When the BIG LIE becomes REAL...

[The_LA_Flash]

I don't advocate for violence, at all, but when you let politicians continue to run amok with the BIG LIE that the election was rigged and stolen, you get a sick criminal breaking into innocent people's houses in the name of the BIG LIE. Trump needs to be hung by his balls and beaten like a pinata until he admits he LOST the election and made up the BIG LIE. Otherwise, these fools will continue to believe the BIG LIE and do things like break into our homes and beat us. Prayers for Nancy's husband, that he makes a full recovery and prayers that people vote out all of those politicians that continue to spread the BIG LIE.

[Tin@]

On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 7:21:20 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> I don't advocate for violence, at all, but when you let politicians continue to run amok with the BIG LIE that the election was rigged and stolen, you get a sick criminal breaking into innocent people's houses in the name of the BIG LIE. Trump needs to be hung by his balls and beaten like a pinata until he admits he LOST the election and made up the BIG LIE. Otherwise, these fools will continue to believe the BIG LIE and do things like break into our homes and beat us. Prayers for Nancy's husband, that he makes a full recovery and prayers that people vote out all of those politicians that continue to spread the BIG LIE.

You really are just a pathetic troll, aren't you? Remember, it's your side that burns cities when they don't get what they want and loot innocent businesses and then cry when they have no grocery store to shop at. It's your side that lets 10s of thousands-so far-die of a v@x that doesn't work that the drug companies now admit never meant to stop the spread and you kool-aid drinkers still think it's us anti-v@x that are the problem and the spreaders yet you v@xers are the ones who keep GETTING it. One of my closest friend, who is 2x v@xxed and 1x boosted has had Covid 3x!!! I'm sitting here not v@xxed and haven't had it once. You kool-aid drinkers, keep lapping up what the MSM tells you to devour. You fools.

[Michael Falkner]

You don't get that, even if you get to a military consideration within 15 words of your rant, you have but the one answer, COUNTERVIOLENCE.

END US OR SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Mike

[Tin@]

Sweetie, take your meds.

[The_LA_Flash]

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 9:00:50 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

NIce try at trying to change the topic but it isn't going to work. Actually I'm SHOCKED you didn't try to use the lame excuse that, that guy was part of Antifa like you did on Jan 6th. You need to wake up and own it, the BIG LIE is what triggered that nut-job to go off and attack Nancy's husband. Things like that will continue to happen unless people in power do the right thing and tell people the 2020 election was NOT rigged against Trump, Trump LOST a fair election. Your Pastor Jack is one of those that likes to keep people in fear that the election was NOT fair by telling them, bring your ballot to our church so we can send it in safely.

[Michael Falkner]

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 12:34:13 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

> Sweetie, take your meds.

You're the one who, within 15 words, started talk about us burning cities.

That would be a military consideration to have you kill us, you fucking sod of an idiot.

You are a perfect example of the uneducated mass who's going to finish the job on this country.

I hope you enjoy rule under Putin -- given your false prophethood, I would state you would actually have a nice life under an Orthodoxy like the Russian Orthodox Church. Seriously.

Let me spell this out to you again:

#1: The level of violence you espouse to the Left can only be met with a large and lethal militia/military response. In fact, this is the genesis of the Trump movement, as all they were waiting on him for was to be allowed to open fire on the rest of us...

#2: Not only as a strict military/crime consideration, but also on an economic one: If you think inflation in your area does not have anything to do with how much is being robbed out of stores in mine, you're more of an idiot than I take you for.

#3: And on top of those two, the Holy Armor of God would require the "culture wars" spoken of, including the complete elimination of LGBT's and others you consider abominations.

Does that help, or do I have to try to get pictures for you so you can have it written for you in crayon, like many Republicans do?

Mike

[Michael Falkner]

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 1:10:39 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

> NIce try at trying to change the topic but it isn't going to work. Actually I'm SHOCKED you didn't try to use the lame excuse that, that guy was part of Antifa like you did on Jan 6th. You need to wake up and own it, the BIG LIE is what triggered that nut-job to go off and attack Nancy's husband. Things like that will continue to happen unless people in power do the right thing and tell people the 2020 election was NOT rigged against Trump, Trump LOST a fair election. Your Pastor Jack is one of those that likes to keep people in fear that the election was NOT fair by telling them, bring your ballot to our church so we can send it in safely.

What Tina refuses to admit is that (and this is if he's a false actor -- the fact he's a nudist activist out of Berkeley cannot be left as a function of the possibility DePape is) Friday's attack is, in fact, a wholly correct Republican response to what they believe the country is -- and, remember, Trump is an open-faced believer in The Big Lie and it's mechanisms.

The problem is: We are about ten days from it not mattering whether the 2020 election was rigged or not. It will be declared rigged and, I do believe, Biden removed from power, one way or the other.

I mean what I tell her: She is going to directly need me dead, for any of a number of reasons, in about ten or eleven days.

Mike

[Tin@]

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 1:10:39 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

Yet you don't speak out against ballot stuffing. my church is doing NOTHING illegal. My church is using what the Democrats passed to stuff the ballot boxes. LEGALLY! No one is forced to bring their ballots there, we just know if we do, they won't end up on the side of the road, or in a garage somewhere or any of the other cheating things Dems do.

[Tin@]

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 1:21:32 PM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:
> On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 12:34:13 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
>
> > Sweetie, take your meds.
>
> You're the one who, within 15 words, started talk about us burning cities.
>
> That would be a military consideration to have you kill us, you fucking sod of an idiot.

No, that's what the dregs of society do.

>
> You are a perfect example of the uneducated mass who's going to finish the job on this country.
>
> I hope you enjoy rule under Putin -- given your false prophethood, I would state you would actually have a nice life under an Orthodoxy like the Russian Orthodox Church. Seriously.
>
> Let me spell this out to you again:
>
> #1: The level of violence you espouse to the Left can only be met with a large and lethal militia/military response. In fact, this is the genesis of the Trump movement, as all they were waiting on him for was to be allowed to open fire on the rest of us...
>
> #2: Not only as a strict military/crime consideration, but also on an economic one: If you think inflation in your area does not have anything to do with how much is being robbed out of stores in mine, you're more of an idiot than I take you for.
>
> #3: And on top of those two, the Holy Armor of God would require the "culture wars" spoken of, including the complete elimination of LGBT's and others you consider abominations.
>
> Does that help, or do I have to try to get pictures for you so you can have it written for you in crayon, like many Republicans do?
>
> Mike

Take your meds

[Michael Falkner]

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 1:32:09 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

> Yet you don't speak out against ballot stuffing. my church is doing NOTHING illegal. My church is using what the Democrats passed to stuff the ballot boxes. LEGALLY! No one is forced to bring their ballots there, we just know if we do, they won't end up on the side of the road, or in a garage somewhere or any of the other cheating things Dems do.

1) You're trying to delegitimize all elections going forward.

2) If you really believed that, you would not allow us to be around.

Either get off your ass and actually do what you believe the Declaration and Constitution gave you the right to do, or please shut up.

Mike

[Michael Falkner]

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 1:33:32 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 1:21:32 PM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:

> > That would be a military consideration to have you kill us, you fucking sod of an idiot.
> No, that's what the dregs of society do.

And this is why I call you a moron.

We're talking a MILITARY/MILITIA situation. Unless your position is the open-faced destruction of urban America (and, to be fair, you would not be alone that were your position -- you just have no earthly idea of what happens next), you have an interest in maintaining the infrastructure. But to maintain that infrastructure (and I speak on multiple grounds -- including electoral and crime), you have to understand there are people you must eliminate from the equation as a military enemy of the United States, in the eyes of the pro-2A Right.

Otherwise, your future is rural, agrarian, tribal, and you will get nothing outside of maybe a 20-50 mile radius.

> Take your meds

I do, but it sounds to me you better contact my local authorities to increase them.

Mike

[The_LA_Flash]

Before you get your panties in a bunch I NEVER said Jack is doing anything illegal. Secondly the election was NOT rigged it was a fair election anybody or any outlet saying otherwise is reporting "Fake News" so by telling people to bring their ballots to the church is giving the perseption that the election wasn't on the up and up. That's my point.

[Michael Falkner]

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 6:40:47 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

> Before you get your panties in a bunch I NEVER said Jack is doing anything illegal. Secondly the election was NOT rigged it was a fair election anybody or any outlet saying otherwise is reporting "Fake News" so by telling people to bring their ballots to the church is giving the perseption that the election wasn't on the up and up. That's my point.

It doesn't matter, and it certainly won't in 10 days when the fools like Tina march this country over the cliff.

Mike

[Tin@]

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 1:46:54 PM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:
> On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 1:32:09 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
>
> > Yet you don't speak out against ballot stuffing. my church is doing NOTHING illegal. My church is using what the Democrats passed to stuff the ballot boxes. LEGALLY! No one is forced to bring their ballots there, we just know if we do, they won't end up on the side of the road, or in a garage somewhere or any of the other cheating things Dems do.
> 1) You're trying to delegitimize all elections going forward.

How am *I* doing that?

>
> 2) If you really believed that, you would not allow us to be around.

I do believe that

>
> Either get off your ass and actually do what you believe the Declaration and Constitution gave you the right to do, or please shut up.
>
> Mike

Take your meds

[Tin@]

Yet it isn't that when the Dems do it, hypocrite?

[Tin@]

Oh poor sweetie. We didn't elect Biden, who has doubled the cost of most everything in less than 2 years, fools like YOU did. I voted for the guy who had us fuel independent with a great stock market and low food costs. And LOW unemployment and businesses thriving.

[Michael Falkner]

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 9:42:21 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

> > 1) You're trying to delegitimize all elections going forward.
> How am *I* doing that?

By believing we are.

> > 2) If you really believed that, you would not allow us to be around.
> I do believe that
> >
> > Either get off your ass and actually do what you believe the Declaration and Constitution gave you the right to do, or please shut up.

> Take your meds

I am.

[Michael Falkner]

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 9:45:24 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

> Oh poor sweetie. We didn't elect Biden, who has doubled the cost of most everything in less than 2 years, fools like YOU did. I voted for the guy who had us fuel independent with a great stock market and low food costs. And LOW unemployment and businesses thriving.

Oh come on, corporate greed is the most Republican of situations.

You need us dead. Get started or we start looting you personally.

Mike

[The_LA_Flash]

If the dems are doing the same thing then, what I said still stands, so I'm not a hypocrite.

[Tin@]

The Dems ARE doing it, just illegally, you just choose to ignore what's in front of your face. As my pastor stated a few weeks ago, the media came in mass to the church to "see what we were up to" and went home, because there was NO STORY, because everything we did was above board. My church just took what the Dems tried to do for evil and turned it into a good thing, a place where you can take your ballot and know it will get SAFELY to the registrar's office.

[The_LA_Flash]

I am well aware of what Pastor Jackass "stated a few weeks ago" and I would say to you and Pastor Jackass, if YOU guys are sooooo sure "the Dems ARE doing it," then you guys should call the law on them like Pastor Jackass said the Dems did to him OTHERWISE, you and Pastor Jackass should "STFU" that is a quotes because they is a quote you always like to throw out there.
Like I said before Pastor Jackass is preying on poorly educated people, I serious believe if Pastor Jackass was hooked up to a lie detector he would fail if he said the electiion was stolen, because he knows it was NOT, but he doesn't want you to know that. BTW, if they hooked you up to a lie detector you would pass because I believe you really think it really was stolen, hence you're part of the poorly educated people they prey on.

[Tin@]

Matthew 5:11-12

[The_LA_Flash]

Matthew 7:12

[Tin@]

Your verse has no bearing on this discussion

[The_LA_Flash]

If you knew the Bible like you want us to believe you do, you would know it is ON the money to this discussion.

[Tin@]

Matthew 7:12
New International Version
12 So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.

Explain your point.

[The_LA_Flash]

I will be happy to, I said above: "I would say to you and Pastor Jackass, if YOU guys are sooooo sure "the Dems ARE doing it," then you guys should call the law on them like Pastor Jackass said the Dems did to him OTHERWISE, you and Pastor Jackass should "STFU" that is a quotes because they is a quote you always like to throw out there."

That is EXACTLY what that verse is saying, do to them what they did to you. I'm sooooo surprised you couldn't figure that out. Hahaha

[Michael Falkner]

On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 11:54:44 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

> I am well aware of what Pastor Jackass "stated a few weeks ago" and I would say to you and Pastor Jackass, if YOU guys are sooooo sure "the Dems ARE doing it," then you guys should call the law on them like Pastor Jackass said the Dems did to him OTHERWISE, you and Pastor Jackass should "STFU" that is a quotes because they is a quote you always like to throw out there.

If the Dems are doing it, she needs to start shooting, as an act given to her "by God" under the 2nd Amendment.

Mike

[Michael Falkner]

On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 2:52:41 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

> > Matthew 5:11-12
> Matthew 7:12

Romans 3:23.

Mike

[Tin@]

Call out to who? The people who are committing the law breaking? Yeah, that'll go well. The system is corrupt and if you were honest, you'd say it too, but since we know you are not....

[Tin@]

God has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment. Our Constitution does.

[Tin@]

Romans 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.

Your point, big boy?

[Michael Falkner]

On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 9:25:27 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

> God has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment. Our Constitution does.

Where do you believe your side believes all rights come from?

Mike (You're BEYOND wrong -- all of them, including life itself, are functions of the state. God's Will does NOT guarantee you a damn thing going in. He can have me killed tomorrow and most of the world would openly celebrate.)

[Michael Falkner]

On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 9:28:12 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

> Romans 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.
>
> Your point, big boy?

Learn it, bitch.

Mike

[The_LA_Flash]

YES!!! It will go well if there really is somone breaking the law, I believe in the US court system, sure they sometime miss things but overall they are right on their decisions.

> The system is corrupt and if you were honest, you'd say it too, but since we know you are not....

There you go blaming the system, don't forget 2 years ago the same system was in place when Trump was in office and I didn't see any posts from you back then complaining about the system.

[Michael Falkner]

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 12:33:42 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

> YES!!! It will go well if there really is somone breaking the law, I believe in the US court system, sure they sometime miss things but overall they are right on their decisions.

I'm done in that belief.

Because you first have to declare that a person is, in fact, breaking the law, and that the police and authorities are willing to actually enforce it.

A person who is otherwise breaking the law, but acting within what the police and authorities consider the person's legitimate purpose, is actually within the law. The law now only exists to remove the unfit from the fit, and otherwise law-abiding citizens can easily end up completely out of luck, because Castle Rock vs. Gonzales has gone from "No Duty To Protect" to "No DESIRE To Protect".

This is one of the reasons why Tina has to shoot me.

> > The system is corrupt and if you were honest, you'd say it too, but since we know you are not....
> There you go blaming the system, don't forget 2 years ago the same system was in place when Trump was in office and I didn't see any posts from you back then complaining about the system.

Because Trump is above all law. And Tina wants to go on all fours to suck his cock, like all "good" Republican women.

Mike

[The_LA_Flash]

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 12:42:05 PM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:
> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 12:33:42 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
>
> > YES!!! It will go well if there really is somone breaking the law, I believe in the US court system, sure they sometime miss things but overall they are right on their decisions.
> I'm done in that belief.
>

I disagree with you on that, but how about that, you and Tina found a common ground to agree on!

> > > The system is corrupt and if you were honest, you'd say it too, but since we know you are not....
> > There you go blaming the system, don't forget 2 years ago the same system was in place when Trump was in office and I didn't see any posts from you back then complaining about the system.
> Because Trump is above all law.

Again, I disagree with you, Trump will soon find out he is NOT above the law when he is indicted soon...

>And Tina wants to go on all fours to suck his cock, like all "good" Republican women.

Ok, finally we found a common ground to agree on.

[Tin@]

We saw people breaking the law, looting and setting buildings on fire and we saw police standing around DOING NOTHING and you think the system ain't broke? What twilight zone are YOU living in????

[jaouad zarrabi]

United Kingdom Gold Britannia 2023 - 1/2 oz
Quantity Price
1 - 19 EUR 934.51
20 or more EUR 931.71
https://www.bullionstar.com/?r=27869

[The_LA_Flash]

Yes and that was when Donny boy was in office, we haven't seen that the last 2 years, it just goes to show you how much of a weak poor leader Donny Boy was, thank you for reminding me about that.

[Michael Falkner]

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 3:30:23 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

> We saw people breaking the law, looting and setting buildings on fire and we saw police standing around DOING NOTHING and you think the system ain't broke? What twilight zone are YOU living in????

Because the riots served legitimate purpose to the law and you aren't welcome there anymore.

Think differently? Lethal force or STFU.

Mike

[Tin@]

Well DUH, since the point was to make Trump look bad, like they've spent the past 7 years doing. You can't be this stupid, right???? I shouldn't have to spell everything out to you. (Here's where you parrot me)

[The_LA_Flash]

I'm not sure what you expect for me to "parrot" you on, but I will say this, I parrot you when it fits, since you always claim to have all the answers, so by you saying that I'm parroting you that is NOT going to make me stop. Now back to your post...
NO, the point was NOT "to make Trump look bad," Trump did a GREAT job of making himself look bad for 4 years, he didn't need anybody to help him with that, Obama pointed that out when he said, "I hoped Donald Trump was going to take the job seriously but he never did," back to the point, the point was to protest against social injustice, now the riots that took place afterwards was WRONG, so I will NOT defend that, I know some believe it was Trump's followers that started the looting/rioting to make the protesters look bad but since I have no proof of that I will NOT say that, unlike YOU who still believe it was ANTIFA that was behind Jan 6. Hahaha

[Michael Falkner]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:51:32 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

> NO, the point was NOT "to make Trump look bad," Trump did a GREAT job of making himself look bad for 4 years, he didn't need anybody to help him with that, Obama pointed that out when he said, "I hoped Donald Trump was going to take the job seriously but he never did," back to the point, the point was to protest against social injustice, now the riots that took place afterwards was WRONG, so I will NOT defend that, I know some believe it was Trump's followers that started the looting/rioting to make the protesters look bad but since I have no proof of that I will NOT say that, unlike YOU who still believe it was ANTIFA that was behind Jan 6. Hahaha

I WILL defend the riots.

I think it's a "no choice". The problem is that the movement has probably been co-opted at this point, even to the point (at least partially) by the "useful idiots" in the Black community who actually support Trump.

But the fact of the matter is exactly what I've said to Tina for a long time and I don't think she gets it: The only way they are going to get control of crime or the homeless situation is a military/militia solution, with eliminative results.

And eventually, if America is to be made Great Again, the population is going to have to be culled. I'm sorry I have to be the one to actually come out and say this, but the fact is, especially if the rampant inflation is a result of the increase of the money supply, the only way to do that is to contract the money supply and kill everyone and everything reliant on it's expansion -- which probably, at barest of minimum, means about two generations of Democrats, as well as much of the COVID relief which Tina doesn't support anyway, because she sees COVID as an eliminative fraud.

The fact is, she believes the vaccines will kill half the population anyway -- and many Republicans wait with bated breath for the day we all drop dead.

Mike

[The_LA_Flash]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:12:02 AM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:51:32 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
>
> > NO, the point was NOT "to make Trump look bad," Trump did a GREAT job of making himself look bad for 4 years, he didn't need anybody to help him with that, Obama pointed that out when he said, "I hoped Donald Trump was going to take the job seriously but he never did," back to the point, the point was to protest against social injustice, now the riots that took place afterwards was WRONG, so I will NOT defend that, I know some believe it was Trump's followers that started the looting/rioting to make the protesters look bad but since I have no proof of that I will NOT say that, unlike YOU who still believe it was ANTIFA that was behind Jan 6. Hahaha

>

> But the fact of the matter is exactly what I've said to Tina for a long time and I don't think she gets it:

You could start every sentence with those words, Tina thinks just because she waves the Trump flag and votes for him that she is one of the Trumps, the fact is, she couldn't be any more wrong, Trump is repulsed by Tina and his followers, he sees them like ANTIFA. Trump wouldn't want to hang out or be seen anywhere near his followers, he sees them as old, overweight and have stupid ghetto tattoos.
Did you notice, Tina didn't even try to deny your statement, "Tina wants to go on all fours to suck his cock, like all "good" Republican women." because she knows you're right. Hahaha

[Tin@]

You parrot me because I am smart and you are not. You can't come up with an original thought, so you just repeat me where you think it fits.

>Now back to your post...
> NO, the point was NOT "to make Trump look bad,"

Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run.

[Tin@]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:12:02 AM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:

> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:51:32 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
>
> > NO, the point was NOT "to make Trump look bad," Trump did a GREAT job of making himself look bad for 4 years, he didn't need anybody to help him with that, Obama pointed that out when he said, "I hoped Donald Trump was going to take the job seriously but he never did," back to the point, the point was to protest against social injustice, now the riots that took place afterwards was WRONG, so I will NOT defend that, I know some believe it was Trump's followers that started the looting/rioting to make the protesters look bad but since I have no proof of that I will NOT say that, unlike YOU who still believe it was ANTIFA that was behind Jan 6. Hahaha
> I WILL defend the riots.
>
> I think it's a "no choice". The problem is that the movement has probably been co-opted at this point, even to the point (at least partially) by the "useful idiots" in the Black community who actually support Trump.
>
> But the fact of the matter is exactly what I've said to Tina for a long time and I don't think she gets it: The only way they are going to get control of crime or the homeless situation is a military/militia solution, with eliminative results.
>
> And eventually, if America is to be made Great Again, the population is going to have to be culled.

That's why they let Covid be released. First they got rid of all the old people and weak/ unhealthy. Now they'll come for the "dregs of society".

I'm sorry I have to be the one to actually come out and say this, but the fact is, especially if the rampant inflation is a result of the increase of the money supply, the only way to do that is to contract the money supply and kill everyone and everything reliant on it's expansion -- which probably, at barest of minimum, means about two generations of Democrats, as well as much of the COVID relief which Tina doesn't support anyway, because she sees COVID as an eliminative fraud.
>
> The fact is, she believes the vaccines will kill half the population anyway

It's on its way

-- and many Republicans wait with bated breath for the day we all drop dead.

For the most part, we aren't the dumb@$$e$ who freely injected poison into ourselves, so we shouldn't be the blame for your poor choices. That's like blaming people who don't do drugs being blamed for those who do do drugs. YOU make your choice, YOU deal with your consequences. Man up, don't blame others for what YOU do.
>
> Mike

[Tin@]

Why would I respond to such a stupid and vulgar remark? You're as stupid and trollish as he is. And you just want to get on all 4s and suck Biden's. There, I sunk to your dumb@$$ level. Feel better?

[The_LA_Flash]

Yeah right, you once famously defended yourself for not going to college by saying "College isn't for everyone" NO, College isn't for YOUR dumbass.

> > NO, the point was NOT "to make Trump look bad,"
> Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run.

OH REALLY??? Just in the past couple of years, was it the Dems fault that Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it the Dems fault that Trump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it the Dems fault that Trump cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it the Dems fault that Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it the Dems fault that Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot? Of course the answer to all of those questions is a BIG FAT, NO!!! And if you're a honest person you would admit it but of course you'll never admit it because you're NOT a honest person.

[Tin@]

Missed the point, aisle 6.

[The_LA_Flash]

Translation: I refuse to answer those question because it will make me or Trump look bad, so I'll just say, "Missed the point, aisle 6"

[Michael Falkner]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:51:05 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

> You could start every sentence with those words, Tina thinks just because she waves the Trump flag and votes for him that she is one of the Trumps, the fact is, she couldn't be any more wrong, Trump is repulsed by Tina and his followers, he sees them like ANTIFA. Trump wouldn't want to hang out or be seen anywhere near his followers, he sees them as old, overweight and have stupid ghetto tattoos.
> Did you notice, Tina didn't even try to deny your statement, "Tina wants to go on all fours to suck his cock, like all "good" Republican women." because she knows you're right. Hahaha

She hasn't answered a lot of the questions -- but the fact remains that much of Trump's base is so stupid, they literally need to be saved from themselves.

The fact is, there are a lot of women who would submit to being raped and groped without consent, _as long as the "right man" did it_.

I remember seeing one shirt on a MAGA cow: "Mr. President, you can grab me in the pussy anytime."

Mike (Too bad she's so fat she probably couldn't find it herself!)

[Michael Falkner]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:02:27 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:12:02 AM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:

> > But the fact of the matter is exactly what I've said to Tina for a long time and I don't think she gets it: The only way they are going to get control of crime or the homeless situation is a military/militia solution, with eliminative results.
> >
> > And eventually, if America is to be made Great Again, the population is going to have to be culled.

> That's why they let Covid be released. First they got rid of all the old people and weak/ unhealthy. Now they'll come for the "dregs of society".

You see, there's two reasons your stupidity shows through here (collective "you", you are far from the only one who has said this the last 2 1/2 years)...

Such an effort, if it were so calculated, would have to be openly controlled, such that the "old" and then "weak and unhealthy" were killed in the first two waves, and then the "dregs of society" in wave three...

(To wit I ask you: Why am I still here, if your claptrap is true?)

The second is, at some point in the equation, those without anything to lose are going to go off.

The fact is (and I think this was shown in 2020), you can't control who dies and you can't stop someone who believes they have nothing to lose by going violent.

Here's a hint: This wasn't intentional on our side of the equation, Tina.

> > The fact is, she believes the vaccines will kill half the population anyway
> It's on its way

Many on your side have waited with bated breath, as I said.

The stupidest thing is: If you were right, we'd have nothing to lose by killing the country full-square.

You also would have to worry about the right-wing conspiracy theory that we can't be allowed in public in the first place as carriers of (at minimum) multiple dormant COVID strains, if not (on top of it) any kind of genetically engineered garbage...

In short, as I said: If you're right, we're done as a nation, country, economy, and culture.

> For the most part, we aren't the dumb@$$e$ who freely injected poison into ourselves, so we shouldn't be the blame for your poor choices. That's like blaming people who don't do drugs being blamed for those who do do drugs. YOU make your choice, YOU deal with your consequences. Man up, don't blame others for what YOU do.

Then I must die. And for far more choices than COVID.

You just want me to commit suicide and don't take military-level responsibility for culling the herd of the unfit and the violent.

Get off your ass, bitch. Because there's nothing that can be done in that realm which leaves me alive.

And you really don't get that.

The very fact I live is a domestic terrorist act to you.

Mike

[The_LA_Flash]

That's pretty funny, I remember seeing that lady wearing that shirt too....Hahahah

The thing that makes me laugh about those religious people that vote for Trump is, they ALWAYS find excuses to blame someone else when Trump makes a mistake, it's either the Dems, the media or ANTIFA's fault, so if they are right, that means Trump is on the same level with Jesus Christ, because JC was the only perfect person to ever walk the Earth. Hahaha

[Michael Falkner]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 2:53:04 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

> The thing that makes me laugh about those religious people that vote for Trump is, they ALWAYS find excuses to blame someone else when Trump makes a mistake, it's either the Dems, the media or ANTIFA's fault, so if they are right, that means Trump is on the same level with Jesus Christ, because JC was the only perfect person to ever walk the Earth. Hahaha

The very fact that numerous religious leaders in this country laid hands on the motherfucker for a picture gives me an indication it has FULLY become the House of Man and not the House of God.

And a lot of these people think he's beyond that. I would not be surprised if, at the appropo time, they lead him in on a literal Golden Calf.

Mike

[BTR1701]

In article <e91dca81-55da-418b...@googlegroups.com>,

The_LA_Flash <annscooki...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't advocate for violence, at all, but when you let politicians continue
> to run amok with the BIG LIE that the election was rigged and stolen, you get
> a sick criminal breaking into innocent people's houses in the name of the BIG
> LIE. Trump needs to be hung by his balls and beaten like a pinata until he
> admits he LOST the election and made up the BIG LIE. Otherwise, these fools
> will continue to believe the BIG LIE and do things like break into our homes
> and beat us.

You don't have to worry. Seriously, you ain't that important.

[The_LA_Flash]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 5:15:46 PM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 2:53:04 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
>
> > The thing that makes me laugh about those religious people that vote for Trump is, they ALWAYS find excuses to blame someone else when Trump makes a mistake, it's either the Dems, the media or ANTIFA's fault, so if they are right, that means Trump is on the same level with Jesus Christ, because JC was the only perfect person to ever walk the Earth. Hahaha
> The very fact that numerous religious leaders in this country laid hands on the motherfucker for a picture gives me an indication it has FULLY become the House of Man and not the House of God.
>

I 100% agree with this, there is a Pastor in LA area, I call him Pastor Jackass who got a big ol' hard-on when he was invited to be on some bullshit committee when Trump was in office, you would have thought the way he was bragging about it, Jesus came down from Heaven and ask him to be an Apostle. Pastor Jackass even had one of his friends come to the Church and speak about voting for Trump in 2020. With Trump's legal issues he has going now, I can't help but laugh at those fools who were supporting him. Hahaha

[BTR1701]

In article <6db63f59-9233-48d3...@googlegroups.com>,

What exactly does the president have to do with the actions of local law
enforcement?

The LAPD is not in the presidential chain of command. They don't work
for him and he has no authority over them.

The Mayor of Los Angeles, however, is a different story. The LAPD *does*
work for the mayor and during the BLM Summer of Love in 2020, Mayor Yoga
Pants Garcetti ordered the police to stand down and let the rioters and
looters have their fun. As a result, 87 business were either burned,
looted, or otherwise destroyed in the Fairfax and Melrose districts.

Those business owners were all taxpayers, who pay their taxes in
exchange for-- among other things-- police protection from rampaging
mobs. Yet the Democrat mayor told the police to stand down and watch it
happen. So the question becomes, why bother paying those taxes if you
get nothing for it. Buy a shotgun instead and shoot the next group of
motherfuckers who show up to loot.

Do you suppose if the mob had been a bunch of wilding MAGA nuts that
Garcetti would have issued the same stand-down order, or would he have
sent in the cops with tear gas, rubber bullets, and shit-ton of
flex-cuffs?

Try being refreshingly honest with your answer instead of disingenuously
blaming the president for all the destruction when the president has no
authority over such things.

[BTR1701]

In article <14db10b9-bb0b-4fb2...@googlegroups.com>,

Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:51:32 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
>
> > NO, the point was NOT "to make Trump look bad," Trump did a GREAT job of
> > making himself look bad for 4 years, he didn't need anybody to help him
> > with that, Obama pointed that out when he said, "I hoped Donald Trump was
> > going to take the job seriously but he never did," back to the point, the
> > point was to protest against social injustice, now the riots that took
> > place afterwards was WRONG, so I will NOT defend that, I know some believe
> > it was Trump's followers that started the looting/rioting to make the
> > protesters look bad but since I have no proof of that I will NOT say that,
> > unlike YOU who still believe it was ANTIFA that was behind Jan 6. Hahaha
>
> I WILL defend the riots.
>
> I think it's a "no choice". The problem is that the movement has probably
> been co-opted at this point, even to the point (at least partially) by the
> "useful idiots" in the Black community who actually support Trump.
>
> But the fact of the matter is exactly what I've said to Tina for a long time
> and I don't think she gets it: The only way they are going to get control of
> crime or the homeless situation is a military/militia solution, with
> eliminative results.
>
> And eventually, if America is to be made Great Again, the population is going
> to have to be culled.

Why don't you lead by example and suck the barrel of the nearest pistol?

[Tin@]

No, you didn't discuss the subject at hand. How Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years. When you discuss that, we can continue, instead, you're going off on your own agenda.

[Tin@]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 2:36:06 PM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:02:27 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:12:02 AM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:
>
> > > But the fact of the matter is exactly what I've said to Tina for a long time and I don't think she gets it: The only way they are going to get control of crime or the homeless situation is a military/militia solution, with eliminative results.
> > >
> > > And eventually, if America is to be made Great Again, the population is going to have to be culled.
>
> > That's why they let Covid be released. First they got rid of all the old people and weak/ unhealthy. Now they'll come for the "dregs of society".
> You see, there's two reasons your stupidity shows through here (collective "you", you are far from the only one who has said this the last 2 1/2 years)...
>
> Such an effort, if it were so calculated, would have to be openly controlled, such that the "old" and then "weak and unhealthy" were killed in the first two waves, and then the "dregs of society" in wave three...

The "dregs" are next, why do you think there's a sudden surge of Fentanyl?

> (To wit I ask you: Why am I still here, if your claptrap is true?)
>
> The second is, at some point in the equation, those without anything to lose are going to go off.

You mean they haven't? Then why do we have so much crime and violence?

>
> The fact is (and I think this was shown in 2020), you can't control who dies and you can't stop someone who believes they have nothing to lose by going violent.
>
> Here's a hint: This wasn't intentional on our side of the equation, Tina.

uh huh, right.

> > > The fact is, she believes the vaccines will kill half the population anyway
> > It's on its way
> Many on your side have waited with bated breath, as I said.

YOUNG, HEALTHY people are suddenly died. Google it yourself or however you do research. Research the spike in miscarriages. HUGE spike, and then explain why Gates has ANYTHING to do with healthcare. Don't be such a fool. He's HUGE on depopulating this world. Look what he did in Africa.

>
> The stupidest thing is: If you were right, we'd have nothing to lose by killing the country full-square.
>
> You also would have to worry about the right-wing conspiracy theory that we can't be allowed in public in the first place as carriers of (at minimum) multiple dormant COVID strains, if not (on top of it) any kind of genetically engineered garbage...

It isn't the right wing doing this, but keep telling yourself that.

>
> In short, as I said: If you're right, we're done as a nation, country, economy, and culture.

That's the agenda, sweetie. What do you think the one world order is about? Just wait til after this election and you'll see how the Dems are about to plunge us into something I'm not sure we can recover from.

> > For the most part, we aren't the dumb@$$e$ who freely injected poison into ourselves, so we shouldn't be the blame for your poor choices. That's like blaming people who don't do drugs being blamed for those who do do drugs. YOU make your choice, YOU deal with your consequences. Man up, don't blame others for what YOU do.
> Then I must die. And for far more choices than COVID.

You will, by one of your poor choices in life, from you own words.

>
> You just want me to commit suicide and don't take military-level responsibility for culling the herd of the unfit and the violent.

No, I don't want you to do that, where have I EVER said that? See, now you're trying to pre-blame me if you decide to off yourself. I just pray you find salvation in the arms of Jesus.

>
> Get off your ass, bitch. Because there's nothing that can be done in that realm which leaves me alive.
>
> And you really don't get that.
>
> The very fact I live is a domestic terrorist act to you.
>
> Mike

YOUR words, not mine

[Tin@]

Worked for the Koreans in the Rodney King riots.

>
> Do you suppose if the mob had been a bunch of wilding MAGA nuts that
> Garcetti would have issued the same stand-down order, or would he have
> sent in the cops with tear gas, rubber bullets, and shit-ton of
> flex-cuffs?
>
> Try being refreshingly honest with your answer

That would never happen. He lies at every turn.

[The_LA_Flash]

"The subject at hand" are things Trump has done, but of course you don't want any part of that so you play this silly game "how the Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years." Clearly you don't get it, if they have been "attacking" him as you say, there is no doubt a GOOD reason for that, if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.

[Tin@]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:10:32 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:56:44 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:58:40 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:42:36 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:48:25 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:56:56 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:51:32 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm not sure what you expect for me to "parrot" you on, but I will say this, I parrot you when it fits, since you always claim to have all the answers, so by you saying that I'm parroting you that is NOT going to make me stop.
> > > > > > You parrot me because I am smart and you are not. You can't come up with an original thought, so you just repeat me where you think it fits.
> > > > > Yeah right, you once famously defended yourself for not going to college by saying "College isn't for everyone" NO, College isn't for YOUR dumbass.
> > > > > > > NO, the point was NOT "to make Trump look bad,"
> > > > > > Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run.
> > > > > OH REALLY??? Just in the past couple of years, was it the Dems fault that Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it the Dems fault that Trump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it the Dems fault that Trump cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it the Dems fault that Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it the Dems fault that Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot? Of course the answer to all of those questions is a BIG FAT, NO!!! And if you're a honest person you would admit it but of course you'll never admit it because you're NOT a honest person.
> > > > Missed the point, aisle 6.
> > > Translation: I refuse to answer those question because it will make me or Trump look bad, so I'll just say, "Missed the point, aisle 6"
> > No, you didn't discuss the subject at hand. How Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years. When you discuss that, we can continue, instead, you're going off on your own agenda.
> "The subject at hand" are things Trump has done,

NO, the subject at hand is how Dems have been attacking him for 7 years.

>but of course you don't want any part of that so you play this silly game "how the Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years."

Well yeah since I clearly stated and you can see above where I said "Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run"

>Clearly you don't get it, if they have been "attacking" him as you say, there is no doubt a GOOD reason for that,

There is, he knows the truth of what they are trying to do. make us part of this New World Order, which wouldn't serve us well at all.

>if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.

Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.

[The_LA_Flash]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:16:19 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:10:32 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:56:44 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:58:40 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:42:36 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:48:25 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:56:56 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:51:32 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm not sure what you expect for me to "parrot" you on, but I will say this, I parrot you when it fits, since you always claim to have all the answers, so by you saying that I'm parroting you that is NOT going to make me stop.
> > > > > > > You parrot me because I am smart and you are not. You can't come up with an original thought, so you just repeat me where you think it fits.
> > > > > > Yeah right, you once famously defended yourself for not going to college by saying "College isn't for everyone" NO, College isn't for YOUR dumbass.
> > > > > > > > NO, the point was NOT "to make Trump look bad,"
> > > > > > > Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run.
> > > > > > OH REALLY??? Just in the past couple of years, was it the Dems fault that Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it the Dems fault that Trump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it the Dems fault that Trump cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it the Dems fault that Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it the Dems fault that Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot? Of course the answer to all of those questions is a BIG FAT, NO!!! And if you're a honest person you would admit it but of course you'll never admit it because you're NOT a honest person.
> > > > > Missed the point, aisle 6.
> > > > Translation: I refuse to answer those question because it will make me or Trump look bad, so I'll just say, "Missed the point, aisle 6"
> > > No, you didn't discuss the subject at hand. How Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years. When you discuss that, we can continue, instead, you're going off on your own agenda.
> > "The subject at hand" are things Trump has done,
> NO, the subject at hand is how Dems have been attacking him for 7 years.

Let me ask you this, why it it so important for you to IGNORE the list of things that I have brought to the table that he has done?

> >but of course you don't want any part of that so you play this silly game "how the Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years."
> Well yeah since I clearly stated and you can see above where I said "Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run"

This is a little game you have been playing since the M&B group, "hey look over there" instead of wanting to deal with the last 2 years.

> >Clearly you don't get it, if they have been "attacking" him as you say, there is no doubt a GOOD reason for that,
> There is, he knows the truth of what they are trying to do. make us part of this New World Order, which wouldn't serve us well at all.

Hahahah! Yeah right, I see you have started your drinking for the night. Hahahaha

> >if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.
> Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.

No thanks, let's stay with those questions I asked you within the last 2 years.

[Tin@]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:28:51 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:16:19 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:10:32 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:56:44 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:58:40 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:42:36 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:48:25 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:56:56 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:51:32 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm not sure what you expect for me to "parrot" you on, but I will say this, I parrot you when it fits, since you always claim to have all the answers, so by you saying that I'm parroting you that is NOT going to make me stop.
> > > > > > > > You parrot me because I am smart and you are not. You can't come up with an original thought, so you just repeat me where you think it fits.
> > > > > > > Yeah right, you once famously defended yourself for not going to college by saying "College isn't for everyone" NO, College isn't for YOUR dumbass.
> > > > > > > > > NO, the point was NOT "to make Trump look bad,"
> > > > > > > > Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run.
> > > > > > > OH REALLY??? Just in the past couple of years, was it the Dems fault that Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it the Dems fault that Trump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it the Dems fault that Trump cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it the Dems fault that Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it the Dems fault that Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot? Of course the answer to all of those questions is a BIG FAT, NO!!! And if you're a honest person you would admit it but of course you'll never admit it because you're NOT a honest person.
> > > > > > Missed the point, aisle 6.
> > > > > Translation: I refuse to answer those question because it will make me or Trump look bad, so I'll just say, "Missed the point, aisle 6"
> > > > No, you didn't discuss the subject at hand. How Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years. When you discuss that, we can continue, instead, you're going off on your own agenda.
> > > "The subject at hand" are things Trump has done,
> > NO, the subject at hand is how Dems have been attacking him for 7 years.
> Let me ask you this, why it it so important for you to IGNORE the list of things that I have brought to the table that he has done?

Because you did the same to me.

> > >but of course you don't want any part of that so you play this silly game "how the Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years."
> > Well yeah since I clearly stated and you can see above where I said "Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run"
> This is a little game you have been playing since the M&B group, "hey look over there" instead of wanting to deal with the last 2 years.

No, I clearly stated what my issue is and YOU said look over here, not talking about 7 years of harassment, but this silly lie your perpetrating.

> > >Clearly you don't get it, if they have been "attacking" him as you say, there is no doubt a GOOD reason for that,
> > There is, he knows the truth of what they are trying to do. make us part of this New World Order, which wouldn't serve us well at all.
> Hahahah! Yeah right, I see you have started your drinking for the night. Hahahaha

I haven't had anything to drink since Saturday, so what new lie do you care to spread about me?

> > >if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.
> > Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.
> No thanks, let's stay with those questions I asked you within the last 2 years.

Because you would have to admit that my witch hunt claim is true.

[The_LA_Flash]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:17:40 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:28:51 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:16:19 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:10:32 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:56:44 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:58:40 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:42:36 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:48:25 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 8:56:56 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:51:32 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure what you expect for me to "parrot" you on, but I will say this, I parrot you when it fits, since you always claim to have all the answers, so by you saying that I'm parroting you that is NOT going to make me stop.
> > > > > > > > > You parrot me because I am smart and you are not. You can't come up with an original thought, so you just repeat me where you think it fits.
> > > > > > > > Yeah right, you once famously defended yourself for not going to college by saying "College isn't for everyone" NO, College isn't for YOUR dumbass.
> > > > > > > > > > NO, the point was NOT "to make Trump look bad,"
> > > > > > > > > Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run.
> > > > > > > > OH REALLY??? Just in the past couple of years, was it the Dems fault that Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it the Dems fault that Trump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it the Dems fault that Trump cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it the Dems fault that Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it the Dems fault that Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot? Of course the answer to all of those questions is a BIG FAT, NO!!! And if you're a honest person you would admit it but of course you'll never admit it because you're NOT a honest person.
> > > > > > > Missed the point, aisle 6.
> > > > > > Translation: I refuse to answer those question because it will make me or Trump look bad, so I'll just say, "Missed the point, aisle 6"
> > > > > No, you didn't discuss the subject at hand. How Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years. When you discuss that, we can continue, instead, you're going off on your own agenda.
> > > > "The subject at hand" are things Trump has done,
> > > NO, the subject at hand is how Dems have been attacking him for 7 years.
> > Let me ask you this, why it it so important for you to IGNORE the list of things that I have brought to the table that he has done?
> Because you did the same to me.

Ok, I'll answer your 7 year question, it is NOT and has NEVER been a "witch hunt" that is something Trump made up and you're believing his lies.

> > > >but of course you don't want any part of that so you play this silly game "how the Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years."
> > > Well yeah since I clearly stated and you can see above where I said "Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run"
> > This is a little game you have been playing since the M&B group, "hey look over there" instead of wanting to deal with the last 2 years.
> No, I clearly stated what my issue is and YOU said look over here, not talking about 7 years of harassment, but this silly lie your perpetrating.

What is the "silly lie" you're taking about? All of the things I've listed in the last 2 years Trump has done.

> > > >Clearly you don't get it, if they have been "attacking" him as you say, there is no doubt a GOOD reason for that,
> > > There is, he knows the truth of what they are trying to do. make us part of this New World Order, which wouldn't serve us well at all.
> > Hahahah! Yeah right, I see you have started your drinking for the night. Hahahaha
> I haven't had anything to drink since Saturday, so what new lie do you care to spread about me?

Ok, then if you're NOT drunk then you're WACKO, there is NO New World Order, you're believing more made up Bullshit.

> > > >if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.
> > > Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.
> > No thanks, let's stay with those questions I asked you within the last 2 years.
> Because you would have to admit that my witch hunt claim is true.

No, I boldly disagree it is a witch hunt, if they are after Trump for something it is with good cause, where there is smoke there is fire.

Now answer my questions, if these things were a "Witch Hunt" in just in the past couple of years, was it a witch hunt when Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it a witch hunt whenTrump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it a witch hunt when cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it a witch hunt when Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it a witch hunt when Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot?

[Michael Falkner]

Importance isn't the issue there. How much can be stolen (or "taken back", depending on the party) from him?

Mike

[Michael Falkner]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 5:56:09 PM UTC-7, BTR1701 wrote:

> The LAPD is not in the presidential chain of command. They don't work
> for him and he has no authority over them.

That would actually depend if the situation there is a question of what is called "The Common Defense".

One of the things I've said is that it may soon become necessary for the White Right to raise a militia and seize the cities, raze the inner cities with lethal force, and depose the governments thereof -- as a function of a military-level operation, which would be their apparent right under the misguided falsehoods of the Second Amendment.

> The Mayor of Los Angeles, however, is a different story. The LAPD *does*
> work for the mayor and during the BLM Summer of Love in 2020, Mayor Yoga
> Pants Garcetti ordered the police to stand down and let the rioters and
> looters have their fun. As a result, 87 business were either burned,
> looted, or otherwise destroyed in the Fairfax and Melrose districts.

Then do something about it -- and if the city and county won't, then you have one option. You don't realize it, because you can't afford to even be arrested in your situation.

> Those business owners were all taxpayers, who pay their taxes in
> exchange for-- among other things-- police protection from rampaging
> mobs. Yet the Democrat mayor told the police to stand down and watch it
> happen. So the question becomes, why bother paying those taxes if you
> get nothing for it. Buy a shotgun instead and shoot the next group of
> motherfuckers who show up to loot.

This is where Castle Rock vs. Gonzales bites you in the ass.

"No duty to protect" has become "No DESIRE to protect". They want you and those businesses GONE.

Seriously.

> Do you suppose if the mob had been a bunch of wilding MAGA nuts that
> Garcetti would have issued the same stand-down order, or would he have
> sent in the cops with tear gas, rubber bullets, and shit-ton of
> flex-cuffs?

I'd like you to test that theory.

And I'm not shooting off my mouth either. But I ask you the same question I've asked right-wing swine: What the fuck are you waiting for, vis-a-vis "When in the course of human events..."

If you believe the citizenry is an active militia under the Second Amendment, at what point do you rise up and take Los Angeles, Garcetti on down? And that's a serious question.

And then you can add San Francisco, Portland, Seattle, Baltimore, Chicago...

Because, otherwise, you run the real risk of basically having to nuke the place, and now you don't have any infrastructure, and you go tribal, rural, and agrarial real quick, where you can't get anything outside maybe a day's walk...

> Try being refreshingly honest with your answer instead of disingenuously
> blaming the president for all the destruction when the president has no
> authority over such things.

I think the blaming comes down to not only the belief against liberals, but the fact that, end of the day, we are getting to that the only solution to same is lethal military force.

Mike

[Michael Falkner]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 7:06:58 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 2:36:06 PM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:

> > Such an effort, if it were so calculated, would have to be openly controlled, such that the "old" and then "weak and unhealthy" were killed in the first two waves, and then the "dregs of society" in wave three...

> The "dregs" are next, why do you think there's a sudden surge of Fentanyl?

The drug gangs which have material governmental control into the exurbs.

> > (To wit I ask you: Why am I still here, if your claptrap is true?)
> >
> > The second is, at some point in the equation, those without anything to lose are going to go off.
> You mean they haven't? Then why do we have so much crime and violence?

Maybe I should take it further: What happens when that's a good half of the American population?

> > The fact is (and I think this was shown in 2020), you can't control who dies and you can't stop someone who believes they have nothing to lose by going violent.
> >
> > Here's a hint: This wasn't intentional on our side of the equation, Tina.
> uh huh, right.

If that's the case, nuke Washington.

No joke. If a political nation entity deliberately released COVID as a function of a biological event, the response to that must be a nuclear strike on said nation. Regardless of what nation that is.

> > > > The fact is, she believes the vaccines will kill half the population anyway
> > > It's on its way
> > Many on your side have waited with bated breath, as I said.
> YOUNG, HEALTHY people are suddenly died. Google it yourself or however you do research. Research the spike in miscarriages. HUGE spike, and then explain why Gates has ANYTHING to do with healthcare. Don't be such a fool. He's HUGE on depopulating this world. Look what he did in Africa.

The only difference between your stand and mine is that I believe it's COVID itself.

I believe we have deliberately underreported the US death toll to COVID by at least (and probably more than) a factor of 5.

The only question left, at that point, is the why. And if you're right that it's a depopulation situation, then we are well and truly done. Because everything we took for granted before March of 2020 is never coming back, and that depopulation situation will win.

BTW, you do realize that there is a conspiracy think-tank -- the Deagel Group -- who believes over 2/3 of the US population will be dead in two years. They did two studies on the economic, etc. future of the world in the last five years. One had the population of the United States in 2025 at 99 million, another had it at 95.

> > The stupidest thing is: If you were right, we'd have nothing to lose by killing the country full-square.
> >
> > You also would have to worry about the right-wing conspiracy theory that we can't be allowed in public in the first place as carriers of (at minimum) multiple dormant COVID strains, if not (on top of it) any kind of genetically engineered garbage...
> It isn't the right wing doing this, but keep telling yourself that.

I disagree. And I did say that it was that the right wing believes we should not be, because of the fact we would be spreading all manner of genetic engineering down your throats.

I ask again: "When in the course of human events..." WHEN???

> > In short, as I said: If you're right, we're done as a nation, country, economy, and culture.
> That's the agenda, sweetie. What do you think the one world order is about? Just wait til after this election and you'll see how the Dems are about to plunge us into something I'm not sure we can recover from.

I'd take that over your rule, bitch.

And here's the fun part of it: Remember that, even if you get the Red Tsunami, the new Congress does not seat until January 3, 2023. So you'd have eight weeks of a lame-duck Congress to begin with. Then, even if you decide to let the situation get to a new Presidential election, that inauguration is another 2 years and a half month off.

If you believe the tripe you're spewing (and you aren't alone, "honey"), then you should be taking up arms, shooting the entire leadership of the country, Biden on down, and taking the country back by lethal force -- because if that were the plan, he would have nothing to lose by putting a nuclear missile square up your ass and setting it off.

You should not be letting this election happen anyway -- rampant election fraud, anyone?

If Biden loses to the extent you desire, he would have nothing to lose by setting off a tactical nuclear explosion on the battlefield in the Ukraine and trying to blame someone else. A lot of people on your side believe that's a very real possibility.

So WHAT. THE. FUCK. ARE. YOU. WAITING. FOR???

> > > For the most part, we aren't the dumb@$$e$ who freely injected poison into ourselves, so we shouldn't be the blame for your poor choices. That's like blaming people who don't do drugs being blamed for those who do do drugs. YOU make your choice, YOU deal with your consequences. Man up, don't blame others for what YOU do.
> > Then I must die. And for far more choices than COVID.
> You will, by one of your poor choices in life, from you own words.

Oh no, you cannot let that happen from due course. Again, nothing left to lose.

Get off your ass and shoot me. And a lot of people like me.

> > You just want me to commit suicide and don't take military-level responsibility for culling the herd of the unfit and the violent.
> No, I don't want you to do that, where have I EVER said that? See, now you're trying to pre-blame me if you decide to off yourself. I just pray you find salvation in the arms of Jesus.

I believe I do -- I believe you are a falsehood blasphemous whore who has fallen to the Antichrist, as many have predicted, including John in Revelations.

And you completely deliberately misunderstood my point. They should've killed me in New York City in 1998. I'm just saying that, if you believe the shit you post, you have a very real interest (both as a personal threat and a threat to the General Welfare) in rectifying that error. It isn't (any longer) a function of suicide. You CANNOT let me continue to live -- and, the fact is, I'm hardly alone in that consideration.

Certain choices have only one valid penalty, bitch.

> > Get off your ass, bitch. Because there's nothing that can be done in that realm which leaves me alive.
> >
> > And you really don't get that.
> >
> > The very fact I live is a domestic terrorist act to you.

> YOUR words, not mine

No, my words as a result of an intelligent reading of your cowardice and claptrap.

Get off your ass, get your gun muzzle out of your anus, and shoot me.

Or else.

Mike

[Michael Falkner]

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:51:57 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

> Ok, I'll answer your 7 year question, it is NOT and has NEVER been a "witch hunt" that is something Trump made up and you're believing his lies.

You underestimate the number of people who are beholden to the concept that many people are above the law, and some so far above the law that they are the law, words on the books be damned.

> What is the "silly lie" you're taking about? All of the things I've listed in the last 2 years Trump has done.

And what is anyone going to do about any of them? It appears the only recourse left is one that, even if mentioned, is five years in the Federal slam.

(It is the same penalty to threaten to kill a former President that it is a current one.)

> > I haven't had anything to drink since Saturday, so what new lie do you care to spread about me?
> Ok, then if you're NOT drunk then you're WACKO, there is NO New World Order, you're believing more made up Bullshit.

She's wacko (at least you spell it right, unlike others I've seen), but I think you're wrong about no New World Order.

The New World Order is going to be Putin and Xi, with the USA a vassal state of at least the former. That's not the one she's talking about.

> > > > >if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.
> > > > Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.
> > > No thanks, let's stay with those questions I asked you within the last 2 years.
> > Because you would have to admit that my witch hunt claim is true.
> No, I boldly disagree it is a witch hunt, if they are after Trump for something it is with good cause, where there is smoke there is fire.

That assumes there is law, and the fact is not that the legitimately purposed are the law in the first place.

Keep in mind: A criminal is of far more value than a law-abiding citizen to a community if the law-abiding citizen is not wanted in said community and the criminal can drive them out.

Remember, the two greatest statements Trump made in his 2016 campaign (the pussy tape and "I could shoot someone in broad daylight...") both coalesce to the concept that there is no law in the country and a person's status makes the PERSON right or wrong, not his or her actions.

We no longer live in a country with right and wrong. The PERSON, pre-existing, is the right or wrong. Their actions and the ramifications thereto only show out whether the person was right or wrong, pre-existing, in the first place.

> Now answer my questions, if these things were a "Witch Hunt" in just in the past couple of years, was it a witch hunt when Trump took those Docs home to Florida?

They believe he's still President, and the home in Florida the White House In Exile. So they believe the seizure is the witch hunt.

> Was it a witch hunt whenTrump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started?

That is a point of still contention today. A number of state GOP platforms this year indicate they do not respect the Biden victory, even two years hence. Why they are not taking the sole measures which that implies, I can't answer that question -- because those states cannot afford to have Biden (or any Democrat) President even today, forget eight weeks from now or two years from now.

> Was it a witch hunt when cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance?

Will he? You have far more confidence than I on that subject. In fact, I think it would be honesty to say that many on the rich (regardless of side) believe tax cheating is the only way to keep making money in this country -- and that being true for a VERY long time previous, not just the current economic situation?

> Was it a witch hunt when Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have?

See the first two answers above. His supporters believe he is still President and that either millions of Trump votes were suppressed or switched.

> Was it a witch hunt when Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot?

"When in the course of human events..." The problem being: They had enough on the inside, they should've won the day!

Mike

[Tin@]

You denying it is not "answering" it

> > > > >but of course you don't want any part of that so you play this silly game "how the Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years."
> > > > Well yeah since I clearly stated and you can see above where I said "Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run"
> > > This is a little game you have been playing since the M&B group, "hey look over there" instead of wanting to deal with the last 2 years.
> > No, I clearly stated what my issue is and YOU said look over here, not talking about 7 years of harassment, but this silly lie your perpetrating.
> What is the "silly lie" you're taking about? All of the things I've listed in the last 2 years Trump has done.
> > > > >Clearly you don't get it, if they have been "attacking" him as you say, there is no doubt a GOOD reason for that,
> > > > There is, he knows the truth of what they are trying to do. make us part of this New World Order, which wouldn't serve us well at all.
> > > Hahahah! Yeah right, I see you have started your drinking for the night. Hahahaha
> > I haven't had anything to drink since Saturday, so what new lie do you care to spread about me?
> Ok, then if you're NOT drunk then you're WACKO, there is NO New World Order, you're believing more made up Bullshit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KknfRwyckpM I know you will deny this, but as you can see, if you watch this, there are people here you know, who are talking about and I can provide sources from plenty but you denying it doesn't change that that's where we're going and if you knew your Bible, then you would know that this is the beginning, but I know you will deny that too and tell me I'm whacko. I may be whacko, by your standards, but at least I'm awake and prepared. You're just a fool denying what they are clearly telling you.

> > > > >if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.
> > > > Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.
> > > No thanks, let's stay with those questions I asked you within the last 2 years.
> > Because you would have to admit that my witch hunt claim is true.
> No, I boldly disagree it is a witch hunt, if they are after Trump for something it is with good cause, where there is smoke there is fire.

You disagreeing with it doesn't change the truth.

>
> Now answer my questions, if these things were a "Witch Hunt" in just in the past couple of years, was it a witch hunt when Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it a witch hunt whenTrump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it a witch hunt when cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it a witch hunt when Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it a witch hunt when Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot?

Plenty of Presidents have taken home stuff, they just are attacking Trump because he's Trump.

[Tin@]

There's no "S", but you already know that, right?

[The_LA_Flash]

I answered it, I said "NO!!" what other answer are you looking for, a yes? Well that's NOT going to happen. Hahah

> > > > > >but of course you don't want any part of that so you play this silly game "how the Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years."
> > > > > Well yeah since I clearly stated and you can see above where I said "Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run"
> > > > This is a little game you have been playing since the M&B group, "hey look over there" instead of wanting to deal with the last 2 years.
> > > No, I clearly stated what my issue is and YOU said look over here, not talking about 7 years of harassment, but this silly lie your perpetrating.
> > What is the "silly lie" you're taking about? All of the things I've listed in the last 2 years Trump has done.
> > > > > >Clearly you don't get it, if they have been "attacking" him as you say, there is no doubt a GOOD reason for that,
> > > > > There is, he knows the truth of what they are trying to do. make us part of this New World Order, which wouldn't serve us well at all.
> > > > Hahahah! Yeah right, I see you have started your drinking for the night. Hahahaha
> > > I haven't had anything to drink since Saturday, so what new lie do you care to spread about me?
> > Ok, then if you're NOT drunk then you're WACKO, there is NO New World Order, you're believing more made up Bullshit.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KknfRwyckpM I know you will deny this, but as you can see, if you watch this, there are people here you know, who are talking about and I can provide sources from plenty but you denying it doesn't change that that's where we're going and if you knew your Bible, then you would know that this is the beginning, but I know you will deny that too and tell me I'm whacko. I may be whacko, by your standards, but at least I'm awake and prepared. You're just a fool denying what they are clearly telling you.

FoxNews...Hahaha I watched it so what should be my take away from a poorly cut up video that FoxNews put together? I would be interested in seeing the whole video without the stupid Fox guy and Rand Paul in there. If you find it, send it my way, until then I'll laugh at your stupid poorly cut up FoxNews video.

> > > > > >if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.
> > > > > Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.
> > > > No thanks, let's stay with those questions I asked you within the last 2 years.
> > > Because you would have to admit that my witch hunt claim is true.
> > No, I boldly disagree it is a witch hunt, if they are after Trump for something it is with good cause, where there is smoke there is fire.
> You disagreeing with it doesn't change the truth.

Like I said, where there is smoke there is more than likely fire, the law just doesn't come up with fake charges all the time on one person unless there is something wrong, case in point, I've NEVER had the law come after me for ANYTHING, WHY? Because I've NEVER done anything wrong for them to come after me.

> >
> > Now answer my questions, if these things were a "Witch Hunt" in just in the past couple of years, was it a witch hunt when Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it a witch hunt whenTrump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it a witch hunt when cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it a witch hunt when Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it a witch hunt when Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot?
> Plenty of Presidents have taken home stuff, they just are attacking Trump because he's Trump.

Okay, let's see what comes out in court once Trump is indicted, that is the case that people are expecting Trump to be indicted for first.

[Michael Falkner]

On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 9:38:28 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

> > I believe I do -- I believe you are a falsehood blasphemous whore who has fallen to the Antichrist, as many have predicted, including John in Revelations.
> There's no "S", but you already know that, right?

For the record, I have actually seen both.

Mike

[Tin@]

It wasn't a yes or no question.

> > > > > > >but of course you don't want any part of that so you play this silly game "how the Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years."
> > > > > > Well yeah since I clearly stated and you can see above where I said "Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run"
> > > > > This is a little game you have been playing since the M&B group, "hey look over there" instead of wanting to deal with the last 2 years.
> > > > No, I clearly stated what my issue is and YOU said look over here, not talking about 7 years of harassment, but this silly lie your perpetrating.
> > > What is the "silly lie" you're taking about? All of the things I've listed in the last 2 years Trump has done.
> > > > > > >Clearly you don't get it, if they have been "attacking" him as you say, there is no doubt a GOOD reason for that,
> > > > > > There is, he knows the truth of what they are trying to do. make us part of this New World Order, which wouldn't serve us well at all.
> > > > > Hahahah! Yeah right, I see you have started your drinking for the night. Hahahaha
> > > > I haven't had anything to drink since Saturday, so what new lie do you care to spread about me?
> > > Ok, then if you're NOT drunk then you're WACKO, there is NO New World Order, you're believing more made up Bullshit.
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KknfRwyckpM I know you will deny this, but as you can see, if you watch this, there are people here you know, who are talking about and I can provide sources from plenty but you denying it doesn't change that that's where we're going and if you knew your Bible, then you would know that this is the beginning, but I know you will deny that too and tell me I'm whacko. I may be whacko, by your standards, but at least I'm awake and prepared. You're just a fool denying what they are clearly telling you.
> FoxNews...Hahaha I watched it so what should be my take away from a poorly cut up video that FoxNews put together? I would be interested in seeing the whole video without the stupid Fox guy and Rand Paul in there. If you find it, send it my way, until then I'll laugh at your stupid poorly cut up FoxNews video.

I knew you wouldn't accept it, which is why I rarely offer you proof. No point when anything I submit won't be accepted.

Here's Bumbling Biden saying it himself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8z5VtVARMag

> > > > > > >if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.
> > > > > > Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.
> > > > > No thanks, let's stay with those questions I asked you within the last 2 years.
> > > > Because you would have to admit that my witch hunt claim is true.
> > > No, I boldly disagree it is a witch hunt, if they are after Trump for something it is with good cause, where there is smoke there is fire.
> > You disagreeing with it doesn't change the truth.
> Like I said, where there is smoke there is more than likely fire, the law just doesn't come up with fake charges

Yeah they do, which is why they keep attacking Trump.

>all the time on one person unless there is something wrong, case in point, I've NEVER had the law come after me for ANYTHING, WHY? Because I've NEVER done anything wrong for them to come after me.

You aren't important enough. Trump is

> > >
> > > Now answer my questions, if these things were a "Witch Hunt" in just in the past couple of years, was it a witch hunt when Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it a witch hunt whenTrump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it a witch hunt when cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it a witch hunt when Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it a witch hunt when Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot?
> > Plenty of Presidents have taken home stuff, they just are attacking Trump because he's Trump.
> Okay, let's see what comes out in court once Trump is indicted, that is the case that people are expecting Trump to be indicted for first.

Ok, we'll wait around for nothing to happen, again,

[Tin@]

For the record, I go with what the Bible says. Only the clueless put an "S" at the end.

[Michael Falkner]

On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 1:22:32 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

> For the record, I go with what the Bible says. Only the clueless put an "S" at the end.

You know what do to, Whore of Babble-On.

Mike

[Tin@]

Yep, ignore you.

[The_LA_Flash]

Your question was poorly asked, it sounded like you wanted me to give you examples on "how the Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years," I told you, they were NOT attacking him so I have NO examples or proof to give you, so NO I don't believe that to be the case.

> > > > > > > >but of course you don't want any part of that so you play this silly game "how the Dems have been attacking Trump for 7 years."
> > > > > > > Well yeah since I clearly stated and you can see above where I said "Of course it was. Dems have done it since the day he said he would run"
> > > > > > This is a little game you have been playing since the M&B group, "hey look over there" instead of wanting to deal with the last 2 years.
> > > > > No, I clearly stated what my issue is and YOU said look over here, not talking about 7 years of harassment, but this silly lie your perpetrating.
> > > > What is the "silly lie" you're taking about? All of the things I've listed in the last 2 years Trump has done.
> > > > > > > >Clearly you don't get it, if they have been "attacking" him as you say, there is no doubt a GOOD reason for that,
> > > > > > > There is, he knows the truth of what they are trying to do. make us part of this New World Order, which wouldn't serve us well at all.
> > > > > > Hahahah! Yeah right, I see you have started your drinking for the night. Hahahaha
> > > > > I haven't had anything to drink since Saturday, so what new lie do you care to spread about me?
> > > > Ok, then if you're NOT drunk then you're WACKO, there is NO New World Order, you're believing more made up Bullshit.
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KknfRwyckpM I know you will deny this, but as you can see, if you watch this, there are people here you know, who are talking about and I can provide sources from plenty but you denying it doesn't change that that's where we're going and if you knew your Bible, then you would know that this is the beginning, but I know you will deny that too and tell me I'm whacko. I may be whacko, by your standards, but at least I'm awake and prepared. You're just a fool denying what they are clearly telling you.
> > FoxNews...Hahaha I watched it so what should be my take away from a poorly cut up video that FoxNews put together? I would be interested in seeing the whole video without the stupid Fox guy and Rand Paul in there. If you find it, send it my way, until then I'll laugh at your stupid poorly cut up FoxNews video.
> I knew you wouldn't accept it, which is why I rarely offer you proof. No point when anything I submit won't be accepted.
>
> Here's Bumbling Biden saying it himself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8z5VtVARMag
> > > > > > > >if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.
> > > > > > > Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.
> > > > > > No thanks, let's stay with those questions I asked you within the last 2 years.
> > > > > Because you would have to admit that my witch hunt claim is true.
> > > > No, I boldly disagree it is a witch hunt, if they are after Trump for something it is with good cause, where there is smoke there is fire.
> > > You disagreeing with it doesn't change the truth.
> > Like I said, where there is smoke there is more than likely fire, the law just doesn't come up with fake charges
> Yeah they do, which is why they keep attacking Trump.

You're like the 5 year old that puts her fingers in here ears and screams Blah, blah, blah, blah....
They had the Jan 6th hearings on TV and they're still there on YouTube with all kinds of proof and you refuse to watch them,

> >all the time on one person unless there is something wrong, case in point, I've NEVER had the law come after me for ANYTHING, WHY? Because I've NEVER done anything wrong for them to come after me.
> You aren't important enough. Trump is

Parrott much???? ...and you tell me I don't have an original thought. Hahaha
It has NOTHING to do with being important or NOT, there have been 44 Presidents before Trump and they were just as important as Trump and NONE of them had the law after them as much as Trump has,.

> > > >
> > > > Now answer my questions, if these things were a "Witch Hunt" in just in the past couple of years, was it a witch hunt when Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it a witch hunt whenTrump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it a witch hunt when cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it a witch hunt when Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it a witch hunt when Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot?
> > > Plenty of Presidents have taken home stuff, they just are attacking Trump because he's Trump.
> > Okay, let's see what comes out in court once Trump is indicted, that is the case that people are expecting Trump to be indicted for first.
> Ok, we'll wait around for nothing to happen, again,

Very good, but when it happens, I'll be in here laughing my ass off at you, unless of course I'm traveling to some cool place out of the country.

[Tin@]

You ignored Biden admitting about the New World Order.

> > > > > > > > >if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.
> > > > > > > > Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.
> > > > > > > No thanks, let's stay with those questions I asked you within the last 2 years.
> > > > > > Because you would have to admit that my witch hunt claim is true.
> > > > > No, I boldly disagree it is a witch hunt, if they are after Trump for something it is with good cause, where there is smoke there is fire.
> > > > You disagreeing with it doesn't change the truth.
> > > Like I said, where there is smoke there is more than likely fire, the law just doesn't come up with fake charges
> > Yeah they do, which is why they keep attacking Trump.
> You're like the 5 year old that puts her fingers in here ears and screams Blah, blah, blah, blah....
> They had the Jan 6th hearings on TV and they're still there on YouTube with all kinds of proof and you refuse to watch them,
> > >all the time on one person unless there is something wrong, case in point, I've NEVER had the law come after me for ANYTHING, WHY? Because I've NEVER done anything wrong for them to come after me.
> > You aren't important enough. Trump is
> Parrott much???? ...and you tell me I don't have an original thought. Hahaha

Parrott? What's that and I didn't parrot you.

> It has NOTHING to do with being important or NOT, there have been 44 Presidents before Trump and they were just as important as Trump and NONE of them had the law after them as much as Trump has,.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now answer my questions, if these things were a "Witch Hunt" in just in the past couple of years, was it a witch hunt when Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it a witch hunt whenTrump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it a witch hunt when cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it a witch hunt when Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it a witch hunt when Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot?
> > > > Plenty of Presidents have taken home stuff, they just are attacking Trump because he's Trump.
> > > Okay, let's see what comes out in court once Trump is indicted, that is the case that people are expecting Trump to be indicted for first.
> > Ok, we'll wait around for nothing to happen, again,
> Very good, but when it happens, I'll be in here laughing my ass off at you, unless of course I'm traveling to some cool place out of the country.

We can only hope your out of the country and hopefully they'll keep you out.

[The_LA_Flash]

Yes, thank you for bringing that to my attention I forgot to comment about it. I learned about that way back in College when it was called the liberal world order, it's been around for the past seventy-five years, except now some call it The New World Order, the way you have been blabbing about it, you act like it is something new, I guess it is new to you since you didn't go to College.... Hahaha

> > > > > > > > > >if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.
> > > > > > > > > Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.
> > > > > > > > No thanks, let's stay with those questions I asked you within the last 2 years.
> > > > > > > Because you would have to admit that my witch hunt claim is true.
> > > > > > No, I boldly disagree it is a witch hunt, if they are after Trump for something it is with good cause, where there is smoke there is fire.
> > > > > You disagreeing with it doesn't change the truth.
> > > > Like I said, where there is smoke there is more than likely fire, the law just doesn't come up with fake charges
> > > Yeah they do, which is why they keep attacking Trump.
> > You're like the 5 year old that puts her fingers in here ears and screams Blah, blah, blah, blah....
> > They had the Jan 6th hearings on TV and they're still there on YouTube with all kinds of proof and you refuse to watch them,
> > > >all the time on one person unless there is something wrong, case in point, I've NEVER had the law come after me for ANYTHING, WHY? Because I've NEVER done anything wrong for them to come after me.
> > > You aren't important enough. Trump is
> > Parrott much???? ...and you tell me I don't have an original thought. Hahaha
> Parrott? What's that and I didn't parrot you.

NOT me, but you did "parrott" that line and you know it. You were just surprised I caught it... Hahaha

> > It has NOTHING to do with being important or NOT, there have been 44 Presidents before Trump and they were just as important as Trump and NONE of them had the law after them as much as Trump has,.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now answer my questions, if these things were a "Witch Hunt" in just in the past couple of years, was it a witch hunt when Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it a witch hunt whenTrump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it a witch hunt when cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it a witch hunt when Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it a witch hunt when Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot?
> > > > > Plenty of Presidents have taken home stuff, they just are attacking Trump because he's Trump.
> > > > Okay, let's see what comes out in court once Trump is indicted, that is the case that people are expecting Trump to be indicted for first.
> > > Ok, we'll wait around for nothing to happen, again,
> > Very good, but when it happens, I'll be in here laughing my ass off at you, unless of course I'm traveling to some cool place out of the country.
> We can only hope your out of the country and hopefully they'll keep you out.

That's not happening, I've got Globel Entry, thank you very much; of course that's just one of the many reasons why I happy Donny Boy LOST the 2020 election because if he had won, he certainly would have tried to keep me out. Hahaha

[Tin@]

It isn't new to me at all. You're the one acting like it isn't happening.

> > > > > > > > > > >if I can come up with a long list of things he has done in just 2 years, I'm sure there is even a longer list of things he has done in the 5 years before that.
> > > > > > > > > > Go for it, got back to 2015 and tell me why they started a witch hunt then.
> > > > > > > > > No thanks, let's stay with those questions I asked you within the last 2 years.
> > > > > > > > Because you would have to admit that my witch hunt claim is true.
> > > > > > > No, I boldly disagree it is a witch hunt, if they are after Trump for something it is with good cause, where there is smoke there is fire.
> > > > > > You disagreeing with it doesn't change the truth.
> > > > > Like I said, where there is smoke there is more than likely fire, the law just doesn't come up with fake charges
> > > > Yeah they do, which is why they keep attacking Trump.
> > > You're like the 5 year old that puts her fingers in here ears and screams Blah, blah, blah, blah....
> > > They had the Jan 6th hearings on TV and they're still there on YouTube with all kinds of proof and you refuse to watch them,
> > > > >all the time on one person unless there is something wrong, case in point, I've NEVER had the law come after me for ANYTHING, WHY? Because I've NEVER done anything wrong for them to come after me.
> > > > You aren't important enough. Trump is
> > > Parrott much???? ...and you tell me I don't have an original thought. Hahaha
> > Parrott? What's that and I didn't parrot you.
> NOT me, but you did "parrott" that line and you know it. You were just surprised I caught it... Hahaha

I'm surprised when you catch anything.

> > > It has NOTHING to do with being important or NOT, there have been 44 Presidents before Trump and they were just as important as Trump and NONE of them had the law after them as much as Trump has,.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now answer my questions, if these things were a "Witch Hunt" in just in the past couple of years, was it a witch hunt when Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it a witch hunt whenTrump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it a witch hunt when cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it a witch hunt when Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it a witch hunt when Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot?
> > > > > > Plenty of Presidents have taken home stuff, they just are attacking Trump because he's Trump.
> > > > > Okay, let's see what comes out in court once Trump is indicted, that is the case that people are expecting Trump to be indicted for first.
> > > > Ok, we'll wait around for nothing to happen, again,
> > > Very good, but when it happens, I'll be in here laughing my ass off at you, unless of course I'm traveling to some cool place out of the country.
> > We can only hope your out of the country and hopefully they'll keep you out.
> That's not happening, I've got Globel Entry, thank you very much; of course that's just one of the many reasons why I happy Donny Boy LOST the 2020 election because if he had won, he certainly would have tried to keep me out. Hahaha

We can still hope.

[The_LA_Flash]

On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 10:42:13 AM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 9:27:18 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 8:47:36 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 1:51:56 PM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

> > NOT me, but you did "parrott" that line and you know it. You were just surprised I caught it... Hahaha
> I'm surprised when you catch anything.

Yes you are, that's why you keep falling all over yourself because you lack safe awareness.

> > > > It has NOTHING to do with being important or NOT, there have been 44 Presidents before Trump and they were just as important as Trump and NONE of them had the law after them as much as Trump has,.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Now answer my questions, if these things were a "Witch Hunt" in just in the past couple of years, was it a witch hunt when Trump took those Docs home to Florida? Was it a witch hunt whenTrump failed to admit he lost a fair election like EVERY President has done since our country was started? Was it a witch hunt when cheated on his taxes for years and now the roosters come home to roost and he'll soon get his comeuppance? Was it a witch hunt when Trump made a phone call to Georgia to try and get 11,000 votes that he did NOT have? Was it a witch hunt when Trump got a shit load of people to show up on Jan 6th, and cause a riot?
> > > > > > > Plenty of Presidents have taken home stuff, they just are attacking Trump because he's Trump.
> > > > > > Okay, let's see what comes out in court once Trump is indicted, that is the case that people are expecting Trump to be indicted for first.
> > > > > Ok, we'll wait around for nothing to happen, again,
> > > > Very good, but when it happens, I'll be in here laughing my ass off at you, unless of course I'm traveling to some cool place out of the country.
> > > We can only hope your out of the country and hopefully they'll keep you out.
> > That's not happening, I've got Globel Entry, thank you very much; of course that's just one of the many reasons why I happy Donny Boy LOST the 2020 election because if he had won, he certainly would have tried to keep me out. Hahaha
> We can still hope.

"We?" do you have a mouse in your pocket or are you counting your sockpuppet, Linda?

[Tin@]

All sane people

[The_LA_Flash]

Stop with your lies, there are ONLY 3 people in this group.

[Michael Falkner]

On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 1:58:18 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

> All sane people

Liar. You aren't sane.

Mike

[The_LA_Flash]

Good catch, she lies and she in NOT sane.

[Tin@]

Who said I was referring to anyone in this group?

[Tin@]

On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 3:15:32 PM UTC-7, Michael Falkner wrote:

Talking to yourself...again?

[The_LA_Flash]

Oh you mean ALL those people from the M&B group that KNOW you are a BIG liar for having the sockpuppet, Lynda?

[Tin@]

Wow, all you have is old, horsebeaten lies from forever ago to drag out? No, I mean AMERICA, not idiots on a newsgroup.

[Michael Falkner]

On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 7:25:35 PM UTC-7, Tin@ wrote:

> Talking to yourself...again?

You wish.

You aren't sane, woman.

Mike

[The_LA_Flash]

It's NOT a lie and YOU know it, the ONLY lie is YOU calling it a LIE.

[Michael Falkner]

On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 5:52:00 AM UTC-7, The_LA_Flash wrote:

> It's NOT a lie and YOU know it, the ONLY lie is YOU calling it a LIE.

It's worse than that.

The "truth" (and, conversely, what is considered a "lie") is only what can be enforced as such.

It is no longer sufficient for an event to have actually happened.

You must now enforce that the event happened and be able to enforce against others that their belief it didn't is false.

(And I'll take you one final step: There are quantum scientists who have released studies this year with the belief that there is no one true "reality" or "truth".)

Mike