com
(PinkBunney) wrote:
>I'm trying desperately to remain open-minded about this, but if this is what we
>have to look forward to, it'll be dead before it ever makes it to the screen.
>And, this coming from someone
>who is really anticipating the new spin-off. Surely, Joss has better sense
>than that.
I'm not really for the spin-off in the first place,
but if it *has* to happen, I want it to work (but
not, I repeat, not as "Angel's Charmies". Sigh.
I see my future and it's full of Forever Knight
reruns.

Anne

unread,
Apr 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/15/99
to
>Why do I get the feeling that this newsgroup is the source of
>Cinemescape's "info"? Ah, I know. Everything they've mentioned has
>been the subject of speculation, and in some cases, jokes, that we've
>done.
I thought this was a rumour, as I read about it on the ng
some time ago and a lot of people brushed it off as a joke.
However, when I read it in a more reputable
publication like Cinescape, I figure there must be some
basis to the whole idea other than a gawd-awful
concept that someone on the ng dreamed up. Am I
naive? Please say so, because I really, really do
*not* want to believe that this story is true. :-/


Scanner

unread,
Apr 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/16/99
to
ANGEL (WB)
>From Twentieth
Produced by Joss Whedon
Starring David Boreanez, Charisma Carpenter, Glenn Quinn (Roseanne) and
Elizabeth Anne Allen
A Buffy the Vampire Slayer spinoff with Angel going to help lost souls in
L.A. Along for the ride are Cordelia, Whistler, and the witch Amy.

The series' format looks to be a supernatural update of Charlie's Angels,
with Slayer Faith, teenage witch Amy and the bitchy Cordelia acting as
Angel's Angels, so to speak. With the reformed vampire unable to act during
the day, his lovely assistants will be working on their own half the time,
aided by Whistler, a demon dedicated to maintaining the balance between
good and evil. [Insider note: My sources indicate that Faith's future may
not be so bright, and she might not be part of this show. Time will tell
..].
But Angel won't be the only undead member of the team. Just as Cordelia and
Angel move to LA following the breakdown of their normal relationship with
Xander and Buffy, the queen of the in-crowd falls victim to a supernatural
threat which leaves her dead -- but refusing to lie down. Though not a
vampire, the development opens up the possibility of a romance between
Cordelia and Angel. The departure of Cordelia, Amy and Faith will also
enable the parent show to concentrate on its core characters for a while,
although Joss Whedon confirms that Buffy The Vampire Slayer regulars Sarah
Michelle Gellar, Alyson Hannigan and Nicholas Brendon will also make
occasional guest appearances on the spin-off.
"I can't help the girls during the day, 'cause I'm a vampire," David
Boreanaz explains to SFX, "so Whistler will be my eyes and ears."
Apparently, Max Perlich has been dropped in favor of Glenn Quinn in the
role of Whistler, which Variety describes as "an Irish demon/vampire."


Scanner

PinkBunney

unread,
Apr 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/16/99
to
I'm trying desperately to remain open-minded about this, but if this is what we
have to look forward to, it'll be dead before it ever makes it to the screen.
And, this coming from someone
who is really anticipating the new spin-off. Surely, Joss has better sense
than that.

If this is true, the supposed lack of acting talent won't have a damned thing
to do with it's failure.

Krissy, chanting "It will be good,it will be good, it will be good..."

>In article <01be87c5$0e6bb780$b76c11ce@default>, "Scanner"
><mrmo...@ihug.com.au> wrote:

>>The series' format looks to be a supernatural update of Charlie's Angels,
>>with Slayer Faith, teenage witch Amy and the bitchy Cordelia acting as
>>Angel's Angels, so to speak. With the reformed vampire unable to act during
>>the day, his lovely assistants will be working on their own half the time,
>>aided by Whistler, a demon dedicated to maintaining the balance between
>>good and evil.
>

Eric L Bailey

unread,
Apr 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/16/99
to
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 20:53:07 -0800, "Anne" <ann...@istar.ca> wrote:

>----------


>In article <01be87c5$0e6bb780$b76c11ce@default>, "Scanner"
><mrmo...@ihug.com.au> wrote:
>>The series' format looks to be a supernatural update of Charlie's Angels,
>>with Slayer Faith, teenage witch Amy and the bitchy Cordelia acting as
>>Angel's Angels, so to speak.

It's Angel's Charmies damn it! Get it right!

>> With the reformed vampire unable to act during
>>the day, his lovely assistants will be working on their own half the time,
>>aided by Whistler, a demon dedicated to maintaining the balance between
>>good and evil.
>
>This is a loathsome idea, IMHO.
>Being old enough to remember Charlie's
>Angels, I find any association to that
>show, however remote, to be a big
>turn-off. What are they thinking of???
>I can only hope that this is Cinescape's
>take on the Angel show, rather than
>JW's. I hope to god he isn't thinking
>of emulating Charlie's Angels. Maybe
>it's finally time to get rid of the TV
>(well, after the end of BtVS season
>3, anyway).
>:-(

Why do I get the feeling that this newsgroup is the source of


Cinemescape's "info"? Ah, I know. Everything they've mentioned has
been the subject of speculation, and in some cases, jokes, that we've
done.

As Wilkins would say, "Now, THAT'S a horrible thought". The
mainstream press is actually taking what WE say seriously?!!!

Hmm, let's get some outlandish rumors going here, keep repeating them
until any unsuspecting soul peeking in takes them as fact, and see
what ends up getting "reported". :)

Oh, wait, we've been doing that :)

E


R Lawrence

unread,
Apr 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/16/99
to
"Anne" <ann...@istar.ca> wrote:
>"Scanner" <mrmo...@ihug.com.au> wrote:

>>The series' format looks to be a supernatural update of Charlie's Angels,

<snip>

>This is a loathsome idea, IMHO.
>Being old enough to remember Charlie's
>Angels, I find any association to that
>show, however remote, to be a big
>turn-off.

Why? Despite its reputation as a t&a-fest, "Charlie's Angels" wasn't that
bad of a show. The acting was acceptable (except in the last couple of
seasons, when horrors like Tanya Roberts were put on the screen), the plots
were OK (no ongoing plotlines like BtVS, but those were very rare on action
shows until recently), the production values were good, and there really
wasn't that much t&a by todays standards (more hair and fashion).

>What are they thinking of???

Maybe the fact that "Charlie's Angels" was a successful show that ran for
several seaons (five or six, IIRC).

Of course, if they really copied that show, the Angel fans would be very
disappointed, because it would mean DB wouldn't actually appear onscreen. I
don't think they'll be doing that.

============================================================================
Richard Lawrence <RL0...@ix.netcom.com>

DesertRoaz

unread,
Apr 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/16/99
to
Eric wrote:

>
>Hmm, let's get some outlandish rumors going here, keep repeating them
>until any unsuspecting soul peeking in takes them as fact, and see
>what ends up getting "reported". :)

Here's one for you. I am dating James Marsters. Story:

"Yes, this posting cutie and the virile vamp from TV's Buffy are one hot item
these days. Seems they are seen all over town, wearing black and creating a
stir the hottest clubs! An inside source reports seeing the two sitting on a
sofa in a bohemian coffee house, smooching away...when he appeared to kiss her
neck Roazie reportedly gave a scream and went limp."

DesertRoaz
www.expage.com/page/desertroaz

Pray for peace


David Johnston

unread,
Apr 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/16/99
to

This all sounds like the description of "Star Trek" as "Wagon Train in Space".
Obviously the day-timers are going to end up doing the bulk of the legwork.
But then, don't they always? How much time does Buffy actually spend doing
research on the latest menace?

Eric L Bailey

unread,
Apr 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/16/99
to
On 16 Apr 1999 14:36:13 GMT, deser...@aol.commondenom (DesertRoaz)
wrote:

Cool! Wonder if Matt Drudge lurks here? He got most of his "inside
info" from alt.showbiz.gossip (which he claimed was his great
investigative skills). It amazes me that anyone still gives Drudge
credibility.

E

Eric L Bailey

unread,
Apr 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/16/99
to
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 23:18:09 -0800, "Anne" <ann...@istar.ca> wrote:

>>Why do I get the feeling that this newsgroup is the source of
>>Cinemescape's "info"? Ah, I know. Everything they've mentioned has
>>been the subject of speculation, and in some cases, jokes, that we've
>>done.

>I thought this was a rumour, as I read about it on the ng
>some time ago and a lot of people brushed it off as a joke.
>However, when I read it in a more reputable
>publication like Cinescape, I figure there must be some
>basis to the whole idea other than a gawd-awful
>concept that someone on the ng dreamed up. Am I
>naive? Please say so, because I really, really do
>*not* want to believe that this story is true. :-/

There's been an increasing amount of net rumors, and jokes mistaken
for stories, turning up in the mainstream press. Matt Drudge, for
example, has built his career on reading gossip newsgroups, with all
their jokes and entertaining outlandish speculation, and printing it
as "investigative reporting".

The Today Show manged to get fooled by a net April Fools Joke a couple
of weeks back. I don't remember what the details were, but it was a
joke from some Austrailians, and the Today Show reported it the next
day as a news item.

Scary as it sounds, the mainstream press thinks Usenet is a legitimate
source of info. You'd think they'd at least credit their damn
sources, though.

E

CARRIE T BRENNAN

unread,
Apr 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/16/99
to

Anne wrote in message ...

>Sigh.I see my future and it's full of Forever Knight
>reruns.

Amen and pass the butter. Thank god for Geraint Wyn Davies and Forever
Knight!

Don Sample

unread,
Apr 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/16/99
to
In article <01be87c5$0e6bb780$b76c11ce@default>, Scanner
<mrmo...@ihug.com.au> wrote:

> ANGEL (WB)
> >From Twentieth
> Produced by Joss Whedon
> Starring David Boreanez, Charisma Carpenter, Glenn Quinn (Roseanne) and
> Elizabeth Anne Allen
> A Buffy the Vampire Slayer spinoff with Angel going to help lost souls in
> L.A. Along for the ride are Cordelia, Whistler, and the witch Amy.

> The series' format looks to be a supernatural update of Charlie's Angels,

> with Slayer Faith, teenage witch Amy and the bitchy Cordelia acting as

> Angel's Angels, so to speak. With the reformed vampire unable to act during


> the day, his lovely assistants will be working on their own half the time,
> aided by Whistler, a demon dedicated to maintaining the balance between

> good and evil. [Insider note: My sources indicate that Faith's future may
> not be so bright, and she might not be part of this show. Time will tell
> ..].
> But Angel won't be the only undead member of the team. Just as Cordelia and
> Angel move to LA following the breakdown of their normal relationship with
> Xander and Buffy, the queen of the in-crowd falls victim to a supernatural
> threat which leaves her dead -- but refusing to lie down. Though not a
> vampire, the development opens up the possibility of a romance between
> Cordelia and Angel. The departure of Cordelia, Amy and Faith will also
> enable the parent show to concentrate on its core characters for a while,
> although Joss Whedon confirms that Buffy The Vampire Slayer regulars Sarah
> Michelle Gellar, Alyson Hannigan and Nicholas Brendon will also make
> occasional guest appearances on the spin-off.
> "I can't help the girls during the day, 'cause I'm a vampire," David
> Boreanaz explains to SFX, "so Whistler will be my eyes and ears."
> Apparently, Max Perlich has been dropped in favor of Glenn Quinn in the
> role of Whistler, which Variety describes as "an Irish demon/vampire."
>
>
>
>
> Scanner

And Franklin sucked in another one!

Here is a copy of the original post in this newsgroup which started
this whole thing:

=====================================================================

I found this article about the new Angel series. Can anyone confirm
any of the rumors?

-- Franklin

WB Newswire (WB)
January 21, 1999 3:15 pm PT

Los Angeles -- Rumors are flying fast and furious in the wake of money
disputes between Fox Television and the WB Network over the hit
television series, "Buffy the Vampire Slayer". In the midst of this
fray, series executive producer Joss Whedon today outlined casting and
strategy changes for next year's "Buffy" spinoff series.

"I'm very pleased that Elizabeth Anne Allen will be joining the new
series as a regular," Whedon began. "She's a marvelous performer,"
Whedon explained, "and the character of Amy the Witch is mega-popular
with the fans."

Whedon countered recent speculation that Allen would be unable to join
the new cast. "That rumor was only partly true," Whedon admitted.
"Once we were in negotiations, it was such a rat's nest, it took a
while to undo," he said.

The new show's previously announced cast include "Buffy" regulars David
Boreanaz (Angel), Charisma Carpenter (Cordelia), Eliza Dushku (Faith),
and previous Buffy guest star, Max Perlich (Whistler). Whedon has also
confirmed that "Buffy" star Sarah Michelle Gellar (Buffy) and regulars
Alyson Hannigan (Willow) and Nicholas Brendon (Xander) will make
occasional appearances in the spinoff series.

David Boreanaz was also on hand to offer a glimpse into the show's new
direction. "We're taking the show in a different direction, more LA,
more current, more Y2K," he said.

Whedon also announced the series, previously named "Angel", would be
titled "Angel's Charmies". "I met with executives at Warner and they
felt the new name and direction would peak the ratings faster", Whedon
explained. "They're really under bidding pressure from Fox," he said.

Series star Boreanaz explained the new direction, "I'll still be
fighting the bad guys, but with a new premise." Boreanaz elaborated,
"Cordelia was a Queen, Amy was a Witch, and Faith was a Slayer." He
added, "But I took them away from all all that up and now they work for
me. My name is Angel."

"Charisma, Eliza and Elizabeth are so charming, the name made total
sense," Whedon said. "They'll be going to college in the morning and
fighting demons in the afternoon," he added.

Describing co-star Max Perlich's role as Whistler, actor Boreanaz said,
"I can't help the girls during the day, 'cause I'm a vampire. So


Whistler will be my eyes and ears."

Series producer Whedon finshed, "I'm all tingly with the fantastic
acting talent and creative team we've got behind this new series.
It'll be a hoot."

Will "Angel's Charmies'" new name and new direction bring Whedon top
the success he's already had with "Buffy"? "I hope so", says Whedon,
"I really need a new yacht."

=====================================================================

You will note that some of the quotes in the Cinescape article are
pulled directly from Franklin's post. And other points in it come from
the "I'm undead and all that" misquote of something CC said in an
interview.

--
Don Sample, dsa...@synapse.net
Visit the Buffy Body Count at http://www.synapse.net/~dsample/BBC
Quando omni flunkus moritati

K.B. Lamke

unread,
Apr 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/16/99
to
Personally, I think this is scary. But if it's true then someone here ( I think
it's forge(john baker?)) better get something out of it. (like maybe a writing
contract)

K.B.Lamke

Terry McNeal

unread,
Apr 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/17/99
to
"Scanner" <mrmo...@ihug.com.au> wrote:

>ANGEL (WB)
>>From Twentieth
>Produced by Joss Whedon
>Starring David Boreanez, Charisma Carpenter, Glenn Quinn (Roseanne) and

Okay.

>Elizabeth Anne Allen

I wish.

>Snipped some stuff

>Just as Cordelia and
>Angel move to LA following the breakdown of their normal relationship with
>Xander and Buffy, the queen of the in-crowd falls victim to a supernatural
>threat which leaves her dead -- but refusing to lie down. Though not a

Ah, the indominatable spirit of Cordelia:

Whistler: "But you're dead!"

Cordelia: "And the big deal would be?"

Whistler: "You have to lie down. You're making me look bad in front of
the other demons."

Cordelia: "First of all, dead? Passé. Secondly, anyone with a
teaspoonful of brains knows not to take my dying seriously, especially
with my extenuating circumstance."

Whistler: " What extenuating circumstance?"

Cordelia: "Broke! Look it up!"

>Snipped some more stuff

>"I can't help the girls during the day, 'cause I'm a vampire," David
>Boreanaz explains to SFX, "so Whistler will be my eyes and ears."

Where have I seen this quote before? Hmm, let's think.

>Snipped the rest

Why do I get the feeling that this "reporter" graduated from the cut
and paste school of journalism?

Terry

Vincent G. Macek

unread,
Apr 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/17/99
to
Eric L Bailey wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 20:53:07 -0800, "Anne" <ann...@istar.ca> wrote:
>
> >----------
> >In article <01be87c5$0e6bb780$b76c11ce@default>, "Scanner"
> ><mrmo...@ihug.com.au> wrote:
> >>The series' format looks to be a supernatural update of Charlie's Angels,
> >>with Slayer Faith, teenage witch Amy and the bitchy Cordelia acting as
> >>Angel's Angels, so to speak.
>
> It's Angel's Charmies damn it! Get it right!
>
> >> With the reformed vampire unable to act during
> >>the day, his lovely assistants will be working on their own half the time,
> >>aided by Whistler, a demon dedicated to maintaining the balance between
> >>good and evil.
> >
> >This is a loathsome idea, IMHO.
> >Being old enough to remember Charlie's
> >Angels, I find any association to that
> >show, however remote, to be a big
> >turn-off. What are they thinking of???
> >I can only hope that this is Cinescape's
> >take on the Angel show, rather than
> >JW's. I hope to god he isn't thinking
> >of emulating Charlie's Angels. Maybe
> >it's finally time to get rid of the TV
> >(well, after the end of BtVS season
> >3, anyway).
> >:-(
>
> Why do I get the feeling that this newsgroup is the source of
> Cinemescape's "info"? Ah, I know. Everything they've mentioned has
> been the subject of speculation, and in some cases, jokes, that we've
> done.
>
> As Wilkins would say, "Now, THAT'S a horrible thought". The
> mainstream press is actually taking what WE say seriously?!!!
>
> Hmm, let's get some outlandish rumors going here, keep repeating them
> until any unsuspecting soul peeking in takes them as fact, and see
> what ends up getting "reported". :)
>
> Oh, wait, we've been doing that :)
>

Just goes to show you can't believe everything you read online. The
*real* synopsis of 'Angel' is, of course, that he shares an apartment in
LA with Cordelia and Faith, and he has to pretend he's gay to avert
suspicion from the nosey landlord (and they all have to hide their
fourth roommate Amy's cage because of the building's 'No pets' policy)

VMacek

Eric L Bailey

unread,
Apr 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/17/99
to


No, no, no. The REAL synopsis is Angel opens a bar, filled with
vampire memorabelia, with Whistler as bartender. Cordy ends up stuck
in town and needs a job, so Angel hires her as a waitress. She's
constantly hitting him with sarcastic jabs, their verbal sparring
masking a growing attraction between them. Meanwhile, they'll have
their regular patrons, including Anya, who's constantly trying to
impress everyone with trivia.

E

DesertRoaz

unread,
Apr 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/18/99
to
VMacek wrote:

>The
>*real* synopsis of 'Angel' is, of course, that he shares an apartment in
>LA with Cordelia and Faith, and he has to pretend he's gay to avert
>suspicion from the nosey landlord

Where the bite marks are hers and hers and his!

Vincent G. Macek

unread,
Apr 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/18/99
to
Eric L Bailey wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Apr 1999 13:29:07 +0000, "Vincent G. Macek"
> <vma...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> >Eric L Bailey wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 20:53:07 -0800, "Anne" <ann...@istar.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >> >----------
> >> >In article <01be87c5$0e6bb780$b76c11ce@default>, "Scanner"
> >> ><mrmo...@ihug.com.au> wrote:
> >> >>The series' format looks to be a supernatural update of Charlie's Angels,
> >> >>with Slayer Faith, teenage witch Amy and the bitchy Cordelia acting as
> >> >>Angel's Angels, so to speak.
> >>
> >> It's Angel's Charmies damn it! Get it right!
> >>
...

>
> No, no, no. The REAL synopsis is Angel opens a bar, filled with
> vampire memorabelia, with Whistler as bartender. Cordy ends up stuck
> in town and needs a job, so Angel hires her as a waitress. She's
> constantly hitting him with sarcastic jabs, their verbal sparring
> masking a growing attraction between them. Meanwhile, they'll have
> their regular patrons, including Anya, who's constantly trying to
> impress everyone with trivia.
>

oh yeahh, I thought Angel looked familiar. The tag line that'll become
popular:
Angel: ID please.
Anya: I'm 1000 years old-just give me a frickin' beer!

Mere speculation, of course. The real poop on 'Angel's Charmies'?

"A darker, edgier spinoff of 'Buffy', Angel returns to his roots and
regains his Irish accent. As his young charges on the front lines
battle it out, he philosophically muses 'They're *always* after me lucky
Charmies!' "

VMacek

C Barrans

unread,
Apr 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/18/99
to
Vincent G. Macek wrote:

> Mere speculation, of course. The real poop on 'Angel's Charmies'?
>
> "A darker, edgier spinoff of 'Buffy', Angel returns to his roots and
> regains his Irish accent. As his young charges on the front lines
> battle it out, he philosophically muses 'They're *always* after me lucky
> Charmies!' "

He regains that accent? I'm frightened already.
(I've read that his wife is actually Irish, so I'm wondering: Doesn't he
ever *listen* to her?)

-- CB
«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»

Some see the world in black and white.
Others see it in shades of grey.

Can you dream in color?

Vincent G. Macek

unread,
Apr 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/18/99
to
DesertRoaz wrote:
>
> VMacek wrote:
>
> >The
> >*real* synopsis of 'Angel' is, of course, that he shares an apartment in
> >LA with Cordelia and Faith, and he has to pretend he's gay to avert
> >suspicion from the nosey landlord
>
> Where the bite marks are hers and hers and his!
>
Of course, there'll be that ep. with guest-star John Ritter. Be afraid,
be very afraid <g>

VMacek

Steve Lamberty

unread,
Apr 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/19/99
to
LOL! I'm glad you guys gave me something to read other than
that "Xander..." thread. And I must say, these ideas make
more sense than what I had heard from DB before!

Steve

DesertRoaz wrote:
>
> VMacek wrote:
>
> >The
> >*real* synopsis of 'Angel' is, of course, that he shares an apartment in
> >LA with Cordelia and Faith, and he has to pretend he's gay to avert
> >suspicion from the nosey landlord
>
> Where the bite marks are hers and hers and his!
>

Victor J. Pusateri

unread,
Apr 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/20/99
to

Vincent G. Macek <vma...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:371A13...@mindspring.com...

> DesertRoaz wrote:
> >
> > VMacek wrote:
> >
> > >The
> > >*real* synopsis of 'Angel' is, of course, that he shares an apartment
in
> > >LA with Cordelia and Faith, and he has to pretend he's gay to avert
> > >suspicion from the nosey landlord
> >
> > Where the bite marks are hers and hers and his!
> >
> Of course, there'll be that ep. with guest-star John Ritter. Be afraid,
> be very afraid <g>
>

don't make me come there and kill you. <vbg>

victoria

--

Buffy: "You're right. Faith would never do that."
Willow: "Faith would totally do that. Faith was built to do that. She's the
'do that' girl!"
_Buffy the Vampire Slayer_

0 new messages