Newlywed hubby stabs his bride to death at post-wedding reception party,in NY,just hours after getting married
Joe1orbit
Hello,
Now here we have a nice way to celebrate a new marriage. Over in New York,
just after getting married, on the same DAY of their wedding, 27 year old Luis
Deleg stabbed his brand new bride, 30 year old tina Entwistle Deleg, to death!
Yes indeed, the insane societal ceremony known as marriage claims yet another
victim. Luis stabbed Tina right below the eye, during a violent argument in
which he himself was stabbed, and fell through a 2nd floor window. This violent
argument took place inside of a locked bedroom, at a post wedding reception
party at the apartment where our new bride lived. This happened on Saturday
night, and our "happy" couple had just gotten married a few hours earlier.
Luis has been charged with murder, although he does remain hospitalized,
suffering from a modestly severe chest wound. He is expected to survive.
Our newlywed couple had been consuming a lot of alcohol. Yes indeed, they
were trying to alter their brain chemistry, artificially. It just AMAZES me
that you humans, even when you are pretending to celebrate "happy and joyful"
occasions, are in fact DESPERATELY sad within your core realities, and the only
way that you can think of to try and DENY that sadness and internal distress,
is to artificially alter your brain chemistry. How pathetic!
In their drunken bliss, Luis accused his new wife of being sexually attracted
to his cousin. An insane argument ensued, with the usual deranged perspective
that a husband & wife must remain "faithful' to each other, and eventually it
escalated to where Luis stabbed Tina to death.
As far as I'm concerned, the entire Marriage Myth is a PERVERSE one, a
malicious tool of society, used to dominate and enslave the masses. It DESTROYS
countless thousands of lives every year. If this society were a rational and
truth-based one, it would eliminate the entire cultural mores of marriage, and
it CERTAINLY would OUTLAW the specific marital vow in which the 2 parties
"pledge in front of the eyes of god to remain faithful to each other and
forsake all others for as long as they both shall live." That specific vow is
the MOST perverse of all, and it is an abomination of rationality, that
countless thousands of people are literally FORCED by their society to make
this ridiculous, irrational, autonomy destroying, and life & freedom robbing
vow, to each other, while invoking the insane god myth, as a topper!
Take care, JOE
The following appears courtesy of today's Associated Press news wire:
Husband Charged in New Wife's Death
PORT JERVIS, N.Y. (AP) - A man is accused of stabbing his bride to death on
their wedding day during an argument at a post-reception party.
Luis Deleg, 27, was stabbed himself and fell through a second-floor window
Saturday night during a struggle with relatives who heard screams from a locked
bedroom at the bride's apartment.
The bride, Tina Entwistle-Deleg, 30, died after being stabbed below the eye.
Deleg was charged with murder Sunday while in the hospital. He was in guarded
condition with a chest wound.
Partygoers said the couple and their guests had been drinking heavily. The two
began arguing when Deleg accused his wife of being interested in his cousin,
said Lisa Quinones, the bride's sister and maid of honor.
``I heard love, honor,'' she said. ``I didn't hear kill in any of that
ceremony.''
AP-NY-03-30-98
CBofGDALE
According to what an attorney told me once, marriage is to protect women and
children. This would be especially true before DNA testing was invented (about
1980?) to prove who children belonged to.
Rosecyrus
Prior to then there were fairly accurate blood tests. I once had an attorney
who used to defend what were then called bastardy cases tell me that after
blood testing came into existence if the jury was out 15 minutes he considered
that a win.
Rose
Joe1orbit
cbof...@aol.com (CBofGDALE) Wrote:
>According to what an attorney told me once, marriage is to protect women and
>children.
Hello,
I'm sure that is what your attorney told you. After all, he is a member of
society, and he adopts the perverse and irrational thinking that his society
chooses to promulgate and forcibly brainwash it's citizen/slaves into
accepting.
Marriage is an institution of ENSLAVEMENT and DOMINATION. If you have a
rational mind, you realize that it "protects" nobody, and serves no useful
purpose beyond enabling societal domination and enslavement of the Unwashed
Masses.
> This would be especially true before DNA testing was invented
>(about
>1980?) to prove who children belonged to.
I understand the irrational thinking behind the institution of marriage. The
FACT is, all children should belong to the State, and the State should then
test all prospective and aspiring parents, and only give legal custody to those
who pass strict competency tests. No "father", no male biological creator,
should in any way be legally obligated to pay money to anyone, in order to help
"raise" the child, ESPECIALLY not if the biological father chooses to REJECT or
REFUSE the role of "father", immediately after the baby is born. There should
be SOME exceptions, in cases where a father lives with and CHOOSES to support
the mother, for years, after the baby is born.
Take care, JOE