Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Shane Wheale, the murderer with the big dick, sentenced

2,020 views
Skip to first unread message

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/12/99
to
Shane Wheale, who was convicted a month or so ago in the rape-murder of
Regina Carr, was sentenced to life plus 13 to 20 years in prison. You
may recall my report that when he was not given the death penalty, he
jumped up with his fists over his head and yelled "Yesss!"

Lawyers around here say that Wheale's appeal of the conviction may be
successful. The DA for some reason--probably trying to show a pattern--
included a previous rape sans murder in the trial with the murder of
Carr. Wheale says that Carr died during consensual sex--she choked on
his huge member, and the evidence of beating was just from her head
hitting the steering wheel of the car they were in. I think it was a
mistake to conflate the two cases; I doubt that the jury would have had
any trouble, given the extent of the victim's injuries (her vagina and
anus were torn from "slipping on the gearshift"), convicting him without
the evidence of prior rapes.

You may also recall that Wheale wept mightily on the witness stand
during his murder trial, frustrated that no one seemed to believe him.
His mother told reporters that everyone was against Shane because he is
so good looking. Wheale spoke again, at length, at his sentencing:

"This was a witch hunt from the beginning, and everyone viewed me as if
I was a monster, everyone." Speaking of the rape victim who testified
against him, he said, "This woman is mentally disturbed. Then they got
some psychological quack to take the stand without even interviewing me
(the psychologist concluded that Wheale is a sadistic serial rapist;
Wheale doesn't see it that way)." He also complained that he was not
allowed to present evidence that Carr's brain could have swelled from
alcoholism and not from the beating. "I don't care what those pictures
said. I don't care what anyone says. I did not rape and kill her." He
claimed that Carr's injuries were self-inflicted, that she performed
sexual acts on herself in his presence which caused her own death--it
was suicide, see.

"They used my looks against me. It's just stupid to say to a jury I
used my looks to pick up women. Imagine that." He said that the rape
victim had been coached by the DA to sit in the second row in court and
cry in the presence of the jurors. "So many people got on that stand
and lied, the court even recognized it."

"I made a promise with God, with myself and with my family to tell the
truth, and no one recognizes that. The only thing the jury saw was a
bad person. They didn't see that maybe this was an accident. As crazy
as it sounds, maybe this was an accident."

"You know what? I'm confident enough that I'm going to get a new trial.
I'm going to prove this. I'm going to prove what I say is true." He
complained that the media put him through "a living hell. Everyone has
a giggle. Everyone has a laugh when I say that. I have a family, too,
that was hurt. They made damn sure to print my mother's name, my son's
name, my girl's name."

"The commonwealth wanted to kill me. They wanted to strap me to a bed
and stick a damn needle in my arm. I'm saying no one deserves to get
the death penalty. No one deserves to die." He said that his life has
been threatened in prison, by inmates who were friends of Carr's late
husband.

He complained that the DA had mischaracterized him as arrogant. "Maybe
I'm not arrogant. Maybe I'm confident I'm telling the truth."

He is now on trial for some other sexual assaults and for insurance
fraud. He hurt his back on the job and was deemed 100% disabled but
during that period worked as a tree surgeon. Uh-oh.

Martha

Redactor44

unread,
Dec 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/13/99
to
Martha concludes her letter about the convicted rapist Shane Wheale as
follows:

>during that period [he] worked as a tree surgeon>

I always wanted to be a tree surgeon, but I couldn't stand the sight of sap.

Redactor44

Every9man

unread,
Dec 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/13/99
to
I remember this Martha, vividly:)
What could the DA have been thinking? I thought prior bad acts were universally
inadmissable except perhaps to challenge credibility.
I'm still trying to visualize the "suicide" .

Barbara

Maggie

unread,
Dec 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/13/99
to
>I remember this Martha, vividly:)
>What could the DA have been thinking? I thought prior bad acts were
universally
>inadmissable except perhaps to challenge credibility.
>I'm still trying to visualize the "suicide" .

***Prior bad acts are universally admissable to show a pattern of behavior. I
have no idea if that pattern was evident in this case, however.

Maggie

"A lot of people mistake a short memory for a clear conscience."--Doug Larson

Every9man

unread,
Dec 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/13/99
to

From: maggi...@aol.comSPAMBLOC (Maggie)

>I remember this Martha, vividly:)
>What could the DA have been thinking? I thought prior bad acts were
universally
>inadmissable except perhaps to challenge credibility.
>I'm still trying to visualize the "suicide" .

***Prior bad acts are universally admissable to show a pattern of behavior. I
have no idea if that pattern was evident in this case, however.

Maggie
***************
I meant during the main trial Maggie.

I thought it was only during the sentencing phase that the pattern of behavior
is really relevant.
Perhaps it's admissable in the guilt/innocence phase and I'm blocking it out
because I dont think it should be.

Barbara

Barbara


AF...@texas.net

unread,
Dec 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/13/99
to
It seems to me, from this scenario, that he was protected because he was one
of the "beautiful people". Towns always survive to protect THOSE people,
but never survive after protecting the innocent victims.

Sincerely,
Mrs. Edna Kowalsky

Martha > <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:38541E...@erols.com...

Mr. Sweetness & Light.

unread,
Dec 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/14/99
to

Af...@Texas.Net wrote in message ...

>It seems to me, from this scenario, that he was protected because he was
one
>of the "beautiful people". Towns always survive to protect THOSE people,
>but never survive after protecting the innocent victims.
>
>Sincerely,
>Mrs. Edna Kowalsky


Convicts love "beautiful people", especially rapists. Hopefully some
benefactor like Joey the Kook will send him a nice pillow to bite on while
the cell block is taking turns.

George Byrd

unread,
Dec 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/15/99
to
In <alt.true-crime>, 13 Dec 1999 16:06:29 GMT,
on "Re: Shane Wheale, the murderer with the big dick, sentenced"
ever...@aol.com (Every9man) wrote:

>From: maggi...@aol.comSPAMBLOC (Maggie)

Evidence of prior bad acts is generally admissible at sentencing.

Maggie's right. Evidence of prior bad acts _is_ admissible at trial
to show "motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge,
identity or absence of mistake" [ see Fed. Rules of Ev. 404(b)].
Most states' rules are similar.

Evidence of prior bad acts is _not_ generally admissible at trial to
prove character or that defendent acted consistent with that character
at the time of the crime charged. For example, prosecution can't
introduce evidence of prior convictions and say "he's been bad in the
past, so he must have done this crime too."

GB

--
Opinions above are NOT those of APAN, Inc.and are NOT legal advice.
"For too many years we've been playing morality poker with public safety for chips,
and it's no time to raise the stakes when you hold a losing hand."
<< Constable Gil Puder (1959-1999), Victoria Times Colonist, 11/24/98 >>


Every9man

unread,
Dec 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/15/99
to

From: geo...@apan.org (George Byrd)

>From: maggi...@aol.comSPAMBLOC (Maggie)

GB

Thanks both of you for the correction. Actually GB, I cant see that the rules
you posted about when it is admissable cant be stretched to cover what it is
*not* admissable which makes the idea of inadmissability a farce.
It's kind of like the hearsay rule and all the exceptions.

Barbara

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to

Did you forget to draw a picture? Can't stay away from anal rape, can
you?

Martha

Every9man

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to

From: Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>

Mr. Sweetness & Light. wrote:

Martha
****************

Lots of people who think they are str8 are fascinated wtih anal rape.

Barbara


Mr. Sweetness & Light

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to

Every9man <ever...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:19991217110938...@ng-fg1.aol.com...

I guess you're including yourself, hag? I'm not fascinated by it, I think
it's probably one of the most horrifying things a person can go through. For
that reason, I like the idea that a rapist will get the same treatment he
himself forced on another.

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to
On 17 Dec 1999 16:09:38 GMT, ever...@aol.com (Every9man) wrote:

>From: Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
>
>Mr. Sweetness & Light. wrote:
>>
>> Af...@Texas.Net wrote in message ...
>> >It seems to me, from this scenario, that he was protected because he was
>> one
>> >of the "beautiful people". Towns always survive to protect THOSE people,
>> >but never survive after protecting the innocent victims.
>> >
>> >Sincerely,
>> >Mrs. Edna Kowalsky
>>
>> Convicts love "beautiful people", especially rapists. Hopefully some
>> benefactor like Joey the Kook will send him a nice pillow to bite on while
>> the cell block is taking turns.
>
>Did you forget to draw a picture? Can't stay away from anal rape, can
>you?
>
>Martha
>****************
>
>Lots of people who think they are str8 are fascinated wtih anal rape.
>
>Barbara
>
>

Kev best ignore this one!

**********

your pal,
The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
femin...@bigfoot.com

esa...@mindspring.com

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to
In article <83dnr7$eqp$1...@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>,

"Mr. Sweetness & Light" <kfr...@lart.com> wrote:
>
> Every9man <ever...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:19991217110938...@ng-fg1.aol.com...
> >
> I guess you're including yourself, hag? I'm not <SLAP>

"HAG!" <SLAP>
"HAG!" <SLAP>
"HAG!" <SLAP>
You sure have a thing for the ladies, don't you, you virgin mewling
SPANKARD?

> I think it's probably one of the most horrifying things a person can
> go through.

HEADLINE: Virgin Mewling SPANKARD Says Rape Is Bad! Late Edition!

> For that reason, I like the idea that a rapist will get the same
> treatment he himself forced on another.

Trying to justify your endless, mewling, embarrassing, frightened and
homophobic fag-lames by ALMOST posting on-topic for the first time in
months will get you nowhere, SPANKARD.

The Darlin of the Lurking Gods,

e-mancipated


"I'm not going in there with two Jedi!"
- Rune Haako


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Every9man

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to

From: Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com>

On 17 Dec 1999 16:09:38 GMT, ever...@aol.com (Every9man) wrote:

>From: Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
>
>Mr. Sweetness & Light. wrote:
>>
>> Af...@Texas.Net wrote in message ...
>> >It seems to me, from this scenario, that he was protected because he was
>> one
>> >of the "beautiful people". Towns always survive to protect THOSE people,
>> >but never survive after protecting the innocent victims.
>> >
>> >Sincerely,
>> >Mrs. Edna Kowalsky
>>
>> Convicts love "beautiful people", especially rapists. Hopefully some
>> benefactor like Joey the Kook will send him a nice pillow to bite on while
>> the cell block is taking turns.
>
>Did you forget to draw a picture? Can't stay away from anal rape, can
>you?
>
>Martha
>****************
>
>Lots of people who think they are str8 are fascinated wtih anal rape.
>
>Barbara
>
>

Kev best ignore this one!

**********

your pal,
The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
femin...@bigfoot.com


**********

:)


Barbara


Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to
Mr. Sweetness & Light wrote:

...I'm not fascinated by it, I think
> it's probably one of the most horrifying things a person can go through. For


> that reason, I like the idea that a rapist will get the same treatment he
> himself forced on another.

Shane Wheale did not commit anal rape on another man.

HTH,
Martha

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 08:20:59 -0800, "Mr. Sweetness & Light"
<kfr...@lart.com> wrote:

>
>Every9man <ever...@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:19991217110938...@ng-fg1.aol.com...
>>

>> From: Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
>>
>> Mr. Sweetness & Light. wrote:
>> >
>> > Af...@Texas.Net wrote in message ...
>> > >It seems to me, from this scenario, that he was protected because he
>was
>> > one
>> > >of the "beautiful people". Towns always survive to protect THOSE
>people,
>> > >but never survive after protecting the innocent victims.
>> > >
>> > >Sincerely,
>> > >Mrs. Edna Kowalsky
>> >
>> > Convicts love "beautiful people", especially rapists. Hopefully some
>> > benefactor like Joey the Kook will send him a nice pillow to bite on
>while
>> > the cell block is taking turns.
>>
>> Did you forget to draw a picture? Can't stay away from anal rape, can
>> you?
>>
>> Martha
>> ****************
>>
>> Lots of people who think they are str8 are fascinated wtih anal rape.
>>
>> Barbara
>

>I guess you're including yourself, hag? I'm not fascinated by it, I think


>it's probably one of the most horrifying things a person can go through. For
>that reason, I like the idea that a rapist will get the same treatment he
>himself forced on another.

I couldn't agree with your more, S&L. But you better be careful or else
Barbara will be twisting your words into something totally different.
That hag is a sly one.

KaEfEr

>


**************************************************

EVIL

I sing a song of tolling bells,
of children crying in their private hells.
How can such vile crimes be committed by the ones we should love?
Like tar poured on a pure white dove,
it is much too obvious to ignore,
yet people keep on shutting the door.
Believe me, it will not go away,
it will just come back to haunt you another day.

This poem is dedicated to my mother, KaEfEr, an incest survivor. (http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY)

by Caeridwyn (http://pagan.drak.net/caeridwyn/)

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 16:22:48 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On 17 Dec 1999 16:09:38 GMT, ever...@aol.com (Every9man) wrote:
>

>>From: Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
>>
>>Mr. Sweetness & Light. wrote:
>>>
>>> Af...@Texas.Net wrote in message ...
>>> >It seems to me, from this scenario, that he was protected because he was
>>> one
>>> >of the "beautiful people". Towns always survive to protect THOSE people,
>>> >but never survive after protecting the innocent victims.
>>> >
>>> >Sincerely,
>>> >Mrs. Edna Kowalsky
>>>
>>> Convicts love "beautiful people", especially rapists. Hopefully some
>>> benefactor like Joey the Kook will send him a nice pillow to bite on while
>>> the cell block is taking turns.
>>
>>Did you forget to draw a picture? Can't stay away from anal rape, can
>>you?
>>
>>Martha
>>****************
>>
>>Lots of people who think they are str8 are fascinated wtih anal rape.
>>
>>Barbara
>>
>>
>

>Kev best ignore this one!

Yeah, since Barbara is the expert on EVERYTHING.

KaEfEr

>
>**********
>
>your pal,
>The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>femin...@bigfoot.com

Mr. Sweetness & Light

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to

KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com> wrote in message
news:tIFaOD51LAxguK...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 08:20:59 -0800, "Mr. Sweetness & Light"
> <kfr...@lart.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Every9man <ever...@aol.com> wrote in message
> >news:19991217110938...@ng-fg1.aol.com...
> >>
> >> From: Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
> >>
> >> Mr. Sweetness & Light. wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Af...@Texas.Net wrote in message ...
> >> > >It seems to me, from this scenario, that he was protected because he
> >was
> >> > one
> >> > >of the "beautiful people". Towns always survive to protect THOSE
> >people,
> >> > >but never survive after protecting the innocent victims.
> >> > >
> >> > >Sincerely,
> >> > >Mrs. Edna Kowalsky
> >> >
> >> > Convicts love "beautiful people", especially rapists. Hopefully some
> >> > benefactor like Joey the Kook will send him a nice pillow to bite on
> >while
> >> > the cell block is taking turns.
> >>
> >> Did you forget to draw a picture? Can't stay away from anal rape, can
> >> you?
> >>
> >> Martha
> >> ****************
> >>
> >> Lots of people who think they are str8 are fascinated wtih anal rape.
> >>
> >> Barbara
> >
> >I guess you're including yourself, hag? I'm not fascinated by it, I think
> >it's probably one of the most horrifying things a person can go through.
For
> >that reason, I like the idea that a rapist will get the same treatment he
> >himself forced on another.
>
> I couldn't agree with your more, S&L. But you better be careful or else
> Barbara will be twisting your words into something totally different.
> That hag is a sly one.
>
> KaEfEr

That particular hag will need to cozy up to some booze so she can forget she
has me 'killfiled'. She's about as sharp as a beach ball.

Mr. Sweetness & Light

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to

Martha > <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:385A80...@erols.com...

> Mr. Sweetness & Light wrote:
>
> ...I'm not fascinated by it, I think

> > it's probably one of the most horrifying things a person can go through.
For
> > that reason, I like the idea that a rapist will get the same treatment
he
> > himself forced on another.
>
> Shane Wheale did not commit anal rape on another man.

Prove it. He did commit rape on another human being. Stop trying to
nit-pick.

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:53:32 -0800, "Mr. Sweetness & Light"
<kfr...@lart.com> wrote:

>> >I guess you're including yourself, hag? I'm not fascinated by it, I think


>> >it's probably one of the most horrifying things a person can go through.
>For
>> >that reason, I like the idea that a rapist will get the same treatment he
>> >himself forced on another.
>>

>> I couldn't agree with your more, S&L. But you better be careful or else
>> Barbara will be twisting your words into something totally different.
>> That hag is a sly one.
>>
>> KaEfEr
>
>That particular hag will need to cozy up to some booze so she can forget she
>has me 'killfiled'. She's about as sharp as a beach ball.

LOL

Penny

>

Famous words from Barbara,the Abuse Excuser:
"No, either you misunderstand me or I was not clear."
"Just so there is no misunderstanding and to be perfectly clear I never claimed to be nice."
"I know I'm going to be unpopular with this remark, but women at times play a part in their own abuse."

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:48:50 -0800, "Mr. Sweetness & Light"
<kfr...@lart.com> wrote:

>
>Martha > <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:385A80...@erols.com...
>> Mr. Sweetness & Light wrote:
>>

>> ...I'm not fascinated by it, I think


>> > it's probably one of the most horrifying things a person can go through.
>For
>> > that reason, I like the idea that a rapist will get the same treatment
>he
>> > himself forced on another.
>>

>> Shane Wheale did not commit anal rape on another man.
>
>Prove it. He did commit rape on another human being. Stop trying to
>nit-pick.

Fries, good fellow, it's just your fantasy of being put in a women's
prison and being a boy toy. I don't know what it is, but I get the
feeling not even that would work.

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to

You are pathetic, Tub. YOU attack me and twisted my words saying I was
saying rape was ok in prisons and then you have the gall to make light
of it?! Practice what you preach for a change.

KaEfEr

>
>
>**********
>
>your pal,
>The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>femin...@bigfoot.com

Famous words from Barbara,the Abuse Excuser:

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:47:21 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
wrote:

>You are pathetic, Tub. YOU attack me and twisted my words saying I was
>saying rape was ok in prisons and then you have the gall to make light
>of it?! Practice what you preach for a change.

I make light of everything. It's called a sense of humour.

And your position on prison rape is quite clear to me: you like it, it's
a deterrent.

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 22:09:07 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:47:21 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>wrote:
>
>>You are pathetic, Tub. YOU attack me and twisted my words saying I was
>>saying rape was ok in prisons and then you have the gall to make light
>>of it?! Practice what you preach for a change.
>
>I make light of everything. It's called a sense of humour.
>
>And your position on prison rape is quite clear to me: you like it, it's
>a deterrent.

And you are a liar! Rape is pathetic and worthy of the death penalty.
I have stated that over and over. Every rapist deserves to have a rod
rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
Clear on my views on rape now, fool?

KaEfEr

>
>
>**********
>
>your pal,
>The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>femin...@bigfoot.com

****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

Desilets

unread,
Dec 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/17/99
to

esa...@mindspring.com wrote in message <83e6dg$9dr$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>In article <83dnr7$eqp$1...@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>,

> "Mr. Sweetness & Light" <kfr...@lart.com> wrote:
>>
>> I guess you're including yourself, hag? I'm not <SLAP>
>
>"HAG!" <SLAP>
>"HAG!" <SLAP>
>"HAG!" <SLAP>
>You sure have a thing for the ladies, don't you, you virgin mewling
>SPANKARD?
>
>> I think it's probably one of the most horrifying things a person can
>> go through.
>
>HEADLINE: Virgin Mewling SPANKARD Says Rape Is Bad! Late Edition!
>
>> For that reason, I like the idea that a rapist will get the same
>> treatment he himself forced on another.
>
>Trying to justify your endless, mewling, embarrassing, frightened and
>homophobic fag-lames by ALMOST posting on-topic for the first time in
>months will get you nowhere, SPANKARD.
>
>The Darlin of the Lurking Gods,
>
>e-mancipated
>

EM-Barrassing Eric <sigh> grow up, get continent, go away , get your
go-cars , get your toys Yank up your diapers <<< Yawn >>>> you
lost ....last time tooo!!!!!

BYE BYE

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 22:25:29 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 22:09:07 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:47:21 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>You are pathetic, Tub. YOU attack me and twisted my words saying I was
>>>saying rape was ok in prisons and then you have the gall to make light
>>>of it?! Practice what you preach for a change.
>>
>>I make light of everything. It's called a sense of humour.
>>
>>And your position on prison rape is quite clear to me: you like it, it's
>>a deterrent.
>
>And you are a liar! Rape is pathetic and worthy of the death penalty.
>I have stated that over and over. Every rapist deserves to have a rod
>rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>
>KaEfEr

But your position on prison rape is that it is something for lawbreakers
to think about before doing the crime. At least that is how it has
appeared to me and others on a.t-c

Here's your opportunity to clarify.

What would you support to eliminate rape in your prison system?

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 00:24:45 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 22:25:29 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 22:09:07 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:47:21 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>You are pathetic, Tub. YOU attack me and twisted my words saying I was
>>>>saying rape was ok in prisons and then you have the gall to make light
>>>>of it?! Practice what you preach for a change.
>>>
>>>I make light of everything. It's called a sense of humour.
>>>
>>>And your position on prison rape is quite clear to me: you like it, it's
>>>a deterrent.
>>
>>And you are a liar! Rape is pathetic and worthy of the death penalty.
>>I have stated that over and over. Every rapist deserves to have a rod
>>rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>>Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>>
>>KaEfEr
>
>But your position on prison rape is that it is something for lawbreakers
>to think about before doing the crime. At least that is how it has
>appeared to me and others on a.t-c

Wrong. I pondered a question, period. No position was ever stated.

>
>Here's your opportunity to clarify.
>
>What would you support to eliminate rape in your prison system?

More funding for more guards so prisoners are better watched. After
all, they should know where every prisoner is at every second. Faster
executions of those where there is no doubt of guilt. Don't put
non-violent criminals in with violent ones. I am sure there are other
ways but none come to mind at this hour of night, I am afraid.
Hopefully this gives you an answer to your question.


KaEfEr

>
>**********
>
>your pal,
>The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>femin...@bigfoot.com

****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 03:03:16 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
wrote:

>>But your position on prison rape is that it is something for lawbreakers
>>to think about before doing the crime. At least that is how it has
>>appeared to me and others on a.t-c
>
>Wrong. I pondered a question, period. No position was ever stated.

Well unlike your gang rape wanna-be lart.pals, I won't harp on a musing
for weeks. But I still have to wonder why you now still won't state your
position. I mean aren't you of the "make prison really horrible so it is
a deterrent" school?


>>Here's your opportunity to clarify.
>>
>>What would you support to eliminate rape in your prison system?
>
>More funding for more guards so prisoners are better watched. After
>all, they should know where every prisoner is at every second. Faster
>executions of those where there is no doubt of guilt. Don't put
>non-violent criminals in with violent ones. I am sure there are other
>ways but none come to mind at this hour of night, I am afraid.
>Hopefully this gives you an answer to your question.

Fair enough. But weren't you propounding a system where the inmates are
left alone on an island to do what they wanted to each other?

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 05:10:30 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 03:03:16 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>But your position on prison rape is that it is something for lawbreakers
>>>to think about before doing the crime. At least that is how it has
>>>appeared to me and others on a.t-c
>>
>>Wrong. I pondered a question, period. No position was ever stated.
>
>Well unlike your gang rape wanna-be lart.pals, I won't harp on a musing
>for weeks. But I still have to wonder why you now still won't state your
>position. I mean aren't you of the "make prison really horrible so it is
>a deterrent" school?

No. My position has been stated many times. Do a search on Deja. And
no, I am not of the " make prison really horrible", Tub.

>
>
>>>Here's your opportunity to clarify.
>>>
>>>What would you support to eliminate rape in your prison system?
>>
>>More funding for more guards so prisoners are better watched. After
>>all, they should know where every prisoner is at every second. Faster
>>executions of those where there is no doubt of guilt. Don't put
>>non-violent criminals in with violent ones. I am sure there are other
>>ways but none come to mind at this hour of night, I am afraid.
>>Hopefully this gives you an answer to your question.
>
>Fair enough. But weren't you propounding a system where the inmates are
>left alone on an island to do what they wanted to each other?
>

Yes, for the vicious criminals that have no hope of ever being a part of
society in a positive way.

KaEfEr

>
>**********
>
>your pal,
>The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>femin...@bigfoot.com

****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 10:47:14 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
wrote:

>No. My position has been stated many times. Do a search on Deja. And
>no, I am not of the " make prison really horrible", Tub.

Accepted.


>>Fair enough. But weren't you propounding a system where the inmates are
>>left alone on an island to do what they wanted to each other?
>
>Yes, for the vicious criminals that have no hope of ever being a part of
>society in a positive way.

But wouldn't that include *plenty* of rape?

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
Mr. Sweetness & Light wrote:
>
> Martha > <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:385A80...@erols.com...
> > Mr. Sweetness & Light wrote:
> >
> > ...I'm not fascinated by it, I think

> > > it's probably one of the most horrifying things a person can go through.
> For
> > > that reason, I like the idea that a rapist will get the same treatment
> he
> > > himself forced on another.
> >
> > Shane Wheale did not commit anal rape on another man.
>
> Prove it. He did commit rape on another human being. Stop trying to
> nit-pick.

You think specifying which person was the victim of anal rape is
*nit-picking*? Sweet Jesus. Don't you ever like to talk about anything
else, Kevin?

And I don't have to "prove it." You're the one asserting he did.

sheesh.

Martha

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
KaEfEr wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 19:44:28 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:48:50 -0800, "Mr. Sweetness & Light"
> ><kfr...@lart.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Martha > <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
> >>news:385A80...@erols.com...
> >>> Mr. Sweetness & Light wrote:
> >>>
> >>> ...I'm not fascinated by it, I think
> >>> > it's probably one of the most horrifying things a person can go through.
> >>For
> >>> > that reason, I like the idea that a rapist will get the same treatment
> >>he
> >>> > himself forced on another.
> >>>
> >>> Shane Wheale did not commit anal rape on another man.
> >>
> >>Prove it. He did commit rape on another human being. Stop trying to
> >>nit-pick.
> >
> >Fries, good fellow, it's just your fantasy of being put in a women's
> >prison and being a boy toy. I don't know what it is, but I get the
> >feeling not even that would work.
>
> You are pathetic, Tub. YOU attack me and twisted my words saying I was
> saying rape was ok in prisons and then you have the gall to make light
> of it?! Practice what you preach for a change.
>

There you go again, Penny. I think your rage has affected your
eyesight, or your brain, or something. Who's making light of anal rape?
It's the larters who draw funny pictures of men being anally raped in
prison, not Tub and me. Again, *my* cite: go to djn and look up
"Laverne Prison Bride," and you'll see what I mean.

Now. You show me where Tub has "made light" of anal rape. If he's made
light of anything, it's Kevin's pathetic non-existant sex life. Seems
to me that's the opposite of rape of any kind.


Martha

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
KaEfEr wrote:

... Every rapist deserves to have a rod


> rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
> Clear on my views on rape now, fool?

Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.

Martha

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
Desilets wrote:

...
> BYE BYE

Oh... if only...

So how's *your* health, Doozie?

Martha, just wondering

daddys_g...@my-deja.com

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to

> >>I have stated that over and over. Every rapist deserves to have a


rod
> >>rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
> >>Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
> >>

> >>KaEfEr

P.S. Except my daddy's pee-pee, of cours. Don't hurt myDaddy. He
treats me ever so good even when we are being bad. Don't tell mommy.

Penny

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:55:10 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 10:47:14 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>wrote:
>
>>No. My position has been stated many times. Do a search on Deja. And
>>no, I am not of the " make prison really horrible", Tub.
>
>Accepted.
>
>
>>>Fair enough. But weren't you propounding a system where the inmates are
>>>left alone on an island to do what they wanted to each other?
>>
>>Yes, for the vicious criminals that have no hope of ever being a part of
>>society in a positive way.
>
>But wouldn't that include *plenty* of rape?

Dunno, would it? Aren't animals raped? What do I care about baby
killers, rapists and murderers, anyways.

KaEfEr

>
>**********
>
>your pal,
>The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>femin...@bigfoot.com

Famous words from Barbara,the Abuse Excuser:

"No, either you misunderstand me or I was not clear."
"Just so there is no misunderstanding and to be perfectly clear I never claimed to be nice."
"I know I'm going to be unpopular with this remark, but women at times play a part in their own abuse."

"Lots of people who think they are str8 - are fascinated with anal rape"

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 09:05:17 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
wrote:

>KaEfEr wrote:
>
>... Every rapist deserves to have a rod


>> rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>

>Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.
>
>Martha

And you favor murder? And you favor wishes of murder on children? And
you favor enabling an abuser? Jesus.

KaEfEr

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 08:59:47 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
wrote:

Excuse me. Did I pull your chain?

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 08:59:47 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
wrote:

>There you go again, Penny. I think your rage has affected your


>eyesight, or your brain, or something. Who's making light of anal rape?
>It's the larters who draw funny pictures of men being anally raped in
>prison, not Tub and me. Again, *my* cite: go to djn and look up
>"Laverne Prison Bride," and you'll see what I mean.
>
>Now. You show me where Tub has "made light" of anal rape. If he's made
>light of anything, it's Kevin's pathetic non-existant sex life. Seems
>to me that's the opposite of rape of any kind.

I make light of *everything*. I just don't hold that anal rape is a good
thing, when I'm being serious.

Then again a good butt-*fucking* might clear out some impacted fecal
matter around here...

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:01:58 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
wrote:

>Yes you do, Tub. I recognized that fact.. too bad your buddy Martha
>doesn't really know her friend. Also, I never even mentioned anal rape
>but Martha sure has lately. And she accuses others of that? ... LOL

Now that the tone of our discussion is approaching civility, may I ask
what it is exactly that makes you so angry at Martha?

Every9man

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to

From: KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>

On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:55:10 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 10:47:14 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>wrote:
>
>>No. My position has been stated many times. Do a search on Deja. And
>>no, I am not of the " make prison really horrible", Tub.
>
>Accepted.
>
>
>>>Fair enough. But weren't you propounding a system where the inmates are
>>>left alone on an island to do what they wanted to each other?
>>
>>Yes, for the vicious criminals that have no hope of ever being a part of
>>society in a positive way.
>
>But wouldn't that include *plenty* of rape?

/Dunno, would it? Aren't animals raped? What do I care about baby
/killers, rapists and murderers, anyways.

/KaEfEr

Gasp! Could that be that our sweet Penny accepts the idea of rape for
prisoners?
Could it be that she thinks that convicted baby killers, rapists and murderers
including those who are innocent, *deserve* it?

Barbara

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 14:58:03 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 08:59:47 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
>wrote:
>
>>There you go again, Penny. I think your rage has affected your
>>eyesight, or your brain, or something. Who's making light of anal rape?
>>It's the larters who draw funny pictures of men being anally raped in
>>prison, not Tub and me. Again, *my* cite: go to djn and look up
>>"Laverne Prison Bride," and you'll see what I mean.
>>
>>Now. You show me where Tub has "made light" of anal rape. If he's made
>>light of anything, it's Kevin's pathetic non-existant sex life. Seems
>>to me that's the opposite of rape of any kind.
>
>I make light of *everything*. I just don't hold that anal rape is a good
>thing, when I'm being serious.

Yes you do, Tub. I recognized that fact.. too bad your buddy Martha


doesn't really know her friend. Also, I never even mentioned anal rape
but Martha sure has lately. And she accuses others of that? ... LOL

>


>Then again a good butt-*fucking* might clear out some impacted fecal
>matter around here...
>

Well, ask Dog3. I am sure he will tell you if it helps or not.

KaEfEr

>**********
>
>your pal,
>The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>femin...@bigfoot.com

Famous words from Barbara,the Abuse Excuser:

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:18:06 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
wrote:

>I am not angry with her, I just don't like her for many, many reasons.
>I tried to make peace once. But I lost total respect for her when she
>asked Jason if his newborn baby was dead yet and then in the following
>posts encouraged Joe to write a demented tale using that baby. I have
>nothing but contempt for anyone who uses a baby for any purpose.

Yeah, but she was joking. Maybe you should get over your differences in
senses of humour.

I joke all the time, sometimes at "inappropriate" times. I even make
jokes about dead family and friends. Doesn't mean I don't love and
respect them. It's just my way.

I really doubt that you really believe that Martha would really harm any
baby.

I seem to remember Jason being hurtful and Martha responding...

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:10:19 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:01:58 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>wrote:
>

>>Yes you do, Tub. I recognized that fact.. too bad your buddy Martha
>>doesn't really know her friend. Also, I never even mentioned anal rape
>>but Martha sure has lately. And she accuses others of that? ... LOL
>

>Now that the tone of our discussion is approaching civility, may I ask
>what it is exactly that makes you so angry at Martha?

I am not angry with her, I just don't like her for many, many reasons.


I tried to make peace once. But I lost total respect for her when she
asked Jason if his newborn baby was dead yet and then in the following
posts encouraged Joe to write a demented tale using that baby. I have
nothing but contempt for anyone who uses a baby for any purpose.

KaEfEr

>
>
>**********
>
>your pal,
>The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>femin...@bigfoot.com

****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

Jason

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to

KaEfEr wrote:

> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:10:19 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:01:58 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>Yes you do, Tub. I recognized that fact.. too bad your buddy Martha
> >>doesn't really know her friend. Also, I never even mentioned anal rape
> >>but Martha sure has lately. And she accuses others of that? ... LOL
> >
> >Now that the tone of our discussion is approaching civility, may I ask
> >what it is exactly that makes you so angry at Martha?
>
> I am not angry with her, I just don't like her for many, many reasons.
> I tried to make peace once. But I lost total respect for her when she
> asked Jason if his newborn baby was dead yet and then in the following
> posts encouraged Joe to write a demented tale using that baby. I have
> nothing but contempt for anyone who uses a baby for any purpose.
>
> KaEfEr
>
> >

Thanx for that KaEfEr

ciao

Jason

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:28:24 +0000, Jason <Jason...@virgin.net> wrote:

>
>
>KaEfEr wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:10:19 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:01:58 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >>Yes you do, Tub. I recognized that fact.. too bad your buddy Martha
>> >>doesn't really know her friend. Also, I never even mentioned anal rape
>> >>but Martha sure has lately. And she accuses others of that? ... LOL
>> >
>> >Now that the tone of our discussion is approaching civility, may I ask
>> >what it is exactly that makes you so angry at Martha?
>>
>> I am not angry with her, I just don't like her for many, many reasons.
>> I tried to make peace once. But I lost total respect for her when she
>> asked Jason if his newborn baby was dead yet and then in the following
>> posts encouraged Joe to write a demented tale using that baby. I have
>> nothing but contempt for anyone who uses a baby for any purpose.
>>
>> KaEfEr
>>
>> >
>
>Thanx for that KaEfEr
>
>ciao
>
>Jason

Welcome, Jason and I totally admire you for the way you handled that,
too. I know I wouldn't have if anyone tried to use my baby for their
sick games.

How it that little sweetheart and the rest of your family? My daughter
and grandson just went back home on Wednesday. Had them here for 4
weeks but it just flew by. My grandson is in that stage where he copies
everything and everyone.. LOL .. We went into London to Covent Garden
last Saturday and they had some mimes and such. Matthew was so funny
watching him watch them and then trying to copy them.. HAHAHAHA.

BTW: I wanted to ask you if you know any channels here in Britain that
show truecrime tales and such like they show in the states. We have
ntl: for phone, cable and internet where we are at. We were told they
are the cheapest but since our contract is ready to expire we are
looking around. Any suggestions?

Penny

>
>>
>> >
>> >**********
>> >
>> >your pal,
>> >The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>> >femin...@bigfoot.com
>>
>> ****************************************
>> http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
>> ****************************************

****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:31:53 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:18:06 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>wrote:
>

>>I am not angry with her, I just don't like her for many, many reasons.
>>I tried to make peace once. But I lost total respect for her when she
>>asked Jason if his newborn baby was dead yet and then in the following
>>posts encouraged Joe to write a demented tale using that baby. I have
>>nothing but contempt for anyone who uses a baby for any purpose.
>

>Yeah, but she was joking. Maybe you should get over your differences in
>senses of humour.
>

That is a sick sense of humor that I want no part of, Tub. That is not
who I am.

>I joke all the time, sometimes at "inappropriate" times. I even make
>jokes about dead family and friends. Doesn't mean I don't love and
>respect them. It's just my way.

And I think that kind of joking is inappropriate at all times. But it
is your way and who is to say you are wrong. I just don't have to like
it.

>
>I really doubt that you really believe that Martha would really harm any
>baby.

I know nothing of the sort because I do not know her in real life. I
just know her from usenet and that makes me not want to know her in RL.

>
>I seem to remember Jason being hurtful and Martha responding...

Not true. Jason made a comment about where he got an expression from,
stating it was Martha. She came back with that baby shot for no reason.
Again, anyone who uses a baby for any means whether they are joking or
not is someone who I hold in contempt. And don't forget, Tub. We all
know how sick Joe is and some of the sick things he puts out there. For
her to encourage a sick man to write a horrible tale about that
beautiful baby is just as sickening.

KaEfEr

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:40:18 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
wrote:

>Again, anyone who uses a baby for any means whether they are joking or
>not is someone who I hold in contempt.

I don't happen to consider a baby a sentient being (it isn't until at
least a year or two) so I'm just as upset at a whale or an elephant dying
as I am a human baby. My feelings might change if I was a parent, but I
doubt it.

I'm not saying it's right to kill a baby (unless it is severely disabled)
but then I don't think it's right to eat meat either.

I *do* think that killing an adult is a *lot* more serious than killing a
baby and the Canadian courts agree.

Jason

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to

KaEfEr wrote:

> Again, anyone who uses a baby for any means whether they are joking or

> not is someone who I hold in contempt. And don't forget, Tub. We all
> know how sick Joe is and some of the sick things he puts out there. For
> her to encourage a sick man to write a horrible tale about that
> beautiful baby is just as sickening.

You're totally right on this one Penny, I was not hurtful to Martha in any
way prior to her remark.
The thread went exactly how you describe it!

ciao

Jason

>
>
> KaEfEr


>
> >
> >**********
> >
> >your pal,
> >The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
> >femin...@bigfoot.com
>

> ****************************************
> http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
> ****************************************


Jason

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to

KaEfEr wrote:

> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:28:24 +0000, Jason <Jason...@virgin.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >

> >KaEfEr wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:10:19 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:01:58 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Yes you do, Tub. I recognized that fact.. too bad your buddy Martha
> >> >>doesn't really know her friend. Also, I never even mentioned anal rape
> >> >>but Martha sure has lately. And she accuses others of that? ... LOL
> >> >
> >> >Now that the tone of our discussion is approaching civility, may I ask
> >> >what it is exactly that makes you so angry at Martha?
> >>

> >> I am not angry with her, I just don't like her for many, many reasons.
> >> I tried to make peace once. But I lost total respect for her when she
> >> asked Jason if his newborn baby was dead yet and then in the following
> >> posts encouraged Joe to write a demented tale using that baby. I have
> >> nothing but contempt for anyone who uses a baby for any purpose.
> >>

> >> KaEfEr
> >>
> >> >
> >
> >Thanx for that KaEfEr
> >
> >ciao
> >
> >Jason
>
> Welcome, Jason and I totally admire you for the way you handled that,
> too. I know I wouldn't have if anyone tried to use my baby for their
> sick games.

They have to get their kicks somewhere, unfortunately my personality is strong
enough to cope with almost anything!

>
>
> How it that little sweetheart and the rest of your family?

Alyssa is 11lb 6oz now, growing and learning well! She is lying across my lap
as I type, (one-handed!! )
The rest of the family is fine, looking forward to xmas.
Kim is happy she's shed the extra weight she put on when she was pregnant! :)


> My daughter
> and grandson just went back home on Wednesday. Had them here for 4
> weeks but it just flew by. My grandson is in that stage where he copies
> everything and everyone.. LOL ..

ahhhhh!

> We went into London to Covent Garden
> last Saturday and they had some mimes and such. Matthew was so funny
> watching him watch them and then trying to copy them.. HAHAHAHA.

LOL

>
>
> BTW: I wanted to ask you if you know any channels here in Britain that
> show truecrime tales and such like they show in the states. We have
> ntl: for phone, cable and internet where we are at. We were told they
> are the cheapest but since our contract is ready to expire we are
> looking around. Any suggestions?

I'm on SKY Digital, they do a number of channels that often touch on crime, eg
Discovery, History channel etc
You get more channels for your money too, than cable!

ciao

Jason

>
>
> Penny


>
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> >**********
> >> >
> >> >your pal,
> >> >The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
> >> >femin...@bigfoot.com
> >>
> >> ****************************************
> >> http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
> >> ****************************************
>

> ****************************************
> http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
> ****************************************


geminiwalker

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
Every rapist deserves to have a rod
> >rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
> >Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
> >
> >KaEfEr
>

Which, of course, would be rape.

...geminiwalker

--
To learn more about me, go to
http://home.earthlink.net/~chuard


Volfie

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
>
> Every rapist deserves to have a rod
>> >rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> >Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>> >
>> >KaEfEr


> Which, of course, would be rape.
>
>...geminiwalker
>

Are you begining to see my point about this person yet, geminiwalker?

Volfie -> and such a lovely way with words, too...

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to

Well I am impressed. :)

>
>>
>>
>> How it that little sweetheart and the rest of your family?
>
>Alyssa is 11lb 6oz now, growing and learning well! She is lying across my lap
>as I type, (one-handed!! )

Wow, she is growing fast! Must like to eat, huh? .. LOL

>The rest of the family is fine, looking forward to xmas.
>Kim is happy she's shed the extra weight she put on when she was pregnant! :)

yeah, I bet she is. I was never so lucky when I had my daughter 21
years ago. We already celebrated Christmas when my family was here.
Hubby and I will probably just stay home in bed alll day.. hehe .. He
wants to go in to London for the parade on New Years Day. Not sure
about that idea.. hehe .. gonna be lots and lots of people for sure.

>
>
*snip*

>>
>> BTW: I wanted to ask you if you know any channels here in Britain that
>> show truecrime tales and such like they show in the states. We have
>> ntl: for phone, cable and internet where we are at. We were told they
>> are the cheapest but since our contract is ready to expire we are
>> looking around. Any suggestions?
>
>I'm on SKY Digital, they do a number of channels that often touch on crime, eg
>Discovery, History channel etc
>You get more channels for your money too, than cable!

I do get Discovery, History on ntl: but don't often see crime programs
on that. Maybe they are different for digital. Have you seen the ones
on serial killers that Channel 5 has been showing? .. Do you know if
SKY offers phone or internet services? .. Hey Jason, one more
question.. hubby just started a new job in Putney area so we want to
move in that area. If you know of any cities where properties aren't
that expensive to rent, could you email me the info, please? Thanks.

Penny

>
>ciao
>
>Jason
>
>>
>>
>> Penny
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >**********
>> >> >
>> >> >your pal,
>> >> >The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>> >> >femin...@bigfoot.com
>> >>
>> >> ****************************************
>> >> http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
>> >> ****************************************
>>
>> ****************************************
>> http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
>> ****************************************

****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 10:32:32 -0800, geminiwalker <chu...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> Every rapist deserves to have a rod
>> >rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> >Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>> >
>> >KaEfEr
>>
>
> Which, of course, would be rape.
>
>...geminiwalker

No shit, Sherlock. So what.. they get what they dish out as far as I am
concerned.

KaEfEr


****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:55:57 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:40:18 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>wrote:
>

>>Again, anyone who uses a baby for any means whether they are joking or
>>not is someone who I hold in contempt.
>

>I don't happen to consider a baby a sentient being (it isn't until at
>least a year or two) so I'm just as upset at a whale or an elephant dying
>as I am a human baby. My feelings might change if I was a parent, but I
>doubt it.

Babies are our future, Tub. And yes, your feelings may change if you
were a parent but then again, not all parents cherish their babies.

>
>I'm not saying it's right to kill a baby (unless it is severely disabled)
>but then I don't think it's right to eat meat either.

I understand that some of what you are saying here but not too sure
about that part of killing a severely disabled baby. I think that
would depend on whether said baby is suffering or not.

>
>I *do* think that killing an adult is a *lot* more serious than killing a
>baby and the Canadian courts agree.

Well I disagree. An adult can try to defend themselves. A baby can
not. Again, babies are our future.

KaEfEr

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 16:12:17 +0000, Jason <Jason...@virgin.net> wrote:

>
>
>KaEfEr wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:31:53 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:18:06 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >

>> >>I am not angry with her, I just don't like her for many, many reasons.
>> >>I tried to make peace once. But I lost total respect for her when she
>> >>asked Jason if his newborn baby was dead yet and then in the following
>> >>posts encouraged Joe to write a demented tale using that baby. I have

>> >>nothing but contempt for anyone who uses a baby for any purpose.
>> >
>> >Yeah, but she was joking. Maybe you should get over your differences in
>> >senses of humour.
>> >
>>
>> That is a sick sense of humor that I want no part of, Tub. That is not
>> who I am.
>>
>> >I joke all the time, sometimes at "inappropriate" times. I even make
>> >jokes about dead family and friends. Doesn't mean I don't love and
>> >respect them. It's just my way.
>>
>> And I think that kind of joking is inappropriate at all times. But it
>> is your way and who is to say you are wrong. I just don't have to like
>> it.
>>
>> >
>> >I really doubt that you really believe that Martha would really harm any
>> >baby.
>>
>> I know nothing of the sort because I do not know her in real life. I
>> just know her from usenet and that makes me not want to know her in RL.
>>
>> >
>> >I seem to remember Jason being hurtful and Martha responding...
>>
>> Not true. Jason made a comment about where he got an expression from,
>> stating it was Martha. She came back with that baby shot for no reason.

>> Again, anyone who uses a baby for any means whether they are joking or

>> not is someone who I hold in contempt. And don't forget, Tub. We all
>> know how sick Joe is and some of the sick things he puts out there. For
>> her to encourage a sick man to write a horrible tale about that
>> beautiful baby is just as sickening.
>
>You're totally right on this one Penny, I was not hurtful to Martha in any
>way prior to her remark.
>The thread went exactly how you describe it!
>
>ciao
>
>Jason

I know, Jason. Course Martha and her pions will see that quite
differently.

Penny


****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:05:21 -0800, "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"Pooh Bear" <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote in message
>news:2r8n5s428bphjko7q...@4ax.com...


>> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:01:58 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Yes you do, Tub. I recognized that fact.. too bad your buddy Martha
>> >doesn't really know her friend. Also, I never even mentioned anal rape
>> >but Martha sure has lately. And she accuses others of that? ... LOL
>>
>> Now that the tone of our discussion is approaching civility, may I ask
>> what it is exactly that makes you so angry at Martha?
>>
>>

>> **********
>>
>> your pal,
>> The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>> femin...@bigfoot.com
>

>2 simple words. Sharon's lies.

Now that just goes to show who the liar is here, Doggie. My dislike of
Martha has NOTHING to do with Sharon as I already stated to Tub. Course
you will claim killfile.

KaEfEr

>
>Michael

****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

Volfie

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
>> Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.
>>
>> Martha

A delicate little flower, isn't she?

Volfie -> the mouth of a trucker on the body of a toad


>> KaEfEr, Wee petite Toad, wrote:
>>
>> ... Every rapist deserves to have a rod

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:09:42 -0800, "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"Volfie" <vol...@aol.comPackQ2> wrote in message
>news:19991218122457...@ng-fq1.aol.com...


>> >
>> > Every rapist deserves to have a rod
>> >> >rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> >> >Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>> >> >

>> >> >KaEfEr
>>
>>
>> > Which, of course, would be rape.
>> >
>> >...geminiwalker
>> >
>>

>> Are you begining to see my point about this person yet, geminiwalker?
>>
>> Volfie -> and such a lovely way with words, too...
>

>She's one of those Lart things. What did you expect ?
>
>Michael

LMAO..so says the dog who is fixated on pussy's.. LMAO

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:08:33 -0800, "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"Martha >" <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:385B94...@erols.com...
>> KaEfEr wrote:
>>
>> ... Every rapist deserves to have a rod


>> > rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> > Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>>

>> Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.
>>
>> Martha
>

>Damned. I've had Penny in the kill pen for a long time but reading these
>followups to her posts has made me realize a couple of things. Larters are
>into rape and anal humiliation.
>
>Michael

LMAO .. you are so funny, doggie. And such a liar. You responded to
one of my posts not too long ago, idiot... LMAO

Every9man

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to

From: KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>

On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 10:32:32 -0800, geminiwalker <chu...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> Every rapist deserves to have a rod


>> >rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> >Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>> >

>> >KaEfEr
>>
>
> Which, of course, would be rape.
>
>...geminiwalker

/No shit, Sherlock. So what.. they get what they dish out as far as I am
/concerned.

/KaEfEr


Exactly my point. You think rape can be deserved.

Totally unlike what I said about some women who contribute to their own abuse.

Barbara

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
Pooh Bear wrote:

>
> Yeah, but she was joking. Maybe you should get over your differences in
> senses of humour.
>

> I joke all the time, sometimes at "inappropriate" times. I even make
> jokes about dead family and friends. Doesn't mean I don't love and
> respect them. It's just my way.
>

> I really doubt that you really believe that Martha would really harm any
> baby.
>

> I seem to remember Jason being hurtful and Martha responding...

Naw, the only thing Jason's ever done to me is the mail-bombing, and
that was after the baby remark. I said it for other reasons.

Martha

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
Pooh Bear wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:40:18 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Again, anyone who uses a baby for any means whether they are joking or
> >not is someone who I hold in contempt.
>
> I don't happen to consider a baby a sentient being (it isn't until at
> least a year or two) so I'm just as upset at a whale or an elephant dying
> as I am a human baby. My feelings might change if I was a parent, but I
> doubt it.
>
> I'm not saying it's right to kill a baby (unless it is severely disabled)
> but then I don't think it's right to eat meat either.
>
> I *do* think that killing an adult is a *lot* more serious than killing a
> baby and the Canadian courts agree.

Erk. I did not say I wanted Jason's baby killed, or to die, even. I
asked if it had died *yet*. That's all it took, apparently.

Martha

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
KaEfEr wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 16:12:17 +0000, Jason <Jason...@virgin.net> wrote:
...

> >You're totally right on this one Penny, I was not hurtful to Martha in any
> >way prior to her remark.
> >The thread went exactly how you describe it!
> >
> >ciao
> >
> >Jason
>
> I know, Jason. Course Martha and her pions will see that quite
> differently.

My, er, pions and I do not see it quite differently at all. Jason is a
jerk, but he didn't do anything specifically to me.

Martha

Every9man

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to

From: KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>

On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 16:12:17 +0000, Jason <Jason...@virgin.net> wrote:

>
>
>KaEfEr wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:31:53 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:18:06 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >>I am not angry with her, I just don't like her for many, many reasons.
>> >>I tried to make peace once. But I lost total respect for her when she
>> >>asked Jason if his newborn baby was dead yet and then in the following
>> >>posts encouraged Joe to write a demented tale using that baby. I have

>> >>nothing but contempt for anyone who uses a baby for any purpose.


>> >
>> >Yeah, but she was joking. Maybe you should get over your differences in
>> >senses of humour.
>> >
>>

>> That is a sick sense of humor that I want no part of, Tub. That is not
>> who I am.
>>

>> >I joke all the time, sometimes at "inappropriate" times. I even make
>> >jokes about dead family and friends. Doesn't mean I don't love and
>> >respect them. It's just my way.
>>

>> And I think that kind of joking is inappropriate at all times. But it
>> is your way and who is to say you are wrong. I just don't have to like
>> it.
>>
>> >

>> >I really doubt that you really believe that Martha would really harm any
>> >baby.
>>

>> I know nothing of the sort because I do not know her in real life. I
>> just know her from usenet and that makes me not want to know her in RL.
>>
>> >

>> >I seem to remember Jason being hurtful and Martha responding...
>>

>> Not true. Jason made a comment about where he got an expression from,
>> stating it was Martha. She came back with that baby shot for no reason.

>> Again, anyone who uses a baby for any means whether they are joking or

>> not is someone who I hold in contempt. And don't forget, Tub. We all
>> know how sick Joe is and some of the sick things he puts out there. For
>> her to encourage a sick man to write a horrible tale about that
>> beautiful baby is just as sickening.
>

>You're totally right on this one Penny, I was not hurtful to Martha in any
>way prior to her remark.
>The thread went exactly how you describe it!
>
>ciao
>
>Jason

/I know, Jason. Course Martha and her pions will see that quite
/differently.

/Penny

Of course Penny doesnt realize that there is a history here as in every other
animosity.

Barbara-pion extraordinaire


Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
KaEfEr wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 10:32:32 -0800, geminiwalker <chu...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Every rapist deserves to have a rod
> >> >rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
> >> >Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
> >> >
> >> >KaEfEr
> >>
> >
> > Which, of course, would be rape.
> >
> >...geminiwalker
>
> No shit, Sherlock. So what.. they get what they dish out as far as I am
> concerned.

So a boy who grew up being, oh--I don't know--orally raped, say? might
be justified in orally raping *his* rapist? And if that wasn't
possible, might the grown-up boy have a justifiable rage against people
who mistreat children?

Martha, in awe of Penny's beautiful way with words

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
KaEfEr wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 09:05:17 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
> wrote:
>
> >KaEfEr wrote:
> >
> >... Every rapist deserves to have a rod

> >> rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
> >> Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
> >
> >Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.
> >
> >Martha
>
> And you favor murder?

Cite, please? I quoted your statement. You quote mine. I do not
"favor" murder.

> And you favor wishes of murder on children?

Cite? I do not "favor" *or* disfavor wishes of any kind--wishes don't
make things happen, Penny. Sorry to break that to you. And it seems to
me that in your quote, above, you wish murder on adults.

And
> you favor enabling an abuser?

Who's the abuser? And what do you mean by "enabling?" If you're
talking about Joe, he doesn't need enabling by me or anyone else. His
parents "enabled" his fury, not me.

Martha

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
Dog3 wrote:
>
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "Martha >" <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:385B94...@erols.com...

> > KaEfEr wrote:
> >
> > ... Every rapist deserves to have a rod
> > > rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
> > > Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
> >
> > Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.
> >
> > Martha
>
> Damned. I've had Penny in the kill pen for a long time but reading these
> followups to her posts has made me realize a couple of things. Larters are
> into rape and anal humiliation.
>
> Michael

I'm telling you. I don't read auk any more, partly because of the
sickening Laverne Prison Bride ascii's of anal rape, each with a cute
caption. They are a homophobic bunch over there, and I think their
fascination with anal rape is the focus.

Martha

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
KaEfEr wrote:

>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:08:33 -0800, "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> >x-no-archive: yes
> >
> >"Martha >" <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
> >news:385B94...@erols.com...
> >> KaEfEr wrote:
> >>
> >> ... Every rapist deserves to have a rod
> >> > rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
> >> > Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
> >>
> >> Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.
> >>
> >> Martha
> >
> >Damned. I've had Penny in the kill pen for a long time but reading these
> >followups to her posts has made me realize a couple of things. Larters are
> >into rape and anal humiliation.
> >
> >Michael
>
> LMAO .. you are so funny, doggie. And such a liar. You responded to
> one of my posts not too long ago, idiot... LMAO

If you could control your ass-offing laughter for a minute, Penny, could
you post proof of this allegation? Or is this another of your careless
accusations, another smear flung at people you don't care for? Or maybe
it's just another hallucination? Whatever--I think you should be
prepared to back up your aspersions, or don't cast 'em.

Martha

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
daddys_g...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> > >>I have stated that over and over. Every rapist deserves to have a

> rod
> > >>rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
> > >>Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
> > >>
> > >>KaEfEr
>
> P.S. Except my daddy's pee-pee, of cours. Don't hurt myDaddy. He
> treats me ever so good even when we are being bad. Don't tell mommy.
>

Oh, dear. Well, this is pretty loathesome, but it does bring up a good
point: I think we all know the origin of Penny's rage. All of us but
Penny, maybe.

Martha

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:24:21 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
wrote:

>KaEfEr wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:08:33 -0800, "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>> >x-no-archive: yes
>> >
>> >"Martha >" <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
>> >news:385B94...@erols.com...
>> >> KaEfEr wrote:
>> >>

>> >> ... Every rapist deserves to have a rod


>> >> > rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> >> > Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>> >>

>> >> Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.
>> >>
>> >> Martha
>> >
>> >Damned. I've had Penny in the kill pen for a long time but reading these
>> >followups to her posts has made me realize a couple of things. Larters are
>> >into rape and anal humiliation.
>> >
>> >Michael
>>
>> LMAO .. you are so funny, doggie. And such a liar. You responded to
>> one of my posts not too long ago, idiot... LMAO
>
>If you could control your ass-offing laughter for a minute, Penny, could
>you post proof of this allegation? Or is this another of your careless
>accusations, another smear flung at people you don't care for? Or maybe
>it's just another hallucination? Whatever--I think you should be
>prepared to back up your aspersions, or don't cast 'em.
>
>Martha

Martha... check out the Sondra London threads and you will see. Why
should I do your friggen work for you when I don't need to prove a
friggen thing to you?

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:20:58 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
wrote:

>KaEfEr wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 09:05:17 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>


>> wrote:
>>
>> >KaEfEr wrote:
>> >
>> >... Every rapist deserves to have a rod
>> >> rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> >> Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>> >
>> >Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.
>> >
>> >Martha
>>

>> And you favor murder?
>
>Cite, please? I quoted your statement. You quote mine. I do not
>"favor" murder.
>
>> And you favor wishes of murder on children?
>
>Cite? I do not "favor" *or* disfavor wishes of any kind--wishes don't
>make things happen, Penny. Sorry to break that to you. And it seems to
>me that in your quote, above, you wish murder on adults.
>
> And
>> you favor enabling an abuser?
>
>Who's the abuser? And what do you mean by "enabling?" If you're
>talking about Joe, he doesn't need enabling by me or anyone else. His
>parents "enabled" his fury, not me.
>
>Martha

Wake the fuck up, idiot. Those were questions by me not statements..
LOL

Taylor NetScum

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 19:00:14 -0800, "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com> said:

>"Pooh Bear" <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote in message

>news:sook5s4gl1amcdb29...@4ax.com...
>> Kev best ignore this one!


>>
>> **********
>>
>> your pal,
>> The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>> femin...@bigfoot.com
>

>Don't forget Cipher, his lap dancing on Hannigan might get him in trouble.

Funny, only lap dancing I see is you on Hannigan's command. Just what
did he offer to get you to finally play along with him? Everybody else
he's tried with laughed at his pathetic ass.


--
Taylor NetScum (RIP 10/16/97)
**************************************************************
I AM SO SMART! I AM SO SMART!
s-m-r-t...I MEAN s-m-A-r-t! - Homer Simpson, 1994
**************************************************************
"Only one was clearly under the age of 10." - Richard Bullis,
Admitted Kiddy Porn Collector - ID: <3793...@news.uncensored-news.com>
**************************************************************

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:29:18 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
wrote:

>So a boy who grew up being, oh--I don't know--orally raped, say? might


>be justified in orally raping *his* rapist? And if that wasn't
>possible, might the grown-up boy have a justifiable rage against people
>who mistreat children?
>
>Martha, in awe of Penny's beautiful way with words

Wow! Penny is Joe's sock!?!

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
Dog3 wrote:
>
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "Martha >" <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:385BEA...@erols.com...

> > Pooh Bear wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Yeah, but she was joking. Maybe you should get over your differences in
> > > senses of humour.
> > >
> > > I joke all the time, sometimes at "inappropriate" times. I even make
> > > jokes about dead family and friends. Doesn't mean I don't love and
> > > respect them. It's just my way.
> > >
> > > I really doubt that you really believe that Martha would really harm any
> > > baby.
> > >
> > > I seem to remember Jason being hurtful and Martha responding...
> >
> > Naw, the only thing Jason's ever done to me is the mail-bombing, and
> > that was after the baby remark. I said it for other reasons.
> >
> > Martha
>
> Jason mail bombed you ?
>
> Michael

Yeah. At least I think it was Jason. Might have been Zitfries. I have
no interest or time to investigate.

Martha

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to

Nice mouth, Penny.

I answered your questions, all but the last one. I don't understand the
question.

HTH,
Martha

Martha <Leo Cox >

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
KaEfEr wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:24:21 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
> wrote:

>
> >KaEfEr wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:08:33 -0800, "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >x-no-archive: yes
> >> >
> >> >"Martha >" <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:385B94...@erols.com...

> >> >> KaEfEr wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> ... Every rapist deserves to have a rod
> >> >> > rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
> >> >> > Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
> >> >>
> >> >> Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.
> >> >>
> >> >> Martha
> >> >
> >> >Damned. I've had Penny in the kill pen for a long time but reading these
> >> >followups to her posts has made me realize a couple of things. Larters are
> >> >into rape and anal humiliation.
> >> >
> >> >Michael
> >>
> >> LMAO .. you are so funny, doggie. And such a liar. You responded to
> >> one of my posts not too long ago, idiot... LMAO
> >
> >If you could control your ass-offing laughter for a minute, Penny, could
> >you post proof of this allegation? Or is this another of your careless
> >accusations, another smear flung at people you don't care for? Or maybe
> >it's just another hallucination? Whatever--I think you should be
> >prepared to back up your aspersions, or don't cast 'em.
> >
> >Martha
>
> Martha... check out the Sondra London threads and you will see. Why
> should I do your friggen work for you when I don't need to prove a
> friggen thing to you?
>

The "Sondra London threads," huh? Not going to give me a "friggen"
clue, then, eh, Penny? So you don't have anything to back up your ugly
allegation. As usual.

Martha

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 16:06:52 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
wrote:

>KaEfEr wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:20:58 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >KaEfEr wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 09:05:17 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>


>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >KaEfEr wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >... Every rapist deserves to have a rod
>> >> >> rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> >> >> Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>> >> >
>> >> >Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.
>> >> >
>> >> >Martha
>> >>

>> >> And you favor murder?
>> >
>> >Cite, please? I quoted your statement. You quote mine. I do not
>> >"favor" murder.
>> >
>> >> And you favor wishes of murder on children?
>> >
>> >Cite? I do not "favor" *or* disfavor wishes of any kind--wishes don't
>> >make things happen, Penny. Sorry to break that to you. And it seems to
>> >me that in your quote, above, you wish murder on adults.
>> >
>> > And
>> >> you favor enabling an abuser?
>> >
>> >Who's the abuser? And what do you mean by "enabling?" If you're
>> >talking about Joe, he doesn't need enabling by me or anyone else. His
>> >parents "enabled" his fury, not me.
>> >
>> >Martha
>>
>> Wake the fuck up, idiot. Those were questions by me not statements..
>> LOL
>
>Nice mouth, Penny.

Thanks. You bring the best out of me. :)

>
>I answered your questions, all but the last one. I don't understand the
>question.
>
>HTH,
>Martha

Not my problem you have a comprehension flaw.

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 21:04:57 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:29:18 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
>wrote:
>


>>So a boy who grew up being, oh--I don't know--orally raped, say? might
>>be justified in orally raping *his* rapist? And if that wasn't
>>possible, might the grown-up boy have a justifiable rage against people
>>who mistreat children?
>>
>>Martha, in awe of Penny's beautiful way with words
>
>Wow! Penny is Joe's sock!?!

You all wish.

KaEfEr

>
>**********
>
>your pal,
>The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>femin...@bigfoot.com

****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

Pooh Bear

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 13:12:52 -0800, Taylor NetScum
<taylor....@TAKOUTTHISlart.com> wrote:

>You ask that without laughing? This is Welfare Queen you are talking
>about, it's her entitlement thinking. People on welfare like her forget
>about what's it's like to do things for yourself. It's no surprise
>she's once again asking for handouts.

Fuck, man, I'm sure glad I'm not you. What a way to go through life, on
a crusade against... a bunch of little old ladies.

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 13:12:37 -0800, Taylor NetScum
<taylor....@TAKOUTTHISlart.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 18:21:12 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>said:


>
>>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:09:42 -0800, "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>

>>>"Volfie" <vol...@aol.comPackQ2> wrote in message
>>>news:19991218122457...@ng-fq1.aol.com...
>>>> >

>>>> > Every rapist deserves to have a rod
>>>> >> >rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>>>> >> >Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>>>> >> >

>>>> >> >KaEfEr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Which, of course, would be rape.
>>>> >
>>>> >...geminiwalker
>>>> >
>>>>

>>>> Are you begining to see my point about this person yet, geminiwalker?
>>>>
>>>> Volfie -> and such a lovely way with words, too...
>>>
>>>She's one of those Lart things. What did you expect ?
>>>
>>>Michael
>>
>>LMAO..so says the dog who is fixated on pussy's.. LMAO
>

>No, the Dog that is a pussy, fixated on Martin Hannigan. Welfare Queen
>must be pissed that she lost her personal suck-ass fuckhead to him.

You could be right on that one, Taylor. Although Martha has plenty of
other suck asses in this ng. Most of them women though. Hmmmmm..what
do you think that means?

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 16:08:17 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
wrote:

>KaEfEr wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:24:21 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >KaEfEr wrote:


>> >>
>> >> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:08:33 -0800, "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >x-no-archive: yes
>> >> >

>> >> >"Martha >" <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
>> >> >news:385B94...@erols.com...
>> >> >> KaEfEr wrote:
>> >> >>

>> >> >> ... Every rapist deserves to have a rod


>> >> >> > rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> >> >> > Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>> >> >>

>> >> >> Wow. Penile rape, followed by murder. And you favor it? Jesus.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Martha
>> >> >

>> >> >Damned. I've had Penny in the kill pen for a long time but reading these
>> >> >followups to her posts has made me realize a couple of things. Larters are
>> >> >into rape and anal humiliation.
>> >> >
>> >> >Michael
>> >>
>> >> LMAO .. you are so funny, doggie. And such a liar. You responded to
>> >> one of my posts not too long ago, idiot... LMAO
>> >
>> >If you could control your ass-offing laughter for a minute, Penny, could
>> >you post proof of this allegation? Or is this another of your careless
>> >accusations, another smear flung at people you don't care for? Or maybe
>> >it's just another hallucination? Whatever--I think you should be
>> >prepared to back up your aspersions, or don't cast 'em.
>> >
>> >Martha
>>
>> Martha... check out the Sondra London threads and you will see. Why
>> should I do your friggen work for you when I don't need to prove a
>> friggen thing to you?
>>
>
>The "Sondra London threads," huh? Not going to give me a "friggen"
>clue, then, eh, Penny? So you don't have anything to back up your ugly
>allegation. As usual.
>
>Martha

You are the liar around here, not me. I don't need to prove one
friggin thing to you, bitch. You want to know.. find it yourself!

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 21:48:07 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 13:12:52 -0800, Taylor NetScum
><taylor....@TAKOUTTHISlart.com> wrote:
>
>>You ask that without laughing? This is Welfare Queen you are talking
>>about, it's her entitlement thinking. People on welfare like her forget
>>about what's it's like to do things for yourself. It's no surprise
>>she's once again asking for handouts.
>
>Fuck, man, I'm sure glad I'm not you. What a way to go through life, on
>a crusade against... a bunch of little old ladies.

LOL, Tub. Little old "ladies"?! You mean litlle old busy bodied hags,
don't you? :)

KaEfEr

>
>**********
>
>your pal,
>The *MIGHTY* (yet modest) Two Tub Man
>femin...@bigfoot.com

****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 13:12:55 -0800, Taylor NetScum
<taylor....@TAKOUTTHISlart.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 16:05:06 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
>said:


>
>>Dog3 wrote:
>>>
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
>>> "Martha >" <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message

>>> news:385BEA...@erols.com...
>>> > Pooh Bear wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > Yeah, but she was joking. Maybe you should get over your differences in
>>> > > senses of humour.
>>> > >
>>> > > I joke all the time, sometimes at "inappropriate" times. I even make
>>> > > jokes about dead family and friends. Doesn't mean I don't love and
>>> > > respect them. It's just my way.
>>> > >
>>> > > I really doubt that you really believe that Martha would really harm any
>>> > > baby.
>>> > >
>>> > > I seem to remember Jason being hurtful and Martha responding...
>>> >
>>> > Naw, the only thing Jason's ever done to me is the mail-bombing, and
>>> > that was after the baby remark. I said it for other reasons.
>>> >
>>> > Martha
>>>
>>> Jason mail bombed you ?
>>>
>>> Michael
>>
>>Yeah. At least I think it was Jason. Might have been Zitfries. I have
>>no interest or time to investigate.
>

>Funny how it's well known that it's Dog3 who does the list bombs around
>here. I'm surprised you didn't blame Sharon. Isn't she the root of all
>your problems from birth till now, Welfare Queen?

I noticed how they love to play that blame game along with the rest of
their assinine games.

Penny


****************************************
http://members.tripod.com/~KaEfY
****************************************

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 14:14:10 -0800, Taylor NetScum
<taylor....@TAKOUTTHISlart.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 22:02:06 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>said:

>Well, you can't blame them. Blame Sharon.

You are right.. Sharon?! It is all YOUR fault Martha and Barbara are
such stupid bitches and it is YOUR fault the rest of the Orbiteers and
wanna be orbiteers are such idiots.

:)

Desilets

unread,
Dec 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/18/99
to

Sharonpo wrote in message <19991218230758...@ng-fn1.aol.com>...
>>Martha <A HREF="mailto:LeoCox <lc...@aol.com">LeoCox <lc...@aol.com >
>
>>
>>Desilets wrote:
>>
>>...
>>> BYE BYE
>>
>>Oh... if only...
>>
>>So how's *your* health, Doozie?
>>
>>Martha, just wondering
>>
>
>This is beyond despicable. Here is the url to your meal ticket's page:
>
>http://njmonthly.com/shoppers/glen.html
>
>Tell us again how you were forced into receiving aid for your disabled
child.

Heh heh heh
Jeffy boy only manages OTHER peoples money,at a third rate company
at that. But, his income IS made on the backs of wealthy people,
(translation leech) , which appears to disqualify them for public aid. I
wonder if
his blue blood, blue chip clients know he is married to usenet's Big Gimp,
aka, Welfare
Queen and that they collect public funds while catering to all those rich
while living in New Hope. I bet Monstra collects SSI for her disabilities
too!!!

TTFN
Desilets


Mr. Sweetness & Light.

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to

Martha > >> wrote in message <385BF7...@erols.com>...

>Dog3 wrote:
>>
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>> "Martha >" <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:385BEA...@erols.com...
>> > Pooh Bear wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Yeah, but she was joking. Maybe you should get over your differences
in
>> > > senses of humour.
>> > >
>> > > I joke all the time, sometimes at "inappropriate" times. I even make
>> > > jokes about dead family and friends. Doesn't mean I don't love and
>> > > respect them. It's just my way.
>> > >
>> > > I really doubt that you really believe that Martha would really harm
any
>> > > baby.
>> > >
>> > > I seem to remember Jason being hurtful and Martha responding...
>> >
>> > Naw, the only thing Jason's ever done to me is the mail-bombing, and
>> > that was after the baby remark. I said it for other reasons.
>> >
>> > Martha
>>
>> Jason mail bombed you ?
>>
>> Michael
>
>Yeah. At least I think it was Jason. Might have been Zitfries. I have
>no interest or time to investigate.
>
>Martha

Wasn't me. I have no interest either. Post the headers.

Every9man

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to

From: Taylor NetScum <taylor....@TAKOUTTHISlart.com>

On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:26:42 -0500, Martha <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com>>
said:

>daddys_g...@my-deja.com (Ever...@aol.com, Barbara) wrote:
>>
>> > >>I have stated that over and over. Every rapist deserves to have a


>> rod
>> > >>rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> > >>Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>> > >>

>> > >>KaEfEr
>>
>> P.S. Except my daddy's pee-pee, of cours. Don't hurt myDaddy. He
>> treats me ever so good even when we are being bad. Don't tell mommy.
>>
>
>Oh, dear. Well, this is pretty loathesome, but it does bring up a good
>point: I think we all know the origin of Penny's rage. All of us but
>Penny, maybe.

Too bad it was Barbage who wrote it though, huh Welfare Queen? Now
hurry and blame Sharon for making Barbara do it.

*********************************************************

Huh?

Barbara


Every9man

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to
Subject: Re: OT: Fries' anal rape fantasies
From: "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 18 December 1999 05:24 PM EST
Message-id: <83gqc6$t37$1...@nntp6.atl.mindspring.net>

x-no-archive: yes

"Every9man" <ever...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:19991218151809...@ng-fj1.aol.com...


>
> From: KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 16:12:17 +0000, Jason <Jason...@virgin.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >KaEfEr wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:31:53 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:18:06 +0000, KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>I am not angry with her, I just don't like her for many, many
reasons.
> >> >>I tried to make peace once. But I lost total respect for her when
she
> >> >>asked Jason if his newborn baby was dead yet and then in the
following
> >> >>posts encouraged Joe to write a demented tale using that baby. I
have
> >> >>nothing but contempt for anyone who uses a baby for any purpose.
> >> >

> >> >Yeah, but she was joking. Maybe you should get over your differences
in
> >> >senses of humour.
> >> >
> >>

> >> That is a sick sense of humor that I want no part of, Tub. That is not
> >> who I am.
> >>

> >> >I joke all the time, sometimes at "inappropriate" times. I even make
> >> >jokes about dead family and friends. Doesn't mean I don't love and
> >> >respect them. It's just my way.
> >>

> >> And I think that kind of joking is inappropriate at all times. But it
> >> is your way and who is to say you are wrong. I just don't have to like
> >> it.
> >>
> >> >

> >> >I really doubt that you really believe that Martha would really harm
any
> >> >baby.
> >>

> >> I know nothing of the sort because I do not know her in real life. I
> >> just know her from usenet and that makes me not want to know her in RL.
> >>
> >> >

> >> >I seem to remember Jason being hurtful and Martha responding...
> >>

> >> Not true. Jason made a comment about where he got an expression from,
> >> stating it was Martha. She came back with that baby shot for no
reason.
> >> Again, anyone who uses a baby for any means whether they are joking or
> >> not is someone who I hold in contempt. And don't forget, Tub. We all
> >> know how sick Joe is and some of the sick things he puts out there.
For
> >> her to encourage a sick man to write a horrible tale about that
> >> beautiful baby is just as sickening.
> >
> >You're totally right on this one Penny, I was not hurtful to Martha in
any
> >way prior to her remark.
> >The thread went exactly how you describe it!
> >
> >ciao
> >
> >Jason
>
> /I know, Jason. Course Martha and her pions will see that quite
> /differently.
>
> /Penny
>
> Of course Penny doesnt realize that there is a history here as in every
other
> animosity.
>
> Barbara-pion extraordinaire

I know nothing about Jason except he's in my killfile for posting tons of
news stories I've already read. The mail bombing of Martha has me stumped
though. I've never thought of Jason as vindictive, just a Joe hater.

Mipon
***************
Jason used to stalk and harrass Joe, assuming many different screen names to
confound Joe's excom list.
He couldnt deal with the fact that Joe didnt want to have anything to do with
him.
He says he had good reason as he maintains that Joe attacked him but Joe doesnt
usually attack anyone unless provoked.

I think he's the one who sent the forged email in my name to Joe --cant prove
it though-- only the fact that he was the only one posting from that domain at
the time.

Barbara

Every9man

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to

From: "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com>


"Every9man" <ever...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:19991218134602...@ng-fo1.aol.com...
>
> From: KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>


> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 10:32:32 -0800, geminiwalker <chu...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
>

> > Every rapist deserves to have a rod
> >> >rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
> >> >Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
> >> >
> >> >KaEfEr
> >>
> >

> > Which, of course, would be rape.
> >
> >...geminiwalker
>

> /No shit, Sherlock. So what.. they get what they dish out as far as I am
> /concerned.
>
> /KaEfEr
>
>
> Exactly my point. You think rape can be deserved.
>
> Totally unlike what I said about some women who contribute to their own
abuse.
>
> Barbara

You have to consider the source here Barbara. Larters like to disrupt
newsgroups, They do not engage in serious discourse.

Michael

*************

It's interesting. With all of the brouhaha over my post to a private list that
Penny decided to purloin to use for flame bait, *only* Hester and Imp dealt
with the issue in a serious manner.

Barbara


Mr. Sweetness & Light.

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to

Every9man wrote in message <19991218215344...@ng-fa1.aol.com>...

>Subject: Re: OT: Fries' anal rape fantasies
>From: "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com>
>Date: Sat, 18 December 1999 05:24 PM EST
>Message-id: <83gqc6$t37$1...@nntp6.atl.mindspring.net>
>
>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"Every9man" <ever...@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:19991218151809...@ng-fj1.aol.com...
>>
>> From: KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>>
So this is on topic to the subject line? Dammit, stick to the topic! Talk
about my "fantasies"!


Sharonpo

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to

Sharonpo

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to
> Taylor NetScum taylor....@TAKOUTTHISlart.com

>Funny how it's well known that it's Dog3 who does the list bombs around
>here. I'm surprised you didn't blame Sharon. Isn't she the root of all
>your problems from birth till now, Welfare Queen?
>

I think she's saving the "one leg is shorter than the other" for a rainy day.
But, I'd be willing to bet it's gonna be my fault.

Sharonpo

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to
>KaEfEr kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com

><taylor....@TAKOUTTHISlart.com> wrote:

>>Well, you can't blame them. Blame Sharon.
>
>You are right.. Sharon?! It is all YOUR fault Martha and Barbara are
>such stupid bitches and it is YOUR fault the rest of the Orbiteers and
>wanna be orbiteers are such idiots.

HOO HAW - my work is done! Just look at those poor excuses for humans. It has
been a really dirty job, but there they are - did you notice Barbage eating
boogers? and Mouthra yelling "Respite"?

Tutu Tub and Michael are still cowering behind Mouthra's voluminous skirt.

There will likely be some residual sniping, but that's to be expected from the
disenfranchised rabble.

Jason

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to

Every9man wrote:

> Barbara

You're not still going on about that?
Sorry I know nothing about it!!
I've never emailed Joe, EVER, either in my name or any other!!

ciao

Jason


Jason

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to

"Martha

> Dog3 wrote:
> >
> > x-no-archive: yes
> >
> > "Martha >" <Leo Cox <lc...@aol.com> wrote in message
> > news:385BEA...@erols.com...
> > > Pooh Bear wrote:
> > >
> > > >

> > > > Yeah, but she was joking. Maybe you should get over your differences in
> > > > senses of humour.
> > > >

> > > > I joke all the time, sometimes at "inappropriate" times. I even make
> > > > jokes about dead family and friends. Doesn't mean I don't love and
> > > > respect them. It's just my way.
> > > >

> > > > I really doubt that you really believe that Martha would really harm any
> > > > baby.
> > > >

> > > > I seem to remember Jason being hurtful and Martha responding...
> > >

> > > Naw, the only thing Jason's ever done to me is the mail-bombing, and
> > > that was after the baby remark. I said it for other reasons.
> > >
> > > Martha
> >
> > Jason mail bombed you ?
> >
> > Michael
>
> Yeah. At least I think it was Jason. Might have been Zitfries. I have
> no interest or time to investigate.
>
> Martha

I have never done anything to you!!! Either before or after the baby remark!!!
You're not worth it!!!

There is far more people here than me that can't stand you!!!

ciao

Jason

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 14:32:38 -0800, "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"Every9man" <ever...@aol.com> wrote in message

>news:19991218134602...@ng-fo1.aol.com...
>>
>> From: KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>>


>> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 10:32:32 -0800, geminiwalker <chu...@earthlink.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Every rapist deserves to have a rod
>> >> >rammed up their dick until they pass out and then kill the bastards.
>> >> >Clear on my views on rape now, fool?
>> >> >
>> >> >KaEfEr
>> >>
>> >
>> > Which, of course, would be rape.
>> >
>> >...geminiwalker
>>
>> /No shit, Sherlock. So what.. they get what they dish out as far as I am
>> /concerned.
>>
>> /KaEfEr
>>
>>
>> Exactly my point. You think rape can be deserved.
>>
>> Totally unlike what I said about some women who contribute to their own
>abuse.
>>
>> Barbara

LIAR, Barbara. I said RAPISTS get what they deserve in this thread.
AFTER the fact of your bullshit hypocricy. In the DP thread, I pondered
a question. And that question was totally in the same line as you.. if
they repeat crimes over and over aren't they contributing to their own
rape? Same as you, idiot. I NEVER stated convicts deserved to be
raped, you lying twit!

>
>You have to consider the source here Barbara. Larters like to disrupt
>newsgroups, They do not engage in serious discourse.
>
>Michael

Right, Michael. You and your pals always turn a nice thread into an
ugly flame war over words you claim you see.. LOL .. I do think all of
you are hypocrites!

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to
On Sun, 19 Dec 1999 03:30:29 GMT, "Mr. Sweetness & Light."
<kfr...@lart.com> wrote:

>
>Every9man wrote in message <19991218215344...@ng-fa1.aol.com>...

>>Subject: Re: OT: Fries' anal rape fantasies
>>From: "Dog3" <do...@mindspring.com>
>>Date: Sat, 18 December 1999 05:24 PM EST
>>Message-id: <83gqc6$t37$1...@nntp6.atl.mindspring.net>
>>

>>x-no-archive: yes
>>
>>"Every9man" <ever...@aol.com> wrote in message

>>news:19991218151809...@ng-fj1.aol.com...
>>>
>>> From: KaEfEr <kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>>>


>>> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 16:12:17 +0000, Jason <Jason...@virgin.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >KaEfEr wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:31:53 GMT, Pooh Bear <lo...@fuzzy.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:18:06 +0000, KaEfEr
><kae...@REMOVECAPSlart.com>
>>> >> >wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >>I am not angry with her, I just don't like her for many, many
>>reasons.
>>> >> >>I tried to make peace once. But I lost total respect for her when
>>she
>>> >> >>asked Jason if his newborn baby was dead yet and then in the
>>following
>>> >> >>posts encouraged Joe to write a demented tale using that baby. I
>>have
>>> >> >>nothing but contempt for anyone who uses a baby for any purpose.
>>> >> >

>>> >> >Yeah, but she was joking. Maybe you should get over your differences
>>in
>>> >> >senses of humour.
>>> >> >
>>> >>

>>> >> That is a sick sense of humor that I want no part of, Tub. That is
>not
>>> >> who I am.
>>> >>

>>> >> >I joke all the time, sometimes at "inappropriate" times. I even make
>>> >> >jokes about dead family and friends. Doesn't mean I don't love and
>>> >> >respect them. It's just my way.
>>> >>

>>> >> And I think that kind of joking is inappropriate at all times. But it
>>> >> is your way and who is to say you are wrong. I just don't have to
>like
>>> >> it.
>>> >>
>>> >> >

>>> >> >I really doubt that you really believe that Martha would really harm
>>any
>>> >> >baby.
>>> >>

>>> >> I know nothing of the sort because I do not know her in real life. I
>>> >> just know her from usenet and that makes me not want to know her in
>RL.
>>> >>
>>> >> >

>>> >> >I seem to remember Jason being hurtful and Martha responding...
>>> >>

>So this is on topic to the subject line? Dammit, stick to the topic! Talk
>about my "fantasies"!
>

Do you have a fantasy in which you tape that hypocrites' fingers
together so she can't type her lies?

KaEfEr

unread,
Dec 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/19/99
to
On Sun, 19 Dec 1999 06:22:57 +0000, Jason <Jason...@virgin.net> wrote:

>> Barbara
>
>You're not still going on about that?
>Sorry I know nothing about it!!
>I've never emailed Joe, EVER, either in my name or any other!!
>
>ciao
>
>Jason

She hates it when anyone speaks bad of her friends, Jason. That is why
she doesn't think before she types.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages