I think BITCH Beth Holloway Twitty owes poor, sweet Juran van der Sloot a MAJOR apology!
Taylor
JAH wrote:
> On 15 Apr 2006 20:15:52 -0700, se...@winning.com wrote:
>
>
>>ORANJESTAD, Aruba (AP) -- Authorities have made an arrest in the
>>case of a young Alabama woman who disappeared while vacationing in
>>Aruba, an Aruban official said Saturday.
>> Mariaine Croes, a spokeswoman for the public prosecutor's
>>office, said Aruban authorities were not prepared to disclose why
>>the person was arrested. Croes also would not say how the arrest
>>was linked to the disappearance of Natalee Holloway nearly a year
>>ago, on the final night of her high school graduation trip to the
>>Dutch Caribbean island.
>> Croes would only say that the person who was arrested is 19 and
>>has the initials "G.V.C."
>> Holloway, an 18-year-old honors student from Mountain Brook,
>>Ala., was last seen on May 30, 2005, leaving an Aruba bar with
>>Dutch national Joran van der Sloot and Surinamese brothers Deepak
>>and Satish Kalpoe. The young men were arrested in June but were
>>released after a court ruled there was not enough evidence to hold
>>them.
>> In recent weeks, Aruban police have searched sand dunes on the
>>northern coast of the island.
>> Dutch Marines, the FBI and hundreds of volunteers have
>>previously searched for Holloway.
>>
>> (Copyright 2006 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
>> APTV 04-15-06 2311EDT
>
>
>
> Has anyone heard more about this?
>
> JAH
>
They say it's big. Gee, I wonder how this will effect her father's book
deal??? Bunch of backwoods hypocrits.
>
> Net Crimes & Misdemeanors - Just $10
> www.netcrimes.net/order.html
> www.haltabuse.org
> www.netcrimes.net/netcrimesblog.html
Alan Pollock
> They say it's big. Gee, I wonder how this will effect her father's book
> deal??? Bunch of backwoods hypocrits.
There you go again. Spewing venom at the family. Must be something in your
past to warp you so. Nex
purplepain78
Taylor wrote:
> They say it's big. Gee, I wonder how this will effect her father's book
> deal??? Bunch of backwoods hypocrits.
What is your problem?
BUPKES
wrote:
A lot of people feel that way. When was the last time you heard about
the thousand or more people still missing and probably dead in their
ruined New Orleans homes since Katrina? How many college kids end up
dead of drug overdoses or alcohol and pills binges on spring break in
Mexico? How many thousands more, men and women alike, are missing now
and have for a lot longer than Holloway? Is Natalee more important
than any of them..... or all of them?
The worst of it is that Holloway's parents do seem to enjoy the
limelight. Especially that unhinged mother of hers. I find her so
irritating that I can't watch her anymore. But it's my impression from
all that I have seen (and heard when I fled the room) was arrogance
and a bunch of sabre-rattling about how she hates dealing with people
in Aruba. I never hear her speak affectionately about her daughter.
And where else on earth would people dig up everything but the
cemeteries looking for a body when there's no hard evidence that there
even was foul play.
If you doubt the public reaction to this excess of media
hand-wringing, just do a Google search on the name Natalee Holloway.
The first link that comes up is "F Natalee Holloway."
I'm not kidding.
Ganjette
Do you have any idea how many people are put off by the way the media
has handled this story? I'm sure that in the beginning, they thought
they'd gotten hold of a thriller about a lily-white high school grad
who got mixed up with a bunch of third world devils and whose body
would wash ashore any minute. Instead, we've heard hours of coverage
of the case a day, rarely any news, and we got only a brief respite
during the twin hurricanes in the Gulf. But still there's no tangible
evidence of foul play.
By keeping their faces in the media, Natalee's parents have succeeded
only in exposing to the world the fact that their "perfect" daughter
had a rocky relationship with the mother (called her "Hitler's
daughter") and that she spent her last night behaving like a
liquor-crazed nympho in a bar.
And they just don't know when to quit.
gulffri...@aol.com
when they lied about the circumstances surrounding her disappearance -
remember the security guards that they implicated in her disappearance
only to recant later. You lie to LE and you place yourself in jeopardy.
Velouria
Hey Purple, meet Taylor - crowned prince of the Van der 'floons...
-V
Taylor
Velouria wrote:
;-) I was merely stating that only the Holloway family directly dare
write a book and profit off their dear-Natalee's disappearance/death,
but if it were Van or Van's family or even Dominick Dunne, then it's a
moral outrage (! "How DARE you profit from our pain?!").
Taylor
avery wrote:
> "ANIM8Rfsk" <ANIM...@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:C069275B.778E0%ANIM...@cox.net...
>
>>in article 1145287502.9...@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Solitary
>>Sunshine at getsome...@yahoo.com wrote on 4/17/06 8:25 AM:
>>
>>
>>>se...@winning.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Croes would only say that the person who was arrested is 19 and
>>>>has the initials "G.V.C."
>>>
>>>
>>>(rolls @@ eyes)
>>>
>>>Like we don't all know who THAT is.
>>>
>>
>>Uh
>>
>>Who is it?
>
>
> Greta Van Custeren, of course!
>
>
Nah, it's Great Van Boxtox!!!!!!!!!!! Actually, Greta Van Collagen would
fit.
G.V.C.
I wouldn't put NOTHIN' over those bastards at The Faux News Channel and
committing murder to create a story to devour like it was a carcass in
the woods somewhere would be RIGHT up their alley! ;-)
Ganjette
It bothers me that the media can demonize people like this and so many
people listen but don't question the motives. The comment below is a
perfect example. Faux News points fingers so we can all engage in some
kind of hate-fest.
I think a lot of people owe apologies. They haven't even come up with
evidence of a crime so far. So why smear anyone with "guilt"?
On 17 Apr 2006 05:46:06 -0700, "gulffri...@aol.com"
bonnie....@gmail.com
could I find the exact reason the person was arrested. Nor could I
find anywhere that says Joran has been cleared and is no longer a
suspect. Where did I miss this? Please point me to a link that has
these details. All I can find is that a person (initials only) was
arrested in the case.
peterpuck86
stated.
Patt...@aol.com
just means this new guy knows something.
Carin
conciousness while he was screwing her? I don't know about Aruba, but in
California we call that rape. He may not be a murderer but he is a
criminal.
"Ganjette" <ganj...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:05f842lt1vav49lj8...@4ax.com...
Carin
for questioning. It is an interesting deevelopment after all thsi time
though. I hope they find some remains of the poor girl soon so the family
has something to bury. Her Mom may be annoying and unlikable but if my kid
disappeared off the face of the earth I'd be annoying to.
"peterpuck86" <peter...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145330688.8...@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
Ganjette
wrote:
>Didn't the little Van Der Sloot punk admit that she was in and out of
>conciousness while he was screwing her? I don't know about Aruba, but in
>California we call that rape. He may not be a murderer but he is a
>criminal.
She's 18, he was 17. Maybe she raped him.
Why does the fact that she was drinking, or drunk, make it rape? If
you can't give your consent drunk, then let all the convicted drunk
drivers out of jail. They couldn't consent to driving, then, could
they?
If you think it's rape, read the Vanity Fair story.
Carin
isn't even concious is not consentual. Maybe that is the only way YOU can
get laid - but that doesn't make it right.
Your driving analogy is just stupid.
"Ganjette" <ganj...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:opr842daie5fn64ot...@4ax.com...
Ganjette
male (or males), invites one of them to lick her navel, removes her
underwear, and does all this within eyesight of people in a crowded
bar, she is willing to have sex. She's made it clear and plain and
undeniable.
You cheapen the act of real rape, actual forced sexual intercourse,
when you try to defend lewd conduct by saying 'she didn't really mean
it.' She had a choice. She made it. There is no rape.
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:18:22 GMT, "Carin" <wave...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
Bo Raxo
> Sorry, but when a woman intentionally gets drunk, throws herself at a
> male (or males), invites one of them to lick her navel, removes her
> underwear, and does all this within eyesight of people in a crowded
> bar, she is willing to have sex. She's made it clear and plain and
> undeniable.
>
The mind boggles. So if someone acts in a highly sexual manner in public,
and then goes some place private with you, and passes out: they are fair
game?
Disgusting.
Out here in the real world, sometimes a girl has a few drinks, she dances
provocatively, she gets out of hand. Sometimes a drunk girl will make out
with you right there in the bar, it happens. That doesn't translate in to
consent for anyone to take a free shot if she passes out. Duh!
> You cheapen the act of real rape, actual forced sexual intercourse,
> when you try to defend lewd conduct by saying 'she didn't really mean
> it.' She had a choice. She made it. There is no rape.
>
>
That's like saying manslaughter cheapens murder. There are different types
of homicide, and there are different types of sexual assault. But sex with
someone who is too wasted to know what is going on is an assault, plain and
simple.
What you are saying here is an insult to every victim of date rape and
similar heinous actions.
Ganjette
<fore...@earthcorp.removethistoreply.com> wrote:
>Out here in the real world, sometimes a girl has a few drinks, she dances
>provocatively, she gets out of hand. Sometimes a drunk girl will make out
>with you right there in the bar, it happens. That doesn't translate in to
>consent for anyone to take a free shot if she passes out. Duh!
Sorry, I do not agree. If a woman asks a man to have sex with her,
even if she's had too much to drink, she's giving her consent. If you
worry that you might go on a sex binge because you're intoxicated,
then consume less or do it in a place where you won't meet potential
partners. It's that simple. We don't need sex police to tell us which
consensual acts are really consensual. Women are not so helpless and
vulnerable that we can't stand up for ourselves.
><SNIP>
>What you are saying here is an insult to every victim of date rape and
>similar heinous actions.
Not at all. There's a huge difference between young women partying all
night at spring break and doing one night stands while liquored-up and
women attacked by rapists.
Carin
"Bo Raxo" <fore...@earthcorp.removethistoreply.com> wrote in message
news:Ka11g.6360$sq5....@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Thank you - I was going to reply to him but you said it all.
I know a little bit about date rape myself...