How does society GET women to agree to raise their womb excretions?? Via the
"Sacred Mommy mystical bond of love" myth and LIE. All women are TOLD by
society that mothers instinctually love their children. ANY biological Mommy
who does NOT love and want to raise her excretions, is decreed to be an
"abnormal freak". Therefore, ANY female biological creator who REFUSES to take
possession of and raise her excretions, is ADMITTING to the WORLD that she IS
an "abnormal freak". How MANY women can be expected to be COURAGEOUS enough to
make this public "admission"?? Almost NONE, and that's how a MILLION or more
Mommies who at their CORE true reality do NOT want their children, are
TERRORIZED by society into agreeing to possess them, leading DIRECTLY to most
of the child TORTURE and MURDER that Mommies end up committing.
The Sando Nieves case, out of California, is a PERFECT example of how EVIL
societal doctrine, coerced conduct and belief, and false mythology, combine
together to take an "ordinary" gal and turn her into a MASS slave murderess.
First of all, the children are decreed subhuman, OBJECTS that exist for the
purpose of meeting the needs and desires of their biological creators. Women
are encouraged to USE child-slaves to gain respect, admiration, MONEY, to
ENSLAVE sexual partners to them, ALL for PERSONAL, SELFISH gain.
Sandi gathereed her FIVE womb excretions together in a room of their house on
June 30, 1998, and deliberately set the house on fire, setting the fire in such
a way that was specifically designed to TRAP and kill all 5 slaves. The four
female slaves, aged 5, 7, 11, and 12, DID all die. The oldest slave, a 14 year
old boy, managed to escape from the house and save his life. Mommy Dearest is
currently on trial, four first degree murder counts, along with other charges.
Prosecutors ARE seeking her legal murder, and this trial is winding down,
closing arguments should begin Monday.
Amazingly, the prosecutor-whore, ADDICTED and BEHOLDEN to societal mythology,
declares: " "What type of a woman does that? What type of mother does that?"
AGAIN, the INSANE mythology that women are OBLIGATED to feel positive emotions
towards their children, is put forth. The TRUE ANSWER to your ridiculous
question, whore Kenneth, is: "A woman who is terroristically coerced by her
society into believing that she MUST love her children, and must ASSUME the
role of motherhood because of the fact that she excreted human life forms from
her womb". That is the "type of woman who does this".
Prosecutors say that Mommy Sandi "hated men', and that's why she committed
this slave massacre. In reality, she hated the fact that the men she dealt with
REFUSED to enslave themselves to her, as the Sacred Family Unit societal
doctrine, demands that they do. She felt that having children who ENSLAVE the
male sperm donator to her, thus guaranteeing her BOTH a sexual partner AND a
financial supporter. This is the TOXIC doctrine that society feeds to women:
Get pregnant and have slaves, because once you have slaves, we will LEGALLY
COMPEL your former sexual partner to EITHER enslave himself to you, or at the
very least, face HARSH and TERRORISTIC monetary THEFT, via the "child support"
laws, if he refuses to remain as your "lover".
Mommy Sandi further felt that she NEEDED a man in her life. Once again,
society and it's perverse brainwashing that is SPECIFICALLY designed to promote
Sacred Family Unit doctrine, is the PRIMARY factor at work. Girls are BRUTALLY
COERCED, from toddlerhood on, into believing that they NEED to be LOVED by a
MAN. Society does this to try and MAXIMIZE procreation, and enslaving women,
the weaker, therefore more WORTHLESS gender, into agreeing to serve as
BREEDERS, AND to agree to RAISE UP their biological creations, here the Sacred
Mommy mythology combines with the "romantic need for love" mythology, to nicely
coerce the VAST majority of women into agreeing that their REASON for LIVING,
their life purpose, has to be to "find a male lover, get married, have
children, and raise children". Were it NOT for OVERT societal brainwashing and
coercion, I am convinced that FEWER than 2% of ALL women, would CHOOSE to
undertake even THREE out of the 4 above life choices, much less ALL four, as in
fact 95% of all women do. Literally, 90%+ of ALL women in amerikkka, make their
most PROFOUND life choices based solely upon societal COERCION, brainwashing,
and terrorization.
All that this now 36 year old gal has done, throughout her life, all the life
choices she has made, all of her mental BELIEFS & ideologies, INCLUDING the
decision to try and burn to death her 5 womb excretions, are nothing more than
ACCURATE REFLECTIONS of the evil, insane, false, unnatural TEACHINGS and
MANDATES of amerikkkan society, that were SHOVED down Sandi's THROAT and
terroristically imposed upon her, from the moment of her birth as a female
slave, in amerikkka.
Stay Strong, Sandi!
Take care, JOE
The following appears courtesy of the 7/21/00 online edition of The Los
Angeles Times newspaper:
Friday, July 21, 2000
Mother Accused of Killing Her 4 Girls Called 'Liar'
By CAITLIN LIU, Times Staff Writer
SAN FERNANDO--Despite her efforts to paint herself as a victim, Sandi
Nieves is really a "liar" and a "manipulator" who killed her four daughters
because she wanted vengeance against men who failed her, a prosecutor argued
Thursday.
"What type of a woman does that? What type of mother does that?" Deputy
Dist. Atty. Kenneth Barshop asked in closing arguments before Los Angeles
Superior Court Judge L. Jeffrey Wiatt.
Barshop urged the San Fernando jury to find Nieves guilty of first-degree
murder.
Nieves, 36, allegedly gathered her five children in the kitchen-den area
of their Saugus house on the night of June 30, 1998, and started a fire. Kristl
and Jaqlene Folden, 5 and 7, and Rashel and Nikolet Folden-Nieves, 11 and 12,
died of smoke inhalation. Her son David Nieves, who was 14 at the time, was
also in the house but survived.
Nieves is charged with four counts of first-degree murder, attempted
murder and arson. If convicted, she could face the death penalty. Closing
arguments by the defense are to begin Monday.
Throughout the trial, which began three months ago, Nieves' lawyer
proposed different, sometimes conflicting theories of why she should be
acquitted. He asserted a lack of proof that she started the fire; that even if
she had started the fire, she was in a sleepwalking-like state at the time and
legally unconscious; or that someone else, perhaps her son, David, started the
fire.
"Does the defense have no shame?" asked Barshop, calling the theories of
Deputy Public Defender Howard Waco "smoke and mirrors."
Barshop painted Nieves as a woman with two failed marriages and a
boyfriend who had rejected her. With no prospect of a paying job and her money
running out fast, Nieves was especially angered by an ex-husband's attempt to
reverse his adoption of three of her children, which would have reduced
child-support payments, the prosecutor asserted.
Just hours before the fire, Nieves wrote and mailed three letters, which
Barshop characterized as "suicide letters."
In a letter to Scott Volk, the boyfriend who left her and whose baby she
had aborted just five days before, Nieves wrote: "I'm sorry if my love wasn't
good enough for you. . . . You just couldn't see it. Now you never will. . . .
I can't live without you in my life," Barshop read aloud in court.
In a letter mailed to David Folden, the ex-husband who tried to reverse
his adoption of the three eldest children, Nieves wrote: "Now you don't have to
support any of us anymore. . . . You are scum."
Barshop argued that the letter indicated Nieves' intent to die, because
Folden's legal action would not have affected his support payment for the two
younger children.
When one of the girls woke up in the smoke and asked to go to the bathroom
to throw up, Nieves told her to stay where she was and throw up on the floor,
Barshop said.
Several times Barshop displayed photos of the dead girls. A few showed the
corpses lying stiffly, mannequin-like on the kitchen floor. Jurors squirmed
uneasily, and one turned away.
Nieves, who took the stand earlier in the trial, "lied to your face,"
Barshop said. The woman testified she had ingested a combination of alcohol,
prescription diet pills and Zoloft, an antidepressant, before the deadly blaze.
But there is no evidence that she was on Zoloft, Barshop said.
When Nieves was hospitalized after the fire, at least eight people from
the hospital questioned her, Barshop said, adding that she said "not a word
about Zoloft."
"Why did she kill the children?" Barshop said. "She sure hated the
fathers. She sure wanted them to pay."
*************************************
Join the Joe1orbit Serial and Mass Murder Mailing List! For more information on
my Mailing List, please visit:
http://hometown.aol.com/joe1orbit/myhomepage/index.html
**************************************