1. Neighbor says he saw John Andrew at the house on
Christmas day.
2. His name is not listed on the airfare ticket to Atlanta.
Also, his "disappearing act" from college during the heat of
the investigation is probably reason for them to take a closer
look into his actions.
Your thoughts?
Sincerely,
Colton
Yes, the not going back to classes at U of C had me wondering.
I heard on one of the TV shows that even Burke had gone back
to school in Boulder. And what about that court thing on alcohol
where John Andrew was supposed to appear. I haven't heard
anything more about that. Maybe they reset a hearing or somesuch,
if there ever was to be one. Maybe a fine was just paid. I don't know.
Any "airline folks" out there who can put some light on this?
B Doe Ta...@aol.com
B Doe Ta...@aol.com
I still wanna hear about Big-Half-Sister. If she and Drew flew to
Minnesota together, what happened to her when Drew flew to Boulder?
Where's *her* airline ticket with Daddy's name on it? Didn't Mom say
"both kids" were planning to meet the family in Michigan?
*>>2. His name is not listed on the airfare ticket to Atlanta.
This is really not all that unusual. I have used a plane ticket that is not in
my name several times. Sometimes my father's name would be on it instead of
mine. I used to visit a family I used to babysit for that had moved from my
neighborhood. My tickets were always in the father's name. That is just how the
travel agency did it. These tickets were all bought in Atlanta. Maybe we all
have the same travel agency?
.......Missy
>
>In <5f51mi$b...@tofu.alt.net> wic...@ionet.net (Colton) writes:
>>
>>Well, the focus has shifted to John Andrew (step-brother) and
>>BPD still questions his alibi. Few things to sort out ...
>>
>>1. Neighbor says he saw John Andrew at the house on
>> Christmas day.
>>
>>2. His name is not listed on the airfare ticket to Atlanta.
>>
>>Also, his "disappearing act" from college during the heat of
>>the investigation is probably reason for them to take a closer
>>look into his actions.
>>
>>Your thoughts?
>
>I still wanna hear about Big-Half-Sister. If she and Drew flew to
>Minnesota together, what happened to her when Drew flew to Boulder?
>Where's *her* airline ticket with Daddy's name on it? Didn't Mom say
>"both kids" were planning to meet the family in Michigan?
Do we know whose name was actually on the ticket? If John Bennet Ramsey, it might have been a case of John ANdrew using his frequent flier mileage. Airline personnel are requiring a picture ID to board these days (although I know of someone who got around that so who knows how strictly it is enforced), but would they have noticed the distinction between John Bennet and John Andrew? Was there a John * Ramsey on the passenger manifest?
Betsy Payne
I've always felt that a person's intelligence is directly reflected by the number of conflicting points of view he can entertain simultaneously on the same topic.
-Lisa Alther
Our local news this morning (Orlando, FL) reported that John Andrew's
alibi is still in question. They also mentioned the Mom has not as of
yet responded with a handwriting sample. Didn't Dad do that weeks ago?
Good thought, however, in light of all the recent security at US
airports, passengers are now required to give photo identification upon
check-in. Any inconsistencies in one's idenetity can cause them to be
denied boarding.
Jo
BDoeTabor <bdoe...@aol.com> wrote
> it doesn't have John Andrews name on it. It seems to me that whenever
> I've flown together with someone else, etc., they always asked me for MY
> name for MY ticket, no matter who was actually paying for it, and those
> times when I have been the one to pay for the tickets on my credit card
or
> cash, the agent still insisted on putting the actual passenfer's name on
> his or her ticket, not MY name.
That has always been my experience as well... In fact, I never pushed it,
but it always seemed pretty important that the actual *person's* name that
was going to be flying was the one on the ticket.( Even small children.)
erin
I think the police are playing a game of physcological warfare with John
Sr. It's like their giving him the message: "You've lost two children
already. One died by your own hand. Are you going to let your third
child go to prison and possibly even death row for something YOU did?
Confess, John Sr, Confess!"
I know police use pshycological tactics like this. They get a
proffesional mental health expert to write key phrases that will provoke
the killer into confessing or goofing up. This tactic was very obvious
in the press conference where they talked about feeling sorry for the
perp earlier in the case but not now.
I just look at those weekly press conferences as a propaganda machine to
talk to the killer.
Another thing to note, how did anyone find out about the name on the
airline ticket anyway? Airlines are tight lipped, so it didn't come
them. Had to come from the police. And police have been very silent on
everything. They let this little tidbit slip out so they could play a
game with John Sr. Their putting the pressure on him by putting more
pressure on John Andrew. And by the way, John Andrew and his sister are
well aware of who murdered Jon Bennet. Maybe I would go into hiding if
I were in this situation too.
JMO,
Daisy
Missy Pound wrote:
If junior is suspect or even guilty, it makes Dad's "SO?!" to the media
hounds, who yelled that the DA would go for the death penalty, an angry
parent's defensive retort to what he perceives as a pack of snarling dogs
on the heel of his child, rather than a sociopath's sneering dismissal of
his pursuers.
I find it curious that Ramsey's PR guy released a statement acknowledging
that the Ramseys "know" dad is the #1 suspect, just when the investigation
has veered back in junior's direction. Deflection? And where the hell is
junior, anyway? Let me predict that the next time we see him, he will be
taking the John Hinckley tour of some private European psychiatric
facility.
Curioser and curioser...
Anna Moore
(B Doe Ta...@aol.com)
Very hard to read which they might be doing. If, indeed, they aren't
being serious about the possibilty of the half-brother. I, personally,
am now taking a longer look at the mother because of this. I've taken a
look or two at the possibility before, but, in spite of the ugly
movie-like thing I dreamed up, I was going with the usual odds of child
abuse and my own biases in combination, so wound up looking hardest at
the nearest man.
-
"If I die of curiousity, who will entertain you with naive questions?"
I only answer my mail on an average of once every two months. Be
patient.
> I find it curious that Ramsey's PR guy released a statement acknowledging
> that the Ramseys "know" dad is the #1 suspect, just when the investigation
> has veered back in junior's direction. Deflection? And where the hell is
> junior, anyway? Let me predict that the next time we see him, he will be
> taking the John Hinckley tour of some private European psychiatric
> facility.
>
> Curioser and curioser...
That was always my response to those who think Burke did it. It would
have been handled very quietly by very discreet, very expensive attys. Of
course a 20 yr old could be a different story.
I still think it's Dad. I can't imagine why Patsy would defend the murder
of her child by someone who wasn't her child. It's a stretch for me to
understand why she would even defend her husband. I suspect she got
wrapped up in the coverup shortly after it happened and that's being held
over her head. If my premise is true, she should call up the DA and talk
plea bargain pronto.
Betsy
>
> Good thought, however, in light of all the recent security at US
> airports, passengers are now required to give photo identification upon
> check-in. Any inconsistencies in one's idenetity can cause them to be
> denied boarding.
>
> Jo
But when both names are "John Ramsey," what's the point?
Betsy
A coverup, required someone to call at the stated time (no one called)..
I wonder if john andrew took his father's ticket and got out.. I
seriously doubt patsy or john sr would attempt any cover for an adult
offspring (the more so if it involved sexual abuse and murder of their
own 6 year old daughter)...
Betsy,
I flip back and forth with my assessment of John Sr vs John Jr.
I do feel that Junior will be found in a psych hospital in the near
future if indeed it is him.
I also feel the police are playing Mind Ga,es so it's hard to know what
is really happenning and who the finger is really poiting at.
Unfortunately for all, Patsy is being such a unreal mother. If she had
integrity she could come forth for the decency of her lost child and
speak up. SHe knows the story. She could and should set things rights
regardless who is at fault. How can she live with herself?
Mary T