Marv Albert accused of biting and raping woman
Jen1orbit
Hello,
Marv Albert, that famous sportscaster, has been accused of forcing a
woman to perform oral sex on him, and biting her several times. Yum!
Perhaps he was hungry, or merely upset that the insane basketball season
is finally drawing to a close. Sports. Now there is a topic worthy of the
imbecilic mindsets of the Great Unwashed Masses of pathetic humanity.
In basketball we have a bunch of genetically tall men, arbitrarily
divided into "teams", each team sent off to a different city which they
call their "home". Groups of tall men spend their time running up and down
an open space, carrying a round ball. At each end of the open space there
is a pole, upon which hangs an opening that is round and fractionally
larger than the ball. The groups of men spend 2 hours a day, 70 or 80 days
a year, trying to throw their ball inside of the opening. For this, they
get paid a lot of money. People crowd into large auditoriums to watch
these men try and throw their ball into the opening. When they succeed,
the people clap and cheer and rejoice. Millions of other people sit at
home or in "sports bars", observing the men as they race back & forth on
the court, also offering their cheers to the "home" team. Unbelievable!
That is the level of rationality upon which your society exists.
Anyway, where was I? Oh yes, Marv Albert. I guess he might lose his job
as head basketball announcer for NBC if this case goes to trial. He has
been indicted on assault and sodomy charges. The forcible sodomy charge
carries a 5 year to life sentence, if he is convicted. Marv apparently
knew this woman quite well. She was not some hooker that he picked up on
the street. And the incident took place in a fancy hotel in Arlington,
Virginia. A court hearing is scheduled for Thursday morning. Sounds like
it might be interesting. Since when is BITING a normal act during sexual
intercourse?? Maybe as she was performing oral sex on him, he bent down
and bit her several times on the back? The pathetic exhibitions of
uncontrollable sexual lust that the human race engages in never cease to
amaze AND amuse me.
Take care, JOE
The following appears courtesy of today's Associated Press news wire:
ARLINGTON, Va. (AP) - Marv Albert, NBC's lead announcer for National
Basketball Association games, has been indicted on assault and sodomy
charges that allege he forced a woman to perform a sex act.
Albert and a 41-year-old Vienna, Va., woman he has known for 10 years got
into an argument in his room at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in this Washington
suburb on Feb. 12, police spokesman Tom Bell said today.
Albert, who is divorced, threw the woman onto a bed, and she was bitten
several times on her back, Bell said.
An indictment handed up Monday said she was forced to perform oral sex.
Albert could be sentenced to five years to life in prison if he is
convicted of the forcible sodomy charge. The assault charge is a
misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in prison and a $2,500 fine,
prosecuting attorney Richard Trodden said.
A hearing is scheduled for Thursday morning in Arlington Circuit Court.
Albert, 53, is known for his skillful play-by-play in many sports,
particularly basketball. Besides his work for NBC, he is the television
voice of the New York Knicks. He also was a frequent guest on ``Late Night
with Dave Letterman.''
AP-NY-05-20-97
Kelly
Jen1orbit wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Marv Albert, that famous sportscaster,
Is this the guy that looks like he wears a toupee?
Jen1orbit
Hello,
Here is a more detailed report on our well known sportscaster allegedly
turned sexual assaulter/biter of a woman. We learn here the circumstances
in which Marv found himself with this woman, as well as more details on
the actual incident itself.
The woman says that Marv bit her viciously on the back. She had 10 to 15
separate bite marks. Only after Marv had bitten her these 10-15 times, did
he proceed to force her to perform oral sex upon him. I had incorrectly
guessed in my previous post that perhaps he bit her during the oral sex.
Oh well, nobody's perfeKt. :)
Investigators have very carefully examined the credibility of this
woman, due to Marv's high profile status within this pathetic society, and
she passes the credibility test with flying colors. Marv is not currently
under arrest, but if he fails to show up in court on Thursday for a court
hearing, an arrest warrant will be issued. C'mon Marv, flee, you must have
a ton of money saved up.
Marv's next scheduled sports broadcast with NBC is on Saturday. I have a
feeling he might not make it into the broadcast booth, regardless of the
outcome of Thursday's court hearing.
Take care, JOE
The following appears courtesy of today's Associated Press news wire:
ARLINGTON, Va. (AP) - Marv Albert, one of the nation's best-known
sportscasters and NBC's lead announcer for National Basketball Association
games, has been indicted on assault and sodomy charges that allege he
viciously bit a woman and forced her to perform a sex act.
The 41-year-old Vienna, Va., woman, who said she had known Albert for
about 10 years, told police he called her to his room at the Ritz Carlton
Hotel on Feb. 12, shortly after midnight, when the two began arguing,
police spokesman Tom Bell said today.
``She says he threw her on the bed and that he bit her severely,
viciously, on the back. She had bite marks, 10 or 15 of them, and then ...
he forced her to commit sodomy,'' Bell said.
Police were called later that night after the woman sought medical
treatment at National Hospital in Arlington, he said. Bell said she drove
herself to the hospital; he didn't know if she needed stitches.
The indictment, handed up Monday, alleges that Albert forced the woman to
perform oral sex.
Bell refused to characterize the relationship Albert and the woman had
except to say they were friends. He said investigators proceeded carefully
because of Albert's high profile and to be sure the woman was credible.
``We wanted to make sure that she checked out, that she was not some kind
of gold digger or something, and she is not,'' Bell said.
Neither the police nor Commonwealth's Attorney Richard Trodden has spoken
to Albert, who is scheduled for a hearing Thursday in Arlington Circuit
Court.
Bell said Albert didn't return telephone calls. He said a warrant will be
issued for Albert's arrest if he does not turn himself in before the
hearing.
Albert, 53, could be sentenced to five years to life in prison if he is
convicted of the forcible sodomy charge. The assault charge is a
misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in prison and a $2,500 fine,
Trodden said.
Albert is known for his skillful play-by-play in many sports, particularly
basketball - and his exhuberant ``Yessssss!'' for a well-executed play.
Besides his work for NBC, he is the television voice of the New York
Knicks. The evening before the alleged attack, the Knicks played the
Washington Bullets in nearby Landover, Md.
NBC Sports had no comment, and Albert's whereabouts were unknown. His next
scheduled appearance on NBC was not until Saturday.
There was no answer at the home of the woman who brought the charges.
AP-NY-05-20-97
Gary
Jen1orbit <jen1...@aol.com> wrote
> The woman says that Marv bit her viciously on the back. She had 10 to
15
> separate bite marks. Only after Marv had bitten her these 10-15 times,
did
> he proceed to force her to perform oral sex upon him.
You gotta figure that Marv, if guilty as charged, was either very brave
or very foolhardy. It seems to me that when a male forces a female to
perform orally on him, he is taking a great chance of having his
"magnificent manhood" (Gifford reference here, sorry) bitten off and spit
into the street on the way out the door.
If Marv actually BIT her 15 times BEFORE doing forcing her, then he
surely must have planted the idea of BITING SOMETHING very strongly in her
mind. Pretty risky, seems to me.
gary
--
========================================
Gary Davis Media -- Television Advertising
E-Mail: ga...@REMOVEgarydavis.com
Web site: http://www.garydavis.com
========================================
Gimarie330
Hello Joe, seems like it has been a "unlucky" week for sports announcers.
I just heard on the radio that Howard Stern was going to the police to
have Frank Gifford arrested. There is a statute on the books in NY that
makes adultery a crime.
Tony Fresco
Nooooooooooooooo!
J9
On Tue, 20 May 1997 14:22:02 -0500, Kelly <ke...@perlmangroup.com>
wrote:
That's him....and it looks like a cheap one too.
J9
"The Future is Now"
Warner Wolf..IITM
remove **** in reply address...Thx.
J9
On Wed, 21 May 1997 05:20:00 GMT, to...@ivic.net (Tony Fresco) wrote:
>>Nooooooooooooooo!
>>
Yeeesssssss !
Riley G
An now the plays of the week. Lets go to the video tape.
Oops, wrong video tape.
Gary <gdm...@REMOVEtexas.net> wrote in article
<01bc6572$ee1baec0$4702...@gdmedia.texas.net>...
doug haire
Jen1orbit (jen1...@aol.com) wrote:
: Hello,
:
: Marv Albert, that famous sportscaster, has been accused of forcing a
: woman to perform oral sex on him, and biting her several times. Yum!
: Perhaps he was hungry, or merely upset that the insane basketball season
: is finally drawing to a close. Sports. Now there is a topic worthy of the
: imbecilic mindsets of the Great Unwashed Masses of pathetic humanity.
Sports are diversion. Like you follow serial killers and mass murderers,
others follow athletes.
[snips]
: Anyway, where was I? Oh yes, Marv Albert. I guess he might lose his job
: as head basketball announcer for NBC if this case goes to trial. He has
: been indicted on assault and sodomy charges. The forcible sodomy charge
: carries a 5 year to life sentence, if he is convicted. Marv apparently
: knew this woman quite well. She was not some hooker that he picked up on
: the street. And the incident took place in a fancy hotel in Arlington,
: Virginia. A court hearing is scheduled for Thursday morning. Sounds like
: it might be interesting. Since when is BITING a normal act during sexual
: intercourse?? Maybe as she was performing oral sex on him, he bent down
: and bit her several times on the back? The pathetic exhibitions of
: uncontrollable sexual lust that the human race engages in never cease to
: amaze AND amuse me.
Biting is actually quite a normal sexual activity... so long as one
doesn't draw blood or tear flesh in the process. "Love bites" are an act
and not a lament (well, most of the time). Once in awhile, a man or a
woman gets a little overcome with passion and pleasure (you wouldn't know
about this, of course) and nibbles a bit too hard. Nothing really serious
about that unless it is constant and leaves scars. I have had scratch
marks left on my back and teeth marks on my shoulders after sex.
If one's lover is a "biter", one should be especially cautious about
engaging in mutual oral sex...
--
[[ my actual login name is dhaire, not d.haire ]]
dles...@earthlink.net
Jen1orbit <jen1...@aol.com> wrote
> The woman says that Marv bit her viciously on the back. She had 10 to 15 separate bite marks. Only after Marv had bitten her these 10-15
> times, did he proceed to force her to perform oral sex upon him.
>
Kinda brings new meaning to the phrase, "Bite Me". What a dumb ass.
dl
Lars Sorensen
> Marv Albert, that famous sportscaster, has been accused of forcing a
>woman to perform oral sex on him, and biting her several times. Yum!
It's early on Wed the 21st and listening to the Stern show
bloated attorney Dominic Barbera brought up some good
points.....
1. Forced to perform oral sex is HARD to prove because of a
lack of trace ( unlike anal or vaginal )
2. 15 is a LOT of bite marks. Sounds like consentual stuff and
then the woman got miffed and bolted to the police.
3. Why didn't she tell someone at the Hotel where it happened?
Instead she left and then decided to go to the hospital. After
a check of phone records expect a call to a lawyer to show up.
VA police did get a GJ indictment though. Not easy. More than
they got for Micheal Irvin or Erik Williams down in Dallas.
Bottom line.... He did it, but it was probably consentual. Then for
whatever reason she got pissed and decided to screw him blue.
Eddie Murphy, Frank Gifford, now this. Unreal.
> In basketball we have a bunch of genetically tall men, arbitrarily
>divided into "teams", each team sent off to a different city which they
>call their "home". Groups of tall men spend their time running up
rant continues aimlessly...
Sounds like you suck at sports there Joe. Lift your skirt Mary and
stick to true crime where you seem to have a clue.
Later,
Lars
Kathieb1
In article <5lu4ke$mtk$4...@news.gate.net>, d.h...@gate.net (doug haire)
writes:
>
>Biting is actually quite a normal sexual activity... so long as one
>doesn't draw blood or tear flesh in the process. "Love bites" are an act
>and not a lament (well, most of the time). Once in awhile, a man or a
>woman gets a little overcome with passion and pleasure (you wouldn't know
>about this, of course) and nibbles a bit too hard. Nothing really serious
>about that unless it is constant and leaves scars. I have had scratch
>marks left on my back and teeth marks on my shoulders after sex.
>
>
Except that this woman had to go to the hospital. Detective Bell from the
Arlington police was quoted as saying these were extremely viscious
bites...not love bites. Looks like they're going to go for Marv's dental
impressions...I guess when they said "Take A Bite Out of Crime" this ISN'T
what they meant :)
Kathie
Col Klink
Joe1orbit wrote:
>
> Yes, I do remember you. I did not reply to your long and
> socially-conscious diatribe against Charlie Manson because I have no
> interest in engaging in a debate with one of you people.
Of course you do not. You are only interested in spewing *blame the
world for my problems* type messages. I spewed nothing. I asked for what
Charlie's ideas were that required him to be locked up. You ran away.
> You, Col, are one
> of the unwashed masses.
Of course you know all about people you never met.
> You have every right to view Charlie in whatever
> manner your socially indoctrinated view of reality compels you.
Yes, and I dont need your permission to do so, either. It is my
*society* that agrees on this, not some nit wit on the edge of reality.
> I don't
> care. I know that 99.5% of all human beings on this planet are incapable
> of recognizing or accepting the truths that I bring forward in my posts.
Oh, I only understand you all too well. You like to blame all people for
your life as it is now. So much is clear. If you are going to continue
to whine about society, dont yelp when someone kicks over the rock you
live under and exposes your *ideas* for what they are.
> If you think I am trying to "convince" you of anything, you are mistaken.
One asks why a person posts to public forums (especially in the
*society* they have so much disdain for) if not to sway opinion. You
like to state ridiculous ideas and yet you chicken out and retreat when
the light of reason comes your way. Of course, you dont intend to follow
reason, so I know you will never come around. But you are in the public
eye now, and impressionable people read your *writings*, so I wish to
reveal to them why your ideas are such a fake.
> What I do in my posts is express my truth.
What you express is a 3 year old method of stating that you are going to
see things your way and the hell with truth.
> You can accept it, you can
> reject it, you can ridicule me, or you can nominate me for President, as
> someone has already done. I don't care. I post my truth.
I choose to examine your whinings and ridicule the times (which is
almost always) you retreat into a subjective world and pretend you have
no part to play in society, that you can freely hold everyone else
reponsible for everything that goes on, yet the wand of logic never need
touch you.
> If you want to
> post your truth, fine. Go right ahead.
I dont need your permission to do so. I will indeed post what I like,
when I like. I enjoy focusing on the people who want attention for its
own sake, people who have no regard for reason.
> But I have absolutely no interest
> in engaging in a debate with one of you brainwashed and moralistic and
> narrow-minded people.
Your actions state otherwise. Why are you posting, then? You like to hit
and run. After you spew the repititious baloney you do, and the time for
asking for good reasons come around, you disappear. I so assert here and
fully expect another *I can think what I want - your society is evil*
post from you and then a bug out on your part when the time comes to
review your lies.
> > At any rate, I am going to apply your *standards*,
> >as you described them, to some of your postings from now on.
>
> Do whatever you see fit, just don't expect me to engage in a pointless
> arguement with you. Your mind is closed, and I have far better things to
> do than to try and pry open the closed mind of one of you people.
No, I have asked patiently for your reasons why you hold the views you
do. It is the open market of ideas. Your idea seems to be *I will feel
any way I want, your society sucks, Charles Manson is great, etc, etc.*.
I have a very open mind, but not an empty head. You have stated Charlie
is a political prisoner. I suggested a way to prove it. You, with your
closed mind to objective proofs, are long on opinions and short on
proofs. I am still waiting to hear about Charlie's *great* ideas. You
cant say I have a closed mind to hearing what they are when you provide
no information on what those ideas are. You run away before we get to
that point. Are you ashamed of them, and that you dont believe it
yourself? I think so. You have a need for attention, it seems, even if
you intend to make no sense.
<big snip of a set of comments unrelated to the facts at hand>
>
> >>Sports. Now there is a topic worthy of the
> >> imbecilic mindsets of the Great Unwashed Masses of pathetic humanity.
>
> >I can talk about it because I recognize that our reality is just as
> >valid to us as your reality is to you.
>
> It is just as valid. If you pathetic people are able to rationalize
> spending your lives mindlessly watching and thinking about and "cheering"
> for complete strangers who make millions of dollars due to their genetic
> luck of being able to successfully throw a round ball into a round
> opening, go for it. All I'm doing is expressing my opinion that it is
> pathetic that the human race has not evolved beyond this incredibly
> mindless and illogical interest in observing sporting events.
And here is your big chance, Joe:
What are we all supposed to be doing now in order to make little Joe
happy again? What IS society supposed to be doing now? Whine on the
Internet? Focus on the negative? Joe, you are a fine example as far as I
can see, of what we should NOT do.
> <another big snip>
>
> >> Maybe as she was performing oral sex on him, he bent down
> >> and bit her several times on the back? The pathetic exhibitions of
> >> uncontrollable sexual lust that the human race engages in never cease
> to
> >> amaze AND amuse me.
> >>
> >> Take care, JOE
>
> >Well, thanks for an outsider's view on the matter of human behavior.
>
> I am an outsider, and proud not to be able to call myself a member of
> your pathetic society.
Bad news Joe:
You post to Usenet and *ipso facto* you ARE part of society. Do you grow
all your own food? Do you make your own clothes out of materials you
grow yourself? Did you build the computer you are writing from out of
materials you mined yourself? Do you own a car? Drive on a road? Read a
newspaper (yes, you provide the text many times). Yes Joe, you are part
of society.
> I have no interest in trying to improve things within
the society you are a part of.
> [SNIP]. Why
> would I? I was the last innocent person on this planet. When your society
> allowed my soul to be murdered during the course of my childhood, you
> negated any and all social obligations that I might have felt as a member
> of your society.
Joe, whoever has done whatever to you was more likely influenced to do
so by the crapola you seem to believe in. If that is the case, why is it
OK for you to believe as you do, and they were not?
Joe, you are very SUBJECTIVE. You are allowing your life to continue the
way it is. That is your responsibility, not *society's*.
> Please keep going on your course of self-destructive derangement as a
> culture. It makes me smile when I see and read about the various cultural
> lies and illogical mores upon which your society is evolving.
I see it as input for your justification to sit on your butt and do
nothing. To make the world better requires effort. You spend the short
time available to you on the planet in the garbage piles. Fine. When you
retrieve the garbage and throw it about the place, there will be those
who will be around to point at you and say *hey society, lets not allow
this person to hurt another person*. Is that not what you asked us to do
while you were *innocent*?
> You do as your reality dictates, and you can be certain that I will
> continue to do as my reality dictates.
Actually, you do not do as your reality dictates. You try to pretend to
reasoning, but you do not. You have closed up into a mystical philosophy
of subjective reality. That being said, why is the person who hurt you
wrong? Maybe they had a mystical view of reality that you can not
disprove, and they were right to do as they did to you? Hmmm? His/her
reality was just as valid to them as yours is to you!!!
> I have no interest or desire to make your society any better.
Or your society, either.
> >Joe: James Dean has already done your act in the 50's. *Rebel Without a
> >Cause* has been done over and over.
>
> If you don't like my posts, why not simply refrain from reading them?
Dont be so defensive Joe. If you dont like criticism, dont post. This is
America. My society allows freedom of expression. I am expressing. You
dont like it, go make your own society.
> I
> express my truth in my posts, and I believe my truth to be valuable and
> correct for those few people who possess the openmindedness to recognize
> the perversity of the society in which they live in. If you choose to view
> me as an "actor", that is your right.
Yes, you are an actor, exactly. That is the right image.
> > I get to go back to the 60's every
> >time I read your *posts* and relive the dissatisfied youth genre. Too
> >much time on your hands worrying about all us poor slobs.
>
> Ha! I don't worry about you people in the slightest. I just feel a need
> to express my truth and to point out the hypocrisy that permeates your
> world.
Fine, and I feel the need to show you up as a fake.
> If you read all of the posts to this newsgroup related to me, you
> see that a few people actually do understand and appreciate many of my
> viewpoints.
Sounds like you have a little society there, Joe. Which is it, are you
alone, or part of a movement?
> Yes, that is surprising, even to me. I had doubts that anyone
> here would ever be able to appreciate and acknowledge the validity of some
> of my viewpoints.
If you say 2+2=4, I will agree. If you say Manson=Mandela, guess what?
> But the fact that a few people have done this, makes it
> certain that all of you narrow-minded folks will have to put up with me
> and my posts for a long time to come.
Narrow minded = disagrees with you, I gather.
> Again, if you don't like me and my
> truth, why not simply avoid reading my posts.
Because I enjoy the easy job of exposing you as a fake. If you admit you
are just seeking to be a troll, then I disappear.
> Or, if you feel compelled to
> ridicule and flame me, go for it. Just don't expect me to bother replying
> to these types of personally judgemental posts. Especially not during the
> hot months of the year, when I have bare feet shows in public to view. :)
I am not flaming you, just your *ideas*. This is America, I have that
right. And duty to the truth. I ask for proofs, you disappear out the
back door.
> >You only see the world you make. I guess you are blind.
>
> I see the truth of your world with such laser sharp acuity that the view
> would blind a man who lacks the analytical brilliance that I possess.
Joe, a legend in his own mind.
> Make your own lemonade, just like you make up your own rationalizations
> for the perversity of your society.
Ditto
Col Klink
Dorothy Marker
On Wed, 21 May 1997 07:36:58 EST, la...@cnj.digex.net (Lars Sorensen)
wrote:
>
>
>> Marv Albert, that famous sportscaster, has been accused of forcing a
>>woman to perform oral sex on him, and biting her several times. Yum!
>
> It's early on Wed the 21st and listening to the Stern show
> bloated attorney Dominic Barbera brought up some good
> points.....
>
> 1. Forced to perform oral sex is HARD to prove because of a
> lack of trace ( unlike anal or vaginal )
True, but so is mugging, how do we know that you didn't lose it all on
the ponies and want to cover yourself?
>
> 2. 15 is a LOT of bite marks. Sounds like consentual stuff and
> then the woman got miffed and bolted to the police.
How many bite marks cross the line between consensual and forced sex?
Is there a minimum? If so, please inform us ignorant slobs so we
don't get bitten too much or too little.
>
> 3. Why didn't she tell someone at the Hotel where it happened?
Why? What could they have done? Given her a mint?
> Instead she left and then decided to go to the hospital.
Maybe she left to go to the hospital. If I were ever sexually
assaulted, the hospital would be the first place I would go. After
all, that's the place all assault victims are told to go.
After
> a check of phone records expect a call to a lawyer to show up.
From the ER? Or would that be the public phone? How would we know if
it isn't some doctor calling about a malpractice suit?
>
> VA police did get a GJ indictment though. Not easy. More than
> they got for Micheal Irvin or Erik Williams down in Dallas.
> Bottom line.... He did it, but it was probably consentual. Then for
> whatever reason she got pissed and decided to screw him blue.
> Eddie Murphy, Frank Gifford, now this. Unreal.
Prove it!
>
-----------------
D. Marker
please remove the ns at the beginning
of my address for replies.
PattyC4303
In article <33845E...@xxx.xxx>, Col Klink <x...@xxx.xxx> writes:
>This is America,
For the record.... *this* is not America. This is the Internet. Just
reminding (again) that we Americans are not the only ones *here...*
Linda and Cliff Griffith
Hey, I like this! You oughta send it to Andy Griffith so he can record
"What It Was Was Basketball." Anyone remember "What It Was Was
Football"? Not being "une sportive," Joe's post describes my
understanding of basketball, just as Andy's described football.
In <19970520181...@ladder02.news.aol.com> jen1...@aol.com
(Jen1orbit) writes:
> In basketball we have a bunch of genetically tall men, arbitrarily
>divided into "teams", each team sent off to a different city which
they
GMSpider
In article <33827018...@news.mindspring.com>, jea...@mindspring.com
(J9) writes:
>>>Nooooooooooooooo!
>>>
>
>Yeeesssssss !
>
>
Come on Jeanie. Make it simple for Grandma.
What is that all about, did I miss something?
Peace,
Grandma
Linda and Cliff Griffith
I'm not cutting the man any slack, but...In
<19970520203...@ladder02.news.aol.com> jen1...@aol.com
(Jen1orbit) writes:
> The woman says that Marv bit her viciously on the back. She had 10
to 15
>separate bite marks.
(Non-PC Post)
Why didn't the woman leave after the first bite?
Only after Marv had bitten her these 10-15 times, did
>he proceed to force her to perform oral sex upon him.
>The 41-year-old Vienna, Va., woman, who said she had known Albert for
>about 10 years, told police he called her to his room at the Ritz
Carlton
>Hotel on Feb. 12, shortly after midnight, when the two began arguing,
>police spokesman Tom Bell said today.
What fun! "Come to my room so we can argue." Why didn't she leave
when she realized it wouldn't be a pleasant evening?
>Bell refused to characterize the relationship Albert and the woman had
>except to say they were friends.
Friends don't bite friends. How did arguing turn into ... whatever
that was? Lovemaking? Rape/Sodomy? I wonder what the woman thought
Marv Albert had in mind when he asked her to show up after midnight.
Was this the first time that biting and oral sex was a part of their
10-year friendship? I'm glad there is/are no wife or children to
suffer from this mess. (Was the woman married?) Let Albert pay the
price if he forced himself on the woman. Let him off if it was
consensual, and she decided later-on to press charges.
Joe1orbit
>>>Nooooooooooooooo!
>>>
>
>Yeeesssssss !
>
>gmsp...@aol.com (GMSpider) Wrote:
>>>>Come on Jeanie. Make it simple for Grandma.
>>>>What is that all about, did I miss something?
>>>>Peace,
>>>>Grandma
Hello Grandma,
I'm not Jeannie, but I can solve the puzzle for ya. Marv Albert is a
sportcaster, and whenever anything exciting or impressive happens in the
sporting event, Marv always yells out the phrase
"Yeeeeesssssssssssssssss!!!!" with a great deal of enthusiasm.
When Marv got accused of this sexual assault/biting, someone posted
"Nooooooooooooo!" as a parody of Marv's "Yeeeesssssssss!" And then
Jeannie replyed with her own "Yeeessssssssssss!" To indicate that Marv
indeed is facing this serious criminal charge. So that's what it's all
about, They were making fun of Marv's patented "Yeeeeeessssssssss"
expression that he uses dozens of times in every sporting event that he
broadcasts.
Take care, JOE
**********************************
Please make note of my new
e-mail address, which is
effective immediately,
Joe1...@aol.com
**********************************
Col Klink
I am in America. My internet provider is in America. Joe is in America.
I was talking to Joe. I stand by my statement. When we were talking
about society, we were not talking about Internet society.
I know everyone whoi reads is not in America. Would you like the Obvious
for $200, Patty?
Col Klink
Col Klink
Joe1orbit wrote:
>
> Hello Grandma,
>
> I'm not Jeannie, but I can solve the puzzle for ya. Marv Albert is a
> sportcaster, and whenever anything exciting or impressive happens in the
> sporting event, Marv always yells out the phrase
> "Yeeeeesssssssssssssssss!!!!" with a great deal of enthusiasm.
>
> When Marv got accused of this sexual assault/biting, someone posted
> "Nooooooooooooo!" as a parody of Marv's "Yeeeesssssssss!" And then
> Jeannie replyed with her own "Yeeessssssssssss!" To indicate that Marv
> indeed is facing this serious criminal charge. So that's what it's all
> about, They were making fun of Marv's patented "Yeeeeeessssssssss"
> expression that he uses dozens of times in every sporting event that he
> broadcasts.
That is what I thought, Joe. You are one of the unwashed masses that
watches the sport you pretend to so hate.
Col Klink
Hoover, J.E.
The headline read "Marv Albert accused of sodomy." Doesn't the word
"sodomy" refer specifically to anal intercourse? If so, why do the news
accounts only refer to forced oral intercourse and Mr. Albert's alleged
appetite for human flesh? Or is this one of those Bible Belt things -
i.e., referring to abnormal sex as sodomy?
~Hoover
GMSpider
In article <19970522215...@ladder02.news.aol.com>,
joe1...@aol.com (Joe1orbit) writes:
>They were making fun of Marv's patented "Yeeeeeessssssssss"
>expression that he uses dozens of times in every sporting event that he
>broadcasts.
>
> Take care, JOE
Thanks for clearing that up, no wonder I didn't know what
it was about, I don't even know who he is. I peeked at that
header once but, since I had no idea who he was, I just deleted
the whole mess. Geez, who has time for all that TV? My damn
yard is a fulltime job. If it wasn't for the neighborhood
teenagers, I would never get done. Weeelll, maybe a little
football now and then, because some of those guys have
great buns. Like I said, we all have our vices.
Peace thru superior firepower,
Grandma
Linda and Cliff Griffith
In <schro-21059...@ip42.portland.or.pub-ip.psi.net>
sc...@pipeline.com (Laure Sturdevant) writes:
>Excellent point! 14 bite marks would have meant sexual abuse, but 15
is
>irrefutably consensual. I have a "Vicious Bite Mark" chart that tells
me
>so.
But I heard on the news tonight that the assault happened in
*February*. Why did she wait so long to report it? (Okay, I imagine
she didn't wait until the second week in May to report it, but it
shouldn't take two months to investigate and get enough evidence for an
indictment.) Had she reported it in February or March, the Enquirer
would've picked up on it before now.
Miss Lane
> Doesn't the word
>"sodomy" refer specifically to anal intercourse?
Legally, sodomy is anal or oral sex. This case taught me for the first
time that "rape" has to be vaginal. He wasn't charged with rape. I always
thought forced oral sex was rape, but I was wrong.
Gary
Linda and Cliff Griffith <grif...@ix.netcom.com> wrote
> But I heard on the news tonight that the assault happened in
> *February*. Why did she wait so long to report it?
She didn't. She reported it that night, after leaving the hospital.
PattyC4303
Seems sodomy can be a lot of things.... oral sex, anal sex AND sex with an
animal.
In article <33852F...@absurd.net>, "Hoover, J.E."
PattyC4303
In article <3384DB...@xxx.xxx>, Col Klink <x...@xxx.xxx> writes:
> Would you like the Obvious
>for $200, Patty?
>
>Col Klink
Oh Col. I would like any money I could get my hands on.
My "reminder" was sort of general. And because so many online seem to
forget there is the rest of the world also reading. I would NEVER presume
to think YOU would not be aware.
wal...@dnvn.com
In article <5m3303$g...@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>,
grif...@ix.netcom.com(Linda and Cliff Griffith) wrote:
> In <schro-21059...@ip42.portland.or.pub-ip.psi.net>
> sc...@pipeline.com (Laure Sturdevant) writes:
> >Excellent point! 14 bite marks would have meant sexual abuse, but 15
> is
> >irrefutably consensual. I have a "Vicious Bite Mark" chart that tells
> me
> >so.
>
> But I heard on the news tonight that the assault happened in
> *February*. Why did she wait so long to report it? (Okay, I imagine
> she didn't wait until the second week in May to report it, but it
> shouldn't take two months to investigate and get enough evidence for an
> indictment.) Had she reported it in February or March, the Enquirer
> would've picked up on it before now.
How plausible is it that he would bite her 15 times and then insist
on inserting a fragile vulnerable part of his anatomy into her mouth?
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what to do with teeth
under those circumstances. Just doesn't sound right.
x
Linda and Cliff Griffith
In <5lu4ke$mtk$4...@news.gate.net> d.h...@gate.net (doug haire) writes:
>Biting is actually quite a normal sexual activity... so long as one
>doesn't draw blood or tear flesh in the process.
I have had scratch
>marks left on my back and teeth marks on my shoulders after sex.
Bragging or complaining, Doug? At any rate, it's all okay as long as
you accept it. At one time or another, this woman decided she didn't
like it. I just don't buy the "ex post facto" defense, if that's what
it was.
GMSpider
>The headline read "Marv Albert accused of sodomy." Doesn't the word
>"sodomy" refer specifically to anal intercourse? If so, why do the news
>accounts only refer to forced oral intercourse and Mr. Albert's alleged
>appetite for human flesh? Or is this one of those Bible Belt things -
>i.e., referring to abnormal sex as sodomy?
My dictionary says "unnatural sexual intercourse esp. between males
or with an animal.". Can we then classify biting as unnatural? Not
according to some on this ng who think it is sexy in the heat of passion.
Some of those people are the same ones who love to point the finger
at someone else. As far as I'm concerned, I'm not into pain, especially
my pain.
Peace,
Grandma
Kathieb1
In article <5m3303$g...@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>,
grif...@ix.netcom.com(Linda and Cliff Griffith) writes:
>
>But I heard on the news tonight that the assault happened in
>*February*. Why did she wait so long to report it? (Okay, I imagine
>she didn't wait until the second week in May to report it, but it
>shouldn't take two months to investigate and get enough evidence for an
>indictment.) Had she reported it in February or March, the Enquirer
>would've picked up on it before now.
>
>
She reported it the same night it happened. After she left the hotel, she
drove herself to hospital and called the police from there. 60 days to
get a grand jury indictment is NOTHING. It usually takes alot longer
depending on where it is...Fulton Cty (Atlanta) takes 6 mos to a year.
J9
On 22 May 1997 21:10:06 GMT, gmsp...@aol.com (GMSpider) wrote:
>>In article <33827018...@news.mindspring.com>, jea...@mindspring.com
>>(J9) writes:
>>
>>>>>Nooooooooooooooo!
>>>>>
>>>
>>>Yeeesssssss !
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Come on Jeanie. Make it simple for Grandma.
>>What is that all about, did I miss something?
>>
>>Peace,
>>Grandma
Hiya GM (wonderful inside whatever :D.
From listening to "Imus in the Morning" I have learned that Marve
says, when he is calling an NBA game says, when a shot is being made
something like "is it gonna make it?" and then a very destinctive
"YEESSSS" when it does. He is the NBC sportscaster who on tv
generally does the "what's going on coverage" for the NY Knicks who
were just recently defeated.
I am not a "full-fledged" NB fan but sort of pick up on this stuff
listening to IITM. I am a "real true I-Man fan". Actually I enjoy
everyone on the "I-Man's" program.
I think you would too. I am going to forward to you a post from the
ng where one of "us" is trying to figure out the "demographics" of our
group. It's a fun and interesting ng.
Best to all....
J9
"The Future is Now"
Warner Wolf..IITM
remove **** in reply address...Thx.
J9
I like you Joe and I am sorry you went through so much crap when you
were a kid. I think I have learned more about the things that "my
society" is, or should be attempting to deal with from you than
anywhere.
Thanks for your correct and erudite explanation of the question.
On 22 May 1997 21:56:03 GMT, joe1...@aol.com (Joe1orbit) wrote:
>>In article <33827018...@news.mindspring.com>, jea...@mindspring.com
>>(J9) writes:
>>
>>>>>Nooooooooooooooo!
>>>>>
>>>
>>>Yeeesssssss !
>>>
>>>gmsp...@aol.com (GMSpider) Wrote:
>>
>>>>>>Come on Jeanie. Make it simple for Grandma.
>>>>>>What is that all about, did I miss something?
>>
>>>>>>Peace,
>>>>>>Grandma
>>
>> Hello Grandma,
>>
>> I'm not Jeannie, but I can solve the puzzle for ya. Marv Albert is a
>>sportcaster, and whenever anything exciting or impressive happens in the
>>sporting event, Marv always yells out the phrase
>>"Yeeeeesssssssssssssssss!!!!" with a great deal of enthusiasm.
>>
>> When Marv got accused of this sexual assault/biting, someone posted
>>"Nooooooooooooo!" as a parody of Marv's "Yeeeesssssssss!" And then
>>Jeannie replyed with her own "Yeeessssssssssss!" To indicate that Marv
>>indeed is facing this serious criminal charge. So that's what it's all
>>about, They were making fun of Marv's patented "Yeeeeeessssssssss"
>>expression that he uses dozens of times in every sporting event that he
>>broadcasts.
>>
>> Take care, JOE
>>
>>**********************************
>>Please make note of my new
>>e-mail address, which is
>>effective immediately,
>>Joe1...@aol.com
>>**********************************
J9
J9
On Thu, 22 May 1997 18:53:52 -0500, Col Klink <x...@xxx.xxx> wrote:
>>Joe1orbit wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Grandma,
>>>
>>> I'm not Jeannie, but I can solve the puzzle for ya. Marv Albert is a
>>> sportcaster, and whenever anything exciting or impressive happens in the
>>> sporting event, Marv always yells out the phrase
>>> "Yeeeeesssssssssssssssss!!!!" with a great deal of enthusiasm.
>>>
>>> When Marv got accused of this sexual assault/biting, someone posted
>>> "Nooooooooooooo!" as a parody of Marv's "Yeeeesssssssss!" And then
>>> Jeannie replyed with her own "Yeeessssssssssss!" To indicate that Marv
>>> indeed is facing this serious criminal charge. So that's what it's all
>>> about, They were making fun of Marv's patented "Yeeeeeessssssssss"
>>> expression that he uses dozens of times in every sporting event that he
>>> broadcasts.
>>
>>
>>
>>That is what I thought, Joe. You are one of the unwashed masses that
>>watches the sport you pretend to so hate.
>>
>>
>>Col Klink
Well, maybe what you say is true. However, I don't watch much sports,
although I used to. I find most of it disgusting now. As I said in a
prior post, Iearned about this "deal" on the IITM morning program.
J9
On 22 May 1997 21:16:29 GMT, grif...@ix.netcom.com(Linda and Cliff
Griffith) wrote:
>>In <3381F9...@perlmangroup.com> Kelly <ke...@perlmangroup.com>
>>writes:
>>>
>>>Jen1orbit wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Marv Albert, that famous sportscaster,
>>>
>>>Is this the guy that looks like he wears a toupee?
>>
>>I thought that was Howard Cosell....who is now deceased.
>>But then, I confuse Marv Albert with Herb Alpert.
LOL Linda, so did I. But since all this "sh*t h*t th* f*n, I have
seen him. That is the worst rug I have ever seen. And that is
including Sam D's wig or whatever the men call it. I have heard some
of best jokes about that flippin' wig than I have ever heard anywhere.
But unfortunately, I don't tell a joke very well.
Best
GMSpider
In article <3386340d...@news.mindspring.com>, jea...@mindspring.com
(J9) writes:
>From listening to "Imus in the Morning" I have learned that Marve
>says, when he is calling an NBA game says, when a shot is being made
>something like "is it gonna make it?" and then a very destinctive
>"YEESSSS" when it does. He is the NBC sportscaster who on tv
>generally does the "what's going on coverage" for the NY Knicks who
>were just recently defeated.
Thank you for the information. Joe already explained it
on the ng to my satisfaction.
>I think you would too. I am going to forward to you a post from the
>ng where one of "us" is trying to figure out the "demographics" of our
>group. It's a fun and interesting ng.
Please do so, sounds like it might be pretty funny, I could use a
good laugh today Joe's crime news yesterday cracked me up but, today is
another day, every onward. Grannys, frogs and cats. Even if it's just
informational, still want it.
Grandma
Joe1orbit
jea...@mindspring.com (J9) Wrote:
>I like you Joe and I am sorry you went through so much crap when you
>were a kid.
Better to be liked than hated, thank you for liking me. :) I'm sorry
that I went through so much crap as a kid too. But just think, if my soul
had not murdered during the course of my youth, you folks would not be
reaping the benefits of my brilliantly ananlytical mind today, via my
newsgroup posts. :)
> I think I have learned more about the things that "my
>society" is, or should be attempting to deal with from you than
>anywhere.
Thank you for the compliment. The truth is out there, staring all of you
in the face. It is amazing that so few human beings possess the insight
and the intellectual courage needed to face up to the truth, and to try
and learn from it. The human race is cowardly. They remind me of turtles.
Whenever a truth that they find incompatible with their narrow mindsets
presents itself, they pull their heads inside a hard shell of illogical
thought, in order to avoid having to face up to the perceived threat to
their pathetic cultural mores that the truth represents.
>Thanks for your correct and erudite explanation of the question.
You're welcome. This gives me a good chance to apologize for referring
to you as "Jeannie", when your screen name indicates that the correct
spelling is "Jeanie". Sorry about that error. Even I, brilliant as I may
be, am not perfeKt. :)
Take care, JOE
>On 22 May 1997 21:56:03 GMT, joe1...@aol.com (Joe1orbit) wrote:
>
>>>In article <33827018...@news.mindspring.com>,
jea...@mindspring.com
>>>(J9) writes:
>>>
>>>>>>Nooooooooooooooo!
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yeeesssssss !
>>>>
>>>>gmsp...@aol.com (GMSpider) Wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>Come on Jeanie. Make it simple for Grandma.
>>>>>>>What is that all about, did I miss something?
>>>
>>>>>>>Peace,
>>>>>>>Grandma
>>>
>>> Hello Grandma,
>>>
>>> I'm not Jeannie, but I can solve the puzzle for ya. Marv Albert is a
>>>sportcaster, and whenever anything exciting or impressive happens in
the
>>>sporting event, Marv always yells out the phrase
>>>"Yeeeeesssssssssssssssss!!!!" with a great deal of enthusiasm.
>>>
>>> When Marv got accused of this sexual assault/biting, someone posted
>>>"Nooooooooooooo!" as a parody of Marv's "Yeeeesssssssss!" And then
>>>Jeannie replyed with her own "Yeeessssssssssss!" To indicate that Marv
>>>indeed is facing this serious criminal charge. So that's what it's all
>>>about, They were making fun of Marv's patented "Yeeeeeessssssssss"
>>>expression that he uses dozens of times in every sporting event that he
>>>broadcasts.
>>>
>>> Take care, JOE
>>>
>>>**********************************
>>>Please make note of my new
>>>e-mail address, which is
>>>effective immediately,
>>>Joe1...@aol.com
>>>**********************************
>
>J9
>
>"The Future is Now"
>Warner Wolf..IITM
>
>remove **** in reply address...Thx.
**********************************
Jill0704
"Hoover, J.E." <highp...@absurd.net> writes:
>The headline read "Marv Albert accused of sodomy." Doesn't the word
>"sodomy" refer specifically to anal intercourse? If so, why do the news
>accounts only refer to forced oral intercourse and Mr. Albert's alleged
>appetite for human flesh? Or is this one of those Bible Belt things -
>i.e., referring to abnormal sex as sodomy?
>
>
In most states, the legal definition of sodomy is
insertion of the penis into any orifice other than
the vagina. Insertion of anything *other* than the
penis into the vagina is also legally considered
sodomy.
Some states have softened non-penile contact
into a category called "improper sexual contact."
Jill
kry...@excaliber.com
On 5/22/97 11:30PM, in message <5m3303$g...@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>, Linda and
Cliff Griffith <grif...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> In <schro-21059...@ip42.portland.or.pub-ip.psi.net>
> sc...@pipeline.com (Laure Sturdevant) writes:
> >Excellent point! 14 bite marks would have meant sexual abuse, but 15
> is
> >irrefutably consensual. I have a "Vicious Bite Mark" chart that tells
> me
> >so.
>
> But I heard on the news tonight that the assault happened in
> *February*. Why did she wait so long to report it? (Okay, I imagine
> she didn't wait until the second week in May to report it, but it
> shouldn't take two months to investigate and get enough evidence for an
> indictment.) Had she reported it in February or March, the Enquirer
> would've picked up on it before now.
She reported it immediately (from the hospital). The police responded
and took pictures of the bites. They claimed it took that long because they
were investigating the woman's credibility. Maybe they were trying to
figure out a way she could have bitten her own back.
Krystal
Coleen
Linda and Cliff Griffith wrote:
>
> In <3381F9...@perlmangroup.com> Kelly <ke...@perlmangroup.com>
> writes:
> >
> >Jen1orbit wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Marv Albert, that famous sportscaster,
> >
> >Is this the guy that looks like he wears a toupee?
>
> I thought that was Howard Cosell....who is now deceased.
> But then, I confuse Marv Albert with Herb Alpert.
yep, thats the one. I heard on the radio that they were blaming the
"badger" on his head for the bitemarks <g>
Coleen
kry...@excaliber.com
Martha Sprowles
JBrown6000 wrote:
>
> hoover says:
>
> <<The headline read "Marv Albert accused of sodomy." Doesn't the word
> "sodomy" refer specifically to anal intercourse? If so, why do the news
> accounts only refer to forced oral intercourse and Mr. Albert's alleged
> appetite for human flesh? Or is this one of those Bible Belt things -
> i.e., referring to abnormal sex as sodomy?>>
>
>
> jb
Sodomy is, I guess, whatever the Sodomites did. I wonder what Gommorhy
is?
Martha Sprowles
lor...@hotmail.com
In article <3388C0...@erols.com>, Martha says...
Attention Bible Scholars !
What exactly did the Sodomites do ? Please be very specific ... Thanks,
Lord Sir
Attention Legal Scholars !
What is meant by the term "sodomy" ? Please be very specific ... Thanks,
Lord Sir
GMSpider
In article <33838E...@xxx.xxx>, Col Klink <x...@xxx.xxx> writes:
>Hi, Joe, remember me? I have been waiting at the corner of Rational Ave
>and Logical Lane over at Charlie Manson Heights, waiting for your
>reasons Charlie is such a philosopher, but you never showed up. You just
>got lost, I guess. At any rate, I am going to apply your *standards*,
>as you described them, to some of your postings from now on.
>
>
major snip,snip,snip
I find you mildly amusing so I will let all this stand with
"No Comment".
Grandmother Spider
GMSpider
In article <338931...@absurd.net>, "Hoover, J.E."
<highp...@absurd.net> writes:
>Strange how misunderstood this psychological dynamic is. There would be
>quite a few impotent convicts in mens prisons, if it weren't the case.
>
>
You know I always love humor, thanks for an eXcellent post.
Grandma
Captain Scarlet
MaryHedman wrote:
>
> Martha said:
> >Sodomy is, I guess, whatever the Sodomites did.
>
> states any sex act other than straight missionary position between married
> people was criminal. Current, more "liberal" sodomy statutes prohibit sex
> with mammals and birds, and between members of the same sex.
>
> Now, I'll bet you really wanted and needed to know this.
>
> Mary
Being a Biblical term, sodomy seems to refer to whatever sex acts the
word's user finds repulsive. "Legal" definitions of sodomy are
relatively recent.
Similar to the way "satanism" often refers to any religion other than
the religion of the person using the word.
later
-b
Terry Hallinan
gmsp...@aol.com (GMSpider) wrote:
>In article <33852F...@absurd.net>, "Hoover, J.E."
><highp...@absurd.net> writes:
>>The headline read "Marv Albert accused of sodomy." Doesn't the word
>>"sodomy" refer specifically to anal intercourse? If so, why do the news
>>accounts only refer to forced oral intercourse and Mr. Albert's alleged
>>appetite for human flesh? Or is this one of those Bible Belt things -
>>i.e., referring to abnormal sex as sodomy?
>My dictionary says "unnatural sexual intercourse esp. between males
>or with an animal.". Can we then classify biting as unnatural? Not
>according to some on this ng who think it is sexy in the heat of passion.
Albert might get his kicks by biting but it is hardly sodomy. Oral
intercourse is.
>Some of those people are the same ones who love to point the finger
>at someone else. As far as I'm concerned, I'm not into pain, especially
>my pain.
>Peace,
>Grandma
Best, Terry
"Christian - One who believes the New Testament is a divinely
inspired book admirably suited to the spiritual needs of his
neighbor" - The Devil's Dictionary
MaryHedman
Terry Hallinan
Captain Scarlet <bs2...@mail.idt.net> wrote:
>> Mary
>Being a Biblical term, sodomy seems to refer to whatever sex acts the
>word's user finds repulsive. "Legal" definitions of sodomy are
>relatively recent.
>Similar to the way "satanism" often refers to any religion other than
>the religion of the person using the word.
>later
>-b
"Religion - A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance the
nature of the unknowable.
'What is your religion, my son?" inquired the Archbishop of Reims.
'Pardon, monseigneur,' replied Rocebriant; 'I am ashamed of it.'
'Then why do you not become an atheist?'
'Impossible! I should be ashamed of atheism.'
'In that case, monsieur, you should join the Protestants.'"
Jill0704
hall...@borg.com (Terry Hallinan) writes:
>Albert might get his kicks by biting but it is hardly sodomy. Oral
>intercourse is.
That's correct. I believe the sodomy charges relates to the the
oral intercourse. If I'm not mistaken, he was charged with
assault for the biting.
Jill
just della
On 24 May 1997 00:58:19 GMT, kath...@aol.com (Kathieb1) wrote:
>In article <5m3303$g...@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>,
>grif...@ix.netcom.com(Linda and Cliff Griffith) writes:
>
>>
>>But I heard on the news tonight that the assault happened in
>>*February*. Why did she wait so long to report it? (Okay, I imagine
>>she didn't wait until the second week in May to report it, but it
>>shouldn't take two months to investigate and get enough evidence for an
>>indictment.) Had she reported it in February or March, the Enquirer
>>would've picked up on it before now.
>>
>>
>
>She reported it the same night it happened. After she left the hotel, she
>drove herself to hospital and called the police from there. 60 days to
>get a grand jury indictment is NOTHING. It usually takes alot longer
>depending on where it is...Fulton Cty (Atlanta) takes 6 mos to a year.
And I've seen the police captain saying that
they wanted to make sure she wasn't some gold
digger (what? who bit herself on the back 15
times?) who was just after Marv Albert for his
fame and money. And if that were the case, she
ought to have set her sights a bit higher.
Saaaaaaaaaaay . . . Pat Summerall?
just della
On Sun, 25 May 1997 23:44:51 -0700, "Hoover, J.E." <highp...@absurd.net>
wrote:
>PattyC4303 wrote:
>> I know it might seem simple to you that she should
>> just BITE and run, but maybe the guy is stronger?
>> And maybe she fears he will then do additional physical
>> harm to her? So she gives in, obeys... it happens.
>
>Strange how misunderstood this psychological dynamic is. There would be
>quite a few impotent convicts in mens prisons, if it weren't the case.
>
>-Hoover
Or maimed and dead women.
GMSpider
In article <5mdtsr$e...@ns2.borg.com>, hall...@borg.com (Terry Hallinan)
writes:
>'In that case, monsieur, you should join the Protestants.'"
>
> - The Devil's Dictionary
>
>
Geez, Terry, I love that book. I have got to go find it.
Grandma
Sky
Sodomy is a term used for anal sex. To sodomize a person is to penetrate
the rectum. Biblically the term comes from the city of Sodom as in Sodom
and Gomorrah. Anal sex was practiced by the homosexual community and also
by heterosexuals to preserve the virginity of the young women. These
practices and others were the reasons God destroyed the two cities.
Sky :>)
Captain Scarlet <bs2...@mail.idt.net> wrote in article
<3389D4...@mail.idt.net>...
PattyC4303
In article <01bc6b47$73d94480$015bf4cc@flo>, "Sky" <flo...@uniserve.com>
writes:
>Sodomy is a term used for anal sex.
Sky, legally it is a term for sex other than the "usual", including
oral....
SNAFU222
Joe,
How do you bite someone on the back 15 times and still hang around the
place to perform oral sex?? Kinda makes you think ....doesnt it?
Linda and Cliff Griffith
Mary said
Current, more "liberal" sodomy statutes prohibit
>sex
>> > with mammals and birds, and between members of the same sex.
>> >
>> > Now, I'll bet you really wanted and needed to know this.
>> >
>> > Mary
>>
Mammals and *birds*?? Aggies and sheep, perhaps...but what mammal
would go for a bird?
Martha Sprowles
Linda and Cliff Griffith wrote:
>
Maybe Carnaby Street birds?
kry...@excaliber.com
On 5/22/97 11:30PM, in message <5m3303$g...@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>, Linda and
Cliff Griffith <grif...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> In <schro-21059...@ip42.portland.or.pub-ip.psi.net>
> sc...@pipeline.com (Laure Sturdevant) writes:
> >Excellent point! 14 bite marks would have meant sexual abuse, but 15
> is
> >irrefutably consensual. I have a "Vicious Bite Mark" chart that tells
> me
> >so.
>
> But I heard on the news tonight that the assault happened in
> *February*. Why did she wait so long to report it? (Okay, I imagine
> she didn't wait until the second week in May to report it, but it
> shouldn't take two months to investigate and get enough evidence for an
> indictment.) Had she reported it in February or March, the Enquirer
> would've picked up on it before now.
She reported it immediately (from the hospital). The police responded