Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

24 y.o.TX fellow,with history of animal cruelty as a teen & sexual assaults of gals since 1995,is now charged with killing 2 gals,in separate attacks,over past 14 months,is in custody,detectives say he COULD be a serial killer with more gal harvestees

553 views
Skip to first unread message

Joe1orbit

unread,
Jul 9, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/9/00
to
Hello,

More OBSCURE but very interesting news on a DEVELOPING serial killer case,
this time out of Texas. Ynobe Katron Matthews, aged just 24, is under arrest
and CHARGED with committing TWO separate murders. Police and detectives
however, are SERIOUSLY probing the possibility our uniquely named enraged young
fellow could be a GENUINE serial killer.

DNA evidence links Ynobe to the killing, a little over a year ago, of Jamie
Hart. Her body was found dumped along the side of a road, last May. THIS May,
another gal, aged 28, was found dead inside of her apartment. Ynobe has
CONFESSED to carrying out this second murder, a assume that DNA test results
are NOT yet in.

The pigs are being tight-lipped, but it SOUNDS as though both harvestees had
their bodies MUTILATED or marked, in a certain distinctive way that suggests a
"signature", of the type that a serial killer might use. At least one other gal
now reports that Ynobe assaulted and tried to CHOKE her, but she did fight him
off and survived.

We learn that young Ynobe VERY foolishly AGREED to provide pigs with a sample
of his DNA, after being arrested a month or so ago, under SUSPICION of
committing the SECOND murder. He VOLUNTARILY agreed to provide the DNA sample,
not even forcing the pigs to obtain a court order. WHY would he voluntarily
agree?? Did he feel that it would be "too suspicious" not to agree?? Too
suspicious to STAND UP for his HUMAN and CONSTITUTIONAL rights?? Tragically,
thanks to how your FACIST society, that only masquerades as a democracy,
operates, this probably IS the main reason he voluntarily agreed. He just
couldn't SEE himself exercising his own CONSTITUTIONAL rights and freedoms.
This is how utterly BROKEN your evil society renders the vast majority of it's
brainwashed & brutalized citizen-slaves.

A SERIOUSLY enraged young victim, Ynobe had ALREADY been charged TWICE, with
aggravated sexual assault, for two SEPARATE attacks that occured in 1995 and
1999. Looks like he harbored. and of course STILL harbors, a TON of rage
towards female humans, but perhaps was not specifically obsessed with KILLING
them, more interested in making them SUFFER, feel PAIN and TERROR, at his
hands.

Ynobe ALSO has THREE 1994 misdemeanor convictions for ANIMAL CRUELTY. In
1994, he was just 17 or 18 years old. Some serial killers and MANY tortured
children do start out their quest for vengeance, by targeting morally superior
animal victims, so this bit of info does fit the "general" pattern of a budding
serial killer. He will be pleading NOT guilty, to both murder charges. But, a
CONFESSION to one murder and DNA evidence linking him to the other, is a TOUGH
double hurdle to overcome, in terms of winning an acquittal.

We also get some uninsightful, bigoted & narrowminded party line opinions on
serial killers, from yet another so-called "expert", an FBI "special agent"
named Mark Young. All he does is PARROT the FBI party line. The NOTION of
serial killers being bedwetters as children, is particularly invalid. But the
FBI pigs don't care, best to stick to their totally invalid claims, than admit
they are dead wrong and that "profiling" is a literally USELESS type of con
artistry.

LUCK is what ID's & captures serial killers, SCIENCE is what allows for a
reasonably positive finding of Guilt, after ID and capture are made, to be
rendered. And yes, DNA is a REAL science, an extremely DANGEROUS threat to all
serial and repeat criminals, who are not tactically astute and determined
enough to AVOID placing, or else TOTALLY REMOVE, all of their DNA traces from
the bodies of their victims, the scenes of their crimes, and the dump sites
they utilyze. DNA is the GREATEST advantage that law enforcement has, and it
poses the greatest threat to the freedom and anonymity of at large repeat
criminal offenders. Profiling is essentially useless. DNA evidence however, is
EXTREMELY useful.

I LOVE how the second article below focuses on one gal who DID survive being
recently attacked by Ynobe, and how this 19 year old is so "open" with her
emotions, admitting to the FEAR that she felt during the attack, and the TERROR
that she will no doubt CONTINUE to experience, on some level, each and every
day for DECADES to come, if not for her entire lifetime. This is the classic
definition of how ONE person, a total "stranger", via ONE act, can ALTER the
entire life path and perception of reality, for another person, for their
entire lives.

Stay Strong, Ynobe!

Take care, JOE

The following appears courtesy of the 7/8/00 online edition of The
Byran-College Station Eagle newspaper:

Detectives consider serial killer scenario

By KELLY BROWN
Eagle Staff Writer

College Station and Brazos County sheriff’s detectives are investigating
whether twice-accused murderer Ynobe Katron Matthews might be a serial killer.

DNA evidence links him to the 14-month-old slaying of a college student on a
rural county road. His own admission connects him to the May slaying of a
College Station woman in her apartment.

The victims’ bodies — combined with graphic details from several young
women who say they escaped Matthew’s violence — are evidence enough for
area law enforcement to research whether Matthews left additional victims in
his wake.

At least one woman told Bryan police that Matthews choked her while assaulting
her last year.

The 24-year-old Matthews was jailed within a week of the May 28 strangulation
murder of Carolyn Casey, a case that led detectives to investigate whether he
was connected to the May 1, 1999, murder and rape of Jamie Hart. Her body was
found along a county road.

Detectives had DNA evidence recovered from Hart’s body the day she was found,
evidence Sheriff Chris Kirk said made him confident the killer would be found.
After Matthews was arrested for the Casey murder, detectives asked Matthews for
a sample of his DNA.

He gave a swab of his saliva voluntarily, according to court documents, which
detail how Matthews admits to sexually assaulting Hart, but not pushing her out
of a moving vehicle. She died from injuries suffered when her body hit the
pavement.

When Matthews was arrested Wednesday in connection with Hart’s death, he was
warned of another charge against him: aggravated sexual assault. He has been
charged with similar crimes twice. Police filed sexual assault charges against
him in 1995 in Dallas County and in 1999 in Brazos County. In both instances, a
grand jury found there wasn’t enough evidence to indict.

While living in Dallas, Matthews was convicted of a felony drug possession
charge and assault charge in 1997. He pleaded no contest to three misdemeanor
charges of cruelty to animals in 1994 and was sentenced to one year probation.

Matthews’ attorney, Lane Thibodeaux, said his client will plead not guilty to
the two murder charges and rape charge.

FBI Special Agent Mark Young explained the definition of a serial killer as
being a person who has killed two or more people with a cooling off period in
between the murders.

“The murders are not connected by the same incident, like in a spree
killing,” said Young, who is not connected to the Matthews case and
emphasized that he has no knowledge of whether Matthews could be a serial
killer.

On average, Young said, serial killers are white males between 25 and 45 years
old, but such patterns have been broken repeatedly, according to statistics.

“There are all kinds of serial murders,” Young said. “And there are
different classifications. For instance, there are those who are sexual sadists
who find pleasure in mentally or physically torturing a victim. They are sexual
predators, but there also are those who have hate as their motive, for
instance, racism.”

Young said most serial killers have several characteristics in common,
including being abused in their childhood, wetting their bed well past an
acceptable age, committing arson and having a history of being cruel to
animals.

“I don’t think I’ve ever seen the answer as to why for those last
three,” Young said. “There’s no one correct theory.”

Young cautioned that no one should isolate one or two of those problems and
equate them to the potential for someone being a serial killer.

“It just happens many have those things in common, but doesn’t mean
everyone with each in their background is capable of being a serial
murderer,” Young said. “You have to look at each individual and the
circumstances.”

He described serial killers as being placed in two categories: cunning and
organized, and unorganized, with the latter having a shorter criminal career
because such culprits tend to leave more evidence behind. Many, he said, learn
from their previous crime and take the experience of what not to do with them
to the next crime.

College Station Lt. Larry Johnson said Friday that their investigation
continues into Casey’s murder.

He said part of the inquiry includes Det. Jeff Capps working with the
sheriff’s department in trying to determine all the places Matthews has
lived. They hope that by comparing notes with law enforcement in those towns,
other crimes will be solved.

“We don’t know for certain if anything will turn up, but we have two like
crimes here in this county in a one-year period,” Johnson said. “It’s
possible Mr. Matthews may have committed similar offenses in other communities,
so we’re looking at that right now.”

That search begins with putting Matthews’ DNA sample into a nationwide
database through an FBI program called the Violent Criminal Apprehension
Program. Analysts for the program search databases throughout the country to
see if there’s a DNA match.

Young, who is the behavioral science field coordinator in Houston for the
National Center for Analyzing Violent Crime, said DNA evidence has become
“incredibly effective” in proving cases, as well as ruling out suspects.

“A defense attorney absolutely does not want to have his client linked to a
crime by DNA evidence — it’s that compelling,” Young said.

DNA, which stands for deoxyribonucleic acid, is the fundamental building block
for an individual’s entire genetic makeup. A person’s DNA is the same in
every cell. For instance, the DNA in skin cells is the same in a man’s semen,
saliva, fingernails, etc.

Law enforcement officials believe it a powerful tool, because each person’s
DNA is different from every other individual’s, except for identical twins.

In 1998, the FBI Laboratory and its criminal forensic experts created another
new tool for fighting violent crimes — the National DNA Index System.

The system allows public forensic laboratories throughout the United States to
exchange and compare DNA profiles electronically. The goal is to link unsolved
serial violent crimes to each other and to known sex offenders.

All 50 states have legislation that requires convicted offenders to provide
samples for a DNA database. At the end of 1998, more than 600,0000 samples had
been collected nationwide, and about 250,000 had been analyzed.

Before 1997, the FBI provided a number indicating the statistical probability
of a DNA match, but as of Oct. 1, 1997, the FBI has been able to provide
testimony that the questioned biological material came from a specific
individual to the exclusion of all others.

Young said one problem with the database systems is that agencies are not
required to send in the DNA samples of suspects or known criminals.

“While more and more local and state law enforcement agencies are seeing the
benefits to sending in samples from offenders or samples found at crime scenes,
it’s still not mandatory” Young said.

He said the way the system works now — a suspect’s DNA is sent in and
nothing pops up — doesn’t mean the suspect is not linked to other crimes.
It means officers and agents must then do more legwork to find the answers by
contacting individual agencies and checking on whether there are any samples,
Young said.
-----------------------------------
The following appears courtesy of the 7/9/00 online edition of The
Byran-College Station Eagle newspaper:

Woman haunted by attack

By KELLY BROWN
Eagle Staff Writer

The 19-year-old petite waitress can still feel the grip of a 280-pound man’s
hands as he squeezed her neck. She can see the rage in his eyes, hear him
whisper he didn’t care if she died.

She recalls the lie she used in an attempt to stall him: I have HIV. But she
said he shrugged off her threat, saying he also had the virus that causes AIDS.

“Within seconds he had gone from this totally nice person to flipping out
into this violent person,” she recalled recently about the incident eight
months ago. “I just kept trying to stall and talk him out of hurting me.”

But his grip grew tighter and her screams louder, loud enough for her friend in
the apartment downstairs to call police.

From the doorstep, Bryan officers who answered the disturbance heard her cries
for help. The officers later described the man who responded to their hard
knocks at the door as storming angrily toward them, “extremely agitated and
appeared to be close to becoming violent.”

The young woman, who asked that her name not be used, still has nightmares
about the predawn Oct. 23, 1999, incident.

But recently, she awakes from her nightmares after the man sets her on fire.

It’s a terror she hasn’t been able to dismiss since learning a month ago
that her accused attacker, Ynobe Katron Matthews, was arrested and charged with
the May 28 murder of Carolyn Casey. He confessed to strangling the 21-year-old
pre-school teacher. Part of her body was set on fire.

“I feel like I was in a car accident with Carolyn Casey, but she died and,
for some reason, I survived and got away, so now I live with what I saw,” the
woman said. “I can’t help thinking that maybe if I had really kept checking
on what was going on with my case, then he would have been in jail and not able
to kill this girl.”

To the woman’s horror, her accused assailant was arrested on a second murder
charge last week. Police say he killed and raped Jamie Hart in May 1999, almost
six months before the woman’s October encounter with Matthews.

Matthews’ attorney said his client will plead not guilty to both murder
charges.

“I didn’t think about it until he was arrested for the first murder, but he
was too calm when he did this to me,” the young woman said of the October
1999 assault. “He appeared as though he had done it before. I believe if I
hadn’t kept talking to him and trying to stall him that I would have ended up
like those girls. I’d be dead.”

She said Matthews was unbuckling his belt, preparing to attack her further when
police banged on the door at his then-apartment on Wayside Drive in Bryan.

He was arrested that morning. The misdemeanor charge was false imprisonment.

The woman said she was hysterical and didn’t report that Matthews had
sexually assaulted her until later that day after visiting with counselors at
the Brazos County Rape Crisis Center. There, officials suggested she report the
assault to police.

“I didn’t know that rape could also mean penetrations other than his
penis,” she said.

At the police department, a detective took pictures of the red marks and
bruising around her neck, which officers at the scene noted in their report.

She told police that she was at a friend’s house on Wayside Drive when
Matthews, a neighbor of the friend, dropped in uninvited.

“My friend and her boyfriend started fighting, so Ynobe and I sat outside on
the porch,” she said. “He suggested that we leave the door open, which made
me more trusting of him. We sat and talked about different stuff — current
events, politics, his church, his wife and kids.

“He didn’t talk like a thug and seemed somewhat well-spoken. I understand
why someone else would believe that he was a nice guy. I did. I know first-hand
that he’s a convincing liar.”

Concerned about the argument her friend was in, she said she didn’t want to
leave completely, but felt uncomfortable being able to hear their dispute. She
said Matthews suggested they go upstairs to his apartment, which they
eventually did

“He closed the door, locked it and turned the music on loud,” she said.
“He changed in an instant. He kept insisting that I take my clothes off and
I’d say I couldn’t do that. After stalling a lot, he put his hand around my
throat and pushed me down on a mattress on the floor. That’s when the
struggle began. I was kicking and screaming when the police came.”

Police reports show Matthews initially denied touching the woman, but two
months later confessed to assaulting her against her will.

He told police different details about the incident. According to court
documents, he said she voluntarily stripped for him in exchange for the promise
of drugs, and when he gave her aspirin instead of cocaine, she “went nuts,”
he said.

She said she never did a “striptease” for him as he suggested, but she said
she did remove some of her clothing as a part of a negotiation to stop him from
hurting her. She said no drug exchange was involved.

Police documents said that Matthews eventually admitted to grabbing her around
the neck when police arrived and “that he was scared because he knew that he
was going to be in trouble,” according to court documents.

Two months, two weeks and several interviews with Matthews later, he was
arrested for sexually assaulting the woman. A Brazos County grand jury
dismissed the charge in the spring, saying there wasn’t enough evidence to
indict him on the felony charge.

It was the second time in less than five years that a sexual assault case
against Matthews had been dismissed by a grand jury.

In 1995, a Dallas County grand jury listened to a report filed by a 17-year-old
woman who said a friend raped her.

She told police in Mesquite that Matthews, whom she hadn’t seen in a few
months, called Nov. 23, 1994, and asked to come over.

Court documents in Dallas state that the woman said the pair drank and talked
for awhile before she blacked out. She said when she awoke, he was raping her.
She said she pleaded with him to stop.

Matthews told police that the woman was drunk and came on to him. He said the
sex was consensual. But he also admitted to police that at one point during
their encounter she told him to stop.

On June 9, College Station police requested the file in that case, according to
Mesquite records.

Matthews’ attorney, Lane Thibodeaux, declined to comment, other than to point
out that two grand juries heard evidence in both the Mesquite and Bryan case
and decided not to indict him.

“I don’t understand why Ynobe kept getting out of these charges,” the
19-year-old Bryan woman said. “Why did it take at least two girls to die for
people to realize he’s evil?”

When the Brazos County grand jury opted not to indict Matthews for the sexual
assault reported in October 1999, Bryan police charged him with misdemeanor
unlawful restraint.

He never showed up for a May 5 hearing in the case and a warrant was issued for
his arrest.

It was on this warrant that College Station police put Matthews in jail within
hours of the May slaying of Casey. Authorities had run computer checks on those
who were at a party the night before with Casey and an outstanding warrant
against Matthews’ turned up.

In the following days, a College Station detective interviewed him, eventually
drawing the confession.

When confronted weeks later, he told that detective and another from the Brazos
County Sheriff’s Department that he sexually assaulted Hart, a 21-year-old
who was trying to get enough money to return to Texas A&M University.

It’s unknown how he met Hart, who was last seen leaving a friend’s home two
miles from Hart’s home in College Station.

DNA evidence connects Matthews to Hart’s rape. He disputes killing Hart, who
suffered fatal trauma to her brain and a broken neck. Matthews said she jumped
from her car as he drove down a county road after the assault. Her nude body
was found hours later by a jogger.

The 19-year-old woman, who said she sometimes has problems breathing when she
recalls Matthews attempts to choke her, said she’s overwhelmed by the
unfolding events involving Matthews.

“It’s been difficult on my family and those who are close to me, like my
boyfriend,” said the woman, who quit her job after the assault because she
was scared to be around people. She has since started working again.

“It’s really hard to forget about all this, especially since he’s been
charged with these brutal murders,” she said. “He could be a serial killer.
It haunts me.”

*************************************
Join the Joe1orbit Serial and Mass Murder Mailing List! For more information on
my Mailing List, please visit:
http://hometown.aol.com/joe1orbit/myhomepage/index.html
**************************************

Repo...@home.net

unread,
Jul 10, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/10/00
to

Joe1orbit wrote:

Well Shaefer and Rolling really fucked you up Sondra!

ciao


Jason


blowitoutyourazz

unread,
Dec 31, 2018, 1:17:07 AM12/31/18
to
Stay dead Ynobe. Ya fat piece of shit.
0 new messages