Over in California, a Mommy named Tammy Holycross has just been sentenced to
prison today, after pleading guilty a few weeks ago to murdering her three year
old male slave. Yes indeed, Mommy Tammy slammed 3 year old Adrian into a
bedroom wall, during a fit of rage, crushing the 3 year olds skull. She was
allowed to plead down to second degree murder, and so, despite receiving a 21
year to Life sentence today, she will be eligible for parole in exactly 18
years, and as long as she behaves herself while beyond bars, it is VERY likely
that she will win parole on her first try.
It's nice to see the MERCY of your pathetic ociety, as it validates the right
of parents to kill their children, while imposing absolute Life sentences, and
even commits legal murder via trhe death penalty, against child killers like
Jesse Timmendequas and Richard Allen Davis, and Wesley Allan Dodd, who are 100%
worthy of MORE leniancy than any parent who kills a child/slave. In your
DERANGED culture, the people ENTRUSTED by your society to care for and raise
children, parents, have MORE of a right to kill their children, than do
complete strangers That is totally irrational, and it demonstrates the fact
that your culture will do ANYTHING to maintain the sanctity of the INSANE
"Sacred Family Unit" cultural mores, upon which this society bases it's
citizen/slave domination and control around. It will GLADLY sacrifice the lives
of thousands of children, in order to maintain the VALIDITY of the notion that
the biological family unit is a "sacred and integral part of the core human
experience of life". That notion is a 100% pure LIE.
Take care, JOE
The following appears courtesy of today's United Press International news
wire:
Tuesday March 10, 1998
Mom sentenced in child death
SACRAMENTO, March 10 (UPI) The mother of a 3-year-old Sacramento boy who died
of a crushed skull two years ago has been sentenced to prison (Tuesday). Tammy
Holycross is expected to serve up to 18 years of the term of 21 years to life
before she's eligible for parole. She plead guilty to second-degree murder in
the death of little Adrian Conway, who apparently was slammed into a bedroom
wall during a fit of rage.
I have mixed emotions regarding the mandatory sentencing laws re: drug
traffickers. However, I would not have any mixed feelings if there was
mandatory sentencing for child abusers. If a person can get 10 years for X
amount of cocaine... THEN WHY IN HELL DOES A PERSON GET 8 MONTHS FOR KICKING
AN 8 MONTH OLD CHILD??? Makes no sense to me....
krasch <--- AGAIN, shaking her head in wonder.....
So, the 7-8 yo kid gets back. But I feel sorry for the 3 yo.
Ok, say this is the situation:
My father and my mother. My mother bashes my two-year old brother to
death by ramming him into a wall. I get very enraged about it and then
my father threatens to beat my brains out if I say anything and my
mother also threatens me severely. I would probably grab a 4x2 (u know
what they are ;-) ) and beat both of them to death (well at least until
they were complete helpless vegetables) ;-).
>I bet this bitch was pretty damn sorry when she was sentenced. That's
>all I can say.
Hello,
She likely regrets the fact that her actions against the 3 year old will
result in her incarceration for the next 18 years. Whether she is sorry for the
act itself, is a very open question. She is sorry that she is being punished
for having committed the act.
> I remember a boy who beat his mother to death. They boy
>was only seven or eight. The mother had taken 'disciplinary action'
>against the boy by destroying his cubby house because the boy answered
>back when the mother made some unjust and selfish demand. The father
>then bashed the child in front of the ruined cubby-house. The mother
>then bashed the child. The child used a bit of intelligent instinct and
>got hold of a thick hard plastic stick with which he delivered repeated
>severe blows to his mother's head and neck. She later died of her
>massive injuries.
IMO, the 7-8 year old boy had an absolute right to kill his mother, given the
above circumstances. He should not have received any type of punishment, for
simply REPLYING with deadly force against the human who chose to initiate a
physical attack against him.
>Apparently the father recieved a heavy blow to the
>head which fractured his jaw. But he survived unharmed except for some
>surgery on his broken jaw.
He was just as deserving of death as was the Mommy, since both of them chose
to physically assault the child.
>So, the 7-8 yo kid gets back. But I feel sorry for the 3 yo.
Being 3 years old is a little too young to kill an adult human. The thing
is, your society refuses to acknowledge the right of a child, abused at age 3,
to KILL their parent(s) at age 8-20. The FACT is, if there was rationality in
your society, all children who kill their parents would be treated with the
SAME leniency and understanding that all PARENTS who kill their children are
now treated with. Of course this will never occur, due to the fact that
children are seen as being worthless, subhuman, slaves, by this society. And by
the fact that this perverse culture revolves around the canonization and
worship of the myth of the "Sacred Family Unit", in which children are ENSLAVED
to their biological creators.
>Ok, say this is the situation:
>
>My father and my mother. My mother bashes my two-year old brother to
>death by ramming him into a wall. I get very enraged about it and then
>my father threatens to beat my brains out if I say anything and my
>mother also threatens me severely. I would probably grab a 4x2 (u know
>what they are ;-) ) and beat both of them to death (well at least until
>they were complete helpless vegetables) ;-).
IMO, you should have a legal right to react to this situation with deadly
force, and to kill or severely beat both parents. If this society were a
rational one, you would face NO punitive punishment of any sort for committing
these 2 murders.
Take care, JOE